579 segments
In this week's episode of Weaponize, let's say there's a document
[0:00:00 - 0:00:03] ▶
That has been referenced in some reports Michael Schellenberger has said there's a 20 something page document
[0:00:04 - 0:00:09] ▶
Let's say there's a document. Let's be honest with our audience
[0:00:09 - 0:00:12] ▶
You have been exposed to the entirety of the document is that correct? All right. Yeah, I've said from the very get-go
[0:00:13 - 0:00:18] ▶
We have been in the know
[0:00:19 - 0:00:21] ▶
that we have been trying to exploit
[0:00:22 - 0:00:25] ▶
Derivative technologies of UAP is that factual from where you're sitting. Yeah, okay. I am directly aware of
[0:00:25 - 0:00:33] ▶
the totality of this report and information
[0:00:33 - 0:00:37] ▶
being in person given to certain
[0:00:37 - 0:00:40] ▶
I'm not saying of Congress or Senate certain members and that I was present now that it's out how can it possibly
[0:00:42 - 0:00:49] ▶
How can anyone hope to wash the story? Okay, I?
[0:00:49 - 0:00:53] ▶
Need to crack a beer because because because we're right now you have now brought up
[0:00:55 - 0:01:01] ▶
That's where it was lately. I'm thinking threats. Yeah, okay
[0:01:03 - 0:01:05] ▶
You are asking me and I'm sorry. I feel like a robot right now, but I just I have been on guard
[0:01:06 - 0:01:13] ▶
For our this is our insurance policy right here. Okay. I've been notified of very specific and direct and detailed threats
[0:01:15 - 0:01:22] ▶
Against my life as well as against anybody who may have information
[0:01:22 - 0:01:27] ▶
Assets or contact with additional whistleblowers or
[0:01:29 - 0:01:33] ▶
Individuals who are aware of this program
[0:01:34 - 0:01:36] ▶
so much so that I've
[0:01:37 - 0:01:39] ▶
Law enforcement do you have in place what you might call a dead switch a system whereby
[0:01:44 - 0:01:51] ▶
Information about this and other matters that that we've collected over the years would be disseminated if something were to happen
[0:01:51 - 0:01:58] ▶
Yeah, I will not mince words
[0:01:59 - 0:02:01] ▶
We have had in place for quite some time unrelated to this story of
[0:02:01 - 0:02:08] ▶
Immaculate constellation that if you or I are removed from the equation that you have absolute
[0:02:09 - 0:02:17] ▶
catastrophic disclosure of information that would be dangerous to the United States of America
[0:02:19 - 0:02:24] ▶
That would be dangerous to global policy that would be dangerous in many ways and
[0:02:24 - 0:02:29] ▶
It benefits everybody to not fuck with journalists doing their job and
[0:02:30 - 0:02:37] ▶
Information prior to the good of public knowledge with no harm to the United States of America
[0:02:40 - 0:02:46] ▶
Secrets cover-ups and strange phenomena UFOs and ideas the challenge reality itself all these mysteries all this time
[0:02:49 - 0:02:57] ▶
We're ever going to get to the bottom of these my name is George nap. I dig into news stories that others can't or won't I'm Jeremy Corbell and for some reason people tell me things they probably shouldn't and
[0:02:58 - 0:03:09] ▶
This is weaponized we're coming to you from the house of the Ryzen Sun. That's what it looks like this brothel
[0:03:15 - 0:03:22] ▶
The word Jeremy hangs out is that where we are oh
[0:03:22 - 0:03:24] ▶
Man, I mean the whole world is against me why you got to do that
[0:03:26 - 0:03:29] ▶
But yeah, yeah, this is a great hotel great room. I love this is my cat
[0:03:29 - 0:03:32] ▶
It looks like the shining or something weird. Yeah, there's a lot of stuff going on
[0:03:32 - 0:03:36] ▶
And I thought maybe we could bring our viewers and listeners up the date on
[0:03:36 - 0:03:40] ▶
Congressional interest in UAPs because a lot of folks messages all the time on
[0:03:41 - 0:03:45] ▶
When's the hearing why was delayed what's going on and heck?
[0:03:46 - 0:03:49] ▶
There's a lot a lot going on in the world for members of Congress who've been sort of driving this train
[0:03:49 - 0:03:54] ▶
The people that we have talked to before you were back there in Congress a couple of weeks ago and were in the offices of the people who are directly involved in this
[0:03:54 - 0:04:03] ▶
What was the reason for the delay of the hearing into November? I just want to be a little bit careful like
[0:04:04 - 0:04:09] ▶
What was the reason for the delay in the hearing? I think common sense
[0:04:10 - 0:04:14] ▶
I think that there's a lot going on in the world. I think very quickly people realized wait a second
[0:04:14 - 0:04:21] ▶
We have a real opportunity
[0:04:21 - 0:04:23] ▶
We've been given information whether it be new or just a discovery as if it was new and
[0:04:24 - 0:04:29] ▶
Common sense said with the state of the world and everything that's going on and
[0:04:37 - 0:04:41] ▶
With this information
[0:04:42 - 0:04:44] ▶
We have a chance to do this a little better. Just give it a little bit more time
[0:04:44 - 0:04:48] ▶
And I think that that was the core reason and
[0:04:48 - 0:04:52] ▶
Also, we want to make sure that everybody's available at the times to testify
[0:04:52 - 0:04:56] ▶
So I have to be really I'm gonna be really honest. I have to be very cautious with my words right now and
[0:04:57 - 0:05:02] ▶
Not about the hearings and you know why yeah, and so I just I'm sorry for that candor
[0:05:02 - 0:05:08] ▶
But that is the reason I think that mines decided it was good to be
[0:05:08 - 0:05:13] ▶
Take take serious what we're doing. I think it's fortuitous that they put it off until after the election a
[0:05:14 - 0:05:19] ▶
Every member of the house is up for reelection. Yeah, a third of the members of the senator up for reelection
[0:05:19 - 0:05:25] ▶
They're worried about the who's gonna be president. There's a lot to focus on in addition. I mean the real world
[0:05:25 - 0:05:31] ▶
Got involved this past week the past two weeks with hurricanes
[0:05:32 - 0:05:37] ▶
You know and you look at the key members in the house who've been driving this UFO UAP train
[0:05:37 - 0:05:43] ▶
Represent Luna. Yeah gates. Yes, Mosquets. Yes
[0:05:44 - 0:05:48] ▶
Birchett. Yes all of their districts got pummeled by Hurricane Helene and now by the latest
[0:05:48 - 0:05:54] ▶
Hurricane as well. So they've got a lot on their on their plates. Yeah, yeah if it takes a hurricane
[0:05:54 - 0:05:59] ▶
Is slow down a little bit. Yeah, there's so there's a lot going on in the world
[0:05:59 - 0:06:04] ▶
I hear about it from other people like you and I do understand so I think that it's fortuitous
[0:06:04 - 0:06:10] ▶
Like I think it's really good everybody's kind of like
[0:06:10 - 0:06:12] ▶
Slowing down November 13th is the date of the upcoming UFO hearing
[0:06:13 - 0:06:18] ▶
It would take a lot to change that but also people need to be protected before that
[0:06:18 - 0:06:25] ▶
You know the public demands we see it every day on social media
[0:06:26 - 0:06:29] ▶
Well, you don't because you're not there, but I am I want to be clear. I am now
[0:06:29 - 0:06:34] ▶
People text me the gnarliest shit every day. Yeah, I say Jeremy. Did you see this like friends and family and I'm not I'm not
[0:06:35 - 0:06:43] ▶
I was kidding. I know but I want people to know I do care what people say I do listen to what people say online
[0:06:43 - 0:06:49] ▶
I just don't seek out trauma. You don't engage with it necessarily back and forth
[0:06:49 - 0:06:55] ▶
Yeah, if you look up how many times I've said other people's name in vain anybody it'll be zero
[0:06:55 - 0:06:59] ▶
I mean about the nature of engagement with the public the UFO public on social media
[0:06:59 - 0:07:05] ▶
They're angry they're upset they're impatient. We want this that we want this witness
[0:07:05 - 0:07:10] ▶
This is the kind of information we want and they're not going to settle for anything less
[0:07:10 - 0:07:14] ▶
You've been speaking with congressional members and with congressional staff about the nature of the hearings
[0:07:14 - 0:07:20] ▶
Do you think that the public will be satisfied with what they end up with in terms of witnesses?
[0:07:20 - 0:07:24] ▶
I don't know specifically what the public is saying on X but keep it up X keep it up
[0:07:25 - 0:07:31] ▶
You know put pressure on I don't know what people are saying I
[0:07:31 - 0:07:34] ▶
Would say I am not aiming at satisfying anybody other than I am aiming to do my duty to make sure that people testify who need to be heard from
[0:07:34 - 0:07:45] ▶
two-word program popped up in the international media in the past couple of days and
[0:07:47 - 0:07:53] ▶
There's a lot of speculation about who knew what and when can you walk us through
[0:07:53 - 0:07:58] ▶
How far back you heard
[0:07:59 - 0:08:01] ▶
About the nature of that program how far back you heard the name of that program and how legit the information is in
[0:08:02 - 0:08:09] ▶
particular this one whistleblower has been mentioned
[0:08:10 - 0:08:12] ▶
Fuck no, but I will say that
[0:08:16 - 0:08:21] ▶
Information will continue to come out about
[0:08:23 - 0:08:25] ▶
Immaculate constellation. I think there are smarter people than me that will be able to hyper-analyze things that
[0:08:26 - 0:08:35] ▶
That I you've told me about that people are looking at like when people look that up on Google or all that stuff
[0:08:35 - 0:08:40] ▶
And I also promise that I will tell everything that
[0:08:40 - 0:08:43] ▶
The that I can that you and I know as time goes on but right now I would say this. This is what I can say
[0:08:43 - 0:08:50] ▶
Michael Schellenberger who I have never spoken with before
[0:08:51 - 0:08:55] ▶
Got it right what he reported is 100% accurate look at what he reported and I am verifying that is 100%
[0:08:56 - 0:09:05] ▶
Accurate meaning what he reported was accurate. You got to read what he reported
[0:09:05 - 0:09:08] ▶
Seems like a hell of a guy like really
[0:09:09 - 0:09:11] ▶
Just like basically an emoji like that guy did good, you know, but I've never talked with him
[0:09:16 - 0:09:21] ▶
So he's independently doing his thing. I would get I would say people should pay attention to what Michael Schellenberger reported on and
[0:09:21 - 0:09:29] ▶
I think we're all in for a treat
[0:09:29 - 0:09:31] ▶
To as you say get out your knives and die sack to like let's see
[0:09:32 - 0:09:36] ▶
I know part of what a company Schellenberger's story was an image that we know pretty well. Yes, what we called the Mosul Lord. I am
[0:09:36 - 0:09:44] ▶
I think he inaccurately attributed that to arrow
[0:09:45 - 0:09:50] ▶
What's the story on that that was not his fault
[0:09:50 - 0:09:52] ▶
Look that so everything in his article was accurate that was one point that was inaccurate
[0:09:53 - 0:09:59] ▶
Which he quickly fixed it said that arrow had produced that image of the Mosul or
[0:09:59 - 0:10:05] ▶
So let's be very clear
[0:10:06 - 0:10:08] ▶
you and I on what and he he immediately corrected that
[0:10:08 - 0:10:12] ▶
Again, it really straight seems like a very straightforward person
[0:10:12 - 0:10:16] ▶
So the Mosul orb is an image that you and I decided to release to the public
[0:10:16 - 0:10:21] ▶
I we have always said that that image is from a
[0:10:21 - 0:10:26] ▶
FMV video a full motion video video full motion video is a certain type of reconnaissance technology
[0:10:27 - 0:10:34] ▶
And people can look that up, but it's very cool and
[0:10:35 - 0:10:38] ▶
in the article he originally under the image
[0:10:39 - 0:10:42] ▶
Where I'm really glad he put that image. It's actually very important that he did
[0:10:42 - 0:10:46] ▶
But that image which was from 2016 so prior to
[0:10:46 - 0:10:50] ▶
What would have been what we now know as immaculate constellation or what we've heard about but that image is very important and
[0:10:51 - 0:10:58] ▶
We gave a chance to arrow
[0:10:59 - 0:11:01] ▶
You and I give a chance to arrow to put out the video
[0:11:01 - 0:11:05] ▶
We've called to action they put out the videos and be transparent
[0:11:05 - 0:11:08] ▶
You'll get it out there every time we put out something arrow comes out with some other thing that a visual imagery and even before arrow when
[0:11:08 - 0:11:17] ▶
Bray and what's his name?
[0:11:17 - 0:11:19] ▶
The other guy were up there in the first hearing and doing the whole slide of hand thing
[0:11:20 - 0:11:24] ▶
Every time mulchry, Brian mulchry every time we come out with something
[0:11:24 - 0:11:29] ▶
Oh, there's some weird ironic thing that's put out so arrow did not put that out
[0:11:29 - 0:11:34] ▶
They've never put out an image of that footage. They've never put out the video
[0:11:34 - 0:11:37] ▶
But something that looks sort of like it so exactly and so here's the point
[0:11:37 - 0:11:41] ▶
And and we did that knowingly but giving a chance to arrow as a representative of the DOD to put out and they never did
[0:11:44 - 0:11:50] ▶
So yeah, so people picked up on that real quick and it was just simply like
[0:11:51 - 0:11:55] ▶
It's important to say
[0:11:55 - 0:11:57] ▶
Independent journalists put that out arrow never did and they could have and so anyway
[0:11:57 - 0:12:02] ▶
Fixed that super quick and I respect him very much the nature why it fits with his story
[0:12:03 - 0:12:07] ▶
Even though it doesn't quite fit in the timeline right is because the
[0:12:07 - 0:12:11] ▶
Program that he described that he had sources that should have had that with him
[0:12:11 - 0:12:16] ▶
It could have been in there
[0:12:16 - 0:12:17] ▶
It should have been in there if it had been an existence at the time that image was captured
[0:12:17 - 0:12:21] ▶
But it fits into the parameters of the program that he describes is that this immaculate constellation
[0:12:22 - 0:12:28] ▶
uses a lot of different kind of platforms to collect
[0:12:29 - 0:12:32] ▶
UAP type imagery and coalesce it into one place is that right? Yeah, both passive and active
[0:12:35 - 0:12:41] ▶
And so this is public so if this program is as appears and described to the public
[0:12:41 - 0:12:47] ▶
One of the primary missions of this program would be to acquire both actively and passively
[0:12:48 - 0:12:54] ▶
imagery from all sensor platforms in all domain
[0:12:55 - 0:12:59] ▶
So we're talking about satellites to underwater sensors to land-based sensors to aerial sensors to space sensors, right?
[0:12:59 - 0:13:07] ▶
Basically capturing UAP, but I'm gonna caveat that
[0:13:07 - 0:13:11] ▶
UAP that is known to be not from any technologically advanced nation on earth that is known to us at this time
[0:13:12 - 0:13:19] ▶
Which people call NHI non-human intelligence and the program
[0:13:20 - 0:13:25] ▶
How other nations may have reverse engineered
[0:13:31 - 0:13:36] ▶
The program had zero to do as far as data collection no mention of
[0:13:42 - 0:13:48] ▶
Legacy us or even current us programs of any reverse engineering
[0:13:49 - 0:13:54] ▶
Full stop that's how I understand it right now if I'm wrong
[0:13:54 - 0:13:57] ▶
So do you understand so the difference? Okay, let's let's say there there's a program that broad across all the different platforms that gather information
[0:13:58 - 0:14:06] ▶
from space from in the sky
[0:14:06 - 0:14:08] ▶
You know drones things that sort that's a lot of different agencies different departments. Yes things that sort a lot of people would be involved
[0:14:08 - 0:14:16] ▶
So this program as described by by Shellenberger in his article and and what you've shared with me
[0:14:16 - 0:14:22] ▶
Unacknowledged special access program for something that broad wouldn't you need
[0:14:25 - 0:14:30] ▶
Something acknowledged at least it goes into with that many people
[0:14:31 - 0:14:35] ▶
It's not a silo. It's not a restricted program. There's a lot of people have to know that exists
[0:14:35 - 0:14:40] ▶
oddly no and that's what's interesting
[0:14:42 - 0:14:45] ▶
so you can have a usap unacknowledged special access program
[0:14:45 - 0:14:50] ▶
Analyze it from a broad spectrum from Air Force to Navy to Army to satellite to underwater to drones
[0:14:55 - 0:15:03] ▶
If there is if there are archives of UAP information you would then co-alate that
[0:15:04 - 0:15:11] ▶
Folks it reduce it get it down and then and then get that into the eyes of people in the usap in the unacknowledged special
[0:15:13 - 0:15:20] ▶
Take the cream off the top
[0:15:20 - 0:15:22] ▶
That's what goes into the usap. It's possible
[0:15:22 - 0:15:25] ▶
But there was more going on in that usap allegedly than just
[0:15:25 - 0:15:30] ▶
Total reconnaissance right there there was material transfer implications if I recall there were things like that so
[0:15:30 - 0:15:37] ▶
What I'm saying is let the world get out their knives and dissect I am not going to sit here and spill any beans
[0:15:39 - 0:15:45] ▶
So a couple of a couple of points that I would raise questions
[0:15:46 - 0:15:49] ▶
Though there's a whistleblower who seems to be a primary source in this
[0:15:50 - 0:15:53] ▶
I don't know if that person has been in contact with Shellenberger. I don't know if that person
[0:15:53 - 0:15:58] ▶
Shellenberger said that he had been in physical context. So I have bulls down to one person is there more than that that no it was not one person
[0:15:58 - 0:16:04] ▶
If you so if you had a usap
[0:16:07 - 0:16:09] ▶
There would obviously be a number of people
[0:16:10 - 0:16:12] ▶
I would imagine and I think it has been said publicly
[0:16:13 - 0:16:15] ▶
That people can have accidental exposure to a usap
[0:16:16 - 0:16:19] ▶
So I would imagine from there
[0:16:20 - 0:16:22] ▶
That this you're saying I'm not that there is a whistleblower
[0:16:23 - 0:16:27] ▶
Okay, that may be true
[0:16:27 - 0:16:29] ▶
There may be publicly stated that there is a a human being a person
[0:16:29 - 0:16:34] ▶
Not I'm not saying male. I'm not saying female. That's in what department not saying inside government not saying contractor
[0:16:34 - 0:16:39] ▶
Sure, we can all deduce that from what was reported by Michael Shellenberger. No problem
[0:16:39 - 0:16:44] ▶
You're asking me directly
[0:16:46 - 0:16:47] ▶
Are there more people that may be able to back up that information? I am telling you directly and I don't need to tell you that
[0:16:48 - 0:16:55] ▶
But I am telling you directly that um yes, there are
[0:16:55 - 0:16:58] ▶
But that is not for you or me to talk about right? So it's just like okay
[0:16:59 - 0:17:04] ▶
You've got one person that is public that obviously has talked with with Shellenberger a person
[0:17:04 - 0:17:10] ▶
And that is true information that is accurate information now we will find out
[0:17:11 - 0:17:15] ▶
Is this program real or are there other people involved that I will tell you from my experience?
[0:17:16 - 0:17:21] ▶
There was knowledge of this program way beyond a whistleblower who ended up
[0:17:23 - 0:17:28] ▶
Going through a very unique process to get that information out for sure. It's not a foreign
[0:17:29 - 0:17:35] ▶
Are you aware of how much information
[0:17:38 - 0:17:41] ▶
About this program has been shared with members of congress for example
[0:17:42 - 0:17:46] ▶
Shellenberger's article has obviously been read on capital hill by a lot of these people especially the names that we mentioned who are interested here in this subject
[0:17:46 - 0:17:54] ▶
Are you aware of additional information that has been shared directly with members of congress and or senior staff members? Yes
[0:17:55 - 0:18:01] ▶
Yes, I I think it is
[0:18:02 - 0:18:04] ▶
factually and important for me to say
[0:18:06 - 0:18:08] ▶
That I am directly aware of
[0:18:09 - 0:18:11] ▶
The totality of this report and information
[0:18:12 - 0:18:15] ▶
being in person given
[0:18:16 - 0:18:18] ▶
I'm not saying of congress or senate certain members and that I was present. Oh, you're present. Yeah, I was okay
[0:18:21 - 0:18:27] ▶
So the indictments will be delivered to your house. There's nothing I did wrong
[0:18:27 - 0:18:30] ▶
Is that wrong? No, no, no, I'm just I don't know if we're gonna leave this in the footage
[0:18:31 - 0:18:35] ▶
But you're asking me am I aware of that statement. I saw that statement
[0:18:35 - 0:18:38] ▶
Michael Shellenberger said that members of Congress are made aware that is 100% true
[0:18:38 - 0:18:43] ▶
And I can testify to it under oath in the court of law because I was fucking there so they're
[0:18:43 - 0:18:48] ▶
From according to Michael's article there is a central whistleblower
[0:18:49 - 0:18:52] ▶
According to you there are more than one source of this information. Yes
[0:18:53 - 0:18:57] ▶
According to the two of you information has been shared with members of congress. Yes
[0:18:57 - 0:19:01] ▶
And it appears for now that this is real that there it's real that who is it?
[0:19:02 - 0:19:06] ▶
Um you're now for for now. Yeah. Yeah
[0:19:07 - 0:19:10] ▶
And do you have a sense of whether the people on the hill who've seen this information are motivated or highly interesting are there
[0:19:11 - 0:19:18] ▶
Asking tough questions?
[0:19:20 - 0:19:22] ▶
I decline the comment. I mean ask you this so um let's say there's a document
[0:19:23 - 0:19:28] ▶
That has been referenced in some reports Michael Shellenberger has said there's a 20 something page document
[0:19:29 - 0:19:34] ▶
Let's say there's a document
[0:19:34 - 0:19:36] ▶
I believe that he's it includes three interesting letters a rv
[0:19:36 - 0:19:41] ▶
That for me as a long time UFO guy
[0:19:42 - 0:19:44] ▶
Raises red flags a rv alien replication vehicle something like that supposedly a vehicle that we have built based on recovered alien technology
[0:19:45 - 0:19:53] ▶
That's been raised in some fairly
[0:19:54 - 0:19:56] ▶
Uh corners of bufology over the years and I know I can never tell whether that's um
[0:19:58 - 0:20:04] ▶
disinformation whether it's a red flag whether it's thrown out as bait you have a sense of how real that is
[0:20:05 - 0:20:12] ▶
And let's be honest with our audience
[0:20:12 - 0:20:14] ▶
You have been exposed to the entirety of the document is that correct? All right. Yeah, I've seen okay. Yeah
[0:20:15 - 0:20:20] ▶
You have been exposed to the entirety of the report as they're calling it right from an individual. Yeah. Okay. Great
[0:20:23 - 0:20:29] ▶
Uh, so from that point let's move forward on two things
[0:20:30 - 0:20:33] ▶
From the very get-go
[0:20:37 - 0:20:39] ▶
We have been in the know
[0:20:40 - 0:20:42] ▶
That we have been trying to exploit
[0:20:43 - 0:20:46] ▶
Derivative technologies of uap is that factual from where you're sitting. Yeah, okay
[0:20:46 - 0:20:51] ▶
We have also heard that we have not made extreme progress, but that could be true not true correct right? Okay
[0:20:53 - 0:21:00] ▶
Do you believe those two statements to be true wrote yeah relatively yeah, I explain that well
[0:21:00 - 0:21:06] ▶
I'll form how much progress we made yeah, we don't know. Yeah, okay. We don't know but those two things were sure have happened right yeah, okay
[0:21:06 - 0:21:13] ▶
Then I want you to tell me why you are
[0:21:14 - 0:21:18] ▶
Alarmed by the term ARB because I'm alarmed by it too, but I just tell me was of the source where it came from where did the source come from
[0:21:19 - 0:21:27] ▶
Some UFO people who are not entirely trustworthy with the first person's ever to mention that term first persons
[0:21:27 - 0:21:34] ▶
I ever heard a promise. Okay. Yeah, so so that's where we're at a point as journalists where we need to reverse engineer
[0:21:34 - 0:21:40] ▶
Some of these terminologies now it's possible that terminologies have been used in public spheres and then adopted by military spheres
[0:21:41 - 0:21:49] ▶
I grant that or even horrible people get good information from time to time is also possible right right okay
[0:21:50 - 0:21:56] ▶
So I don't know where we're going with this, but my point is you and I both have red flags based on the totality of the document
[0:21:56 - 0:22:03] ▶
That we have both consumed correct. Let's talk about that a little bit because they're you know
[0:22:03 - 0:22:08] ▶
We have confidentially we've received indications from people that we know and we trust who suggested there is risk and have a misinformation
[0:22:08 - 0:22:16] ▶
I'm gonna think Sheldon Burberry's probably had the same thing
[0:22:16 - 0:22:18] ▶
Is that risk real and what is the risk? What's the nature of it and now that it's out how can it possibly?
[0:22:19 - 0:22:25] ▶
How can anyone hope to quash the story? Okay, I
[0:22:25 - 0:22:29] ▶
Need to crack a beer because because um we're right now you have now brought up
[0:22:31 - 0:22:36] ▶
That's where it was leaving threats. Yeah, okay
[0:22:38 - 0:22:40] ▶
I'm not cutting this out of the episode. I'm just being honest like
[0:22:41 - 0:22:45] ▶
Let's just take a second because obviously there's a lot George ain't saying playing dumb right George playing dumb right now
[0:22:45 - 0:22:51] ▶
interview I'm a journalist trying to get information. I've somebody who's been very reluctant to cough up this
[0:22:51 - 0:22:56] ▶
I feel like I'm being grilled by the FBI and it's George Natt
[0:22:56 - 0:23:00] ▶
I don't really understand what's going on in her skin. Okay, so let me just pour my beautiful chorus light
[0:23:00 - 0:23:05] ▶
I'm trying to keep my slim figure
[0:23:08 - 0:23:10] ▶
Okay, if we're gonna get into this I need to like
[0:23:17 - 0:23:20] ▶
You are asking me and I'm sorry. I feel like a robot right now, but I just I have been on guard
[0:23:23 - 0:23:30] ▶
For as our this is our insurance policy right here. Okay. Is there risk in mentioning the name of that program?
[0:23:30 - 0:23:39] ▶
Is there risk in reporting about it? Is there risk in even knowing information?
[0:23:42 - 0:23:48] ▶
Is there risk and um
[0:23:50 - 0:23:52] ▶
In admitting that you know more that that has not been made public yet. Yeah, so
[0:23:53 - 0:24:00] ▶
I think we just talk frankly and then we go from there um
[0:24:03 - 0:24:08] ▶
Maybe not no, I think we we I think we do record this and then we go from there so
[0:24:11 - 0:24:17] ▶
Have you had direct put this way? Have you had direct communications with people uh in the intelligence world
[0:24:18 - 0:24:27] ▶
whom you trust who told you hey, this is this is red hot. This is really risky. This is dangerous
[0:24:27 - 0:24:33] ▶
Yeah, um, I've been notified of very specific and direct and detailed threats against my life as well as against anybody who may have
[0:24:34 - 0:24:43] ▶
assets or contact with additional whistleblowers or individuals who are aware of this program
[0:24:46 - 0:24:53] ▶
is so much so that I have um taking action through
[0:24:54 - 0:24:59] ▶
to make sure that they're aware
[0:25:03 - 0:25:05] ▶
and uh, I do I did not uh take put a lot of stalking it
[0:25:07 - 0:25:12] ▶
and then I I called four different people to advise me and
[0:25:13 - 0:25:19] ▶
With actual knowledge of this program prior to it being announced was told for me to take it
[0:25:23 - 0:25:29] ▶
One hundred percent deadly seriously and so let's really unpack that for once and give me a second to say something
[0:25:30 - 0:25:36] ▶
That program was outed by an independent journalist who has nothing to do with me
[0:25:37 - 0:25:46] ▶
I've never talked to the guy prior to the release and I actually haven't talked to him yet on the phone
[0:25:46 - 0:25:50] ▶
It was done legally and lawfully which people will understand hopefully on November 13th
[0:25:53 - 0:25:58] ▶
talked about that program prior
[0:26:08 - 0:26:10] ▶
That it would ping intelligence services it is a real use app from what I understand and
[0:26:11 - 0:26:17] ▶
The last point to this is
[0:26:19 - 0:26:21] ▶
I believe that people need to know
[0:26:24 - 0:26:26] ▶
That they're that the cover-up of this
[0:26:29 - 0:26:31] ▶
They don't color within the lines
[0:26:32 - 0:26:34] ▶
And that people's lives are at risk and right now my job that you taught me
[0:26:36 - 0:26:41] ▶
Is to protect sources and witnesses even if they don't protect themselves
[0:26:42 - 0:26:48] ▶
And you and I are doing that and we will continue to do it um
[0:26:50 - 0:26:55] ▶
Do you have in place what you might call a dead switch a system whereby
[0:26:56 - 0:27:00] ▶
Information about this and other matters that that we've collected over the years would be disseminated if something were to happen
[0:27:01 - 0:27:08] ▶
Yeah, I will not mince words
[0:27:09 - 0:27:11] ▶
We have had in place for quite some time unrelated to this story of
[0:27:11 - 0:27:18] ▶
Immaculate constellation
[0:27:18 - 0:27:20] ▶
That if you or I are removed from the equation that you have absolute
[0:27:20 - 0:27:26] ▶
catastrophic disclosure of information that would be dangerous to the United States of America
[0:27:28 - 0:27:34] ▶
That would be dangerous to global policy that would be dangerous in many ways
[0:27:34 - 0:27:39] ▶
It benefits everybody to not fuck with journalists doing their job and
[0:27:41 - 0:27:48] ▶
Information prior to the good of public knowledge with no harm to the United States of America
[0:27:50 - 0:27:56] ▶
Putting it out and so I want to be very clear
[0:27:57 - 0:27:59] ▶
You're putting it on me because we're having a fun little game here
[0:27:59 - 0:28:03] ▶
You and I have a dead man switch and it's not one. It's not two. It's not three. It's not five
[0:28:03 - 0:28:11] ▶
Well, well put uh let me ask you at this about the whistleblower whether or not you want to say on
[0:28:13 - 0:28:18] ▶
Camera whether you've ever met with this person or know this person or know the even the identity of the person
[0:28:18 - 0:28:23] ▶
What their state of mind is right now now that it's out the story is known
[0:28:24 - 0:28:28] ▶
Is somebody looking I would imagine somebody is really looking for that person
[0:28:29 - 0:28:33] ▶
If there is one person in particular
[0:28:34 - 0:28:36] ▶
They got to be scared. She's endless. It does not boil down to one person
[0:28:37 - 0:28:40] ▶
We have to get that out of everybody's head
[0:28:41 - 0:28:43] ▶
There is an individual that has been talked about and is a patriot and has been walked into offices and Michael Schellenberger reported on
[0:28:44 - 0:28:51] ▶
That is true. That is public. There you go other than that
[0:28:52 - 0:28:56] ▶
I am not saying shit and here's the reason
[0:28:56 - 0:28:59] ▶
People's names aren't leaked
[0:29:06 - 0:29:08] ▶
If information isn't leaked
[0:29:08 - 0:29:10] ▶
The world will learn about it on November 13th
[0:29:11 - 0:29:13] ▶
There is a way in which the world is 100% no stopping it gonna learn about it on November 13th of the year for the congressional hearings
[0:29:14 - 0:29:21] ▶
Now there's a dramatic way that can happen and an undramatic way
[0:29:22 - 0:29:26] ▶
If anything were to fuck if anybody were to fuck with witnesses or us or anybody
[0:29:27 - 0:29:32] ▶
It's gonna be dramatic and and we don't want that we want the information out
[0:29:34 - 0:29:40] ▶
And if it's the dramatic way then all of a sudden other people coming forward too
[0:29:41 - 0:29:46] ▶
I never know what to make of threats, you know
[0:29:48 - 0:29:50] ▶
They in nature of the business and journalism you get threats
[0:29:50 - 0:29:53] ▶
Sometimes all the time eat a breakfast
[0:29:54 - 0:29:56] ▶
You know somebody calls you on the phone and they're gonna threaten your life
[0:29:56 - 0:29:59] ▶
How serious gonna be if they really want to kill you. Yeah, do they give you a warning shot in advance
[0:30:00 - 0:30:05] ▶
But there was an interesting little side story with this um the name of this program
[0:30:07 - 0:30:12] ▶
When it after it came out some of the detectives on social media and a lot of those folks do some really good work
[0:30:13 - 0:30:19] ▶
You great work dig into looking for google searches for that term heard about where it's popped up before
[0:30:19 - 0:30:25] ▶
Yeah, and it popped up when Dave grush came forward when he gave his testimony
[0:30:25 - 0:30:29] ▶
Suddenly the name of this immaculate program. There's a spike immaculate constellation. Yeah, immaculate constellation
[0:30:29 - 0:30:36] ▶
There's a spike in google requests under that term. Wow, which is weird because grush didn't mention it
[0:30:36 - 0:30:42] ▶
No, he didn't but if I was sitting at right pat
[0:30:42 - 0:30:45] ▶
I would be worried what that dude was gonna say and if you recall
[0:30:46 - 0:30:49] ▶
We had to make sure that uh
[0:30:50 - 0:30:52] ▶
Chuck McCullough former inspector general of the intelligence community the first ever inspector general of the intelligence community and for people
[0:30:52 - 0:31:00] ▶
They don't know inspector general is like the police of the intelligence community
[0:31:00 - 0:31:05] ▶
So big baller chuck McCullough. We know him. We know him very well. Yeah, so he was the lawyer
[0:31:06 - 0:31:11] ▶
To David grush and I remember this moment where I had to get very socially awkward my wife said
[0:31:11 - 0:31:16] ▶
Where I'd be like get out the way get the fuck out the way although I did it
[0:31:17 - 0:31:22] ▶
Chuck McCullough needed to sit behind David grush so he could do what he did over and over which is leaning and say
[0:31:25 - 0:31:30] ▶
Because everybody is looking for David grush to speak outside of his dopsur or his pre publication agreement
[0:31:33 - 0:31:40] ▶
I actually have been infiltrated by
[0:31:41 - 0:31:45] ▶
Did people from different agencies trying to get me to falsely say
[0:31:50 - 0:31:54] ▶
Conversations with David grush because he came to you and me first by leaning in I got that point on film
[0:31:57 - 0:32:03] ▶
That he has ever said anything outside of his pre publication
[0:32:03 - 0:32:06] ▶
Which he hasn't and they keep trying to get me and others to say he has
[0:32:07 - 0:32:11] ▶
So Chuck McCullough needed to sit behind him because in the live moment you know how it is you're in a live moment
[0:32:12 - 0:32:18] ▶
You're excited you're scared or maybe you're just amped up and you just what are you gonna say?
[0:32:19 - 0:32:24] ▶
And I remember here in Chuck lean in real quiet like he's a ball or chuck Chuck McCullough
[0:32:24 - 0:32:29] ▶
He is a gangster man. He just lean in be like
[0:32:29 - 0:32:31] ▶
Yeah, we're on the two sides of them. It was amazing. What a guy we'd be lucky to have a lawyer like that
[0:32:34 - 0:32:40] ▶
I mean that guy is just a me to expensive for us
[0:32:40 - 0:32:43] ▶
But he's a baller so check it out this guy
[0:32:43 - 0:32:46] ▶
Sitting behind grush leaning in and saying that so the big picture is this
[0:32:47 - 0:32:52] ▶
If I recall your your kind of point what you were saying
[0:32:53 - 0:32:55] ▶
Right now it's very real and people don't understand that there is a program the government has hid from Senate from Congress from the gangity
[0:32:58 - 0:33:07] ▶
It's called a Mac the Constellation and by the fucking way
[0:33:07 - 0:33:10] ▶
That's just top of the pyramid big piece of the pie chart
[0:33:11 - 0:33:14] ▶
There's more up there and there's a lot of constellations below
[0:33:14 - 0:33:18] ▶
So I just want to say that that is a tiny thing
[0:33:18 - 0:33:22] ▶
We are just talking about it right now because it's public but there's a much bigger story to tell
[0:33:22 - 0:33:28] ▶
That program primarily involved with gathering imagery
[0:33:29 - 0:33:32] ▶
Not in the hands-on let's say you had hardware trying to take it apart figure it out rebuild something
[0:33:33 - 0:33:39] ▶
That would be something else that would absolutely have a different name be a different task program with a different
[0:33:39 - 0:33:46] ▶
What they call bigot list of people that were read in let's shoot back to the Wilson Davis memo
[0:33:46 - 0:33:52] ▶
Because you know it's real and you know the Eric Davis spoke with Admiral Wilson and Admiral Wilson said he'd always deny
[0:33:52 - 0:33:59] ▶
That that was true and to this day he denies it where did we
[0:34:00 - 0:34:05] ▶
Give that publicly and vouch for it that was to our pal Joe Rogan if you go all the way back rude and rewind
[0:34:06 - 0:34:14] ▶
We talked to him about it. I think I think I started
[0:34:15 - 0:34:18] ▶
I think when I was on with the Lazar back in 2018. I could get that wrong
[0:34:18 - 0:34:23] ▶
But I made sure to throw down and say that was real the Wilson Davis memo and one of it was that time when it was being questioned
[0:34:24 - 0:34:31] ▶
If it was real or not we all know kind of now it was real it is real
[0:34:31 - 0:34:34] ▶
And will you please just finally tell people that that is an actual conversation that happened? It's real
[0:34:34 - 0:34:39] ▶
Yes, it is. Okay. Davis met with Admiral Thomas Wilson had that conversation. It's real
[0:34:39 - 0:34:44] ▶
It's called the Wilson memo
[0:34:45 - 0:34:47] ▶
Admiral Wilson met with a scientist who's actually was featured in one of my films
[0:34:48 - 0:34:52] ▶
everybody has been debating whether or not this document of a conversation
[0:34:53 - 0:34:58] ▶
With it with an sitting Admiral at the time is a real document
[0:34:59 - 0:35:03] ▶
It's an actual conversation that happened and this document is right everybody wants another world is going crazy right now in the UFO world
[0:35:03 - 0:35:08] ▶
I'll tell you straight up right now
[0:35:09 - 0:35:11] ▶
I'm in the position to know and it is a real document
[0:35:11 - 0:35:14] ▶
Admiral Thomas Wilson is lying like he said he would
[0:35:16 - 0:35:19] ▶
This is job. It's supposed to do that good for him protect national security
[0:35:20 - 0:35:24] ▶
So anyway, I don't know where I'm going with that but basically here's the point
[0:35:27 - 0:35:30] ▶
I don't I don't pick who's going to be there
[0:35:33 - 0:35:36] ▶
That's the big ballers like the chair like Nancy makes who's a gun slinger. I like her right? Yeah, he's tough
[0:35:36 - 0:35:41] ▶
She's tough and and I think that no matter whose testifying it is the right thing. It is the right thing
[0:35:41 - 0:35:48] ▶
It's all a bunch of nonsense
[0:35:49 - 0:35:51] ▶
Because Elon Musk said he came out this week and told Tucker Carlson yeah all these UFOs are advanced secret
[0:35:51 - 0:35:58] ▶
US technology there it is it's all out there. Yeah, okay, Elon should know right
[0:35:59 - 0:36:04] ▶
Okay, so no, no, I'll do I look I believe him when he says if he got evidence of
[0:36:05 - 0:36:10] ▶
Aliens he would put it on Twitter. I fucking believe him. I believe him
[0:36:11 - 0:36:15] ▶
He is so wild. I believe him and and and God bless that like you know if you get evidence of aliens like a perfect photo from your satellites
[0:36:15 - 0:36:22] ▶
Put it out. I think I believe him that he would do that
[0:36:22 - 0:36:26] ▶
I don't believe for one fucking second that he is not more curious and I'm not gonna say anymore
[0:36:27 - 0:36:32] ▶
But I believe for once and that's like gaslighting to me that you were saying this is all all this stuff the pilots are seeing your opinions
[0:36:32 - 0:36:38] ▶
Well my comment to them on X was okay. Well great. That's great news. Oh you wrote it. Yeah, look
[0:36:39 - 0:36:46] ▶
It's great. That's great news. That's our technology
[0:36:46 - 0:36:49] ▶
So when are we gonna release that 2004 nifty tic-tac technology that'd be really kind of kind of convenient to have that when it's 20 years
[0:36:49 - 0:36:57] ▶
20 years coming up. Yeah, so it's an argument that is so
[0:36:57 - 0:37:01] ▶
You're you're not in a position
[0:37:02 - 0:37:04] ▶
To to know if you say so I you maybe you're right. Maybe it's gaslighting people anyway
[0:37:04 - 0:37:08] ▶
Let me recall something for everybody
[0:37:09 - 0:37:11] ▶
When we walked into to talk with Joe
[0:37:11 - 0:37:13] ▶
I think it was the the last time the word was the last time we're on was you and me
[0:37:13 - 0:37:17] ▶
I was ready to talk with him about how long the UFO thing has been going on why this is not just our tech
[0:37:18 - 0:37:23] ▶
I was like thinking all these things man. I've heard him say some things saying that the he thinks it's just our stuff
[0:37:24 - 0:37:29] ▶
They look there might be fuckery in the UFO
[0:37:29 - 0:37:31] ▶
You know kind of disclosure thing going on for sure
[0:37:32 - 0:37:35] ▶
There might be fuckery you and I are like worried about fuckery. However
[0:37:35 - 0:37:38] ▶
I was gonna go at him with like hey here's the reasons why this is just not our tech
[0:37:39 - 0:37:43] ▶
I think it was almost opening line after he did some said one thing about us being those swashbucklers of the pioneers or the three
[0:37:44 - 0:37:51] ▶
Musketeers or something of UFO disclosure
[0:37:51 - 0:37:53] ▶
I don't remember what he said but he shocked me
[0:37:53 - 0:37:56] ▶
I think it was when we were together it might have been on the time when I was before he says something like this
[0:37:56 - 0:38:01] ▶
Can't be all ours because it's been here a long time. It's like you read my fucking mind
[0:38:01 - 0:38:04] ▶
So your point is the UFO thing has been going on a long time
[0:38:05 - 0:38:08] ▶
Let me just remind people about Edward Snowden and I'm not making any opinion on what he did or the morality of it
[0:38:09 - 0:38:15] ▶
But here is what I'm saying
[0:38:16 - 0:38:17] ▶
He did say that he found no evidence of UFOs in this huge data leak of uncontrolled information
[0:38:17 - 0:38:24] ▶
If he had access he would have found out about the program you reported on called all sap
[0:38:26 - 0:38:33] ▶
Advanced aerospace weapon systems applications program and he didn't right which means not all archives are or equal right?
[0:38:33 - 0:38:40] ▶
It's siloed there we go
[0:38:40 - 0:38:42] ▶
I would just put it this way to with Elon Musk giving him the benefit of the doubt
[0:38:42 - 0:38:46] ▶
Let's put him in a category look
[0:38:46 - 0:38:48] ▶
He has billions of dollars worth of contracts
[0:38:48 - 0:38:51] ▶
With the Department of Defense yeah with NASA
[0:38:52 - 0:38:55] ▶
Let's say he's on a par with Admiral Wilson and he knows stuff
[0:38:55 - 0:38:59] ▶
And is required to lie about it. Yeah, you know just food for thought. Oh sure
[0:39:00 - 0:39:05] ▶
I don't know I have no but I will tell you this that I know 100% sure about Elon Musk
[0:39:06 - 0:39:11] ▶
He makes the coolest mother fucking UFO on planet earth. I have a cyber truck
[0:39:12 - 0:39:18] ▶
I got a cyber truck the first in my county. It's the craziest thing. I've had it almost a year every I'm on auto drive now
[0:39:18 - 0:39:25] ▶
You were driving it say you push a button and you you monitor you make sure it doesn't crash
[0:39:26 - 0:39:30] ▶
Holy shit that dude can make cars because that thing is so fucking wild
[0:39:30 - 0:39:34] ▶
Seems like an on route or you know you know where you're going Jeremy
[0:39:35 - 0:39:38] ▶
Um, no, I have no my name is Jeremy Corbell. I have no idea where we're going because I'm not fucking driving
[0:39:39 - 0:39:45] ▶
And I think we're going to a kill spot
[0:39:45 - 0:39:48] ▶
What works spot because there's a car tailing us and I'm not driving and I've never gone this way in my life
[0:39:48 - 0:39:55] ▶
Oh, it's good. It's putting it's putting on a right turn signal
[0:40:02 - 0:40:05] ▶
November 13th the congressional hearing is going to happen
[0:40:14 - 0:40:16] ▶
As we mentioned at the start of this conversation the members of the committee they're going to be asking questions that day
[0:40:17 - 0:40:22] ▶
They got a lot on their plate right now because the hurricane damaged the election
[0:40:23 - 0:40:26] ▶
But after the election they can refocus on this and I think they're gonna they're gonna um
[0:40:26 - 0:40:32] ▶
I think I gotta ask some really good questions on that day and and make some progress. I hope
[0:40:33 - 0:40:37] ▶
Um, I would just add one more thing there's there's some project that you and I have been involved with for a while
[0:40:38 - 0:40:44] ▶
That has not been mentioned at all
[0:40:44 - 0:40:46] ▶
It's a Netflix series and um
[0:40:47 - 0:40:49] ▶
It's gonna be an announcements coming out in the next day or so
[0:40:49 - 0:40:52] ▶
It's something I've been working on for 16 months
[0:40:53 - 0:40:56] ▶
Which is why I missed some
[0:40:57 - 0:40:58] ▶
Weaponized episodes from coast to coast a lot of stories for Kaleas
[0:40:58 - 0:41:02] ▶
But it's finally going to be coming out it's a multi-part series
[0:41:02 - 0:41:05] ▶
It is currently being edited and translated into 124 languages
[0:41:06 - 0:41:10] ▶
They're supposed to have a trailer that's coming out tomorrow at the time of recording this
[0:41:11 - 0:41:15] ▶
And if if it exists to have a copy of it we'll run it right here
[0:41:15 - 0:41:19] ▶
Crack the fucking microphone open did George nap just admit his secret project for over a year
[0:41:21 - 0:41:27] ▶
On weaponized I did oh
[0:41:28 - 0:41:30] ▶
Okay, you're admitting now finally, so we're gonna see some of your investigative journey
[0:41:31 - 0:41:36] ▶
Current modern day. Is there anything you can tell me right now that you saw captured anything weird? Yeah
[0:41:37 - 0:41:43] ▶
A UFO that becomes a us. Oh, that's pretty spectacular stuff now. I've shared that with you. You've seen it and it's pretty cool
[0:41:43 - 0:41:50] ▶
Um, and then Kaleas comes to mind uh mexico
[0:41:51 - 0:41:55] ▶
tempiko a lot of pretty cool stuff
[0:41:57 - 0:41:59] ▶
Hopefully we'll be able to share a lot more and the next episode of weaponized it was a lot of work went into this a lot of travel
[0:42:00 - 0:42:06] ▶
A lot of miles and um hopeful that it's gonna be great
[0:42:08 - 0:42:12] ▶
So now we can say why we've only been doing a weaponized about once a month and now we're starting to speed up
[0:42:12 - 0:42:17] ▶
And you can expect more from us. I want to say something about November 13th
[0:42:17 - 0:42:21] ▶
But I do want to finish with this which is that we have been throwing down as hard as we could with weaponized for an entire year
[0:42:21 - 0:42:28] ▶
And then this year we've been doing it like about once a month or a little bit more
[0:42:28 - 0:42:32] ▶
And now we're gonna ramp up and I hope we get to keep doing this together
[0:42:32 - 0:42:36] ▶
It's so fun because I I have a sense
[0:42:37 - 0:42:39] ▶
Barely scraped the surface of what you and I can report on
[0:42:42 - 0:42:46] ▶
Visually to the public maculath constellation is the beginning of a lot more to come
[0:42:46 - 0:42:52] ▶
Oh, shit. Did you get just get the next looks trailer texted to your phone?
[0:42:52 - 0:42:56] ▶
I did so this is before it comes out a day. Yeah, okay. I hope you like it. All right. November 13th. Here we are
[0:42:56 - 0:43:02] ▶
Okay, I want to talk about this real quick
[0:43:02 - 0:43:04] ▶
There are bright-minded really smart people that are motivated and honest brokers of information
[0:43:04 - 0:43:10] ▶
They understand the need to protect sources witnesses and journalists
[0:43:10 - 0:43:15] ▶
And they also I believe are fighting for the cause of true transparency to the American public and just straight up from the names
[0:43:16 - 0:43:23] ▶
You've already said the people from Nancy Mase who's cheering it from our friend Tim Birchett from
[0:43:23 - 0:43:28] ▶
Representative Luna, you know, everybody is really looking to do the best they can
[0:43:30 - 0:43:35] ▶
This is going to be a powerful hearing fingers crossed
[0:43:35 - 0:43:39] ▶
But we need to before November 13th we need to protect
[0:43:39 - 0:43:44] ▶
whistleblowers we need to protect witnesses and I will say we have to protect journalists
[0:43:44 - 0:43:49] ▶
Agreed being shelling burger who who said that story? Yeah, he's probably there's a bullseye on him right now straight up
[0:43:50 - 0:43:56] ▶
There is um and you know, I know there are a lot of folks who are calling Congress calling their elected representatives to
[0:43:56 - 0:44:02] ▶
gripe and moan and share their opinions about this or that right now leading up to the election
[0:44:03 - 0:44:07] ▶
Keep in mind after the election too to let these folks know on this congressional committee the folks who are
[0:44:07 - 0:44:13] ▶
Pushed in the ball down the field that we support him, you know, okay? Awesome. Can we now watch your netflix or the air can we share it on weaponized?
[0:44:13 - 0:44:20] ▶
Okay, all right are we and I'll dim this and when you're ready, let's watch it like it's just TV
[0:44:21 - 0:44:26] ▶
You are what we would classify as a whistleblower
[0:44:28 - 0:44:31] ▶
Yes, that wouldn't be exactly what I am
[0:44:31 - 0:44:33] ▶
I want to be able to share this with the world. How can we help you break this story
[0:44:33 - 0:44:37] ▶
There is enormous amount of evidence to suggest that we do have a non-human intelligence
[0:44:38 - 0:44:44] ▶
Interacting with us on this planet. We need to get beyond that obvious question. Are you opposed real?
[0:44:44 - 0:44:49] ▶
But what really matters? Why are they here? Oh, what do they want from us? We can handle it can't we?
[0:44:50 - 0:44:56] ▶
My name is George nap people know me as the UFO reporter last year the Pentagon debuted arrow to investigate the UFOs
[0:44:57 - 0:45:04] ▶
arrow has found no evidence if they would go to such lengths to discredit this topic it tells us we're gonna have to do it ourselves
[0:45:04 - 0:45:10] ▶
We need solid evidence and we need it now
[0:45:11 - 0:45:13] ▶
We had some pretty dramatic UFO encounters all over the world
[0:45:15 - 0:45:18] ▶
Who's addressing the camera? Wow something weird happened to those bulls
[0:45:19 - 0:45:24] ▶
What happened at Phoenix was seen by thousands of people?
[0:45:25 - 0:45:28] ▶
Federal agents were confiscated videos afterwards
[0:45:28 - 0:45:31] ▶
We will say the larger concern we tend to get never happened
[0:45:31 - 0:45:34] ▶
The technology that we faced was far superior than anything we had
[0:45:38 - 0:45:42] ▶
We have a light on the front of the radar
[0:45:43 - 0:45:45] ▶
There will be some information that's going to be put out
[0:45:46 - 0:45:49] ▶
The more we can bring out of the shadows
[0:45:50 - 0:45:52] ▶
The closer we get to masters
[0:45:53 - 0:45:55] ▶
Boom hug me high five. We're done
[0:46:03 - 0:46:05] ▶