I first took note of Witness 11063, who I will further refer to as Ed, when Dr. Greer released his witness list.
Unlike MSTB and myriad other witnesses, no communications or files existed on Ed at the initial release of the DPI archive files.
intelligence briefing modules, that we would get our first leads on Ed.
Towards the end of Module 3, we see our first discussion of Ed outside the witness list, quote,
First, let's analyze what I would consider to be the less impactful of the two documents on Ed
an unknown individual emailed Greer stating witness Ed had been following Greer's work for some time
This DPI employee states Ed served in USAF from 1999 to his early retirement in 2015,
According to the email, Ed additionally came from an engineering background,
The email accurately breaks down Ed's service record.
In 2006, Ed was sent to Edwards AFB for the base's test pilot school.
It was here Ed would claim pilots at the Air Force Base are trained for unacknowledged special access programs
Ed would serve as the head of an electronic warfare group that tested NHI reverse-engineered technology.
In this role, Ed claimed to serve as the intermediary between engineers who had direct reporting to him
Ed agrees with Dr. Greer's stance on free energy systems from direct first-hand involvement in various projects.
Ed is in complete agreement with Greer's stance on free energy.
Ed isn't the only witness to comment on zero-point systems either.
Towards the end of our witness testimony internal email, mention is made Ed had been tracking current legislation relating to legacy program member Amnesty,
according to Ed,
So, let's briefly cover a new revelation that supports Ed's accusations of the doctor injecting misinformation into the public.
The witness testimony document gives us a brief overview of Ed, his background, and motives,
This two-page set of notes roughly covers a phone conversation between Dr. Greer and Ed on November 25th, 2023.
Not only do these notes describe Ed's testimony in depth,
Off the bat, Ed asks Greer if he has threatened legal action against Lockheed and Boeing,
as Ed was read into programs overlapping these two companies.
Ed did indeed work with Lockheed as a range technical contractor in the early 2000s at Nellis Air Force Base,
The idea, Ed was read into UAP programs at Nellis Air Force Base as a first lieutenant from 1999 to 2002,
Ed was briefed at Area 51 S-4,
the base where Ed would transfer to and conduct the bulk of his first-hand work around UAP programs.
Ed states this briefing was conducted via a 30-minute video which showed inspection aircraft that were essentially invisible.
Is Ed referring to crash retrievals or possibly alien reproduction vehicles, ARVs, for inspection use only?
Ed worked at Building 200, under the redacted name of the first commander of the 98th Range Wing.
His time at Building 200 at the NTTR may have seen Ed interact with Boeing, Lockheed Martin, alongside the DOE,
Circling back to the call notes, Greer made specific note to Ed serving under the first commander right around 2001 of the 98th Range Wing, or NTTR.
I find this analysis necessary, as Ed may have implied the 98th commander has oversight to UAP reverse-engineering programs.
Ed saw man-made craft on the range, was there quite a bit, end quote.
From this statement, we can also gauge that Ed is claiming Area 51-S4 and or Nellis Air Force Base
Greer then comments on Ed being sent to Edwards Air Force Base in California in 2006 for range orientation,
where Ed would go on to serve as director of Redacted for an electronic warfare group.
this station followed Ed's service in Edwards' test pilot school.
What bolsters these claims from Ed is the fact Edwards Electronic Warfare Group stems from the 412th Test Wing,
If Ed's testimony is true,
Ed was briefed on UAP programs at S-4 while stationed at Nellis,
The documents state Ed served at Nellis until 2002,
Where was Ed during this gap?
saw Ed stationed at Hanscom Air Force Base near Boston, Massachusetts.
Greer writes that Ed worked with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology while at Hanscom,
Okay, so Ed served at Edwards from 2006 to 2010,
almost like Ed's time at Nellis saw him getting bits and pieces of program information,
Ed was part of a go-public plan via the Air Force.
The plan was called off in 2009 to 2010 and saw Ed move to the Pentagon.
and served as a colonel during Ed's alleged disclosure plan.
His early career dovetails almost identically with that of Ed and is worth mentioning.
According to Ed, Wright-Patterson has a tight connection with Edwards.
Ed even makes an educated guess Wright-Patt's Hangar 6,
as Ed has claimed.
Ed moved to the Pentagon where, according to Greer,
Little was discussed between Greer and Ed on his responsibilities at the Pentagon.
The primary testimony of ED involves first-hand work on UAP programs
As we have discussed before, numerous factors including ED being briefed at S-4
we can conclude with high confidence ED's work revolved primarily
that can support or detract from ED's claims?
as we took a deep dive into Ed's witness testimony.
Analyzing Ed's credible witness testimony,
on Ed's time at the Pentagon.
After hearing Ed's testimony,
than to speak to Ed firsthand
to see this individual, Ed,