4 videos containing this reference
I wager the USMC is quite unlikely to run and operate UFO Legacy Program Operations, and
[0:12:37 - 0:12:44] ▶
Agencies, I can find no such evidence even suggesting USMC engages with the UFO portfolio.
[0:13:00 - 0:13:08] ▶
Castle served with the VMA-513, nicknamed the Flying Nightmares, a USMC attack squadron known
[0:13:08 - 0:13:16] ▶
occur when we analyze the Hunter Warrior experiment out of USMC 29 Palms Center.
[0:46:01 - 0:46:07] ▶
Indeed, as I mentioned, I believe USMC's involvement in UFO legacy programs is slim to none,
[0:46:07 - 0:46:14] ▶
and as you will see shortly, our analysis will turn us away from the USMC completely.
[0:46:14 - 0:46:19] ▶
Indeed, according to a 1997 USMC news release titled
[0:47:01 - 0:47:06] ▶
or as the USMC call it, SPMAGTF-X.
[0:47:33 - 0:47:37] ▶
And clearly, some commanding officer or person of authority contacted USMC commanding officers
[0:51:11 - 0:51:16] ▶
Why in the world would we discuss the Navy over USMC?
[0:54:30 - 0:54:33] ▶
Returning to the 1997 USMC news release detailing findings on Hunter Warrior,
[0:54:55 - 0:55:00] ▶
In 1997 Wagant and the USMC MacGee 28 were deployed to Buqalpa Peru to support Operation laser strikes
[0:07:13 - 0:07:21] ▶
The operation included up to 20 US agencies including the USMC
[0:07:40 - 0:07:44] ▶
The USMC maintained usage until 2002
[0:18:14 - 0:18:18] ▶
This being because the USMC phased out Hawk missiles from laser strike in early 1997
[0:18:24 - 0:18:30] ▶
To this day Jonathan maintains there were internal USMC attempts to make him appear unstable and an unreliable witness
[0:43:07 - 0:43:15] ▶
All three are real USMC veterans and enjoyed long accomplished careers with the core after laser strike
[1:28:13 - 1:28:20] ▶
and the impossibility that the USMC employed a Hawk battery during 1997
[1:30:07 - 1:30:12] ▶
Monta-Legre Allen and adkins all went career USMC they all retired and listed but it retired
[1:49:59 - 1:50:07] ▶
USMC having hawk batteries and prove it that time and I agree with that Jonathan agrees with that
[1:51:14 - 1:51:19] ▶