video here, but I do want to talk with you about the findings that were made by SCU
about the rubber duck video. Because that's the primary focus of the SCU report. What did they
And I think it only stopped until that SCU report came out. When the SCU report made its findings
the significance of what SCU found? No, not at all. Not at all. And I don't even think I've seen any
reports from mainstream media about the SCU. Which is unusual, listen. It's an amazing unusual.
done the right thing. Andy had made the decision to put it before SCU. It's anomalous. Yes,
And what did that analysis by SCU's Peter Riali show? It showed that the object was circling and
SCU make this determination that this isn't a normal or subject. Is there any response? Have you
to the scientists that put in the time at SCU to look at the rubber duck video and stuff. That could
at least in the public domain, to deal with the issues that could quite laudably address by SCU
pattern. So the implications of that are that on the SCU, on the scientific coalition for UIP
SCU, the scientific coalition for UIP studies, has ruled out the possibility that it was a balloon