If I may, I'd like to read a short excerpt from testimony before Congress of the Defense Department.
talk Congress? We were going to do this. There are two problems. First one is the sources and methods
the public. It would be useful to the scientific community. It would be useful to Congress.
when it is, it's a limited number of committees. The best way to get this information to Congress
degree to which in some cases nobody even in Congress has a clue. So when I was involved in reviewing
oversight committee in Congress except for DOD approves and their black programs I think are
legitimate argument for classification. And so I'm hoping that with this new pressure from Congress
we need to fix it because we're dealing with a huge drone issue. If Congress puts language
reaching Aero, much less Congress of the American people. And I think that kind of information,
history report requirement in my view, completely bungled at Congress asked for the history of UAP
Congress is not just interested in aerial phenomenon. It could be under the ocean, it could be in
I mean, I came from Congress. That term came from Congress. It's like, man, we just twist ourselves up.
Well, number one, we do have still some interested parties in Congress who are willing to shake