Years later, Marjorie Fish and Ohio School Teacher decided to take the star map and to
light years.
So over a period of six years, she built three-dimensional models of the Sun's neighborhood of stars
Finally, at two years after I started trying to get this data, I was able to get into the
further out towards the 32 light years.
When you get out to 100 light years you've got quite a margin of error but I'm trying
to get to 200 light years, you better forget it.
A few of them are two or three light years difference.
The latest published measurement would put it out to around 38 light years.
that measurement entirely that model was made, but was at 38 light years, which is the
It needs to be carried out to the 65 years at least to make sure that this star roofing
I am planning on building possibly two models out to 65 light years.
65 light years.
And I am working on is all the stars that could have plants with life are 200 light years.
I have the 65 light years listening down although I am rechecking it with the double star
years because I am setting for scratch for the 100 light year model.
about 20 years ago which does not amount too much except it did show me star placements.
So I had started the research years before and will be continuing it for years after probably.
I want to extend the catalog of stars possible for life to 100 light years, which means actually a complete revision.
Then I want to make a model of these stars to 100 light years.
Two models of stars out to 65 light years need to be made too.
So now the range is the 13 within 32 light years plus these 2 that are just beyond this range that was quoted in the last tape.
I also did most of the correlation by luminosity by components the HR diagram because I couldn't find the actual spread of the HR diagram I decided to make my own using all the components within the 32 light years.
I was planning at this time of making a model of all the bright stars within possibly 800 light years, possibly 1000 light years.
This will be quite an undertaking I expected it to take over four or five years probably and it will be a rather tedious but it would give us what their skies looked like.
Because of the present inaccuracy of the trigonometric parallax beyond 100 light years, I was completely given up the idea of 800 to a thousand light year model.
These would be about 30 light years or 31 light years from Zeta to Canal of the jump off point from Zeta 1 reticulum.
They are both put out at the same parallax this time and they are both about 36 light years away from Earth if this last parallax measurement is correct.
This would take all the stars from 65 light years out to 100 light years to supplement the leacy catalog so that a model can be constructed of these stars.
Once the listing on the Yashic catalog for the stars that could have plants with life is made and then the Eiltric and Nitric prolax listing is added to it to bring the listing out to 100 light years.
I was taking this list out to Parallax 30 and said it was 100 light years.
Actually, Parallax 0.032 is 100 light years, but I'm taking out a little bit farther because it's easier to pull all the Parallaxes out within a certain set number.
Out to about 10 light years, our measurements are quite accurate within a small fraction of the light year.
Out to 20 light years, there are a few stars that vary from one catalog to another as much as one or two light years, but this is rare, usually it's only about half light year difference.
When you get out to the 32 light years, most of the stars are fairly stable from one measurement to another, but a few...
By the time you get out to the 65 light years, there's quite a bit of difference in measurements from one source to another.
And of course, out to the 100 light years, it is getting rather shaky.
54 apaisis is out about two light years farther in the new greasy catalog than what it was in the old.
So Zeta to Cana is 23.3 light years in the new greasy catalog, which is about one year difference from what it was before.