471 segments
In March of 2024, the Infographics Show, a popular and excellent channel with custom animations
[0:00:00 - 0:00:06] ▶
and fantastic storytelling posted a video titled US Special Forces Confession,
[0:00:06 - 0:00:12] ▶
I Recovered Crash UFOs. Although the channel has covered the UAP subject in the past,
[0:00:12 - 0:00:17] ▶
this entry stood out entirely. The video covers the testimony of an individual who encountered a
[0:00:17 - 0:00:24] ▶
crashed UAP while serving in Vietnam. With engaging storytelling and mesmerizing animations,
[0:00:24 - 0:00:30] ▶
the Infographics team highlights how this sighting saw the soldier read into covert UAP operations
[0:00:30 - 0:00:36] ▶
and details his work on the program. Estonishing details of UAP crash retrieval and reverse
[0:00:36 - 0:00:42] ▶
engineering are highlighted in this account very similar to the claims of David Grush.
[0:00:42 - 0:00:47] ▶
I'm sure many people saw this video enjoyed it and moved on. Just as many watched it and thought,
[0:00:47 - 0:00:53] ▶
I wonder if this is real. But the narrator starts this video with a statement that almost
[0:00:53 - 0:00:58] ▶
forces us to analyze the entire video line by line. Note, the following is based on testimony
[0:00:58 - 0:01:05] ▶
provided over a series of interviews and written correspondence edited and cut together in an
[0:01:05 - 0:01:10] ▶
attempt to create a cohesive timeline of the events as described. Do these events recount the
[0:01:10 - 0:01:15] ▶
experience of a real anonymous whistleblower? Is this story rooted in fact and are there elements
[0:01:15 - 0:01:21] ▶
we can verify? And why did he speak to the Infographics Show? Hey guys, it's UAP Gurb and thank
[0:01:21 - 0:01:28] ▶
you for joining me as we conduct a full breakdown and analysis of the Infographics Show's US Special
[0:01:28 - 0:01:34] ▶
Forces confession I recovered UFOs. Since its release, I have played this testimony over and over
[0:01:34 - 0:01:41] ▶
and over in my head. Is it possible that these events and details recount the true testimony of
[0:01:41 - 0:01:46] ▶
someone on a UFO crash retrieval program? I think it is well worth investigating their story.
[0:01:46 - 0:01:52] ▶
Searching for holes are confirmable elements because this could very well be the most crucial
[0:01:52 - 0:01:57] ▶
firsthand whistleblower of all time. To start, our witness states and I will be calling him our
[0:01:57 - 0:02:08] ▶
witness for the duration of this video that our story begins in 1968 during the Vietnam conflict
[0:02:08 - 0:02:14] ▶
along the Vietnam Cambodia border. Before we get into his story, we do have two interesting
[0:02:14 - 0:02:19] ▶
Vietnam cases that may be contextually relevant to our Infographics whistleblower. We can check in
[0:02:19 - 0:02:25] ▶
on the ever-relevant Stephen Greer redacted witness log to analyze the statements and emails of
[0:02:25 - 0:02:30] ▶
witness 10-622. 10-622 served as CTR communication technician radio in the US Navy from 1966 to 1970
[0:02:30 - 0:02:40] ▶
on the Bonhom Richard aircraft carrier. It was in June of 1968 on official duties. He received
[0:02:40 - 0:02:47] ▶
scrambled messages mentioning at least 11 UAP were tracked on visual and radar. And on September 9th
[0:02:47 - 0:02:55] ▶
1968, several US helicopter pilots and soldiers stationed at a Marine Corps base in Donghav
[0:02:55 - 0:03:00] ▶
Vietnam had a close encounter with a fast-moving object. This object had green and white lights and
[0:03:00 - 0:03:06] ▶
engaged in maneuvers for 20 minutes. Anyways, our witness states his US military unit was performing
[0:03:06 - 0:03:12] ▶
an LRRP, a long-range reconnaissance patrol tracking supply routes into South Vietnam from Cambodia,
[0:03:12 - 0:03:19] ▶
as well as marking out sites for a B-52 bombing raid the following year. This tiny snippet in the
[0:03:19 - 0:03:25] ▶
video gives us so much to unpack the following year of 1969 a covert bombing raid did in fact occur.
[0:03:25 - 0:03:32] ▶
On March 18th 1969, the strategic air command commenced Operation Menu. Not to classify it until
[0:03:32 - 0:03:38] ▶
2000 by President Bill Clinton, Operation Menu was a year-long B-52 bombing campaign that
[0:03:38 - 0:03:44] ▶
ravaged Eastern Cambodia and that mention LRRP may be one of the most significant pieces to
[0:03:44 - 0:03:51] ▶
solving this puzzle. Long-range reconnaissance patrol was a special unit acting in Vietnam,
[0:03:51 - 0:03:56] ▶
Company E 52nd Infantry, attached to the first Calvary Division in the US Army. This unit operated
[0:03:56 - 0:04:03] ▶
in Vietnam from 1967 to 1969, well within the time frame of our witness and participated in two
[0:04:03 - 0:04:10] ▶
of the largest battles of Vietnam, the Tet Offensive and Siege of Kaisen. In late October of 1968,
[0:04:10 - 0:04:18] ▶
Company E 52nd Infantry was relocated and headquartered at Fuokvin, North of Vietnam. The
[0:04:18 - 0:04:25] ▶
division's area of operations was designated along the Cambodian border, Intainin, Binlong,
[0:04:25 - 0:04:31] ▶
and Fulklong provinces, all in South Vietnam, quote, these areas contained significant routes for
[0:04:31 - 0:04:37] ▶
enemy infiltration into the Saigon area from Cambodia. So if our witness is telling the truth and
[0:04:37 - 0:04:43] ▶
this crash is real, this event occurred in October to December 1968 within the Company E 52nd Infantry
[0:04:43 - 0:04:50] ▶
LRRP stationed out of Fuokvin, so far his testimony lines up exactly with real events.
[0:04:50 - 0:04:57] ▶
And finally back to our story, a quote unquote object appeared overhead the witness in his platoon,
[0:04:57 - 0:05:02] ▶
emitting a bright red orange glow appearing to be melting. The object quickly moved out of sight
[0:05:02 - 0:05:08] ▶
but only five or six seconds later, a large crash followed by a dull thump reverberated throughout
[0:05:08 - 0:05:15] ▶
the jungle. The platoon figured this must have been a US plane so knowing better than to risk
[0:05:16 - 0:05:20] ▶
long-range radio communications being intercepted by Soviet agents, they moved to secure the crash
[0:05:20 - 0:05:25] ▶
site. Arriving at the site, the platoon knew immediately this was not a US plane classified or
[0:05:25 - 0:05:31] ▶
acknowledged. The only prosaic explanation the soldiers could think of was a crash base probe,
[0:05:31 - 0:05:36] ▶
something from NASA or the Soviets. The craft was egg-shaped, dull gray and metallic and seemingly
[0:05:36 - 0:05:43] ▶
cracked open. Again we see the description this craft appeared to be made from a single piece
[0:05:43 - 0:05:48] ▶
of metal with no bolts, seams or screws. This sighting and craft description give us a lot to work
[0:05:48 - 0:05:56] ▶
off of actually. What immediately stands out to me is this red orange glow the craft emanated while
[0:05:56 - 0:06:01] ▶
flying over the jungle. There are two cases within our crashes time frame that are worth mentioning
[0:06:01 - 0:06:06] ▶
to this. We can look to November 22, 1968 to NICAP case 6-8-1-1-2-2. On this date in Albany,
[0:06:07 - 0:06:16] ▶
Georgia a glowing yellow white oval UFO was seen from a car, directed a light beam at the vehicle
[0:06:16 - 0:06:23] ▶
and flew away changing colors to red and orange. And let's head to Move France on December 15, 1968.
[0:06:23 - 0:06:30] ▶
Reporting in a book translated as UFO, the first complete file on close encounters in France,
[0:06:30 - 0:06:36] ▶
we can find a case where an egg-shaped object the size of a car moved quickly without making noise,
[0:06:36 - 0:06:41] ▶
emanating orange reflections. But let's not forget an event that occurred just a year earlier
[0:06:41 - 0:06:47] ▶
on March 24, 1967 highlighted in the sworn affidavits by Captain Robert Salis and others at
[0:06:47 - 0:06:54] ▶
Malmstrom Air Force Base. I covered this case in my UFO and Nuke's video, but this events hall
[0:06:54 - 0:07:00] ▶
of red orange oval UAP appear over the base, disabling the ICBMs of Malmstrom.
[0:07:00 - 0:07:06] ▶
And this mention of an egg-shaped object comes up again and again and again in ufoology.
[0:07:07 - 0:07:12] ▶
We will talk about this more later in the video with the witnesses experience within the program.
[0:07:12 - 0:07:17] ▶
But let's look at the testimony of aerospace contractor Eric Taper to Arrow, who recounted an egg-shaped
[0:07:17 - 0:07:23] ▶
metallic UFO being kept at Area 51 in the 1980s. The description of this craft is almost identical
[0:07:23 - 0:07:29] ▶
to the Vietnam encounter. And lastly, the molten feel of the craft reminds me closely of the
[0:07:29 - 0:07:35] ▶
mother of Pearl Effect displayed on the skin of the craft Lance Corporal Jonathan Wagant claimed
[0:07:35 - 0:07:40] ▶
to have observed in the jungles of Peru in 1997. Our platoon of Marines called in the crash only to hear
[0:07:40 - 0:07:46] ▶
there were already birds in route and ordered to secure the crash quickly, a pair of F4 jets
[0:07:46 - 0:07:52] ▶
fell into orbit overhead. The mention of the McDonald Douglas F4 Phantom 2 may seem small,
[0:07:52 - 0:07:58] ▶
but this is actually a huge detail in our story. In June of 1986, former Bechel Corps contractor James
[0:07:58 - 0:08:05] ▶
McCamble told Ufoology Jacques Vallet he met with a military contact with the wild weasels,
[0:08:05 - 0:08:11] ▶
a codename given by USAF for aircraft equipped with anti-radiation missiles and tasked with the
[0:08:11 - 0:08:17] ▶
suppression of enemy air defenses in Vietnam. This contractor told McCamble F4 jets were equipped
[0:08:17 - 0:08:23] ▶
with EM detection equipment to detect UAP during the war. Dr. Stephen Greer may have an additional
[0:08:23 - 0:08:29] ▶
witness adding valuable context to these F4 claims. Witness 10272 claims to have worked for a UK
[0:08:29 - 0:08:36] ▶
based contractor installing low observable radar assemblies on F4 fighters at Area 51.
[0:08:36 - 0:08:42] ▶
Along with these claims, the witness alleges to have been involved in the evaluation of hardware
[0:08:42 - 0:08:47] ▶
from NHI craft. Anyways, infantry then touched down and acted in perimeter security, but I want to
[0:08:47 - 0:08:53] ▶
note the witness states they were allowed nowhere near the craft. They were deployed in a wide swath.
[0:08:53 - 0:08:58] ▶
It took two days for the craft to be removed from the jungle, all with the help of SOF,
[0:08:59 - 0:09:03] ▶
Special Operations Forces, Navy, and Air Force officials on site who had already been read into
[0:09:03 - 0:09:09] ▶
the program. The mention of the Air Force is no surprise here. Ever since the 1947 Roswell,
[0:09:09 - 0:09:15] ▶
New Mexico crashed and the involvement of USF General Roger Raimi, the Air Force has long been
[0:09:15 - 0:09:20] ▶
entwined with the study of UAP again. I would like to recommend my Moon Dust video and USF
[0:09:20 - 0:09:26] ▶
Document AFC1E draft policy, which states project UFO and Moon Dust both had quartered out of
[0:09:26 - 0:09:33] ▶
the Air Force have collection responsibilities for UAP and descended foreign space vehicles.
[0:09:33 - 0:09:38] ▶
The Navy is a bit more interesting. Sure, we have rear Admiral Timothy Gallaudet who speaks openly
[0:09:39 - 0:09:44] ▶
about UAP and op-nav regulations to restrict UAP reporting that covered in my USO videos,
[0:09:44 - 0:09:50] ▶
but I can't help thinking about the Wilson Davis memo after all, if this memo is true which I
[0:09:50 - 0:09:55] ▶
fully believe it is, DIA Director and Vice Admiral Thomas Wilson was stone-walled from reading
[0:09:55 - 0:10:01] ▶
into the program. This was our witnesses first ever interaction with the program. Throughout
[0:10:01 - 0:10:12] ▶
Vietnam, several rapid reaction units were on standby for retrieval purposes. And it's here the
[0:10:12 - 0:10:17] ▶
witness adds some interesting context. That's what everyone called it, the program, and there were
[0:10:17 - 0:10:23] ▶
several rapid reaction units stationed throughout in theater. See, we learned from the Korean war that
[0:10:23 - 0:10:28] ▶
these things are attracted to conflict, and I guess that makes sense. It's probably one of the most
[0:10:28 - 0:10:33] ▶
interesting things we do. A lot of people think this whole mess started in World War II, and maybe
[0:10:33 - 0:10:38] ▶
it did, but the program got put together during the Korean War. That's when it was official.
[0:10:39 - 0:10:43] ▶
The Korean War lasted from 1950 to 1953, while the first US-based retrieval of a UAP occurred in
[0:10:43 - 0:10:50] ▶
Roswell in 1947, it is possible the program took a few years to put together. If we are going to
[0:10:50 - 0:10:57] ▶
believe the MJ-12 documents, the program in charge of UAP investigation, crash retrieval, and
[0:10:57 - 0:11:02] ▶
reverse engineering operated under US President Truman, and briefed President Eisenhower who took
[0:11:02 - 0:11:07] ▶
office in 1953. This means the program was put together during 1945 more like 1947 to 1950,
[0:11:07 - 0:11:16] ▶
fitting in nicely with the realm of the Korean War. We can of course guess the program was already
[0:11:16 - 0:11:21] ▶
implemented by 1950 when senior radio engineer wrote to the Canadian controller of telecommunications
[0:11:21 - 0:11:27] ▶
in the Department of Transport, stating the US was actively engaged in studying UAP in an effort
[0:11:27 - 0:11:32] ▶
so classified, it rated even higher than the H-bomb. This information was provided to the engineer
[0:11:32 - 0:11:38] ▶
Wilbert B. Smith by physicist and member of the US Research and Development Board and student
[0:11:38 - 0:11:44] ▶
under Einstein Robert Sarbacher. I highly recommend my video on this subject as it very well may
[0:11:44 - 0:11:51] ▶
cover the early days of the program. The witness also states, quote, these things are attracted to
[0:11:51 - 0:11:56] ▶
conflict, end quote. What we know from numerous stories including Robert Salis and Mounts from Air
[0:11:56 - 0:12:01] ▶
Force Base, UAP have a direct interest in observing and interacting with nuclear arms. We know from
[0:12:01 - 0:12:07] ▶
the testimony of Bob Jacobs, UAP have even an interest in dummy flights of ICBMs, and if the 1953
[0:12:07 - 0:12:14] ▶
Kingman Arizona crash is true, let's remember this happening during Operation Upshot Nothole,
[0:12:14 - 0:12:19] ▶
which oversaw extensive nuclear testing. It certainly looks like they want to understand
[0:12:19 - 0:12:25] ▶
how far we've advanced in our nuclear fizzle kind of technologies at the very least.
[0:12:26 - 0:12:32] ▶
I mean, it looks like preparatory probing activity, it might be innocent kind of scientific
[0:12:32 - 0:12:37] ▶
gathering, could be ISR probing. Anyways, it was that this time the witness in his fellow platoon
[0:12:37 - 0:12:43] ▶
mates were read into the program, joining the program was by force. The soldiers were faced with
[0:12:43 - 0:12:48] ▶
this or a general discharge. Likely drug charges are an article 15, which gives military commanders
[0:12:48 - 0:12:54] ▶
an easy way to punish minor infractions breaching military conduct. This draws my attention to an
[0:12:54 - 0:13:00] ▶
alleged crash retrieval that occurred on April 12th, 1954, relayed to Leonard Stringfield by a
[0:13:00 - 0:13:06] ▶
witness K.A. You can read about this in Stringfield's UFO crash retrieval status report 3,
[0:13:06 - 0:13:12] ▶
amassing the evidence, and the link of course will be in the description.
[0:13:12 - 0:13:15] ▶
In this incident, K.A and the USAF crew rescue 4 out of Roswell Air Force Base were dispatched
[0:13:15 - 0:13:21] ▶
to a site 25 to 30 miles northwest where they observed a metallic saucer crashed edge-wise
[0:13:21 - 0:13:27] ▶
into the sand with a dome in its center. A ground crew in fatigue was already at this site,
[0:13:27 - 0:13:32] ▶
prevented the men from getting closer and began tagging debris and scattered NHI bodies.
[0:13:32 - 0:13:37] ▶
K.A. returned to Roswell, was debriefed for three days in a quote-unquote living hell,
[0:13:37 - 0:13:42] ▶
and told by men identifying as intelligence officers in civilian clothes not to speak about
[0:13:42 - 0:13:47] ▶
the incident, reading to K.A. a law that referred to a fine imprisonment with hard labor and
[0:13:48 - 0:13:53] ▶
general discharge. Our witness states his introduction to the program was highly compartmentalized.
[0:13:53 - 0:13:59] ▶
He was only told what he needed to know. This mirrors accurately the compartmentalization
[0:13:59 - 0:14:04] ▶
discussed in the Wilson Davis memo. The four programs that referred Admiral Wilson to the program
[0:14:04 - 0:14:10] ▶
were, quote, part of it. In different compartments, placed in different layers of the compartments pyramid,
[0:14:10 - 0:14:16] ▶
split up to do different things of parts of it. It is interesting to hear a witness state.
[0:14:16 - 0:14:21] ▶
I didn't even realize those damn things were from space until I actually saw a body.
[0:14:21 - 0:14:27] ▶
So some of these craft are indeed from space and some are manned vessels.
[0:14:27 - 0:14:31] ▶
We know from my Fast Walker video there is factual evidence USG elements had a term for objects
[0:14:31 - 0:14:37] ▶
entering or leaving Earth's atmosphere denoted as fastwalkers, and defense supports satellites
[0:14:37 - 0:14:43] ▶
were likely used to monitor these objects. And the subject of bodies can be pretty contentious,
[0:14:43 - 0:14:48] ▶
but like David Gruss said, well naturally when you recover something that's either landed or crashed,
[0:14:48 - 0:14:54] ▶
sometimes you encounter dead pilots. And I believe you're not as fantastic as the
[0:14:56 - 0:15:02] ▶
cools that sounds. It's true. The witness states the more he figured out the more he was
[0:15:02 - 0:15:08] ▶
read into the program, he never learned all the truth, but new enough he felt compelled to come
[0:15:08 - 0:15:12] ▶
forward, especially as an aging gentleman. Serving in Vietnam, I would put this individual's age
[0:15:12 - 0:15:18] ▶
at around 74 or older. And claiming he had been out of the program for 20 years means his service
[0:15:18 - 0:15:24] ▶
in the program occurred from around 1969 to 2004. The witness even discusses David Gruss,
[0:15:24 - 0:15:31] ▶
commenting on his approach to speaking publicly and labeling him a patriot. He even confirms the
[0:15:31 - 0:15:36] ▶
involvement of aerospace contractors and sophisticated disinformation. I don't think we need to expand
[0:15:36 - 0:15:42] ▶
on these topics too much in general as I have multiple videos exploring the full involvement of
[0:15:42 - 0:15:47] ▶
Lockheed Martin and Battelle Memorial Institute's interaction with UAP and fully covered the birth of
[0:15:47 - 0:15:52] ▶
the UAP stigma. Check out those videos for some valuable context here. After being read into the program,
[0:15:52 - 0:15:58] ▶
the witness's unit was put back on duty but broken up and placed in horrific combat engagements.
[0:15:58 - 0:16:03] ▶
5 of the original 12 died in combat. I know 5 of the original 12 died in combat.
[0:16:04 - 0:16:10] ▶
3 more badly wounded. I think they were trying to kill us off.
[0:16:10 - 0:16:14] ▶
If this broken up team still served with the first Calvary Division LRP, we may in fact be able to
[0:16:14 - 0:16:20] ▶
track these names. Of the 1000 men who served in this unit, 45 were killed in Vietnam in Cambodia.
[0:16:20 - 0:16:26] ▶
And the witness states a year after the initial crash, he was officially brought into the program where
[0:16:27 - 0:16:32] ▶
his primary job was no longer being a soldier, but he was now part of the program. So with this
[0:16:32 - 0:16:38] ▶
information, we can conclude that these soldiers were killed between October to December of 1968,
[0:16:38 - 0:16:44] ▶
where the crash occurred in October to December of 1969, when he was brought into the program,
[0:16:44 - 0:16:50] ▶
and will give an air factor of around plus or minus let's say three months.
[0:16:50 - 0:16:54] ▶
I have actually found a memorial site dedicated to those served and fell in the LRP unit within the
[0:16:54 - 0:17:00] ▶
first Calvary Division. Analyzing the casualty list, we can try and trace the deaths of these
[0:17:00 - 0:17:05] ▶
brave soldiers from the time of our crash, October to December of 1968, and our witness being read
[0:17:05 - 0:17:11] ▶
into the program October to December 1969. So we're left with 16 possible names. If we filter out
[0:17:11 - 0:17:18] ▶
soldiers who died of non-hostile actions, we are left with 8 possible names. If our witness is
[0:17:18 - 0:17:23] ▶
telling the truth, 5 of 8 of these names are likely platoon mates of his who observed the crashed,
[0:17:23 - 0:17:30] ▶
egg-shaped UAP. It didn't happen often, but these things did fall out of the sky,
[0:17:30 - 0:17:35] ▶
where people would see something land or witness beings happening more often than people know,
[0:17:35 - 0:17:40] ▶
and we'd swoop in as fast as we could in case there was anything to snatch up. I think we pulled
[0:17:40 - 0:17:44] ▶
three total craft out of theater, and not just Vietnam. Damn near-started a war with China in one
[0:17:44 - 0:17:49] ▶
recovery. Up to three craft in Vietnam, well, perhaps there are others who can expand on this.
[0:17:49 - 0:17:55] ▶
Within Stephen Greer's redacted witness list, we return to again and again and again.
[0:17:55 - 0:18:00] ▶
We find witness 10659, quote, first-hand involvement in Vietnam crash-lash retrieval of ET
[0:18:00 - 0:18:07] ▶
craft. Involved directly with ET technology, POC to other military UFO events, including
[0:18:07 - 0:18:13] ▶
Dad's presence at 1954 Edwards Air Force Base UFO landing. I do think this witness is
[0:18:13 - 0:18:20] ▶
separate from our Infographics Witness due to the claims of Dad's presence at a 1954
[0:18:20 - 0:18:25] ▶
Edwards AFB landing. The witness comments how one retrieval almost started a war with China.
[0:18:25 - 0:18:31] ▶
The program only getting the upper hand due to China's primitive early warning systems.
[0:18:31 - 0:18:35] ▶
David Grush has commented on this, a multi-decade long cold war between the US, China, and other US
[0:18:36 - 0:18:42] ▶
adversaries. We're in a competition with our adversaries to understand this, and it's a multi-decade
[0:18:42 - 0:18:49] ▶
cold war that has been under our nose for so long. There is no good way to level the playing field and
[0:18:49 - 0:18:57] ▶
hold other nation-states accountable if they're doing unethical or illicit activity as it relates
[0:18:57 - 0:19:03] ▶
to the subject. I think the up to secrecy is actually putting us in a very dangerous position
[0:19:03 - 0:19:10] ▶
where a country might make a breakthrough that's an adversary of ours.
[0:19:11 - 0:19:17] ▶
And it is so destabilizing. You say this being a cold war behind the scenes with Russia and China.
[0:19:18 - 0:19:26] ▶
There has been a cold war against our with our with our peer adversaries, yeah.
[0:19:26 - 0:19:30] ▶
The witness also states where coverage in the ocean would be near impossible,
[0:19:30 - 0:19:34] ▶
that Europe was another hotspot for UFO activity. This was due to curiosity towards the
[0:19:34 - 0:19:39] ▶
always militarized European mainland, especially within the cold war and a few decades removed from
[0:19:39 - 0:19:45] ▶
World War II. Europe was able to keep a tighter lid on the subject, especially with the European
[0:19:45 - 0:19:50] ▶
populace quote, turning their nose up at the whole UFO thing. The crafts themselves were extraordinary.
[0:19:50 - 0:20:02] ▶
That's the only way to describe them. I wasn't there for every single recovery, obviously, but they
[0:20:02 - 0:20:06] ▶
kept collections of them in different places, and I got to see two of the collections.
[0:20:06 - 0:20:11] ▶
The question of craft housing and material handling is done is always fascinating,
[0:20:11 - 0:20:16] ▶
starting with a quote-unquote collection of craft. As we know from David Grush,
[0:20:16 - 0:20:20] ▶
the USG is in possession of up to 12 to 15 craft. When you say crash retrieval, what do you mean?
[0:20:20 - 0:20:26] ▶
These are retrieving non-human origin technical vehicles, you know, call it spacecraft, if you will,
[0:20:27 - 0:20:34] ▶
non-human, exotic origin vehicles that have either landed or crashed. We have spice craft
[0:20:34 - 0:20:40] ▶
from another species. We do. Yeah. How many? Quite a number. You're kidding. No.
[0:20:40 - 0:20:47] ▶
These claims have been echoed by numerous whistleblowers, including alleged S4 project,
[0:20:48 - 0:20:52] ▶
a quarriest biologist Dan Berish. Sit tight for a video on him, but he claimed nine hanger
[0:20:52 - 0:20:59] ▶
bays housed UAP and reverse engineered vehicles, including the 1953 Kingman Arizona crash at S4.
[0:20:59 - 0:21:05] ▶
The witness states Wright Patterson and the Foreign Technology Division is a red herring,
[0:21:06 - 0:21:11] ▶
that this is where the Soviets would have immediately come looking. Quote, we faked some stuff
[0:21:11 - 0:21:16] ▶
going into Wright Patterson, end quote. It's likely in the early days of the program,
[0:21:16 - 0:21:20] ▶
Wright Pat housed both crashes and biological material, and we only have to look at Roswell to
[0:21:20 - 0:21:26] ▶
guess that. This means that either before or during the witnesses tenure in the program,
[0:21:26 - 0:21:31] ▶
program duty shifted away from the air bays. And any sort of material or crash-shiding at Wright Pat
[0:21:31 - 0:21:37] ▶
from roughly 1969 to 2004, our hoax is perpetrated by the program. Now there is some conflicting
[0:21:37 - 0:21:44] ▶
information here, as I think back to the testimony of Senator Barry Goldwater, who in 1975 was
[0:21:44 - 0:21:50] ▶
stonewalled by General Curtis Lemay into accessing the blue room at Wright Pat where UAP information
[0:21:50 - 0:21:56] ▶
materials were likely stored. Possibly this means Wright Pat held a database or record of UAP
[0:21:56 - 0:22:02] ▶
in program activity, but not actual materials and biologics. There were these co-opsites run by the
[0:22:02 - 0:22:08] ▶
government and the big defense contractors, people like Raytheon Boeing, everyone knows their names,
[0:22:08 - 0:22:13] ▶
but also people like Texas Instruments. It was a hole in Borella, but the little guys only got a
[0:22:13 - 0:22:19] ▶
tiny piece of the puzzle. Some guys from TI would get a piece of something and then be asked to
[0:22:19 - 0:22:24] ▶
figure out how it works, never being told where it came from. And on its own, I'm sure these egg
[0:22:24 - 0:22:28] ▶
heads had their suspicions, but it's hard to tell if something's actually alien. Raytheon Boeing and
[0:22:28 - 0:22:34] ▶
Texas Instruments are specifically name-dropped, and we can infer TI is one of the quote-unquote
[0:22:34 - 0:22:39] ▶
little guys mentioned here, as the witness proposes the example of TI getting a little piece of
[0:22:39 - 0:22:45] ▶
something. Can we find one interesting connection for each of these three companies? Well, to start,
[0:22:45 - 0:22:50] ▶
we can find Raytheon name-dropped specifically alongside Lockheed Martin Aerospace Corp,
[0:22:50 - 0:22:55] ▶
TRW, etc. by Lockheed Martin astrophysicist Bernard Haysh, as one of a major aerospace company in
[0:22:55 - 0:23:02] ▶
which the legacy UAP programs hide. In 1956, Boeing was mentioned in a special weapon study of aviation
[0:23:02 - 0:23:10] ▶
studies examination of electro-gravity systems. This piece references a project winner haven, which
[0:23:10 - 0:23:16] ▶
suggests construction of a saucer, creating a local gravitational field designated to serve as a
[0:23:16 - 0:23:22] ▶
use-aff interceptor. Boeing was one such company mentioned on working on these anti-gravity rigs.
[0:23:22 - 0:23:28] ▶
When we hear Texas Instruments, we think of the TI-84 calculator that got me through college,
[0:23:29 - 0:23:35] ▶
at least I do. But TI also operates within the aerospace and defense industries.
[0:23:35 - 0:23:40] ▶
Unfortunately, there is not much to confirm here as the only link to TI-I can find is a 1961
[0:23:40 - 0:23:47] ▶
establishment of the Southwest Center for Advanced Studies by TI to work on gravitational physics.
[0:23:47 - 0:23:53] ▶
And finally onto everybody's favorite subject, the craft. The witness makes a very curious
[0:23:58 - 0:24:03] ▶
claim. Although he knows these craft can operate in a microgravity medium, he does not know if they
[0:24:03 - 0:24:09] ▶
are really spacecraft, and wonders if quote, that's where they want us to think they are coming from.
[0:24:09 - 0:24:14] ▶
End quote. The witness comments, you follow G has done a pretty good job at compiling craft shape.
[0:24:14 - 0:24:19] ▶
So you got your flying eggs, your tick-tax, I guess you now call them, we just call them pills,
[0:24:19 - 0:24:25] ▶
your old-fashioned saucers, bells, triangles, whole messishapes. But the ones that crash are almost
[0:24:25 - 0:24:30] ▶
always the eggs in the bells. In Aero's data from 1996 to 2023, we can actually find the most
[0:24:30 - 0:24:37] ▶
commonly reported UAP configurations. Factoring out spheres and lights which in my opinion often
[0:24:37 - 0:24:43] ▶
have a more possible prosaic explanation than other configurations, we can see commonly cited
[0:24:43 - 0:24:49] ▶
craft shapes accurately reflect our witnesses list. Eggs and bell shapes are the most frequently
[0:24:49 - 0:24:55] ▶
crashed objects according to our witness. Sometimes disintegrating on impact, and our witness
[0:24:55 - 0:25:00] ▶
claims these are likely unmanned drones. We have already covered some really interesting
[0:25:00 - 0:25:04] ▶
and possibly credible eggs and oval-shaped objects, Eric Taper and Jonathan Wagan. But what about
[0:25:04 - 0:25:10] ▶
this bell? There is a fascinating and perplexing case that occurred in 1965 in Kexberg, Pennsylvania,
[0:25:10 - 0:25:17] ▶
I plan to cover soon, allegedly a bell-shaped almost acorn object crashed in the area.
[0:25:17 - 0:25:23] ▶
This case was covered extensively by Leonard Stringfield, so if you'd like to brush up before
[0:25:23 - 0:25:27] ▶
my video, I recommend reading his UFO crash retrievals, the inner sanctum status report 6.
[0:25:27 - 0:25:33] ▶
And if you remember from my Robert Sarbacher video, Dr. Eric Walker, an alleged original
[0:25:33 - 0:25:38] ▶
program manager, claimed to have been on-site and at location for this crashed object.
[0:25:38 - 0:25:44] ▶
Our witness declares the saucers are the crown jewels, and he only ever participated in the
[0:25:44 - 0:25:49] ▶
recovery of two such craft. I probably don't need to dive too much into the importance of discs
[0:25:49 - 0:25:54] ▶
or saucers in UFO lore, but let's see if we can investigate the witnesses aid in a crash
[0:25:54 - 0:26:00] ▶
retrieval in South America. The saucer we've recovered and hit the side of a rocky outcropping
[0:26:00 - 0:26:05] ▶
on its way down, it smashed the rock to pieces, then took out a quarter mile of trees.
[0:26:05 - 0:26:11] ▶
If it had happened on the outskirts of civilization, the whole UFO mystery would have been public
[0:26:11 - 0:26:15] ▶
knowledge by now. That's how much destruction that then cost, but the craft itself was relatively
[0:26:15 - 0:26:20] ▶
unharmed. I will be using the date frame 1969-2004, I derived earlier for our witnesses time in the
[0:26:20 - 0:26:27] ▶
program. I can find three relevant cases for my all-time favorite crash retrieval handbook,
[0:26:27 - 0:26:32] ▶
Magic Eyes Only by Ryan S. Wood. We will not be covering the 1997 Jonathan Wagen pru case,
[0:26:32 - 0:26:39] ▶
or the 1978 Moon Dust retrieval in Bolivia, as these craft are explicitly stated as not saucer
[0:26:39 - 0:26:46] ▶
like. One example can be found that was also related in the notes of Leonard Stringfield dated
[0:26:46 - 0:26:51] ▶
March 23rd 1978. In his note, Stringfield spoke with one Bob Berry who claimed a UFO crash retrieval
[0:26:51 - 0:26:58] ▶
occurred on November 11th 1975. Very close to Lima, Peru. This craft was unmanned and measured 12
[0:26:58 - 0:27:05] ▶
feet high and 8 feet in diameter. If what our witnesses saying is true, and mostly egg-slash bells
[0:27:05 - 0:27:11] ▶
are unmanned, this may not be a saucer, but still worth mentioning, the outer surface was metallic
[0:27:11 - 0:27:16] ▶
with material deemed to be non-terrestrial. Another possible event occurred in Potrario's
[0:27:16 - 0:27:22] ▶
Chile 1978. Pulled from the files of Bob Pratt also, he learned while in the area a year later,
[0:27:22 - 0:27:28] ▶
a tremendous explosion occurred that woke up all 3,000 people in the area. All houses shook and
[0:27:28 - 0:27:34] ▶
everyone thought a blast furnace had exploded. Engineers determined the event was an airburst,
[0:27:34 - 0:27:38] ▶
the explosion occurred in the air and the blast force exerted downwards. Following the crash,
[0:27:38 - 0:27:43] ▶
American operatives and NASA coveralls arrived at the scene questioning witnesses.
[0:27:43 - 0:27:47] ▶
An American or Soviet spacecraft maybe, but when Bob Pratt filed FOIA requests to NASA and the
[0:27:48 - 0:27:54] ▶
CIA, they responded they had no data on the event. And we can find a third case that's also
[0:27:54 - 0:27:59] ▶
mentioned in Stringfield's UFO crash retrieval syndrome status report Two New Sources, New Data,
[0:27:59 - 0:28:04] ▶
which discusses an October 3rd 1980 saucer crash in Piedra, Dela Guia, Argentina. Here witnesses
[0:28:04 - 0:28:11] ▶
in a 300 mile radius saw what appeared to be a saucer-shaped fireball come down from the
[0:28:11 - 0:28:16] ▶
skies and explode near 7 pm. Some witnesses claimed the fireball flew in circles before crashing,
[0:28:16 - 0:28:22] ▶
exhibiting intelligent control. Captain Carlos Lima then head of the Space Research Division of the
[0:28:22 - 0:28:28] ▶
Argentinian Air Force, officially investigated the incident. He found four burned spots circular
[0:28:28 - 0:28:34] ▶
and 10 to 18 meters in diameter. And notice what appeared quote, to be the product of combustion
[0:28:34 - 0:28:40] ▶
originated by liquid fuel or some sort of material with a very high temperature.
[0:28:40 - 0:28:45] ▶
End quote, could any of these cases or possibly the Varsina Brazil case so
[0:28:45 - 0:28:50] ▶
excellently covered by James Fox be the crash our witness mentioned? When the witness reached
[0:28:50 - 0:28:55] ▶
the administrative side of the program, he learned saucers were formed from a single piece of material
[0:28:55 - 0:29:00] ▶
or put together at an atomic level quote, even the entrance is invisible until it actually opens
[0:29:00 - 0:29:06] ▶
but interiors could be accessed through destructive and non-destructive means.
[0:29:07 - 0:29:11] ▶
I have recently covered two witnesses whose claims mirror these statements identically.
[0:29:11 - 0:29:16] ▶
MS who declared the UFO he observed undergoing inspections at Dougway Proving Ground was
[0:29:16 - 0:29:22] ▶
quote, flawless. Like it had been 3D printed and RB who claimed the saucer he guarded in 1963
[0:29:22 - 0:29:29] ▶
had a door panel with tolerances so tight not even a piece of paper could fit through the seams.
[0:29:29 - 0:29:34] ▶
The first mention of biologics comes with the South American saucer retrieval.
[0:29:37 - 0:29:44] ▶
Once access was gained to the craft the interior wreaked of decaying organic material.
[0:29:44 - 0:29:49] ▶
The quote unquote things inside were dead. I call them things on purpose.
[0:29:49 - 0:29:54] ▶
Not at a disrespect or anything like that. I just don't think any of us were ever convinced
[0:29:54 - 0:29:58] ▶
they were actually living creatures. Well, not in the sense that you and I are.
[0:29:58 - 0:30:02] ▶
These biologics featured a crude digestive system only enough to process basic proteins and such.
[0:30:03 - 0:30:09] ▶
Leading the witness and program to believe these things were similar to biological
[0:30:09 - 0:30:13] ▶
androids. The typical gray alien depicted in media is allegedly accurate but these beans are
[0:30:13 - 0:30:19] ▶
a little taller than the famous humanoids and possess large but not massive eyes.
[0:30:19 - 0:30:23] ▶
The witness remarks how these beans were raised in a dimly lit environment supported by their
[0:30:24 - 0:30:28] ▶
dimly lit craft. These creatures feature long limbs and knees quote not in the right places.
[0:30:28 - 0:30:34] ▶
The subject of almost android like living beans has been echoed by many including Dr.
[0:30:35 - 0:30:40] ▶
Gary Nolan. I think that part of what we're seeing here. I mean look if you're an intelligence
[0:30:40 - 0:30:47] ▶
are you going to go down on a planet with a bunch of angry monkeys who might kill you?
[0:30:48 - 0:30:53] ▶
No, unlikely. You'll send some intermediary. Well, what kind of intermediary are you going to send?
[0:30:53 - 0:31:00] ▶
You're going to send something that maybe almost looks like them but isn't them. So I think and
[0:31:00 - 0:31:05] ▶
this is again from inside the intelligence community most of what we think we're seeing are
[0:31:05 - 0:31:12] ▶
avatars biological robots that are basically put there to be the minions if you will.
[0:31:13 - 0:31:22] ▶
And that's that's the current view of that's a that is a it is a hypothesis.
[0:31:24 - 0:31:29] ▶
Living biologics had been recovered by our witness specifically at a near UK based
[0:31:30 - 0:31:35] ▶
retrieval. This event occurred at the same time of a meteor strike in the UK area.
[0:31:35 - 0:31:40] ▶
And I actually think I may have found this incident. This story occurred in May of 1996 in
[0:31:40 - 0:31:46] ▶
Boyle, Ireland. Locals witnessed a meteor or an aerial craft heading towards land appearing to
[0:31:46 - 0:31:52] ▶
misjudge its approach, shearing trees and landing in the lake. Allegedly several occupants were
[0:31:52 - 0:31:58] ▶
taken into custody by a retrieval team and significant military activity including American soldiers
[0:31:58 - 0:32:04] ▶
continued for the following six months. Even local police were instructed to stay away.
[0:32:04 - 0:32:09] ▶
The American soldier bit here is key as our witness states Europe has a default agreement
[0:32:09 - 0:32:14] ▶
with the United States that recovered materials go to the US but quote,
[0:32:14 - 0:32:18] ▶
that's the price you pay for having a superpower watch your back. At this crash site the witness
[0:32:19 - 0:32:24] ▶
states two of five of the craft's crew survived. Light bruising covered the dead from the hard
[0:32:24 - 0:32:29] ▶
landing. The program has ruthlessly strict protocols for dealing with live biologics according
[0:32:29 - 0:32:35] ▶
to our witness. These rules include never leveling a weapon at a being and for that matter,
[0:32:35 - 0:32:40] ▶
security is positioned well away and out of sight from the biologics. Immediately taking
[0:32:40 - 0:32:46] ▶
readings to ensure nothing toxic or hazardous is present near the craft and medical personnel are
[0:32:46 - 0:32:51] ▶
then sent to the craft area or interior including a lead doctor known as the ambassador who always
[0:32:51 - 0:32:58] ▶
spoke at least English, Chinese, Spanish and Russian. The biologics at this UK crash just stood
[0:32:58 - 0:33:04] ▶
around aimlessly solely reacting to basic stimuli as the team entered the craft after the door
[0:33:04 - 0:33:10] ▶
opened on its own. The beans were even let out of the craft like school children. In this instance
[0:33:11 - 0:33:17] ▶
and almost any other where live biologics were recovered, the witness remarks the beans live at
[0:33:17 - 0:33:22] ▶
most a few days before they keel over dead. These points alongside the fact that beans could
[0:33:22 - 0:33:27] ▶
breathe Earth's atmosphere are used by the witness to support the hypothesis they are like drones
[0:33:27 - 0:33:33] ▶
or biological computers like Gary Nolan said. Whatever's making these things just creates a
[0:33:33 - 0:33:38] ▶
biological crew when it needs one and they do their job and nothing else, at least that was our
[0:33:38 - 0:33:43] ▶
theory because their bodies didn't seem built to last and the eggheads found it suspicious that
[0:33:43 - 0:33:48] ▶
they were able to breathe our atmosphere so easily. Of course we do not have access to any living
[0:33:48 - 0:33:53] ▶
or deceased NHI biologics in the public sector so are there at least any parallels we can draw
[0:33:53 - 0:33:59] ▶
from the witness. The subject of biologics and their taxonomy is one of the most contentious
[0:33:59 - 0:34:04] ▶
subjects in UAP. The visual of the classic grey alien, small beans varying in color with elongated
[0:34:04 - 0:34:11] ▶
limbs, frail bodies, enlarged heads, large to enormous eyes, tiny to non-existent noses and mouths
[0:34:11 - 0:34:17] ▶
have been echoed since the dawn of UAP lore. From Roswell to Kingman to Abductor Claims to
[0:34:17 - 0:34:23] ▶
myriad files in the Leonard Stringfield files, similar descriptions of non-human biologics pop up
[0:34:23 - 0:34:29] ▶
and this isn't mentioning countless accusations of the program being in possession of living
[0:34:30 - 0:34:35] ▶
and dead beans. Unfortunately this is also one of the most lied about and hoaxed aspects of the
[0:34:35 - 0:34:40] ▶
phenomenon. So for now we must stick to the direct confirmation of biological retrieval confirmed
[0:34:40 - 0:34:45] ▶
by Grush. And relate statements of quote little grey men who ships had crashed or had been
[0:34:45 - 0:34:53] ▶
shot down, being kept on ice by the Air Force Technology Division at Wright Patterson Air Force
[0:34:53 - 0:34:58] ▶
and quote. As stated by former Special Assistant the deputy director of the CIA,
[0:34:59 - 0:35:04] ▶
Victor Marchetti. Our witness goes back to pondering why it is saucers and maybe one or two other
[0:35:04 - 0:35:09] ▶
types actually have a manned crew. I'm guessing maybe one of these is the triangular shape. The
[0:35:09 - 0:35:14] ▶
witness in the program had a theory quote, this was all being fabricated for us and even tasked NASA
[0:35:14 - 0:35:20] ▶
to look for where something like a big 3D printer could be in the solar system. Some facility or
[0:35:20 - 0:35:26] ▶
computer just making these crafts and these things and sending them to earth and sometimes they
[0:35:26 - 0:35:31] ▶
crashed or they just landed and didn't take off. Like whatever was doing this wanted us to recover
[0:35:31 - 0:35:36] ▶
the craft. I don't know if they have found anything though there was some excitement for a while.
[0:35:36 - 0:35:41] ▶
It's hard to hide heat in space and obviously making these crafts on such a large scale
[0:35:41 - 0:35:46] ▶
would give off a lot of heat or maybe not. Maybe they use physics we don't even understand.
[0:35:46 - 0:35:51] ▶
These are some very charged statements with a lot to unpack. We do know around the time of our
[0:35:51 - 0:35:56] ▶
witnesses involvement in the program. NASA openly denied studying UFOs. However we can find a letter
[0:35:56 - 0:36:03] ▶
to NASA Chief of Ground Operations Safety, dated December 13th 1977. This page observed only via
[0:36:03 - 0:36:11] ▶
a FOIA request is directed towards the NASA administrator about UFOs detailing quote,
[0:36:11 - 0:36:17] ▶
what could be a piece of a UFO end quote was examined at Los Alamos for a period of over two months.
[0:36:17 - 0:36:23] ▶
Additionally on page 121 and 126 of this black vault PDF detailing NASA FOIA requests,
[0:36:23 - 0:36:30] ▶
we can see an internal memo in mid the agency conducted a UFO hard evidence analysis program titled
[0:36:30 - 0:36:36] ▶
UFO heap around the late 70s. And this 3D printer has actually a very real basis in 20th century physics.
[0:36:36 - 0:36:44] ▶
The idea of a universal constructor or self replicating automata was first proposed in the 1940s by
[0:36:44 - 0:36:51] ▶
physicist John Von Neumann who by the way was listed as being involved in UFO recovery along with
[0:36:51 - 0:36:58] ▶
Vannevar, Bush and Robert Oppenheimer by physicist Robert Sarbacher I talked about earlier.
[0:36:58 - 0:37:04] ▶
His theory explores how a sub faster than light civilization can colonize a galaxy.
[0:37:04 - 0:37:09] ▶
The automata involve robotic or nanorobotic systems that replicate by creating miniature copies
[0:37:09 - 0:37:14] ▶
of themselves which grow over time. Such a feat would require an abundance of materials so maybe
[0:37:14 - 0:37:20] ▶
this heat signature the witness mentioned occurred near our asteroid belt. But the replicator hub
[0:37:20 - 0:37:26] ▶
nestled within the dark regions of a solar system for creating craft and I guess biologics
[0:37:26 - 0:37:31] ▶
is an extremely plausible scenario. This even rings identically to the alleged 4chan whistle blower,
[0:37:31 - 0:37:37] ▶
who stated a UFO replicator lies within our oceans. And these statements by our witness quote whatever
[0:37:37 - 0:37:43] ▶
was doing this wanted us to recover the craft and quote is widely known within ufology as donation
[0:37:43 - 0:37:48] ▶
craft. This subject has been touched on by David Grush. Is the subject of Eric Taber's
[0:37:48 - 0:38:00] ▶
arrow testimony as this egg-shaped craft was simply found untouched in the desert and features
[0:38:00 - 0:38:06] ▶
in many corners of ufology. The witness makes multiple mentions to failed in 1990's successful
[0:38:06 - 0:38:13] ▶
attempts to down UAP craft. One failure occurred in Iran and I am almost positive this is the 1976
[0:38:13 - 0:38:21] ▶
Iran Major Gefari case. The successful downing of UAP craft is something I have covered often
[0:38:21 - 0:38:26] ▶
including in my last video where witness tb states the usg developed technology within the
[0:38:26 - 0:38:31] ▶
Star Wars program to down craft. People have been hurt by these craft according to the witness
[0:38:31 - 0:38:37] ▶
but theorizes this is incidental and a byproduct of the craft themselves. Manor unmanned the craft
[0:38:37 - 0:38:43] ▶
have the ability to distort perception and mess with minds. Quote unquote anchors were formed for
[0:38:43 - 0:38:49] ▶
recovery operatives to keep them grounded in reality. For instance if you and I were on a
[0:38:49 - 0:38:54] ▶
security team and approached a craft would say okay the craft is resting up against a big oak tree
[0:38:54 - 0:38:59] ▶
and there's a gray boulder on the other side. You'd think of that picture and it would help with
[0:38:59 - 0:39:03] ▶
the confusion whenever that effect happened. Kind of warded off. This messing with human cognition has
[0:39:03 - 0:39:09] ▶
been mentioned extensively by Dr. Gary Nolan and even mentioned an A-tip slide 9 leaked from Christopher
[0:39:09 - 0:39:15] ▶
Melon's personal website. And lastly what do they want? The witness doesn't know. The program strongly
[0:39:15 - 0:39:21] ▶
supports the donation theory where the craft are gifted. Maybe the technology is gifted to not
[0:39:21 - 0:39:27] ▶
cause massive disruption within our own evolution. We had another conclusion though this one more
[0:39:27 - 0:39:33] ▶
disturbing. Maybe they just left these crafts lying around because they were easy to build.
[0:39:33 - 0:39:37] ▶
Hey guys thank you so much for watching as I broke down the infographics whistleblower who
[0:39:38 - 0:39:43] ▶
claimed to have first hand experience in the crash retrieval program. My objective of this video
[0:39:43 - 0:39:50] ▶
was to analyze some of these claims relate them to ufology at large as well as try to investigate
[0:39:50 - 0:39:55] ▶
as much as we could about this whistleblower to see if their testimony and the individual
[0:39:55 - 0:40:00] ▶
is fact or fiction. So I think I feel pretty confident in us being able to kind of determine the
[0:40:00 - 0:40:08] ▶
time frame of this initial event in Vietnam occurring October to December 1968 in the company E-52
[0:40:08 - 0:40:15] ▶
Infantry in the first Calvary Division L-R-R-P close to Saigon in South Vietnam probably for long.
[0:40:15 - 0:40:21] ▶
And I'm pretty confident in five of the eight or nine names I may have messed that up who
[0:40:22 - 0:40:28] ▶
following died in combat after the initial sighting of the UAP from our whistleblower.
[0:40:28 - 0:40:34] ▶
And I'm also pretty confident in his introduction to the program October to December 1969 and his
[0:40:34 - 0:40:41] ▶
years of service 1969 to 2004. I'm also medium confident on the three South America crashes and
[0:40:41 - 0:40:49] ▶
Ireland UK crash that occurred in 1996. These are all not very known cases pretty kind of low
[0:40:49 - 0:40:57] ▶
key but you know these kind of fit our timetable fit fit our interest fit what we were looking for.
[0:40:57 - 0:41:02] ▶
So guys I do have a theory on who this whistleblower might be. Now this could very well be false.
[0:41:02 - 0:41:10] ▶
I don't think it holds much water more so than dates and kind of interesting coincidences lining up
[0:41:11 - 0:41:16] ▶
because if I had to put money on it I do think this whistleblower is offering some true testimony here.
[0:41:17 - 0:41:22] ▶
I don't think this is as simple as just something uh fictitious. This is a very interesting
[0:41:23 - 0:41:27] ▶
testimony and a lot of things that line up to you falligy at large but the theory remember just a
[0:41:27 - 0:41:32] ▶
theory uh for those of you who watched my last video the witness TB do you remember the general
[0:41:32 - 0:41:38] ▶
that he said showed classified UAP derived cloaking technology in 2004 and was thus
[0:41:39 - 0:41:46] ▶
investigated, demoted a star and retired. This is general John M. Riggs guys I think it's possible
[0:41:46 - 0:41:53] ▶
that this whistleblower is this aforementioned general general John M. Riggs. Why do I think that?
[0:41:53 - 0:41:59] ▶
Well John M. Riggs enlisted in the US Army in 1965 was commissioned a second lieutenant in 1969
[0:41:59 - 0:42:08] ▶
and he then went on to achieve 1100 hours of flight time earning himself a distinguished cross.
[0:42:09 - 0:42:16] ▶
Remember what he said in theater in Vietnam a rapid reaction unit. This would make sense that if
[0:42:17 - 0:42:22] ▶
he then got his flying license in the military helicopter pilot he would have then served on that
[0:42:22 - 0:42:28] ▶
rapid reaction unit, uh possibly providing perimeter security and flying the team there. Right so
[0:42:28 - 0:42:34] ▶
his time in the military was 1965 when he enlisted 1969 when he was commissioned an officer to 2004.
[0:42:35 - 0:42:41] ▶
John M. Riggs was forced to retire in 2004 2005 so this lines up exactly with our witnesses
[0:42:42 - 0:42:49] ▶
tenure in the program as well and our witness states eventually he moved over to the administrative
[0:42:49 - 0:42:54] ▶
side of the program right well John M. Riggs was promoted to general and and higher up in the
[0:42:54 - 0:43:00] ▶
military worked with Congress. He was also stationed at a US Army base in trying to look in in Germany.
[0:43:00 - 0:43:09] ▶
I'm not quite sure when this is but this would line up with our UK based crash would it not kind of a
[0:43:09 - 0:43:15] ▶
as our witness says that Europe is always ready in a constant state of war that you know these
[0:43:16 - 0:43:21] ▶
objects are attracted to conflict there. Um again this theory doesn't hold much water but we know
[0:43:21 - 0:43:27] ▶
that if this story about John M. Riggs is true which I do believe it is because I do with the
[0:43:27 - 0:43:34] ▶
credibility of of TB's claims Mr. Riggs is also well aware of UAP drive tech reverse engineering and
[0:43:34 - 0:43:43] ▶
crash retrieval efforts and let's not forget once he retired after allegedly showing a BAE
[0:43:43 - 0:43:48] ▶
systems employee classified technology he went on to then serve as an aviation and strategic defense
[0:43:48 - 0:43:54] ▶
consultant so not much besides dates and I don't want to kick off an investigation I can't
[0:43:54 - 0:44:00] ▶
control because there's still so much more to investigate with this but that is my little theory
[0:44:00 - 0:44:05] ▶
right now um if you guys have watched this and you have another theory let me know what it is because
[0:44:05 - 0:44:10] ▶
I'm I'm investigating I really want to get to the bottom of this because this is such an interesting
[0:44:10 - 0:44:15] ▶
story and as we can see that a 25 minute video takes over 40 minutes to kind of analyze and
[0:44:15 - 0:44:20] ▶
it not just watching the video right like you guys know I'm not just a screen cap in the video
[0:44:20 - 0:44:26] ▶
plan me positive every couple of minutes and given my thoughts no we're linking documents we're
[0:44:26 - 0:44:31] ▶
linking cases we're linking relevant video footage and clips so yeah that shows you how much meat
[0:44:31 - 0:44:37] ▶
on it is on the bone of this specific case I think it's enthralling and I really have tried to
[0:44:37 - 0:44:42] ▶
get in contact with the infographics team everything short of paying to to become a member of theirs to
[0:44:42 - 0:44:48] ▶
join their discord which I just might at this point because I really want to find this out but
[0:44:48 - 0:44:52] ▶
I hope you guys have just as great of a time kind of sifting through this video as I did and
[0:44:52 - 0:44:58] ▶
joining me on this venture as we try to learn more about this whistleblower and determine if this
[0:44:58 - 0:45:03] ▶
is a real individual and real experience I know I find the the biologics the androids one of the
[0:45:03 - 0:45:10] ▶
most interesting things ever since grush came out last summer of 2023 and talked about biologics
[0:45:10 - 0:45:17] ▶
that statement as he testified to congress biologics dead pilots as he said to Ross Colthart has
[0:45:18 - 0:45:23] ▶
enthralled me and hearing Gary Nolan talk about the hypothesis of biological androids that's
[0:45:23 - 0:45:29] ▶
just something I found so interesting if any of you guys listened to the podcast mysterious
[0:45:29 - 0:45:33] ▶
universe I think this was back in 2017 I can't remember exactly one
[0:45:33 - 0:45:37] ▶
that they did a show on this exact subject kind of like the classic gray has been a biological
[0:45:38 - 0:45:43] ▶
androids so for the better part of a decade now I've been thinking about this theory it's just
[0:45:43 - 0:45:50] ▶
been so interesting my head so you know watching this whistleblower say that these biologics are like
[0:45:50 - 0:45:55] ▶
children respond to basic stimuli keel over and dead and die when their purpose is done it's just
[0:45:55 - 0:46:00] ▶
so fascinating to me so in the comments guys let me know what you think please remember to like and
[0:46:00 - 0:46:04] ▶
subscribe always remember I got a patreon if you think the channels worth anything I don't
[0:46:04 - 0:46:07] ▶
geek any content just support what you think the channels worth and please let me know what you
[0:46:07 - 0:46:12] ▶
think I'd love to get some more discussion around this video and I will catch everybody on the next
[0:46:12 - 0:46:16] ▶