232 segments
Why have six American scientists that were working on advanced materials technology,
[0:00:00 - 0:00:06] ▶
including plasma technology, suddenly gone missing?
[0:00:06 - 0:00:10] ▶
Now we can disagree about where this technology initially came from.
[0:00:10 - 0:00:14] ▶
According to sources we've spoken to, it came from downed UAPs, downed UFOs.
[0:00:14 - 0:00:21] ▶
The United States got their hands on this actually accidentally, and these scientists
[0:00:21 - 0:00:25] ▶
have been working on this technology for years.
[0:00:25 - 0:00:28] ▶
But why have they all suddenly gone missing?
[0:00:28 - 0:00:31] ▶
And why are Chinese scientists also going missing?
[0:00:31 - 0:00:36] ▶
So we sat down and had a discussion with Joe Kent, of course, who just left the Trump administration.
[0:00:36 - 0:00:41] ▶
We wanted to ask him this question, but we also sat down with Brandon Weikert from the NatSec
[0:00:41 - 0:00:45] ▶
podcast who's been writing about this and actually has a brand new report that he's about to publish
[0:00:45 - 0:00:51] ▶
on this very question.
[0:00:51 - 0:00:53] ▶
So here are two interviews back to back.
[0:00:53 - 0:00:56] ▶
First let's start with Brandon.
[0:00:56 - 0:00:57] ▶
I want to ask you about the Chinese piece of all of this and maybe even the Russian piece
[0:00:57 - 0:01:03] ▶
So this, I wanted to talk to you specifically about this because over the past couple of
[0:01:04 - 0:01:10] ▶
weeks, a number of American scientists have gone missing that have worked on really advanced
[0:01:10 - 0:01:17] ▶
I think reverse engineering of advanced weaponry that may have been, may have come from UFO
[0:01:18 - 0:01:25] ▶
craft downed, downed aircraft and the reverse engineering.
[0:01:25 - 0:01:29] ▶
And you posted something interesting, which I think because, you know, people get like bogged
[0:01:30 - 0:01:35] ▶
And you said, well, no, it's not, it's not aliens that are disappearing.
[0:01:37 - 0:01:41] ▶
These American scientists all of a sudden, maybe you can walk us through what you believe
[0:01:41 - 0:01:45] ▶
is actually happening.
[0:01:45 - 0:01:46] ▶
So I'm just going to, and the reason I have to put these, these God awful readers is because
[0:01:47 - 0:01:51] ▶
I'm blind as a bat now.
[0:01:51 - 0:01:52] ▶
But so you, you mentioned the six American scientists and this is where it gets really
[0:01:53 - 0:01:58] ▶
This is the article that I'm getting ready to drop at NatSecGuy on Emerald.tv.
[0:01:58 - 0:02:02] ▶
I went in and I found that in mid March, 2026, three of China's top defense scientists, Zhao
[0:02:02 - 0:02:11] ▶
Jingkeng, who's a nuclear weapons expert, Wu Manqing, who's a radar and metamaterials
[0:02:11 - 0:02:17] ▶
expert, Wei Yi Yan, which is, who is a missile systems expert.
[0:02:17 - 0:02:21] ▶
They were all quietly erased from the Chinese Academy of Engineering's website, which means
[0:02:21 - 0:02:27] ▶
they're no longer among the living.
[0:02:27 - 0:02:29] ▶
Then just a few days after that, a hypersonics expert, Yan Hong, who's one of the key figures
[0:02:29 - 0:02:37] ▶
working on plasma aerodynamics died suddenly at just 56 years old.
[0:02:37 - 0:02:43] ▶
So now what I did is I took that list of five Chinese scientists and I paired it with what
[0:02:43 - 0:02:50] ▶
those six scientists, American scientists were working on and they have massive overlap.
[0:02:50 - 0:02:56] ▶
So what the, what these scientists for the Americans were doing for our military, these
[0:02:56 - 0:03:01] ▶
five or four or five Chinese scientists were doing for their military.
[0:03:01 - 0:03:05] ▶
So what that tells me is that, and this is the conclusion of my, spoiler alert, this is
[0:03:05 - 0:03:10] ▶
the conclusion of my essay.
[0:03:10 - 0:03:12] ▶
What this tells me is that there's shadow boxing going on between the United States and China.
[0:03:12 - 0:03:18] ▶
I think that there, that this is a shaping operation in the run up to the big war between
[0:03:18 - 0:03:23] ▶
the United States and China.
[0:03:23 - 0:03:24] ▶
And we're trying to take out each other's brain power because the, you know, the modern
[0:03:24 - 0:03:29] ▶
warfare map is not just about geography.
[0:03:29 - 0:03:34] ▶
It's not just about bullets and bombs and, and, and technology.
[0:03:34 - 0:03:38] ▶
It's about the people who make the technology and the bullets and the bombs work.
[0:03:38 - 0:03:44] ▶
And if you knock out the brain power, you've knocked out the ability to sustain high end
[0:03:44 - 0:03:49] ▶
warfare, at least for a period of time.
[0:03:49 - 0:03:51] ▶
We saw, by the way, this is not the first time something that has happened.
[0:03:51 - 0:03:54] ▶
There's a great show called the Americans, a large storyline on that show.
[0:03:54 - 0:03:58] ▶
And it was based on true stories.
[0:03:58 - 0:04:00] ▶
Cause I know one of the, yeah, it was based on true stories.
[0:04:00 - 0:04:03] ▶
We lived down the street from that house in Montclair, New Jersey.
[0:04:03 - 0:04:05] ▶
And so they were killing Soviet scientists.
[0:04:07 - 0:04:09] ▶
We're trying to kill you.
[0:04:09 - 0:04:10] ▶
They were trying to kill Soviet scientists.
[0:04:10 - 0:04:11] ▶
We were trying to kill, or I'm sorry, we were trying to kill Soviet scientists.
[0:04:12 - 0:04:14] ▶
They were trying to kill our scientists.
[0:04:14 - 0:04:15] ▶
The Iranians and the Israelis do it all the time.
[0:04:16 - 0:04:18] ▶
The Israelis whack Iranian scientists all the time.
[0:04:18 - 0:04:21] ▶
So this is not unprecedented in the annals of modern warfare, but what's, what I find fascinating
[0:04:21 - 0:04:28] ▶
are the systems they were working on.
[0:04:28 - 0:04:30] ▶
I don't believe they were alien systems.
[0:04:30 - 0:04:32] ▶
I know we disagree on that.
[0:04:32 - 0:04:33] ▶
I think the United States and now Russia and China have for years been playing with very
[0:04:34 - 0:04:40] ▶
advanced systems in the desert, or in our case, in the desert.
[0:04:40 - 0:04:43] ▶
And I think that they're actually many years ahead of what we have off the shelf.
[0:04:43 - 0:04:47] ▶
And I think all this talk about aliens and stuff, it's all very conveniently timed for a
[0:04:47 - 0:04:52] ▶
moment in which we know the Chinese have caught up to us conventionally, technologically.
[0:04:52 - 0:04:57] ▶
And so now suddenly we're saying, oh, we're bringing out, you know, plasma and, you know,
[0:04:57 - 0:05:03] ▶
Well, maybe it is real, but, and I think it is probably real, but I don't know if it's
[0:05:04 - 0:05:07] ▶
It might just be from, you know, Nazi scientists that we inherited at the end of the Second
[0:05:08 - 0:05:11] ▶
But the point is, I think there's shadow boxing going on here between our intelligence
[0:05:13 - 0:05:18] ▶
service and likely the Chinese service killing each other's scientists in this next generation
[0:05:18 - 0:05:23] ▶
technology arena before we even really get to World War III.
[0:05:23 - 0:05:27] ▶
Philip, you were going to say something?
[0:05:27 - 0:05:28] ▶
So I'm just, I'm just sitting here, I'm listening to you and like, like just letting my mind
[0:05:30 - 0:05:33] ▶
But like when it seems like there's such a, like an aggravated attack on the U.S.
[0:05:34 - 0:05:39] ▶
education system from within, like they're going after universities, like some of these
[0:05:39 - 0:05:42] ▶
top universities, like then it just all, all an adversary would have to do is wait about
[0:05:42 - 0:05:47] ▶
And then there won't be, we won't have the education, they won't even need to kill our
[0:05:47 - 0:05:52] ▶
This is the basis of that hilarious meme of, you know, it shows Xi Jinping with an accentuated
[0:05:52 - 0:05:58] ▶
jaw looking very muscular.
[0:05:58 - 0:06:00] ▶
And the tagline is, Xi does nothing, still wins.
[0:06:00 - 0:06:05] ▶
And that's basically the Chinese mindset is just wait them out, right?
[0:06:05 - 0:06:09] ▶
5,000 year old civilization.
[0:06:09 - 0:06:11] ▶
We can wait out the Americans.
[0:06:11 - 0:06:13] ▶
This is the same mentality of the Persians, by the way.
[0:06:13 - 0:06:15] ▶
Just stretch out the war, make them bleed a little bit and they'll quit because they
[0:06:15 - 0:06:20] ▶
don't have the patience.
[0:06:20 - 0:06:21] ▶
We're thousands of years old.
[0:06:21 - 0:06:23] ▶
The art of doing nothing.
[0:06:24 - 0:06:25] ▶
And so that is the mentality in China.
[0:06:27 - 0:06:29] ▶
And really they benefit quite significantly.
[0:06:29 - 0:06:31] ▶
I would just say I was sitting, I gave a briefing to a group of Air Force generals back
[0:06:32 - 0:06:37] ▶
And one of the generals there was assigned to Silicon Valley.
[0:06:39 - 0:06:42] ▶
And I thought there was assigned to Silicon Valley.
[0:06:42 - 0:06:44] ▶
He said, yeah, I'm a liaison for certain projects we're doing, the Pentagon, the Air Force, and
[0:06:44 - 0:06:49] ▶
So that's very cool.
[0:06:50 - 0:06:51] ▶
He goes, you know, I'm really troubled, though.
[0:06:52 - 0:06:53] ▶
He goes, well, a lot of brilliant young people work at Google.
[0:06:54 - 0:06:57] ▶
He said, but a lot of them hate America.
[0:06:58 - 0:07:00] ▶
And I said, well, it's the education system.
[0:07:00 - 0:07:03] ▶
And he said, I'm realizing this now.
[0:07:03 - 0:07:05] ▶
And I said, you know, General, the single greatest threat, and I still maintain this, the single
[0:07:05 - 0:07:10] ▶
greatest national security threat to the United States.
[0:07:10 - 0:07:12] ▶
It's not China, it's not Russia, Iran, Al Qaeda, or anything like that.
[0:07:12 - 0:07:15] ▶
It's the Department of Education.
[0:07:15 - 0:07:17] ▶
And it's the stuff that they're teaching our kids.
[0:07:17 - 0:07:19] ▶
And then if you want to throw in the national debt, you can do that, too.
[0:07:20 - 0:07:23] ▶
But the human capital is what makes a country competitive, is what makes a country dominant.
[0:07:23 - 0:07:29] ▶
And we have had declining, significantly declining human capital for many, many years.
[0:07:30 - 0:07:35] ▶
It's become almost terminal now, the decline.
[0:07:35 - 0:07:37] ▶
Well, let's talk about the satellites, because this is another big piece of this, right?
[0:07:37 - 0:07:41] ▶
And what's kind of going on behind the scenes right now with maybe the sort of satellite warfare?
[0:07:41 - 0:07:45] ▶
You even tweeting about this, you want to talk about the satellites?
[0:07:46 - 0:07:49] ▶
So, I mean, I don't know if you've been seeing, but on Twitter, people are filming.
[0:07:51 - 0:07:54] ▶
They're getting wigged out by it.
[0:07:54 - 0:07:55] ▶
There are all these meteors, supposedly, fireballs in the sky in places like Texas.
[0:07:55 - 0:08:00] ▶
I think Ohio's another one that's been seeing a lot of them.
[0:08:00 - 0:08:03] ▶
And ultimately, I do not believe, maybe some of them are, but I don't believe these are all meteors.
[0:08:03 - 0:08:09] ▶
I think what you're seeing are the debris from satellites that are being shot down in low Earth orbit.
[0:08:09 - 0:08:17] ▶
And I posted this morning.
[0:08:17 - 0:08:19] ▶
It looks like, I wish I had it up.
[0:08:19 - 0:08:22] ▶
There was a very funny way that they framed it.
[0:08:22 - 0:08:24] ▶
I think they called it an explosive fragmentary event.
[0:08:24 - 0:08:27] ▶
But SpaceX claims two of their Starlinks suffered an explosive fragmentary event.
[0:08:27 - 0:08:34] ▶
What it means is they were hit by something, and then they exploded.
[0:08:34 - 0:08:37] ▶
And what were they hit by?
[0:08:38 - 0:08:39] ▶
Well, it could have been space debris.
[0:08:39 - 0:08:41] ▶
There's a lot of it up there.
[0:08:41 - 0:08:42] ▶
But given the context of what's going on on the ground on Earth, I would argue it was probably an anti-satellite weapon of some kind.
[0:08:42 - 0:08:49] ▶
And we know, for instance, that the United States, or somebody, gave the protesters in Iran 40,000 Starlinks, part of their protest movement.
[0:08:49 - 0:09:01] ▶
We know that in 2023, Elon Musk gave all those Starlink terminals to Ukraine.
[0:09:01 - 0:09:06] ▶
And the Russians have now been using Starlink in their conflict.
[0:09:06 - 0:09:10] ▶
So what we're seeing now is Starlink, which was not originally meant to be a combat system of any kind, is now being used in some capacity.
[0:09:10 - 0:09:19] ▶
It's being used in some capacity for offensive capabilities.
[0:09:20 - 0:09:25] ▶
And ultimately, they're being, I think, taken out.
[0:09:26 - 0:09:31] ▶
We know the Russians have developed the Kalinka system, and I think the Tobol system as well, which are specifically designed to knock down Starlink satellites.
[0:09:31 - 0:09:44] ▶
And also, by the way, I'll just add one other thing, another input here.
[0:09:44 - 0:09:48] ▶
We have long suspected, I say we, I say people I know in the Missile Defense Agency and people like the now deceased Dr. Peter Prye, my friend David Pine, who worked with Peter.
[0:09:48 - 0:09:58] ▶
All of these people have long said for about a decade that the Iranians placed electromagnetic pulse weapons on satellites in orbit.
[0:09:58 - 0:10:07] ▶
And that Space Force, what is now Space Force, has been tracking it for years.
[0:10:07 - 0:10:12] ▶
And we might be witnessing also preemptive shootdowns of these suspected EMP bomb satellites as part of our escalation against Iran.
[0:10:12 - 0:10:21] ▶
Well, that's been a big concern from a number of our guests who've said, you know, EMP attacks on our infrastructure, and it wouldn't take much for an entire electric grid to be wiped out.
[0:10:21 - 0:10:31] ▶
One EMP detonated 50 miles above the continental United States will knock out 90 to 95 percent of the electric grid, and there is no restoring it for a minimum of two years.
[0:10:31 - 0:10:44] ▶
And I guarantee you it ain't coming back online in two years, especially when you consider the physical gear needed to restore the electrical grid comes from China.
[0:10:44 - 0:10:56] ▶
And we don't have it.
[0:10:57 - 0:10:58] ▶
Well, Brandon, thank you so much.
[0:10:59 - 0:11:02] ▶
We look forward to reading your piece.
[0:11:02 - 0:11:03] ▶
I want to dive more deeply into these missing.
[0:11:03 - 0:11:05] ▶
I'll send it to you guys.
[0:11:05 - 0:11:06] ▶
Fascinating that these Chinese scientists are, there's this massive overlap here with these United States scientists who've gone missing.
[0:11:07 - 0:11:13] ▶
Yeah, you and I can disagree on where they got this tech from.
[0:11:15 - 0:11:17] ▶
I've heard from special forces and involvement in the secret space program specifically that this was accidentally discovered as part of crash retrieval from UAPs, you know, a long time ago.
[0:11:17 - 0:11:30] ▶
Well, I don't have any special knowledge on that.
[0:11:31 - 0:11:32] ▶
I just, I find, I just, I think that we have a lot of extraordinary people, and I think we have a lot of extraordinary, I mean, go back to Tesla.
[0:11:33 - 0:11:39] ▶
He was playing with technology that was hidden.
[0:11:39 - 0:11:42] ▶
And go back to the Nazis.
[0:11:42 - 0:11:43] ▶
I mean, we know at Pina Munda, the Nazis were playing with really advanced systems that they developed that we inherited.
[0:11:43 - 0:11:51] ▶
And so that's why I think it's, I think the alien thing might be a cover story.
[0:11:52 - 0:11:55] ▶
But I don't have any, you know, I don't have anybody on the inside that could tell me one way or the other.
[0:11:55 - 0:11:59] ▶
This is just my opinion.
[0:11:59 - 0:12:00] ▶
I think the cover story, well, I would just say this because I could talk about this all day and my wife will give me a side eye.
[0:12:01 - 0:12:06] ▶
But I think the cover story piece of it is like, well, every time you look up in the sky, oh, that's definitely an alien craft.
[0:12:06 - 0:12:12] ▶
No, no, that's U.S. military.
[0:12:12 - 0:12:13] ▶
That's definitely these advanced technologies.
[0:12:13 - 0:12:15] ▶
But I think at the core of it, a core of a lot of this technology, the Nazi technology came from these crash retrieval programs.
[0:12:15 - 0:12:22] ▶
Russia, China, and we all have it.
[0:12:23 - 0:12:25] ▶
Anything's possible.
[0:12:25 - 0:12:26] ▶
In different striations.
[0:12:26 - 0:12:28] ▶
Anyway, I want to ask you sort of a UFO related question.
[0:12:29 - 0:12:33] ▶
And we've seen now six scientists that have gone missing.
[0:12:33 - 0:12:39] ▶
Several scientists, military personnel working in plasma physics, advanced heat resistant materials, magnetism, doctors, director of MIT's Plasma Science Fusion Center.
[0:12:40 - 0:12:54] ▶
I know from sources that in special forces that this plasma technology was found accidentally after a downed UAP.
[0:12:54 - 0:13:05] ▶
That's how we obtained this advanced plasma technology.
[0:13:05 - 0:13:08] ▶
China has also scientists that have gone missing.
[0:13:10 - 0:13:13] ▶
Brandon Weikert reported earlier today.
[0:13:14 - 0:13:15] ▶
He said this isn't about aliens.
[0:13:15 - 0:13:17] ▶
I mean, that's where the tech came from initially.
[0:13:17 - 0:13:19] ▶
It's not about aliens.
[0:13:19 - 0:13:20] ▶
But China and the United States are playing this very dangerous game right now of basically missing each other's scientists.
[0:13:20 - 0:13:27] ▶
Can you talk about that on the U.S. side specifically?
[0:13:28 - 0:13:31] ▶
I know it sounds a little out there, but they're missing.
[0:13:32 - 0:13:34] ▶
And they were working on this advanced technology.
[0:13:35 - 0:13:37] ▶
And China has now missing scientists as well who are also working on this advanced technology.
[0:13:37 - 0:13:41] ▶
I don't have any insider knowledge about that.
[0:13:43 - 0:13:45] ▶
I mean, I think I was pretty nearly focused on the Middle East terrorism, those types of things.
[0:13:45 - 0:13:50] ▶
What I think Brandon said, though, is the most likely, to be honest.
[0:13:50 - 0:13:56] ▶
It's pretty well documented that countries will take out each other's key leaders, will try and take out the brains.
[0:13:57 - 0:14:02] ▶
Again, you saw the Israelis do this really effectively in Iran about 10 years ago when they killed off a lot of the nuclear scientists.
[0:14:02 - 0:14:09] ▶
So I think what Brandon is talking about is probably closer to the truth than anything else.
[0:14:09 - 0:14:16] ▶
But honestly, unfortunately, I can't give you too much good insight on that case.
[0:14:16 - 0:14:20] ▶
No, not even presidents of the United States are apparently on a need-to-know basis with this.
[0:14:21 - 0:14:25] ▶