Security World. The arrow, historical review of UAPs, was a big pile of steaming BS.
issue is the kind of bias that happened last week when the Arrow Historical Review report was
able to talk about before the fact that he gave direct evidence to Arrow, the Pentagon's all-domain
I do want to comment about the Arrow Historical Review Report because what it is,
did you go to Dr Sean Kirk Patrick at the arrow, the Pentagon's UFO investigation office,
as a first hand direct witness, did you provide that information to arrow of what you'd seen?
that no direct first hand evidence with knowledge of a retrieval program was provided to arrow,
provided to arrow or the crash retrieval? I, I provided him under oath the exact same information
Sean Kirkpatrick as is an official arrow investigative hearing, which we pushed on him
check the records. Now to your knowledge, were any inquiries made by Arrow as a result of your
arrow to the Congress. You're saying they're lying. Well, and I also I interviewed Albert Stein,
direct firsthand information about this this program that Sean Patrick and the arrow office