So the problem is, I'm on team Ackham here and I'm on all the data lines.
I said, Ackham, you're right.
It's Ackham's razor.
So Ackham's razor.
So Ackham's razor.
Name it after William of Ackham.
Why is it Ackham's razor?
So Ackham says nothing about the nature of an assumption.
I think Ackham would be rolling in his grave if it was used in a rationalist framework