1,765 segments
When you calculate the speed that this thing goes by, by the way, it was bigger than the offshore oil
[0:00:00 - 0:00:05] ▶
derrickate was passing by. It says to be moving between 450 and 550 knots underwater.
[0:00:05 - 0:00:11] ▶
He reported that they have specific psionic teams taking these things, at least bringing them into
[0:00:11 - 0:00:18] ▶
range to where they can take them down. Is that something that you've been read into in the past?
[0:00:18 - 0:00:23] ▶
What would be another reason other than national security for it to be classified?
[0:00:23 - 0:00:28] ▶
Wow, we were going to set a trap for these things. We knew that having a huge nuclear footprint
[0:00:28 - 0:00:33] ▶
in the middle of the ocean would be irresistible. Have you seen heard or no of any other egg-type
[0:00:33 - 0:00:40] ▶
crafts at A-Tip? Yes. More than one? Oh boy. Have you ever noticed seen heard or heard whispers
[0:00:40 - 0:00:50] ▶
of any type of language or symbols apparent on these craft? Yes. If I show you picture, can you
[0:00:50 - 0:00:56] ▶
confirm or deny? This is an image. This is zoomed in. This is really interesting. When I was at
[0:00:56 - 0:01:04] ▶
the Pentagon, I spent considerable time researching ancient script. You were aware of craft that had
[0:01:04 - 0:01:12] ▶
script on it. That is good. Yeah, it's pretty undeniable at this point. Was it written or engraved
[0:01:12 - 0:01:18] ▶
in these crafts? No, it was engraved. It wasn't written. If you're holding on to that type of
[0:01:18 - 0:01:23] ▶
clear imagery, it really cements the idea that it's a planned dissemination to the public. You got
[0:01:24 - 0:01:29] ▶
to peek behind the curtain. We did not. It involves our own potential religion. It involves life
[0:01:29 - 0:01:34] ▶
and death. It involves why we're here. It involves the questions of the universe. It involves the
[0:01:34 - 0:01:39] ▶
most important things that humanity has ever asked for. And you potentially had one of the closest
[0:01:39 - 0:01:48] ▶
encounters with the answer. This is important. That's what I'm trying to tell people. Don't put
[0:01:48 - 0:01:52] ▶
that responsibility on my show. I'm just like you. I'm not a Messiah, man. That's your set. That is
[0:01:52 - 0:01:57] ▶
my job as a purveyor of the information. How you interpret that and what you think about that.
[0:01:57 - 0:02:04] ▶
Brother, that's on you, not me. Some people's frustration, my guess, is that you have that luxury
[0:02:04 - 0:02:09] ▶
of formulating some type of answer that they would love to formulate themselves. Makes sense? Yeah,
[0:02:09 - 0:02:14] ▶
good point. And there's also a lot of trust me, bro. You're going to get hate, by the way,
[0:02:14 - 0:02:18] ▶
as I promise you, just for having me in your state. I'm aware. I'm aware.
[0:02:18 - 0:02:22] ▶
Having this conversation. For me, this is not only a pursuit for them. This is a pursuit for myself
[0:02:22 - 0:02:26] ▶
as well. I want to know. There have been some people who have made suggestions to conduct
[0:02:26 - 0:02:31] ▶
illegal activities to cover this topic up. And it's going to come out. It's going to come out.
[0:02:31 - 0:02:35] ▶
In a few months, I do a lot of work behind the shadows behind the scenes. Whether it's a new whistle
[0:02:35 - 0:02:40] ▶
blower that maybe I've been aware of for the last few years or the secret project that will
[0:02:40 - 0:02:44] ▶
hopefully blow the lid on a lot of this, you know, whether through a documentary, getting the right
[0:02:44 - 0:02:48] ▶
people to have a conversation. Can you shed any light on what's to be expected in this documentary?
[0:02:48 - 0:02:54] ▶
There's people that are being interviewed that have never come up publicly on this topic.
[0:02:54 - 0:02:58] ▶
That we've not seen on the trailer. We've not seen on trailer.
[0:02:58 - 0:03:00] ▶
Jay Stratton does say, I have seen with my own eyes non-human craft and non-human beings.
[0:03:00 - 0:03:06] ▶
Do you know what he's referring to? Have you yourself seen NHI? Why doesn't the government talk
[0:03:06 - 0:03:13] ▶
about bizarre? 2027's been thrown around. Can you shed a little bit of light on this just so we
[0:03:13 - 0:03:18] ▶
can stop being paranoid or we can start, you know, being paranoid? Let me see if I can thread the
[0:03:18 - 0:03:25] ▶
needle on this. Sure. How can I phrase this in a way that you can answer this? Are you aware of
[0:03:25 - 0:03:33] ▶
more than one type of NHI? Let me see how I can answer this.
[0:03:33 - 0:03:41] ▶
Accuracy is very important.
[0:03:53 - 0:03:59] ▶
What I'm gathering from this is there are potential that some of these NHI might look a lot like us.
[0:03:59 - 0:04:13] ▶
What else you want to know?
[0:04:17 - 0:04:21] ▶
You know what this reminds me of? It reminds me of like an interrogation.
[0:04:21 - 0:04:31] ▶
That's kind of what I wanted to be. I call it the skiff. I love it. Obviously not a skiff.
[0:04:31 - 0:04:38] ▶
Too many recording devices here for it to be a skiff. We know that.
[0:04:38 - 0:04:42] ▶
But it wouldn't be the first time you sir have entered a skiff, would it? No, unfortunately.
[0:04:43 - 0:04:48] ▶
This is a lot nicer than a skiff. Is it? People are like, oh, you've been in skiffs in the
[0:04:48 - 0:04:51] ▶
sat-back facilities. I'm like, look, actually, they're really boring. Most of them don't have windows.
[0:04:51 - 0:04:56] ▶
They don't have any electronics. You can't bring anything in there. So, yeah, you can't even play
[0:04:56 - 0:05:01] ▶
like solitaire on your computer, right? So, wow. How's the coffee compared to the skiffs?
[0:05:01 - 0:05:07] ▶
So, I think you probably already know this being Latino. Genetically, there's three things we do
[0:05:08 - 0:05:14] ▶
very well coming out of the room. One is drinking strong coffee. The other one is being able to dance
[0:05:14 - 0:05:22] ▶
salsa and madengate. It's like, it's genetic force. You dance salsa, right?
[0:05:22 - 0:05:27] ▶
And then the third thing, I look more like a weeble wobble out there on the dance floor.
[0:05:28 - 0:05:32] ▶
And then the third thing I probably can't talk about because it's not appropriate. Those are the
[0:05:33 - 0:05:37] ▶
three things that Latinos can do very well. I'll take your word for the last two.
[0:05:37 - 0:05:42] ▶
Yeah, you know, my days of dancing, unfortunately, are over. Once you get older and your knees start
[0:05:43 - 0:05:50] ▶
to fail, you gain a little bit of weight in the places that really aren't very conducive for dancing.
[0:05:50 - 0:05:55] ▶
Yeah, I hear it. I hear it. I'm definitely also absent on the dance floor.
[0:05:55 - 0:06:02] ▶
All right, let's get this started. I'm here with Lu Elisando. Luis Elisando.
[0:06:03 - 0:06:09] ▶
You know, Chris, you can call me Bob Bill Joe. I don't care. My real name is Luis. I hear
[0:06:09 - 0:06:14] ▶
that usually when I'm in trouble with my wife. Okay, gotcha. Most people call me Lu because I look
[0:06:14 - 0:06:18] ▶
like I'm from Iowa. I realize I'm, you know, my family's Cuban. They're like, what?
[0:06:18 - 0:06:23] ▶
You don't look like a Luis. Like I know, I know. But Lu has got a nice ring to it. Yeah, I'll call
[0:06:24 - 0:06:28] ▶
you Lu so that people who are listening know who I'm talking to. Thank you so much for being
[0:06:28 - 0:06:35] ▶
here first of all. For those of you who aren't aware of Lu and what he's done, I highly recommend
[0:06:35 - 0:06:40] ▶
you check out his book, which we got here. We'll be signing a few copies as well and I'll let you
[0:06:40 - 0:06:45] ▶
know later in the episode how you guys can grab them. But if you want to pick one up, there's a
[0:06:45 - 0:06:49] ▶
link below. Lu bestselling author. Eminent was amazing. I read through it and I also listened to the
[0:06:49 - 0:06:55] ▶
audio version. Oh, I'm sorry. You had to deal with that. I tell people I have the silky smooth voice
[0:06:55 - 0:07:01] ▶
of a cement truck hurtling down a, cringing down a country road with no breaks. I think you did a
[0:07:01 - 0:07:08] ▶
great job. I think it also helps sort of personify your story and you can humanize it in a certain
[0:07:08 - 0:07:17] ▶
way that we get to hear it authentically. I always prefer that. I remember listening to communion
[0:07:17 - 0:07:23] ▶
by Whitley Streber and it was him, you know, saying reading his book too and it just conveys I think
[0:07:23 - 0:07:29] ▶
a little bit more of the gravitas of the story when it's a person who's salisonary. I appreciate
[0:07:29 - 0:07:34] ▶
that. But I also want to say thank you for taking the opportunity to speak with me and I also want to
[0:07:34 - 0:07:40] ▶
think even more importantly than you and me is your audience. You know, I think these types of
[0:07:40 - 0:07:47] ▶
interviews are very important because it allows all of us to connect. I mean, obviously not everybody
[0:07:47 - 0:07:51] ▶
listening is right here with us. But I hope they get this sensation that they really are part of
[0:07:51 - 0:07:56] ▶
this conversation. This is we're only having this conversation really because of them. And I think
[0:07:56 - 0:08:02] ▶
it's really important that we recognize the value of, you know, we live in amazing times right now.
[0:08:02 - 0:08:07] ▶
You have the ability now, whereas even just 10 years ago mainstream media, right major,
[0:08:08 - 0:08:13] ▶
major networks like where I live down ABC and CBS and NBC. You have more people tuning into you
[0:08:13 - 0:08:20] ▶
than most of these mainstream outlets. So you have a very important voice and the audience is
[0:08:20 - 0:08:28] ▶
arguably the most important aspect of this, right? These are people that want to hear what you have
[0:08:28 - 0:08:32] ▶
to say week after week and whatnot. And really that's that is why we are where we are today in
[0:08:32 - 0:08:38] ▶
the conversation because this has been a whatever this conversation is. It's really been a it's been
[0:08:38 - 0:08:45] ▶
a grassroots movement. And ultimately it is because of your audience and people like that.
[0:08:45 - 0:08:49] ▶
We are where we are today in the conversation about UAPs. Yeah, well said. And thank you. Thank you
[0:08:50 - 0:08:58] ▶
for for saying that. And I think you know, you I part of the reason people are listening, you know,
[0:08:58 - 0:09:06] ▶
if not to tune into me is definitely to hear from you. And I think right now, especially, you know,
[0:09:06 - 0:09:11] ▶
we've been faced with a lot of news recently in the UAP space specifically. And you know, it's been
[0:09:11 - 0:09:22] ▶
it's been snowballing ever since the latest congressional hearing, which obviously you were a big
[0:09:22 - 0:09:29] ▶
part of. And you attended phone obviously. I did attend. Yeah, it was kind of surreal for myself. I
[0:09:29 - 0:09:34] ▶
did have, you know, an immense amount of imposter syndrome being a Canadian magician content creator
[0:09:34 - 0:09:41] ▶
sitting in the front row, you know, core side seats to to something so monumental is, I mean, humbling.
[0:09:41 - 0:09:47] ▶
Of the 366 sightings included in the report, 171 remain uncharacterized. And many high ranking
[0:09:47 - 0:09:53] ▶
individuals in the military and intelligence communities leave UAPs demand greater attention.
[0:09:53 - 0:09:59] ▶
Are contractors are they pulling technology from this? Are they are the reverse engineering
[0:09:59 - 0:10:05] ▶
and the other end of the world? But more importantly, after that, you know, it's these these congressional
[0:10:06 - 0:10:12] ▶
hearings are very important. But arguably what's more important, it's what they do with that information.
[0:10:12 - 0:10:18] ▶
And where that sort of, you know, I'm sure you sick of hearing this, but where that moves the needle.
[0:10:18 - 0:10:23] ▶
And I think recently, you know, we've had a lot of people come forward numerous people have come
[0:10:25 - 0:10:30] ▶
forward to share their stories as well in hopes to move the needle. And so today, I've got a lot
[0:10:30 - 0:10:40] ▶
of questions that I'm hoping that we can get through. And you've been and I got to say for the audience
[0:10:40 - 0:10:45] ▶
listing. And by the way, if I'm ever looking over here, it's just to make sure everything's recording
[0:10:45 - 0:10:48] ▶
because I'm a one-man team here. If you ever see me looking like this because I'm looking over my
[0:10:48 - 0:10:52] ▶
shoulder and looking over my back, paranoia. Yeah, that's good. We're safe here. But one thing I did
[0:10:52 - 0:10:59] ▶
want to mention was that Lou, prior to the interview, said something very important. I think
[0:10:59 - 0:11:05] ▶
that a lot of people should know. And this is not something that's usually recorded. But Lou said,
[0:11:05 - 0:11:10] ▶
I don't want to read your questions before. You don't have to cut anything out. Ask me anything you
[0:11:10 - 0:11:18] ▶
want. And if I don't answer something, I'll tell you why it is I can't answer it. And I think that's
[0:11:18 - 0:11:22] ▶
just so important that you respect the journalistic integrity to that extent, especially after being put
[0:11:22 - 0:11:30] ▶
through ringer, after ringer podcasts, after podcasts and being grilled on things that you
[0:11:30 - 0:11:35] ▶
legally can't talk about. I think it just goes to show some level of character there. And I think a
[0:11:35 - 0:11:42] ▶
lot of people would omit that in an interview. They wouldn't they wouldn't allow that. They would
[0:11:42 - 0:11:47] ▶
want to have final say. They would want certain boundaries to be put on, especially in the
[0:11:47 - 0:11:52] ▶
position that you're in. Well, that's because they're trying to protect themselves. And in reality,
[0:11:52 - 0:11:57] ▶
this conversation is much bigger than anyone person. And this is what I've said over and over
[0:11:57 - 0:12:01] ▶
again to people. I could get hit by a bus tomorrow and disclosure, this transparency effort that we're
[0:12:01 - 0:12:07] ▶
all in part of must go on. The show must go on. And so my part of this is very simple. Speak the
[0:12:07 - 0:12:15] ▶
truth. Whatever that truth is, speak the truth and let the ships fall where they fall. And I think
[0:12:16 - 0:12:21] ▶
it's important from a journalistic integrity perspective that that be maintained and preserved
[0:12:21 - 0:12:26] ▶
at all costs. And this is why I've always made it a rule. Say, look, you're not going to pay me
[0:12:26 - 0:12:31] ▶
to do anything like this. You know, great if you pay my hotel. That's great. You know, but other than
[0:12:32 - 0:12:37] ▶
that, I don't get payment for this. You're like, oh, you're making all these money. He's doing the,
[0:12:37 - 0:12:40] ▶
no, I'm not. I'm actually doing it for free. I'm actually leaving work aside to come out and have
[0:12:40 - 0:12:45] ▶
these types of conversations where I don't get paid. And then also having questions that are a lot
[0:12:45 - 0:12:53] ▶
of people want to know ahead of way and ask me, you're going to ask me any trick questions. You know
[0:12:53 - 0:12:56] ▶
what to hell with that? I don't care. Ask me whatever you want. And if I don't know, I don't know.
[0:12:56 - 0:12:59] ▶
I don't tell you that honestly, or if I can't tell you, I'll tell you that too. And I think that's
[0:12:59 - 0:13:03] ▶
that this topic demands that type of I cannot in good faith demand transparency from the United
[0:13:04 - 0:13:11] ▶
States government. If I myself am not willing to be transparent, right? It's a typical. You can't
[0:13:11 - 0:13:16] ▶
eat. It doesn't work that way. So fair point. And I appreciate that. And I'm sure my audience is
[0:13:16 - 0:13:20] ▶
going to appreciate that as well. So for the next few hours, folks, drive yourselves in.
[0:13:20 - 0:13:25] ▶
We're going to try to get through these questions. And hopefully, you know, get some answers for those
[0:13:26 - 0:13:32] ▶
of you, you know, seeking some answers. Let me start off. Let me just start off by asking a question
[0:13:32 - 0:13:38] ▶
a little bit off target here. But are you familiar or have you been familiar in the past with any
[0:13:38 - 0:13:45] ▶
forechan or Reddit leaks? Quote unquote. I am familiar tangentially with the forms of forechan
[0:13:45 - 0:13:53] ▶
and also Reddit. I am not a subscriber. And that's not a good or bad thing. I'm not necessarily,
[0:13:53 - 0:13:59] ▶
you know, poo pooing it or promoting it. Because my bandwidth is very limited. Also, I'm an older
[0:13:59 - 0:14:05] ▶
guy. This is graying up a lot. Yeah. So I'm a little dude. I'm not overly technically proficient.
[0:14:05 - 0:14:10] ▶
As most people tell you, especially in a wife, you know, when people are using scientific
[0:14:11 - 0:14:16] ▶
calculators, I'm still using an abacus. I'm an older generation. So more than the typical social
[0:14:16 - 0:14:24] ▶
media engagement now, if it involves Reddit or forechan, it's beyond me. But I am aware that
[0:14:24 - 0:14:30] ▶
sometimes information comes out. Yeah. That can be very interesting. And you say that can be
[0:14:30 - 0:14:35] ▶
very interesting. Has there been a time where you're like, Oh, damn, that guy slipped up. He shouldn't
[0:14:35 - 0:14:40] ▶
have said that. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. But you know what? At the end of the day, look, I think,
[0:14:40 - 0:14:46] ▶
I think sunlight is the best antiseptic sometimes. I think it's the best way to get rid of an
[0:14:47 - 0:14:54] ▶
infection. Sure. And so I've never proposed or never supported the idea of leaking anything,
[0:14:54 - 0:15:02] ▶
anything classified. Okay. I am a patriot. I still have my security clearance. And I will never
[0:15:02 - 0:15:07] ▶
support the leaking of classified information. But there's a difference between information that
[0:15:07 - 0:15:12] ▶
is classified for righteous and legal purposes, right, to protect sources of methods and whatnot.
[0:15:12 - 0:15:17] ▶
And then there is the abuse of that system where people will classify things simply because they're
[0:15:17 - 0:15:21] ▶
trying to hide or cover malfeasance over compartment or embarrassment, right? And that's a
[0:15:21 - 0:15:26] ▶
problem because that information shouldn't be classified. And it's being classified in an
[0:15:26 - 0:15:31] ▶
illegal manner. There are very specific prohibitions because in the past, my country has abused the
[0:15:31 - 0:15:37] ▶
classification system to hide the truth from the American people, whether it's around contra and
[0:15:37 - 0:15:41] ▶
all of our North, even recently might some of my work in in Guantanamo Bay and maybe some of the
[0:15:41 - 0:15:46] ▶
methods used to get information from individuals. And there was no reason that should have been
[0:15:46 - 0:15:51] ▶
classified. The only reason why they classified some of that was because we're embarrassed. We didn't
[0:15:51 - 0:15:54] ▶
we didn't want to admit what we were doing and how we were doing it. And so in those cases,
[0:15:54 - 0:15:58] ▶
when that information comes to to the public's attention, I'm okay with that provided they're not
[0:15:58 - 0:16:03] ▶
violating any laws of real classification, right? If information is classified illegally, then that
[0:16:03 - 0:16:08] ▶
really isn't classified. So when it comes to the UAP subject, what would be another reason other
[0:16:08 - 0:16:15] ▶
than national security for it to be classified? Wow. So okay, great question, but it's not a
[0:16:15 - 0:16:21] ▶
simple question. It's not a simple answer either. It's multifaceted, a bit like a diamond really.
[0:16:21 - 0:16:27] ▶
And so you have to in order to understand this topic, you need to understand a little bit about
[0:16:27 - 0:16:31] ▶
the history and where our country was in the state of the world at the time, right? So really the UAP
[0:16:31 - 0:16:38] ▶
topic for the United States government really started to kick into high gear right around the end
[0:16:38 - 0:16:42] ▶
of World War II and and the development of the atomic bomb for our country. That's what we really
[0:16:42 - 0:16:48] ▶
started noticing and increased frequency of UAP interest in our capabilities. Now where were we
[0:16:48 - 0:16:54] ▶
at the end of World War II? Well, the US had just become really a global superpower and had the
[0:16:54 - 0:17:00] ▶
opportunity to dominate a lot of the world politics for for about 10 years. That was until the
[0:17:00 - 0:17:06] ▶
Russians very quickly afterwards developed the atomic bomb too, right? So now now it's no longer
[0:17:06 - 0:17:11] ▶
US preeminence. Now there's this competition and what begins the Cold War, which by the way,
[0:17:11 - 0:17:17] ▶
most people don't realize wasn't really a Cold War at all. It's pretty hot. We had proxy wars going
[0:17:17 - 0:17:21] ▶
all over the place, whether it's Korean war and Vietnam and things like that. And it was kind of this
[0:17:21 - 0:17:24] ▶
winter takes all chess game. Now you have a beautiful chess set here. Your audience can't see it,
[0:17:24 - 0:17:29] ▶
but you can imagine this this Cold War is being an invisible chess match with the Russians. And
[0:17:29 - 0:17:36] ▶
you have the United States on one side, a NATO, you had the Warsaw pack and and and then Soviet Union
[0:17:36 - 0:17:41] ▶
on the other side. And it was kind of this winter takes all mentality. And so what we didn't want to
[0:17:41 - 0:17:46] ▶
do was broadcast to our enemies or our adversaries at the time that we were dealing with this UAP topic.
[0:17:46 - 0:17:53] ▶
We didn't want to let them know what we knew about it. And more importantly, what we didn't know,
[0:17:53 - 0:17:58] ▶
were those intelligence gaps late. And furthermore, the Soviet Union felt the same way. But we both
[0:17:58 - 0:18:04] ▶
understood each other enough to realize that in the 60s, when we started to develop really the
[0:18:04 - 0:18:09] ▶
northern tier radar systems, early warning system for nuclear attack, both the Soviet Union and the
[0:18:09 - 0:18:14] ▶
United States realized that, hey, we better come to the table at least a little bit on this. Because
[0:18:14 - 0:18:19] ▶
what we don't want to do is set up these radar systems, very sophisticated radar systems. And then
[0:18:19 - 0:18:24] ▶
all of a sudden a UAP is is is picked up by one of these radar systems, either ours or the Russians.
[0:18:24 - 0:18:30] ▶
And all of us need to be could get confused for some sort of nuclear strike or nuclear attack, right?
[0:18:30 - 0:18:35] ▶
So so there was enough, I think wisdom there where the United States and Russia in a in a secret
[0:18:35 - 0:18:41] ▶
memo in one of the paragraphs, they actually say, look, if you happen to see something before you
[0:18:41 - 0:18:46] ▶
press that nuke button, do us a favor, give us a call because it might be a UFO. And we don't want
[0:18:46 - 0:18:52] ▶
to start World War III because either one of us, you know, confused us as some sort of provocation.
[0:18:52 - 0:18:57] ▶
And then you have the other issue during the 50s and the 60s and the nuclear age, nuclear
[0:18:58 - 0:19:03] ▶
family in the United States. Our government was dealing with a lot of things. We were dealing with
[0:19:03 - 0:19:07] ▶
civil rights, right? We were dealing with equity issues with between between genders. We were
[0:19:07 - 0:19:13] ▶
dealing with anti-war movement with Vietnam and even before that. And you had the you had also had
[0:19:13 - 0:19:19] ▶
the hippie movement, which was really, you know, kind of this this anti-establishment effort,
[0:19:19 - 0:19:24] ▶
just kind of can't we all love each other anti-war. And so the government was dealing with a lot of
[0:19:25 - 0:19:29] ▶
stuff. And they were concerned that this topic, the UAP topic was a destabilizing conversation,
[0:19:29 - 0:19:36] ▶
meaning all that's going to do is add fuel to the fire and add mistrust to the American public,
[0:19:36 - 0:19:41] ▶
especially once you start, you know, lying for decades, you have to double down on that.
[0:19:41 - 0:19:45] ▶
Because if you don't, what happens is you tell the American people out, which is folding you guys,
[0:19:45 - 0:19:49] ▶
yeah, we've been actually monitoring these things. We just didn't want to tell you. That doesn't
[0:19:49 - 0:19:54] ▶
that doesn't hold very much water, especially if you're a government bureaucrat or a leader. So
[0:19:54 - 0:19:59] ▶
what do you do? Say, well, I mean, shelved this. We'll have this conversation later.
[0:19:59 - 0:20:02] ▶
Meanwhile, let's see if we can deal with this topic in a secret manner. Okay. So sort of interrupt,
[0:20:02 - 0:20:07] ▶
are you saying that the subject is being classified under the disguise of national security?
[0:20:07 - 0:20:16] ▶
Well, it was. That's part of the problem. And we had backed ourselves in a corner for decades.
[0:20:16 - 0:20:21] ▶
Now came a point where, okay, these things, everybody's beginning to see them. How do we deal with
[0:20:21 - 0:20:26] ▶
this? Do we come out and let the cat on the bag? Or do we simply try to suppress this information and
[0:20:26 - 0:20:30] ▶
maybe deal with it down the road? And so you had the US government involved in the collection of
[0:20:30 - 0:20:36] ▶
UAP data, but lying to the American people. And for, you know, look, there's maybe some valid
[0:20:36 - 0:20:42] ▶
reasons there. I don't agree with them, but I can understand them. Some of them was like, look,
[0:20:42 - 0:20:45] ▶
we need more time to understand and figure this out. Also, there were some studies done,
[0:20:45 - 0:20:49] ▶
commissioned by the US government, that the results were very simple. Look, this is a destabilizing
[0:20:49 - 0:20:54] ▶
conversation. If you tell the truth to the American people, you risk literally potentially the
[0:20:54 - 0:20:59] ▶
collapse of civil society. People going to do runs on banks are going to panic. They're going to
[0:20:59 - 0:21:03] ▶
lose their faith in their religions or, you know, why, why do the normal stuff that they normally do
[0:21:03 - 0:21:07] ▶
and pay your mortgages and whatnot? When there's this other topic out here that is potentially,
[0:21:07 - 0:21:13] ▶
existential. It's really only where I know how to use really because it's something beyond.
[0:21:16 - 0:21:21] ▶
And when people put their faith and and and confident in a government, the biggest vulnerability
[0:21:21 - 0:21:28] ▶
to any government institution organization is when the people, the masses, lose faith and confidence.
[0:21:28 - 0:21:34] ▶
So this is true with any government, not just the United States, any government. This is,
[0:21:34 - 0:21:38] ▶
this is how they survive and religions as well. So you can't afford to lose that. If people turn
[0:21:38 - 0:21:43] ▶
around and realize you've been lying to me for all these years, well, you know, we already don't trust
[0:21:43 - 0:21:48] ▶
the government. Now we're really not going to trust the government. Oh, by the way, you want us to
[0:21:48 - 0:21:51] ▶
fight these wars and you want us to do this and do that and do this and pay taxes and whatnot.
[0:21:51 - 0:21:55] ▶
So I think the mindset at the time was much different. We had this cold war with the Soviet Union.
[0:21:55 - 0:22:00] ▶
And we weren't prepared as a nation to have the conversation at the time.
[0:22:00 - 0:22:05] ▶
Do you think that then that's part of the problem is them, you know, admitting that this is real
[0:22:05 - 0:22:11] ▶
is also them admitting to the cover up. Yeah. Well, you have to, right? You have to say, well,
[0:22:11 - 0:22:16] ▶
yeah, actually, we admit that this is real and it's been going on for decades. And then what
[0:22:16 - 0:22:20] ▶
happens? People say, well, why did you lie about it? What about those people who told the truth?
[0:22:20 - 0:22:24] ▶
And now all of a sudden, they lost their jobs and lost its security clearances. Maybe they got
[0:22:24 - 0:22:27] ▶
a divorce, maybe now they're homeless living on this street because of all that. But isn't the,
[0:22:27 - 0:22:30] ▶
isn't the worst outcome of the two that we discover it's real and call them liars,
[0:22:30 - 0:22:36] ▶
then to them, fess up? I think that time has come. We have to have this conversation. I've always
[0:22:36 - 0:22:42] ▶
said that that secrets, a lot of people think secrets are like fine wine, where the longer you keep
[0:22:42 - 0:22:48] ▶
a cork on it, the better it gets. I disagree with that. I've always said that secrets are perishable.
[0:22:48 - 0:22:53] ▶
They have a shelf life. They're like vegetables in your refrigerator. They'll stay good for a while.
[0:22:53 - 0:22:57] ▶
But if they stay, if they outlive their shelf life, they begin to rot and they begin to stink.
[0:22:57 - 0:23:02] ▶
And now you've got a bigger problem on your hand because now you got to clean up the mess.
[0:23:02 - 0:23:05] ▶
And so I think that therein lies part of the conundrum that we've been keeping this information
[0:23:05 - 0:23:10] ▶
suppressed for way too long. My government at least now realizes that it's it's probably time to
[0:23:10 - 0:23:17] ▶
have the conversation because it's only going to get worse. The longer we can look at the JFK
[0:23:17 - 0:23:21] ▶
files, right? The right now in the United States, the amount of faith and confidence we have in our
[0:23:21 - 0:23:27] ▶
government is at an all time low. That's a fact. They don't trust their government. And that's a
[0:23:27 - 0:23:33] ▶
problem. And the longer you hold on to the ghost, the worse it's going to be, you're going to have to
[0:23:33 - 0:23:37] ▶
pay that paper and interest, right? That compounding interest will eventually be more than the loan
[0:23:37 - 0:23:42] ▶
itself. Right. And so I think the time has come. And I think some people now there's a critical
[0:23:42 - 0:23:47] ▶
mass within my government that recognizes that we now really, really, really have to be open and
[0:23:47 - 0:23:52] ▶
honest with the American people. We're at an apotheosis of the UAP subject. Very interesting.
[0:23:52 - 0:23:59] ▶
I mean, there's okay. I mean, I'm going to jump all over the place a little bit here with
[0:23:59 - 0:24:05] ▶
these questions. So be prepared from hitting different angles. Got it. Going back to the
[0:24:05 - 0:24:10] ▶
forechand stuff, I myself had a deep dive into a lot of this stuff because I thought it was really
[0:24:10 - 0:24:14] ▶
interesting. And I read through a lot of those back and forth AMAs or Q&As they had on those
[0:24:14 - 0:24:20] ▶
different platforms with my audience. And there was one that stood out to me in particular because
[0:24:20 - 0:24:27] ▶
it related to something that you had touched on previously in a podcast in the past. And we're
[0:24:27 - 0:24:34] ▶
talking about a giant submerged UFO. Okay. This particular forechand leaker said that he worked
[0:24:34 - 0:24:45] ▶
on a team that was looking into what he called an MCU, a mobile construction unit that was in the
[0:24:45 - 0:24:54] ▶
ocean in the Atlantic Ocean that builds these UAPs and sends them out and that they come in and
[0:24:54 - 0:25:01] ▶
out of this mobile construction unit. That's massive. That's in the ocean and that moves very
[0:25:01 - 0:25:08] ▶
rapidly. He said he goes on to say the down crafts were recovered and that these crafts were built
[0:25:08 - 0:25:15] ▶
to spec in his opinion. They were built exactly for the things that they had to do the jobs that
[0:25:15 - 0:25:22] ▶
they had to do. And it would seem so to the beings inhabiting or maneuvering these crafts.
[0:25:22 - 0:25:28] ▶
My question is you've talked about this video that exists of this giant craft moving very rapidly
[0:25:29 - 0:25:37] ▶
underwater. Is there a possible connection to this forechand leaker? I mean, we can't say there's not,
[0:25:37 - 0:25:45] ▶
you know, all I can tell you is what we know. I can't tell you what we don't know. You know,
[0:25:45 - 0:25:48] ▶
that old saying we don't know what we don't know. What I can say is that without getting in trouble
[0:25:48 - 0:25:55] ▶
myself, that it wasn't just me. A lot of people in the US government have seen this video. So it is real.
[0:25:55 - 0:25:59] ▶
Let me set the stage for you if I can. So in the late 1990s, there was this effort by the US
[0:26:01 - 0:26:08] ▶
government. We would test our cruise missiles technology and particularly in the Caribbean when I
[0:26:08 - 0:26:15] ▶
was there at Puerto Rico, we would every so often we would launch these cruise missiles over the ocean
[0:26:15 - 0:26:20] ▶
in an area that was predetermined in a no boats or a traffic. And then when they would run out of fuel,
[0:26:20 - 0:26:26] ▶
they'd hit the water splash down and then they would sink. And then at a predetermined time,
[0:26:26 - 0:26:30] ▶
they would blow their ballast. They would rise to the top of the surface and then helicopter
[0:26:30 - 0:26:34] ▶
crew would be dispatched to go recover them, bring them back to the Navy base and they would be
[0:26:34 - 0:26:39] ▶
cracked open and exploited. Meaning they would test for the telemetry and the fuel consumption and did
[0:26:39 - 0:26:45] ▶
the missile operate the way it was supposed to operate. Now most people know that Tom Hock cruise
[0:26:45 - 0:26:49] ▶
missiles, some can be modified to carry nuclear payload. That's been one of the advantages of
[0:26:49 - 0:26:56] ▶
these cruise missiles. And so there's a helicopter crew. I won't say the person's name because
[0:26:56 - 0:27:02] ▶
they haven't given me permission to say their name, but they're legit. They're real helicopter pilot.
[0:27:02 - 0:27:05] ▶
And you had so much of that helicopter crew, you've got the pilot, the co-pilot, a crew chief in the
[0:27:05 - 0:27:10] ▶
back and you got a Navy frogman dangling from a line and they're going to, you know, as he's
[0:27:10 - 0:27:16] ▶
going down the line, he's going to, he's going to put a hook on the missile, the deployments palace
[0:27:16 - 0:27:20] ▶
and fly back. And as this frogman is dangling down the line, the helo crew notices and the frogman,
[0:27:21 - 0:27:28] ▶
something black. The water begins to churn and something black and around. As described to me,
[0:27:29 - 0:27:35] ▶
something black is a devil and the size of a small island. So submarines are linear, right? They
[0:27:35 - 0:27:40] ▶
look like you're pen there. They're kind of long and skinny and like a tube, almost like a toilet
[0:27:40 - 0:27:44] ▶
paper tube. This was this was cylinder round, this shape begins to come to the surface. Now you
[0:27:44 - 0:27:52] ▶
understand that the trench of Puerto Rico is the second deepest part of our ocean. It's only second
[0:27:52 - 0:27:57] ▶
to challenge your deep, right? Which is part of the Marianist trench. I think it's like 22,000 feet
[0:27:57 - 0:28:04] ▶
deep, right? So the height that some commercial aircraft flight, this is how deep that water is.
[0:28:04 - 0:28:09] ▶
So there's nothing really out there. This thing begins to rise to the surface of the water,
[0:28:10 - 0:28:14] ▶
the water's churning, the helo crew goes into a panic. The frogman is literally trying to climb
[0:28:14 - 0:28:18] ▶
the line back up because he's scared like hell and I get it. And right as this thing is about to
[0:28:18 - 0:28:23] ▶
break the surface, the missile gets sucked under water and then the whole thing disappears.
[0:28:23 - 0:28:26] ▶
And the helo crew goes back and that missile to this day remains unaccounted for this cruise missile.
[0:28:28 - 0:28:33] ▶
Very shocking to the air crew, try explaining that to your leadership of what happened.
[0:28:33 - 0:28:40] ▶
Is this some sort of Soviet technology? Is it something else? Is it our technology? What the
[0:28:41 - 0:28:45] ▶
hell took our missile? Where did it go? How did it get there? How did it is able to come up and
[0:28:45 - 0:28:48] ▶
and steal our, steal our cruise missile? And several years ago, I have to be careful of the
[0:28:49 - 0:28:55] ▶
capacity. I say this in, but there was a very, very, very classified video. Now the fact that the
[0:28:55 - 0:28:59] ▶
video exists isn't classified. Where it was taken, how it was taken, the methods very sensitive.
[0:28:59 - 0:29:05] ▶
So I won't go into that. But it's very clear we had a capability where we're looking down into the water.
[0:29:05 - 0:29:11] ▶
And there were these offshore oil wells, right? So these are huge platforms like think of
[0:29:12 - 0:29:20] ▶
British petroleum and some of these other folks out of these huge massive structures out in the
[0:29:20 - 0:29:24] ▶
middle of the water or the ocean, right? They're just like the size of a small city. If you've ever
[0:29:24 - 0:29:28] ▶
seen one of these, they have helicopter pads and buildings and hospitals and they're on the middle
[0:29:28 - 0:29:33] ▶
of the ocean, they're huge. And in this video, very, very clear. There's a still of the water
[0:29:33 - 0:29:38] ▶
churning. And then there is the video of this perfectly round disc shape object, black,
[0:29:38 - 0:29:46] ▶
whizzing past one of these things under water. Now there's no waves, there's no disturbance on
[0:29:47 - 0:29:51] ▶
the top of the water other than the still of this water kind of looks kind of roiling if you will
[0:29:51 - 0:29:57] ▶
in the very beginning. But when you calculate the speed that this thing goes by, by the way,
[0:29:57 - 0:30:01] ▶
it was bigger than the offshore oil derrick. It was passing by. It was bigger than that. It's
[0:30:01 - 0:30:08] ▶
diameter, the diameter of the circle was bigger. And it was assessed to be moving between 415
[0:30:08 - 0:30:15] ▶
and 550 knots underwater. Now imagine that for a minute. Do we are there technologies out there
[0:30:15 - 0:30:22] ▶
that move very fast? Yeah, we know the Russians have the supercavitational torpedo and they've
[0:30:22 - 0:30:26] ▶
have capabilities. But to have an object that big where you're talking, you know, tremendous
[0:30:26 - 0:30:31] ▶
enforcers. No, no, no, no, right. Huge, whizzing by one of these offshore oil derrick at phenomenal
[0:30:31 - 0:30:39] ▶
speed. That's a technology that we don't have. And that is extremely, extremely compelling when
[0:30:39 - 0:30:45] ▶
you see it, you realize, whoa, what the heck is that? This first encounter, I think was voiced by
[0:30:45 - 0:30:52] ▶
Graves in the past. Was it Ryan Graves or Fraver? One of the two had talked about this encounter
[0:30:52 - 0:30:58] ▶
where they went to go get Fraver. One of his buddies that we know is their footage of that encounter.
[0:30:58 - 0:31:05] ▶
I haven't seen it. But there has to be because if it's a helicopter, probably has some type of
[0:31:06 - 0:31:10] ▶
weapons. You know, back in the 90s, not necessarily. You mean, you would want to document your
[0:31:10 - 0:31:15] ▶
recovery missions. But if something really routine, you're not always going to have a camera on
[0:31:15 - 0:31:19] ▶
there simply because it's routine, right? You've done this a hundred times. It's just the 101st
[0:31:19 - 0:31:24] ▶
time you're doing it. But it's possible. Oh, it's possible. Sure. Absolutely. But I can certainly ask
[0:31:24 - 0:31:27] ▶
the pilot. I mean, I know the pilot. I can certainly ask you. Secondly, the other object. Have you
[0:31:27 - 0:31:34] ▶
seen this video? Which one? The one whizzing past? Yeah. It's on myself. By the way, my colleagues did
[0:31:34 - 0:31:40] ▶
too. Was when I was, what was your reaction in the room? What was the reaction like watching that
[0:31:40 - 0:31:44] ▶
video for the first time? Not what you might think because we have seen so many videos of UAP that at
[0:31:44 - 0:31:48] ▶
this point, it was just added to, to, yeah, but this one's in the water. That is what made it,
[0:31:48 - 0:31:53] ▶
for me, that is what what probably put this up a little bit in the, in the, wow, what the heck is
[0:31:53 - 0:31:59] ▶
that? We had heard about usos before. We never really had any direct evidence other than sonar
[0:31:59 - 0:32:04] ▶
pings from submarines and, and Navy captains and, you know, anecdotal information like that. This
[0:32:04 - 0:32:10] ▶
is the first time that we saw one on camera. Yeah. So it was kind of like, wow, but also keep in
[0:32:10 - 0:32:14] ▶
mind. We've been so saturated for so long on this topic when I was working it in the Pentagon and
[0:32:14 - 0:32:19] ▶
my colleagues that you must kind of become desensitized. I know it sounds weird. I understand that.
[0:32:19 - 0:32:26] ▶
As someone who, you know, knows how magic tricks work, I get to see methods all the time. I've
[0:32:26 - 0:32:33] ▶
seen things that other, which by the way, you are one hell of a magician. I never really appreciated
[0:32:33 - 0:32:38] ▶
the trade until I saw you do some of the stuff you do that's, that's pretty incredible. Thank you.
[0:32:38 - 0:32:43] ▶
I appreciate that. I'll show you, I'll show you some more stuff a little later. Secondly,
[0:32:43 - 0:32:47] ▶
you said this object was round. How did you have that perspective? Was this a satellite footage?
[0:32:48 - 0:32:52] ▶
I can't say the, the source member sources of methods are very sensitive, but let's just say we had
[0:32:52 - 0:32:57] ▶
the fidelity enough where it was very, very clear what was going on. But I mean, if it's round.
[0:32:57 - 0:33:01] ▶
Yeah, it's wrapped. Okay. So you had the top down view of it. It was a top down view. Okay.
[0:33:01 - 0:33:05] ▶
Well, anything more than I probably can't talk. Sure. Now, my hope is at some point it might
[0:33:05 - 0:33:09] ▶
become public. Yeah. They'll have to strip up metadata and maybe some other things there because
[0:33:09 - 0:33:13] ▶
people on the internet give a very clever and they look at figure things out. Absolutely. Leave it
[0:33:13 - 0:33:17] ▶
to them. Absolutely. Absolutely. That's crazy. And you know what? I think that's great.
[0:33:17 - 0:33:21] ▶
It is. There's several times that I've actually been corrected for the record by a bunch of
[0:33:21 - 0:33:25] ▶
internet sleuths. Yeah. So I think it's fantastic. I actually welcomed that. We need more of that.
[0:33:25 - 0:33:29] ▶
Oh, that's, that's the whole point of the internet. Last, last thing I want to touch on on this particular
[0:33:29 - 0:33:36] ▶
thing is footage the only intel you have here or do you have corroborating data with this,
[0:33:36 - 0:33:43] ▶
but with this specific sighting you have rate, you have sonar, you have radar, you have,
[0:33:43 - 0:33:47] ▶
do you have other corroborating intel or is it simply just this foot? Unfortunately, I can't go into
[0:33:47 - 0:33:52] ▶
detail because in this shows the type of capability we have in certain areas. Can you say yes, we have
[0:33:52 - 0:33:57] ▶
other intel? We have other intel. I can't say the type of intel. Sure, but you could say there
[0:33:57 - 0:34:02] ▶
is other corroborating information. Yeah. No, we had teams of very, very specialized analysts
[0:34:02 - 0:34:07] ▶
with T.S. Clarence. This is not private. This is by the way, government. This is still in the
[0:34:07 - 0:34:11] ▶
possession of government, government people analyzing more than more than two points of data.
[0:34:11 - 0:34:16] ▶
I probably can't talk about that right now. Okay. I know it's frustrating to leave you.
[0:34:17 - 0:34:20] ▶
I know your audience is like, what the hell? Why can't you just say that? No, but I mean,
[0:34:20 - 0:34:23] ▶
just saying that, you know, gives us some type of idea because you might, people can extrapolate,
[0:34:23 - 0:34:27] ▶
you know, the more sensor data you have in a place, the more of an interest it is for us.
[0:34:27 - 0:34:31] ▶
Chances are it's more of a hostile environment. Do you mean intel? Again, I really can't go
[0:34:31 - 0:34:38] ▶
into that path. I had to ask. Yep. Okay. So we're talking about this underwater stuff. First of all,
[0:34:38 - 0:34:46] ▶
to me, this is really interesting because if we're talking about the type of propulsion or the
[0:34:47 - 0:34:52] ▶
type of capability that these crafts are using, technically from what we're seeing in the skies,
[0:34:52 - 0:34:58] ▶
it wouldn't matter whether they're in the water or not. Right. That's what some of the scientists
[0:34:59 - 0:35:03] ▶
have speculated. Look, the medium in which it's traveling is irrelevant. If you understand physics,
[0:35:03 - 0:35:07] ▶
you understand technology, then you understand that sometimes the medium you're maneuvering in
[0:35:07 - 0:35:15] ▶
is rather irrelevant, including physical, potentially, potentially. So potentially these
[0:35:16 - 0:35:20] ▶
crafts can go through mountains. Potentially. You know, again, I'm not a trained physicist. I took
[0:35:20 - 0:35:26] ▶
physics in college. You'd have to ask some of the smart folks in the intelligence community who've
[0:35:26 - 0:35:32] ▶
kind of come up with some of these scientific models. What I will say, though, is that for the
[0:35:32 - 0:35:37] ▶
purposes of this discussion, we can't forget the simple fact that something less than 15% of the
[0:35:37 - 0:35:44] ▶
ocean floor has been mapped. Meaning we know more about the surface of the moon than we do what's
[0:35:44 - 0:35:49] ▶
in our own oceans. And let's not forget, my generation, I remember this. I remember the notion
[0:35:49 - 0:35:55] ▶
of giant cracking in the ocean and sea monsters as being silly and oh, you know, this is all just
[0:35:56 - 0:36:01] ▶
wives' tales. And it wasn't until we actually had proved positive the giant squid of the Pacific
[0:36:01 - 0:36:05] ▶
that there are giant crackin, right? It just turns out that these aren't sea monsters or part of
[0:36:05 - 0:36:09] ▶
nature and our normal paradigm or normal reality in which we live in. So, you know, we're always
[0:36:09 - 0:36:15] ▶
learning something new about what could be and what is in our natural environment. And the ocean
[0:36:15 - 0:36:20] ▶
is certainly no exception. Is it possible that there's something down there that's been speculated
[0:36:20 - 0:36:25] ▶
sure? And is it possible? Yeah, sure. And you've seen it, man. Yeah, I mean, we've seen things in the
[0:36:25 - 0:36:28] ▶
water and, you know, we know that we're so the Navy had a program for a long time. So the Air Force
[0:36:28 - 0:36:33] ▶
had something called the Fast Walker program. Yeah, and I can talk about that. It's been declassified.
[0:36:33 - 0:36:37] ▶
The DSO office had this effort to try to track things from space and one of the things was
[0:36:37 - 0:36:43] ▶
you thought, I just believe it or not. The Navy had something similar and they called the Fast
[0:36:43 - 0:36:48] ▶
Mover program. And they would pick up information. They would pick up data in some cases,
[0:36:48 - 0:36:54] ▶
zone our returns of things that are moving them very, very high velocity almost seems to be
[0:36:54 - 0:36:59] ▶
stalking or or trailing the submarine only to pass by the submarine very, very fast and then
[0:36:59 - 0:37:07] ▶
disappear. Tim Gallaudet mentions this. Tim does. And not only Tim, a lot of folks do.
[0:37:07 - 0:37:11] ▶
In Naval intelligence. Absolutely. Yes, sir. Do you think Naval intelligence has more
[0:37:11 - 0:37:16] ▶
intel on the UAP subject than than a lot of these other intelligence groups? I think they've
[0:37:16 - 0:37:20] ▶
been more forthcoming. I'm not sure they're being more and from I think they've been more forthcoming.
[0:37:20 - 0:37:24] ▶
I'll tell you I talked to a Navy captain of a boomer sub. And he was telling me the story,
[0:37:24 - 0:37:30] ▶
how they were picking up on on sonar and object moving, 450 knots underwater, which is really fast.
[0:37:30 - 0:37:38] ▶
It's insanely fast. And he said it was bigger than than us. It was bigger than a Boomer class
[0:37:38 - 0:37:44] ▶
submarine that they're on, right? And so I asked him and I feel kind of silly, but I'll share this
[0:37:44 - 0:37:49] ▶
with you because it's true. I said, kind of an amazing, what'd you do? And he looked at that
[0:37:49 - 0:37:54] ▶
straight face. He said, we went around it. Okay. I can see that. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Makes sense.
[0:37:54 - 0:38:02] ▶
It's dumb question, I guess. Yeah. Yeah. You avoid it. Is there are there current discussions
[0:38:02 - 0:38:09] ▶
about the possibility of at least some of the NHI slash UAP phenomenon being artificial intelligence?
[0:38:09 - 0:38:18] ▶
Well, I don't think we can rule it out. Have you seen any evidence that might suspect that
[0:38:19 - 0:38:24] ▶
that is the case? Like there is some type of AI controlling these things? No, my background,
[0:38:24 - 0:38:29] ▶
but let me caveat here. My focus was more on nuts and bolts of craft. It wasn't really with the
[0:38:29 - 0:38:35] ▶
occupants or other folks overlooking at that. But let me also give you a very real example of why
[0:38:35 - 0:38:42] ▶
it's not far fetched. Right now we have the capability. You could put a helmet on
[0:38:42 - 0:38:47] ▶
and we can fly drones remotely using a helmet using our thought patterns. There was a gentleman
[0:38:48 - 0:38:54] ▶
probably earlier this year who gained some significant notoriety. He was a quadriplegic and
[0:38:54 - 0:38:59] ▶
they decided to give him an implant that allows him to play a video game in this particular case.
[0:39:00 - 0:39:06] ▶
I think it was Call of Duty. And just using his brain and his thought patterns and it turned out
[0:39:06 - 0:39:11] ▶
that he wanted to be almost better than just about any gamer out there because that interface
[0:39:11 - 0:39:15] ▶
was instant. So we are already using technical means to manipulate matter. Now, taking away
[0:39:15 - 0:39:25] ▶
the spookiness of it and telekinesis, no, it's technology. Not telekinesis technology. It's
[0:39:25 - 0:39:30] ▶
simply the ability to interpret brain waves in a certain way in electrical signals,
[0:39:30 - 0:39:34] ▶
neural electrical signals and biometric signals and translate that into an action using technology.
[0:39:34 - 0:39:41] ▶
So we as a simple species are already doing that. So does it make sense that in the future,
[0:39:41 - 0:39:47] ▶
not only our own species, but anybody else who is technologically proficient would do the same.
[0:39:48 - 0:39:53] ▶
I mean, it's clearly a more efficient way of doing things. By the time the signal goes from the
[0:39:53 - 0:39:57] ▶
brain, down through the muscles and then crosses the response and a reaction, there's a delay there.
[0:39:57 - 0:40:01] ▶
That's not really a fish and isn't. And also the signals can be misinterpreted. Right. So it makes
[0:40:01 - 0:40:06] ▶
sense to have that type of technical interface. And we are already doing it in a species. Now,
[0:40:06 - 0:40:10] ▶
you get into the artificial intelligence aspect of it. Can NHI somehow could it be some sort of
[0:40:10 - 0:40:17] ▶
form of artificial intelligence? Because it could potentially predict what you're doing if it
[0:40:17 - 0:40:23] ▶
already has information on what you've done. Right. Absolutely. And so, you know, if you look in
[0:40:23 - 0:40:28] ▶
a commander-fraver's case where this tic-tac object sort of got anticipated almost to his
[0:40:28 - 0:40:34] ▶
waypoint, you know, part of that could be, oh, it can read the future, but part of that is it's
[0:40:34 - 0:40:40] ▶
just really good at mapping out the past. Right. Or exploiting the data systems on board the aircraft
[0:40:40 - 0:40:44] ▶
as well. Right. So there's options. I think artificial intelligence is a brave new world for us.
[0:40:44 - 0:40:49] ▶
Because for the first time, we may be on the verge of creating true sentience, but not biological.
[0:40:49 - 0:40:55] ▶
Based upon silicon and not carbon, right, based upon bond electricity and not the biometric
[0:40:55 - 0:41:01] ▶
processes in the human brain. So artificial intelligence is anything's almost possible.
[0:41:01 - 0:41:08] ▶
Because we're just now beginning to scratch a surface on what it can do. And we've already seen
[0:41:08 - 0:41:13] ▶
some of those capabilities, which are very compelling, which can be disturbing for some people,
[0:41:13 - 0:41:16] ▶
because that brings another question of like really free will and fate, right, which is really
[0:41:16 - 0:41:22] ▶
uncomfortable as a species for us to consider. Because most of us look at life and say, well,
[0:41:22 - 0:41:28] ▶
I've got a series of choices. You don't know what I'm going to what choice I'm going to make ahead
[0:41:28 - 0:41:31] ▶
of time unless you're like you who's a magician, right? You kind of already know that to some degree.
[0:41:31 - 0:41:36] ▶
Because you set the stage, you set the environment where only one choice is possible, right? But
[0:41:36 - 0:41:40] ▶
they think it's free will. That's very concerning for a lot of people, because we don't like that idea
[0:41:40 - 0:41:47] ▶
that we're not in control of ourselves in our environment. And so when you talk about artificial
[0:41:47 - 0:41:51] ▶
intelligence and the capabilities of it, that's something we're going to have to deal with in the
[0:41:51 - 0:41:55] ▶
very near future, because maybe we're not as free will as we... It's also something as an intelligence
[0:41:55 - 0:42:01] ▶
you'll have to exploit, right? Because... Oh, we have to. Yeah, you have to. Because the enemy's doing
[0:42:03 - 0:42:08] ▶
that's right. So we have to. The adversary is doing it and they're doing it quite well. So we need
[0:42:08 - 0:42:11] ▶
to, as we need to do that, we also need to figure out a way to defend ourselves also from artificial
[0:42:11 - 0:42:17] ▶
intelligence and how to, which is very fascinating to me, if artificial intelligence has a 99%
[0:42:17 - 0:42:23] ▶
certainty of something happening because it's done all the calculations and algorithms and
[0:42:23 - 0:42:27] ▶
looking at our previous behavior patterns or whatnot, then is there a way to spoof? Is there a way
[0:42:27 - 0:42:32] ▶
to circumvent that? Is there a way to do something that artificial intelligence hasn't predicted yet?
[0:42:32 - 0:42:39] ▶
Because that's how you're going to survive. Because an adversary knows your next move on a chess
[0:42:39 - 0:42:43] ▶
board and knows how to win the game and put you in checkmate, then you got to figure out a way where
[0:42:43 - 0:42:47] ▶
they don't know what your next move is, right? And so that's kind of the situation we're in now with.
[0:42:47 - 0:42:52] ▶
Yeah, I think the best way would be to make them think you're playing chess.
[0:42:52 - 0:42:57] ▶
That's right. So, well, this is really interesting. It leads me to also understand because,
[0:42:58 - 0:43:05] ▶
you know, you said you're tracking nuts and bolts. This is part of what you were doing. Before
[0:43:06 - 0:43:11] ▶
I ask this next question, I also just want to ask, are there more videos of submerged vehicles
[0:43:11 - 0:43:18] ▶
out there that you guys have access to? Well, is there more evidence information? Yes.
[0:43:18 - 0:43:24] ▶
So, video is something very difficult when you talk about underwater. Sure, but you have more data.
[0:43:26 - 0:43:33] ▶
A lot more data. A lot more than yes, there's some video evidence, but underwater is much more
[0:43:33 - 0:43:38] ▶
difficult than in the atmosphere. Right. Because water will affect the electromagnetic spectrum
[0:43:38 - 0:43:46] ▶
a little bit differently, especially the electro obstacles. So we don't see that's why we use sonar,
[0:43:46 - 0:43:50] ▶
where you sound waves instead of radar under the ocean because sound waves travel very well,
[0:43:50 - 0:43:55] ▶
whereas electromagnetic signals much, much more different. So, it's not you're not using the same
[0:43:55 - 0:44:01] ▶
tools to quote unquote see something underwater. You're using technical equipment to give you a
[0:44:01 - 0:44:08] ▶
site picture of what's there, but you're not actually physically seeing it. You don't have a photon
[0:44:08 - 0:44:12] ▶
of light bouncing off something coming back into your eye and then your camera lens and interpreting
[0:44:12 - 0:44:17] ▶
that data because light doesn't travel. Look, if you've ever been any of your folks out there,
[0:44:17 - 0:44:21] ▶
your audience or scuba divers know this, once you get past 300 feet underwater, it's virtually dark.
[0:44:21 - 0:44:26] ▶
You can't see anything. Light stops. Now, there's some animals and fish that have very sense
[0:44:26 - 0:44:30] ▶
and eyes and they can see much, much deeper, but for the most part, the human eye is restricted because
[0:44:30 - 0:44:36] ▶
light waves and photon of light eventually get absorbed by the water. So it doesn't travel as far
[0:44:36 - 0:44:43] ▶
as it would like when you look at the horizon, it's maybe 11 miles away. Under water, your horizon is
[0:44:43 - 0:44:47] ▶
maybe a couple hundred feet. But that sonar information can be just as valuable.
[0:44:47 - 0:44:52] ▶
Oh, yes. That sonar data revealing can be high fidelity, like a incredible fidelity.
[0:44:52 - 0:45:00] ▶
Are there reports of these giant craft down there that you've sort of speculated that the
[0:45:00 - 0:45:07] ▶
information is pointed to that these things might be massive down there? Well, we've heard already
[0:45:07 - 0:45:11] ▶
from Tim Galli-Det, and Galli-Det, right? These things have been a mystery for the Navy for some time.
[0:45:11 - 0:45:18] ▶
And you don't have to even look at the United States Navy. You can go back. There's anecdotal
[0:45:18 - 0:45:25] ▶
information even by some of the great explorers hundreds of years ago. Yeah, Columbus. That's right.
[0:45:25 - 0:45:31] ▶
That's right. That that experienced strange things under the water. I spoke to some civilian
[0:45:31 - 0:45:38] ▶
fishermen in Mexico when I was down there off the coast of Ensenada, kind of between the little island
[0:45:38 - 0:45:45] ▶
there called Jalelube Island, Isla Jalelube and Ensenada. And they report these luminous
[0:45:45 - 0:45:52] ▶
objects, these balls of light all the time under the water and sometimes even pop out of the
[0:45:52 - 0:45:55] ▶
water and then fly away. And so this is not, and these are people who have no interest in being
[0:45:55 - 0:46:00] ▶
sensational. In fact, they love their privacy. They don't even want to be they don't even want to be
[0:46:00 - 0:46:03] ▶
associated publicly with this. But they've experienced this. And there's there's logbooks of other
[0:46:03 - 0:46:10] ▶
seafaring captains and people who've reported very similar experiences going back centuries.
[0:46:10 - 0:46:16] ▶
Is that does that make it a place of interest for the government?
[0:46:16 - 0:46:18] ▶
Well, it should. But no. So government's interest typically is from a national security perspective.
[0:46:19 - 0:46:27] ▶
Meaning how do we protect our people and how do we maintain a strategic advantage over our adversaries?
[0:46:27 - 0:46:33] ▶
Anything that is, and this is one of the people who always ask me, well,
[0:46:34 - 0:46:37] ▶
how much research did you do into UFOs when you're at A-Tip and historical stuff? Did you talk to
[0:46:37 - 0:46:42] ▶
this? Did you talk to this? You followed just no, I didn't. Because really when you're talking to
[0:46:42 - 0:46:46] ▶
a three or four star general, they don't care what happened in the 1950s or 1960s. They want to
[0:46:46 - 0:46:50] ▶
know what happened yesterday, right? And so you, you're really kind of narrowly focusing on the
[0:46:50 - 0:46:55] ▶
incidents that involve military equities. And as they're happening now, if you go to a general
[0:46:55 - 0:47:00] ▶
and say, well, here's a report from 1966, they're going to say, what the hell are you showing me?
[0:47:00 - 0:47:03] ▶
That's where I don't care. Sure. You know, I want to know what happened yesterday. And so
[0:47:03 - 0:47:06] ▶
their focus is on the here and now. But I think that's part of a mistake because I don't think you
[0:47:07 - 0:47:12] ▶
can get an accurate understanding of the here and now unless you understand a little bit about
[0:47:12 - 0:47:16] ▶
the past and realize that there's paddle cabins and intelligence officer, we're all about patterns.
[0:47:16 - 0:47:21] ▶
Kind of like magicians, right? There's there's there's certain predictive patterns. And if you
[0:47:21 - 0:47:24] ▶
understand those patterns like putting together a puzzle, you can figure the puzzle out. And that's
[0:47:24 - 0:47:29] ▶
why it's so important that we do take a historic look at this. Now, some of the information is going
[0:47:29 - 0:47:34] ▶
to be bonkers junk, but some of it may be very, very telling. And most of it happens over water,
[0:47:34 - 0:47:40] ▶
it seems. Yes, water and also this is two really interesting patterns that we've seen over
[0:47:40 - 0:47:47] ▶
over time. One is there's an interest in our our military capabilities and our nuclear
[0:47:47 - 0:47:52] ▶
nuclear capabilities and technology and also large bodies of water. There seems to be an
[0:47:52 - 0:47:57] ▶
overwhelming number of UAP sightings in and around bodies of water, which kind of answered the
[0:47:57 - 0:48:02] ▶
question you asked me about the Navy. Are they most proactive? Are they seeing the most?
[0:48:02 - 0:48:05] ▶
No, but they're on the water the most, aren't they? Right? And so what else do you have? Well,
[0:48:05 - 0:48:09] ▶
you've got let's say the USS Nimitz or USS Roseville. That is a huge nuclear footprint. In fact,
[0:48:09 - 0:48:15] ▶
in some cases, that's a lot when that fleet goes out with the with the nuclear carrier and nuclear
[0:48:15 - 0:48:20] ▶
submarines and other nuclear powered boats with potential nuclear weapons and other technology,
[0:48:20 - 0:48:24] ▶
that's a bigger footprint than the entire state of New York from a nuclear perspective. And you're
[0:48:24 - 0:48:29] ▶
on the water, which is why we early on in the Pentagon set up this operation interloper, which I
[0:48:29 - 0:48:34] ▶
can now talk about. Pentagon's giving me permission to do it, where we were going to set a trap
[0:48:34 - 0:48:38] ▶
for these things. We knew that having a huge nuclear footprint in the middle of the ocean would
[0:48:39 - 0:48:43] ▶
be irresistible to these UAP because we had we had experienced it so much. So the idea was to set a
[0:48:43 - 0:48:48] ▶
trap set up a now when I say trap, you're going to say, I'm going to go down a lure. Right. And we had
[0:48:48 - 0:48:54] ▶
we had the intelligence community approval and joint staff to do this. The approval from the joint
[0:48:54 - 0:48:58] ▶
staff. So this was a very, very comprehensive effort that we were we were proposing and was
[0:48:58 - 0:49:05] ▶
almost unanimously accepted because they were seeing the same issues we were seeing at a tip.
[0:49:06 - 0:49:10] ▶
So we were going to create this this lure and unfortunately at the last minute they pulled the plug.
[0:49:11 - 0:49:16] ▶
They pulled the plug on the project on the project. Yeah, it was called project. It was called
[0:49:16 - 0:49:19] ▶
O'Plan Interloper. I mean, there has been rumors that the government hasn't been too shy about
[0:49:19 - 0:49:27] ▶
creating these type of lures in the past to attract an HI activity to attract UAP activity.
[0:49:28 - 0:49:36] ▶
Namely, now this goes into a lot of what Jake Barber talked about. Now, you know, before we had
[0:49:37 - 0:49:46] ▶
psychics, now it's psionics before it was UFOs, now it's UAP before it was an HI,
[0:49:46 - 0:49:50] ▶
now before it was extraterrestrial, now it's an HI. It's all these these other terms. Right.
[0:49:50 - 0:49:55] ▶
But all three of these terms were used by Mr. Barber in his recent three-hour podcast with
[0:49:55 - 0:50:01] ▶
Ross Kultard. And I wanted to get into that a little bit because I think you've already touched
[0:50:01 - 0:50:07] ▶
on it and had said that these these objects that he's describing these egg-like objects are not
[0:50:07 - 0:50:13] ▶
they're not these weather balloons are not ours and they're not ours.
[0:50:14 - 0:50:19] ▶
He reported that they have specific psionic teams taking these things or at least bringing them
[0:50:20 - 0:50:30] ▶
into range to where they can take them down. Is that something that you've been read into in the
[0:50:30 - 0:50:37] ▶
past? Have you been read to any of these programs regarding psionics? So let's let's break it down. I
[0:50:37 - 0:50:41] ▶
think for the purposes of your listener what psionics means. Sure. Because you obviously know what it
[0:50:41 - 0:50:47] ▶
means but but the word psionics is something that is not it's not a general term. The sci-fi term.
[0:50:47 - 0:50:53] ▶
Right. It's a sci-fi term. So psionics comes from the base word of psychic.
[0:50:53 - 0:50:58] ▶
Sci-psychology, psychic, whatever. And we're dealing with the brain. And potentially
[0:50:59 - 0:51:05] ▶
human cognition and things like that. There is some speculation. Remember we talked about
[0:51:07 - 0:51:11] ▶
technical interfaces with brainwaves right so that technology already exists. If you were a
[0:51:11 - 0:51:17] ▶
super sophisticated society would it make sense to create technology that you could potentially
[0:51:17 - 0:51:25] ▶
interface with manipulate work with using brainwave functions instead of necessarily you know
[0:51:25 - 0:51:30] ▶
wasting the time for the signal to go down to the hand and make you know make a movement which by
[0:51:30 - 0:51:34] ▶
the way is not very precise. I think there's an argument to say for that. Has then you have to
[0:51:34 - 0:51:39] ▶
ask a question. Has US government in the past been involved with psionic type research or psychic
[0:51:39 - 0:51:45] ▶
research? And the answer is again a definitive yes. Of course. Now note through programs like
[0:51:45 - 0:51:49] ▶
Stargate and Grillflame before that. That's the other land. That's right. That the US
[0:51:49 - 0:51:53] ▶
government and her adversaries have had a long and deep rich history in doing using psychic research
[0:51:53 - 0:52:01] ▶
and using it for the purposes of espionage and clutch of data. That's a fact. Anybody can
[0:52:02 - 0:52:06] ▶
look that up and it was actually very very successful. Then you have to ask the question well fine
[0:52:06 - 0:52:13] ▶
but do we really accept that now in society? The answer again is a definitive yes. Look at a lot
[0:52:13 - 0:52:18] ▶
of local police force will employ psychics and by the way to a great deal of of effect they've
[0:52:18 - 0:52:24] ▶
actually solved murderers and found bodies using psychics right now. People can put all their
[0:52:24 - 0:52:29] ▶
long the bottom line is it works. Now how it works maybe a different story and we can you know debate
[0:52:29 - 0:52:33] ▶
that all day long but the bottom line is proof is in the pudding. Statistically there is something
[0:52:33 - 0:52:38] ▶
there whatever that means and however it works. So that's already we've read across that bridge. We
[0:52:38 - 0:52:44] ▶
don't have to argue that that that it is what it is. So is it possible now to your question specific
[0:52:44 - 0:52:50] ▶
question is it possible that the US government employed certain individuals who had a predisposition
[0:52:50 - 0:52:57] ▶
to some of this phenomena psychic phenomena whether you call it remote viewing or channeling or
[0:52:57 - 0:53:02] ▶
psychic or what you can use your name to shore to try to interface with or communicate with a
[0:53:02 - 0:53:09] ▶
non-human intelligence. Well I think it'd be foolish to assume that we didn't or we wouldn't
[0:53:09 - 0:53:14] ▶
given that our our previous history in human cognition. The question is have you
[0:53:16 - 0:53:23] ▶
has the government found success in there? I can't answer that. I don't know. I'm not surprised
[0:53:23 - 0:53:30] ▶
that the allegations are there because certainly if I had unlimited budget and I was in charge I would
[0:53:30 - 0:53:36] ▶
try throwing everything at it trying to figure out how it works. And people say well that's a bunch
[0:53:36 - 0:53:43] ▶
of who you and say look here the bottom line is you know how we tell if people are dead or not in
[0:53:43 - 0:53:46] ▶
the hospital brainwave functions. Sure and when there's no brainwave function people are presumed
[0:53:46 - 0:53:52] ▶
to be dead. Now what is brainwave function? Now some can argue say well they're actually still alive
[0:53:52 - 0:53:56] ▶
yeah yeah yeah maybe but let's argument say we use brainwave function to determine if a human
[0:53:56 - 0:54:01] ▶
being is still alive or not and braveway brain to detect brainwave function is nothing more than
[0:54:01 - 0:54:06] ▶
electrical process going on in the brain and we have technology that can detect it and actually say
[0:54:06 - 0:54:11] ▶
yes there's higher functioning of the brain or know this person to the vegetative state very
[0:54:11 - 0:54:15] ▶
little chance are going to come back that part of the brain is shut down. And how do we know that
[0:54:15 - 0:54:18] ▶
because we have technical equipment that can detect it we know that that's a fact and that's
[0:54:18 - 0:54:23] ▶
technology we accept all the time every day. So does it make sense that if that if that is
[0:54:23 - 0:54:29] ▶
real that there is an actual physics behind brainwave function and we can detect it which we do
[0:54:30 - 0:54:36] ▶
does that also apply to something else that may have some sort of brain or higher brain function
[0:54:36 - 0:54:41] ▶
and can we is there a way to interface with their form of brainwave function and therefore
[0:54:41 - 0:54:48] ▶
setting up tests where you could have people try to to if you will interface or in some
[0:54:48 - 0:54:53] ▶
somehow have been alleged that there's some sort of conjuring capability there I don't know
[0:54:53 - 0:54:57] ▶
that to be fact I know there's a lot of people out in yeah or or high jacking. High jacking right
[0:54:57 - 0:55:02] ▶
you know it's certainly very interesting and there was even in a Russian something called
[0:55:03 - 0:55:07] ▶
psychotronic so I'm not sure if you're familiar with that but the psych- psychotronic weapon
[0:55:07 - 0:55:11] ▶
development system and by the way the CIA also invested in that might know that to be fact
[0:55:11 - 0:55:15] ▶
and that is the ability to use human brainwave functions with a piece of technology to affect
[0:55:16 - 0:55:21] ▶
matter now think about that for a minute people talk about telekinesis the bottom line is that
[0:55:21 - 0:55:25] ▶
there are ways to to interpret brainwave functions using technology a technological interface
[0:55:25 - 0:55:31] ▶
and then affecting change and we talked about that with with you know even the god helmet and
[0:55:31 - 0:55:36] ▶
other experiments we're working on where we can use the pros of the mirror and that's right
[0:55:36 - 0:55:41] ▶
all these other experiments but back to back to mr. barber um you know because what he's coming out with
[0:55:41 - 0:55:47] ▶
recently seems to be I mean it seems to be obviously a lot for a lot of people because you know not
[0:55:48 - 0:55:56] ▶
only did we go into he you know was part of a team that recovered a craft that was of exotic origin
[0:55:56 - 0:56:04] ▶
but also talked about being recruited as someone with psionic ability also talked about using other
[0:56:05 - 0:56:15] ▶
factions that are non-governmental contractors and using their technology to help down some of these
[0:56:16 - 0:56:22] ▶
things when they're in close proximity and then also about other crafts that were recovered
[0:56:22 - 0:56:30] ▶
that somehow had some emotional effect on him and you know this gets it gets woo really fast
[0:56:30 - 0:56:37] ▶
when listening to a lot of this stuff and you know I know there are a lot of listeners out there
[0:56:38 - 0:56:43] ▶
that when they hear of anything other than uap they're out because it took them so long
[0:56:43 - 0:56:49] ▶
to even get to uap but we do have to understand that something's piloting these things
[0:56:50 - 0:56:55] ▶
these uap you know maybe they're flying themselves but at some level something is piloting these
[0:56:55 - 0:57:00] ▶
can't have a conversation about extreme advanced technology without then having the conversation
[0:57:00 - 0:57:07] ▶
of who built it how does it work yeah why are they doing right and these are the follow on questions
[0:57:07 - 0:57:11] ▶
yes I understand it can be disturbing for a lot of people um and people say well our government
[0:57:11 - 0:57:16] ▶
never would be involved in anything like that you know using individual to do certain things and
[0:57:16 - 0:57:21] ▶
well look if that's what you think I don't know what to tell you but there's lots of examples
[0:57:21 - 0:57:25] ▶
where we have I mean we've done some pretty heinous stuff in experiments on human beings without
[0:57:25 - 0:57:30] ▶
their permission look at the CIA's use of LSD when we try to look at Canada how to handle that too
[0:57:30 - 0:57:35] ▶
by the way look at the the syphilist experiments right where we allowed human beings to die when we had
[0:57:35 - 0:57:40] ▶
the cure simply because we wanted to see what happened right so there's a long laundry
[0:57:40 - 0:57:47] ▶
history of malfeasance and things that people have done in the name of national security that wound
[0:57:47 - 0:57:52] ▶
up being absolutely atrocious and heinous and you know yeah if if there are children who are
[0:57:52 - 0:57:59] ▶
predisposed to having some sort of psychic capability as as stated by some individuals are their
[0:57:59 - 0:58:05] ▶
individuals in our government that would try to exploit that I think in the past probably sure
[0:58:05 - 0:58:10] ▶
you know and I've got my personal reasons for saying that but I also want to be very careful not
[0:58:11 - 0:58:15] ▶
to be conspiratorial because I don't have first hand knowledge I have I've heard the rumors
[0:58:15 - 0:58:21] ▶
are now is an a tip of this going on but I was never part of that effort of you to be clear you
[0:58:21 - 0:58:27] ▶
heard of the rumors of the psionics teams I heard rumors and psionics teams or you heard rumors of
[0:58:27 - 0:58:32] ▶
the psionics team bringing down craft not bringing down craft of trying to use human brains to try
[0:58:32 - 0:58:40] ▶
to interface with interface some of these things whatever that is correct but again I wasn't there
[0:58:40 - 0:58:44] ▶
for the experiments I don't know this is just kind of the hearsay that I heard when I was at a tip
[0:58:45 - 0:58:49] ▶
and then afterwards it makes sense when you look at the government's interests into people like
[0:58:49 - 0:58:54] ▶
Chris Bledso and why that would be so valuable if he could just summon them at will right you know
[0:58:54 - 0:59:00] ▶
if that was the case then that would be absolutely you know a leg up on the competition sure sure
[0:59:00 - 0:59:05] ▶
I you know I've there's a lot of weird stuff as a kid I experienced I don't never talk about
[0:59:05 - 0:59:11] ▶
it publicly but you know I've there's been times I've kind of scratched my head and say huh what was
[0:59:11 - 0:59:16] ▶
that was that coincidence sir was that yeah something else as someone did someone plan this to you
[0:59:16 - 0:59:22] ▶
know it's it's certainly not outside the realm of possibility and by the way for the record the
[0:59:22 - 0:59:29] ▶
whistleblower they referring to that came forward he is who he is he was a special operator he's
[0:59:29 - 0:59:34] ▶
an American hero he's not a lot for his country now whether his observation and his perspective is
[0:59:34 - 0:59:40] ▶
accurate I think he's telling his truth and I think people need to understand he put to put
[0:59:41 - 0:59:45] ▶
himself to a lot of risk Jake did for having this conversation with America now for the record I've
[0:59:45 - 0:59:50] ▶
never met the guy but I have special operator friends of mine who I've worked with that were actually
[0:59:50 - 0:59:56] ▶
there with him and providing some security support and have said hey this guy is legit and here's
[0:59:56 - 1:00:02] ▶
his background and these are the missions he's been on so he he is part of that elite group of the
[1:00:02 - 1:00:06] ▶
best to the best of our country and I know it's kind of difficult for a lot of people to absorb
[1:00:06 - 1:00:10] ▶
that you have this guy that's coming out kind of out of the blue and making these claims but I
[1:00:10 - 1:00:16] ▶
think I think everybody deserves to be heard have you seen heard or know of any other egg type
[1:00:16 - 1:00:25] ▶
crafts at a tip yes you have more than one boy yes there's a story I'm dying
[1:00:25 - 1:00:36] ▶
to tell you hopefully I can get clear at some point to say it that has to do with this has to
[1:00:36 - 1:00:43] ▶
do with with egg shaped vehicles yeah have you ever noticed seen heard of or heard whispers of any
[1:00:43 - 1:00:49] ▶
type of language or symbols apparent on these craft yes if I show you picture can you confirm or deny
[1:00:49 - 1:00:55] ▶
it depends can I try sure I'm gonna put my old main glasses on for the record this is gray and
[1:00:57 - 1:01:03] ▶
not blonde or so I'm an old dude I need as much help as I can get this is this is an image this is
[1:01:03 - 1:01:10] ▶
now someone has taken the liberty of of pointing some of these symbols out and saying that there is
[1:01:22 - 1:01:26] ▶
some type of resemblance to this language this is really interesting when I was at the Pentagon
[1:01:26 - 1:01:38] ▶
I spent considerable time researching ancient script and hieroglyphics and symbology from and
[1:01:38 - 1:01:47] ▶
uh even uh cuneiform and to see if there was any similarity on what was seen on the outside of
[1:01:48 - 1:01:57] ▶
these vehicles which appear to be some sort of glyph or ruin if you will um I'm not familiar with
[1:01:57 - 1:02:07] ▶
this actual one but but you are familiar with oh absolutely they're being symbols on the outside
[1:02:07 - 1:02:13] ▶
yeah which by the way it's significant that means something look when you have what what let's
[1:02:14 - 1:02:18] ▶
break this down from a from a human and a scientific perspective what is the pearl I see your notes
[1:02:18 - 1:02:23] ▶
there what is the purpose of of written script what is it uh to communicate that's right to communicate
[1:02:23 - 1:02:30] ▶
and and more importantly there's a way to communicate when you are reading notes or you see a word
[1:02:30 - 1:02:37] ▶
I like to just kind of give it away how do you detect it what how do you how do you how do you how
[1:02:38 - 1:02:44] ▶
do you how can you read written script because you have eyes right it's a visual thing people who
[1:02:44 - 1:02:50] ▶
are blind can't read sure so they use braille so whenever you have reports that a a a a a a UAP
[1:02:50 - 1:02:58] ▶
UFO has something written on it there's a few things that you can summarize immediately first and
[1:02:58 - 1:03:04] ▶
foremost that they're communicating something you don't write something unless there's a meaning
[1:03:04 - 1:03:08] ▶
behind it whether it's a Chinese character or uh you know a English ancient Elizabethian English
[1:03:08 - 1:03:17] ▶
yeah right or even going back to some of the older forms of of written communication you're conveying
[1:03:17 - 1:03:22] ▶
an idea a thought or a directive and you're doing it through visual sight so that means whoever that
[1:03:22 - 1:03:27] ▶
is intended to see and whoever wrote it chances are they have eyes or they look they use the the
[1:03:27 - 1:03:33] ▶
electro optical spectrum to to discern their environments and that's not to discern or from humans
[1:03:33 - 1:03:38] ▶
and other animals on this planet and that there's a higher brain function you know dogs don't use
[1:03:38 - 1:03:43] ▶
writing they don't they don't you know read dictionaries it's only a human thing in fact of all
[1:03:43 - 1:03:49] ▶
the animals on our planet and all the primates the only animal that actually use written communication
[1:03:49 - 1:03:56] ▶
are human beings right ever since we were living in caves and we were painting animals that we
[1:03:56 - 1:04:01] ▶
hunted and and and and painting our palm print the human print on that side of that cave
[1:04:01 - 1:04:06] ▶
we're the only ones that do that so when you come across in this particular case a UAP that
[1:04:07 - 1:04:14] ▶
has some sort of writing on it there's some assumptions and presumption that can be made
[1:04:14 - 1:04:18] ▶
immediately yeah and that there may be not that dissimilar from us now maybe it simply is like
[1:04:18 - 1:04:23] ▶
we ever had a Jeep you know and you have those upside down stickers if you can read this flip me
[1:04:23 - 1:04:26] ▶
back over right maybe it's something like that or if you can read this you know phone home for me
[1:04:26 - 1:04:31] ▶
because I'm in trouble or maybe it means something else um but yeah we we looked at that at AIT
[1:04:31 - 1:04:38] ▶
as says wondering if there's some sort of intent that we can glean from from script because you were
[1:04:38 - 1:04:46] ▶
aware of craft that had script on it and not just me no there's there's there's there's a lot of
[1:04:46 - 1:04:52] ▶
yeah it's it's pretty undeniable at this point that were the was it written or engraved in
[1:04:52 - 1:04:58] ▶
these crafts no it was it was engraved it wasn't written it was it did it look not too dissimilar
[1:04:58 - 1:05:02] ▶
from what I just showed you yeah more if much more precise than that actually I mean there's no doubt
[1:05:02 - 1:05:07] ▶
about what you showed me there is someone's interpretation of what could be either script or could
[1:05:07 - 1:05:12] ▶
be just scratches and and and a book the ablative process of of it was very it was very blatant oh
[1:05:12 - 1:05:19] ▶
oh yeah like clear looking at that yeah it's like hey that's that's there for an intended purpose
[1:05:19 - 1:05:25] ▶
you've seen these on egg crafts let me do a polite pass on that it was on a it was on a on a
[1:05:25 - 1:05:34] ▶
a different craft but the egg craft is something that is people are now just saying oh this is a
[1:05:34 - 1:05:38] ▶
new form of you if it knows not we've been and and not just us this is there are people if the
[1:05:38 - 1:05:44] ▶
story ever comes out we have been dealing with this shape for a long time it's not new people
[1:05:44 - 1:05:48] ▶
think it's new it is not at all very interesting intelligence information about that I cannot go
[1:05:48 - 1:05:55] ▶
into any detail I'm very hopeful that information will probably come up soon enough not by me but
[1:05:55 - 1:06:00] ▶
some scientists who actually research some of this stuff and it is not new to our intelligence
[1:06:00 - 1:06:05] ▶
community either I mean we've been hearing about egg crafts with symbols on it since Lonnie's
[1:06:05 - 1:06:09] ▶
Amora you know we've also spoken to Chris Bledso who he described his as being an egg as well
[1:06:09 - 1:06:16] ▶
so these things tend to tend to pop up but more than that in both of these stories they have
[1:06:17 - 1:06:25] ▶
some type of intelligent being on the inside well and if you if you think about an egg it's
[1:06:25 - 1:06:30] ▶
almost nature's perfect solution it is the egg shape is there's a reason why it is it is what it
[1:06:30 - 1:06:36] ▶
is yeah it's perfect it's perfect and it's extremely resilient to external forces try again
[1:06:36 - 1:06:42] ▶
there's an old trick where you can take an egg and try to smash it with your fingers you know it's
[1:06:42 - 1:06:46] ▶
very tough to do and so there's a reason you could even summarize a reason why some of our early
[1:06:46 - 1:06:51] ▶
space capsules almost had that little bit of a egg shape to it because it's very resistant to
[1:06:51 - 1:06:55] ▶
earth's atmosphere when you're coming in on reentry it's a very efficient shape it is naturally
[1:06:55 - 1:07:01] ▶
aerodynamic naturally so there's a lot of there's a lot of advantages to to to having something
[1:07:01 - 1:07:08] ▶
the shape of an egg in fact if you look at world war two and some more bombs they look like
[1:07:08 - 1:07:12] ▶
eggs with fins on them you know there's a reason for that is because of the efficiency of that shape
[1:07:12 - 1:07:17] ▶
I mean it's really interesting you know that we're talking about this because to me this just
[1:07:18 - 1:07:22] ▶
communicates that we also have data specific data on crafts that are very close up very HD very
[1:07:22 - 1:07:32] ▶
I mean that type of information
[1:07:33 - 1:07:37] ▶
leads me to believe that you know the information that we were given with the Tick-Tack the gimbal
[1:07:40 - 1:07:46] ▶
the go fast was all just preparatory because if you're holding on to that type of clear imagery
[1:07:46 - 1:07:53] ▶
it was re it really cements the idea that it's a planned dissemination to the public is it but
[1:07:54 - 1:08:00] ▶
let me ask you something if you were in charge for just a day and you know that this whole experiment
[1:08:00 - 1:08:05] ▶
only works because people have faith and confidence in you right this is this is a term we call
[1:08:05 - 1:08:10] ▶
we call catastrophic disclosure versus control disclosure I know people hate that idea you're
[1:08:10 - 1:08:14] ▶
controlling you know I'm no right to control but look if if if really there is there is even a
[1:08:14 - 1:08:19] ▶
remote possibility that this really could be destabilizing conversation then it is a responsible move
[1:08:19 - 1:08:26] ▶
to handle this in a in a in a very methodical manner sure right because you don't want to
[1:08:26 - 1:08:31] ▶
disrupt low at the end of the people start to pay their mortgages and pay your cell phone bills
[1:08:31 - 1:08:34] ▶
yeah I'm gonna pta meaning you gotta take the kids a soccer I think we all get it but it's the
[1:08:34 - 1:08:38] ▶
admission of that I think that people have a hard time with it's not so much the act of it but
[1:08:38 - 1:08:43] ▶
brother look you already had a former director of national intelligence state for the record that
[1:08:43 - 1:08:48] ▶
these things are real whatever they are you know former director the CIA to former presidents
[1:08:48 - 1:08:52] ▶
of the United States you've got other elected leaders in other countries all saying it I mean
[1:08:52 - 1:08:56] ▶
people so well wondering if I have disclosure I said look you already have it we're we've crossed
[1:08:56 - 1:09:01] ▶
the brewbacana right now the question is what are we gonna do about and how are we gonna have it
[1:09:01 - 1:09:04] ▶
may not be the flavor of disclosure you want yeah but you already have the government look you have
[1:09:04 - 1:09:08] ▶
you have the setting up of arrow yeah I know there's some hiccups there and they still kind of
[1:09:08 - 1:09:12] ▶
dorken around but that'll be fixed very soon yeah you have a new administration and the United
[1:09:12 - 1:09:16] ▶
States that is very proactive in this topic wants the American people to know the truth and think
[1:09:16 - 1:09:20] ▶
they American people can handle the truth and by the way same with our elected officials for the
[1:09:20 - 1:09:23] ▶
first time we have a bipartisan issue that both Democrats and Republicans can agree with and say yeah
[1:09:23 - 1:09:29] ▶
you know what Americans deserve the truth so we've already had disclosure big D as people call it
[1:09:29 - 1:09:36] ▶
it's just maybe not the flavor people are expecting well I think a lot of people are just of
[1:09:36 - 1:09:41] ▶
a simpler you know sort of mind where they're like we'll just show me what you got you know and I
[1:09:41 - 1:09:48] ▶
think that's what it really comes down to with a lot of people's frustrations is is not that yeah
[1:09:48 - 1:09:53] ▶
transparency it's a transparency issue exactly and this is this is what motivates me I agree look I
[1:09:53 - 1:09:58] ▶
think we need to level with with the American people I think we need a level with the world and let's
[1:09:58 - 1:10:02] ▶
face it look if we know they aren't adversarial that is right well even if they are adversarial we
[1:10:02 - 1:10:07] ▶
need to know and and look the dumbest secret there is is that the Canadians have been dealing with this
[1:10:07 - 1:10:14] ▶
the U.S. has been dealing with this the Mexican been dealing with this South American dealing with it
[1:10:14 - 1:10:17] ▶
Europe's been dealing with their Russians and Chinese and the is it the worst kept secret at this
[1:10:17 - 1:10:21] ▶
point you know was it possible that maybe this is the one conversation that can actually get
[1:10:21 - 1:10:26] ▶
countries that are adversarial to each other say look for this one thing let's agree to agree
[1:10:26 - 1:10:31] ▶
and let's work together on this you know and I will make a treaty I promise I will not exploit
[1:10:31 - 1:10:35] ▶
this technology to hurt you and you have to do the same thing let's work together scientifically
[1:10:35 - 1:10:40] ▶
on this because maybe it'll help us as humanity move forward clean energy solutions for example or
[1:10:40 - 1:10:46] ▶
better medical look what only has to look at the 10 years of one decade that we had the space
[1:10:46 - 1:10:51] ▶
race with the then Soviet Union right now Russia what happened during the Apollo years we went from
[1:10:51 - 1:10:56] ▶
1960 to 1969 to putting a person on the moon and we did it almost routinely if you can imagine that
[1:10:56 - 1:11:03] ▶
right what happened as a result well over 6,200 industries not products industries were a result
[1:11:03 - 1:11:12] ▶
of that one decade of competition to get into space and ultimately get on the moon things like
[1:11:12 - 1:11:18] ▶
the LED light bulb things like the CAT scan that have outlived their initial intended purpose
[1:11:18 - 1:11:23] ▶
and have changed the well-being of humanity for the good forever right yeah and so and that's
[1:11:24 - 1:11:31] ▶
just 10 years of trying to get to to the moon can you imagine this type of technology
[1:11:31 - 1:11:36] ▶
uh the potential benefits it could have for our species now with that said there's the counter
[1:11:36 - 1:11:43] ▶
argument right of course every time like looking nuclear energy yeah they can power a city but it can
[1:11:43 - 1:11:46] ▶
also ignore destroy so you can't ignore it because there are rogue nations out there that will say
[1:11:46 - 1:11:51] ▶
hmm well if I can fly from here to there almost instantly and be not be seen then I can put a weapon
[1:11:51 - 1:11:56] ▶
on that thing right and now all of a sudden uh oh you know Pandora's box has been open and there's
[1:11:56 - 1:12:00] ▶
a liability there so you know maybe it's we need to have a conversation an adult conversation
[1:12:00 - 1:12:06] ▶
with the rest of the world you know and I'm not talking like United Nations I'm talking bigger like
[1:12:07 - 1:12:11] ▶
a no kidding eight guys we got to get to the table on this because we're gonna wind up you don't
[1:12:11 - 1:12:16] ▶
want to die we don't want to die we don't want to kill each other with this you know this is
[1:12:16 - 1:12:19] ▶
this is like for real real psych nuclear weapons right you know let's let's not use them if we can
[1:12:20 - 1:12:25] ▶
yeah this is the like the Manhattan project on steroids that's right but if for smart we'll
[1:12:25 - 1:12:29] ▶
will do this as for peaceful purposes yeah for once for once and I think we can and by the way
[1:12:29 - 1:12:35] ▶
the reason why I have hope is not because of my generation my generation is paranoid we screwed
[1:12:36 - 1:12:41] ▶
this topic up long enough we've hit it we suppressed it and then we ruined people's life for it
[1:12:41 - 1:12:45] ▶
it's your generation because when I had to have secret conversations about this topic in the Pentagon
[1:12:45 - 1:12:50] ▶
it was always because we were afraid of the reaction we were gonna get the this whole reaction
[1:12:51 - 1:12:55] ▶
in the fear your generation which is the generation of my daughters see much more open to this
[1:12:55 - 1:13:01] ▶
it's much more hey listen we really need to get to the bottom this because there could be a benefit
[1:13:02 - 1:13:05] ▶
here and look we don't want to have a war with Russia we don't want to have a war with China we
[1:13:05 - 1:13:09] ▶
can we all just get along for once and yeah and try to work this out because this involves all of
[1:13:09 - 1:13:12] ▶
humanity and that gives me encouragement that's why I think the time is now to have this conversation
[1:13:12 - 1:13:17] ▶
because unlike before previous generations like mine that completely botched this topic
[1:13:17 - 1:13:22] ▶
your generation actually seems to be more open and more responsible about it and I think it's
[1:13:23 - 1:13:29] ▶
partly because of this type of technology when I was in high school if I wanted to learn about
[1:13:29 - 1:13:35] ▶
the Andy's mountains I had to go to a library pick up a cycle of pdf of the shelf that was probably
[1:13:35 - 1:13:39] ▶
10 or 15 years old already luckily maybe the page was still there wasn't ripped out for some other
[1:13:39 - 1:13:44] ▶
kids project you know and and I got about a paragraph a paragraph and a half about the Andy's mountains
[1:13:44 - 1:13:49] ▶
now in virtually any language instantaneously in anywhere part of the world you can pull up on your
[1:13:49 - 1:13:54] ▶
phone all the information you want and have volumes of volumes of volumes volumes about the Andy's
[1:13:54 - 1:13:59] ▶
mountains how they were made and the precipitation rate and the population and erosion rates and all
[1:13:59 - 1:14:04] ▶
that stuff right you have more information at the tip of your hand for the first time the the world
[1:14:04 - 1:14:10] ▶
is connected like never before there's great power in that because for the first time your
[1:14:10 - 1:14:16] ▶
generation can understand how people in your generation in China feel right and you can
[1:14:16 - 1:14:21] ▶
communicate and how people in Iran feel and people in Russia and China and UK and France and Germany
[1:14:21 - 1:14:27] ▶
and and if you don't understand the language it'll automatically be translated for you so that
[1:14:27 - 1:14:32] ▶
that that communication barrier is has been evaporated and also the cultural barrier you guys are
[1:14:32 - 1:14:38] ▶
far more accepting of new ideas new principles new new perspectives then mine look I grew up in a
[1:14:38 - 1:14:46] ▶
generation where there was I was on the tail end of literally where they were we had separation
[1:14:46 - 1:14:51] ▶
of races can you imagine that right how foolish and silly is that and now it's like my god what
[1:14:51 - 1:14:57] ▶
what the hell were people thinking right yeah but that wasn't associated nor was it expect norm when
[1:14:57 - 1:15:01] ▶
I was in the military we're always told don't ask don't tell right and oh homosexuality in
[1:15:01 - 1:15:06] ▶
in a military is bad well it's silly it's stupid what the hell did we ever care why because we
[1:15:06 - 1:15:12] ▶
were ignorant my my generation made these dumb rules because we didn't know better your generation
[1:15:12 - 1:15:19] ▶
is not that way you don't have these preconceived notions of what shouldn't shouldn't be you use
[1:15:19 - 1:15:25] ▶
common sense and I think that's why the timing is like never been before because we've never had
[1:15:25 - 1:15:30] ▶
the technology before and we've also never had a generation like yours before and that those two
[1:15:30 - 1:15:36] ▶
perfect storms allow us to have a conversation like this great I mean that that gives me some hope
[1:15:36 - 1:15:42] ▶
you know the one that one of the scariest things that I've ever heard was I think it was
[1:15:42 - 1:15:47] ▶
how put off I who said this and if the military if the government discovered a drop of water the
[1:15:47 - 1:15:57] ▶
first thing they're going to do is figure out how to drown you in it yep and you know part of
[1:15:57 - 1:16:02] ▶
me is thankful for that because and you can say what you want but if we didn't invent the
[1:16:02 - 1:16:07] ▶
nuke first right this this podcast would not be happening that's right and that's that's pretty
[1:16:07 - 1:16:12] ▶
much a fact I'm speaking a different language perhaps absolutely but at the same time you know
[1:16:12 - 1:16:17] ▶
it's you bring up a really interesting point um there is this weird if you look at from a biological
[1:16:17 - 1:16:23] ▶
perspective an sociological perspective this this um I guess the best way to describe this
[1:16:23 - 1:16:31] ▶
tribalism ancient mankind had a small circle of people within their tribe maybe living in a cave
[1:16:31 - 1:16:39] ▶
living in a hut whatever and that was your reality and everybody else were enemies right because
[1:16:39 - 1:16:43] ▶
they were good it was we were living in an environment where we were resource starved so either
[1:16:43 - 1:16:48] ▶
I ate or you ate and if you ate I didn't and so we had this weird competition and then as society
[1:16:48 - 1:16:55] ▶
expanded into the village it became now a village mentality and we saw right books now you know
[1:16:55 - 1:16:59] ▶
and takes a village right so our society and our little our little little myopic society that
[1:16:59 - 1:17:04] ▶
that we kind of encapsulate ourselves and and everybody else is out there in the enemy and we're
[1:17:04 - 1:17:08] ▶
we're gonna stick together and then you had the urbanization and and once we became we kind of
[1:17:08 - 1:17:14] ▶
entered this this point of agriculturalism and we weren't nomads anymore we kind of kind of
[1:17:14 - 1:17:19] ▶
gravitated to to a central region and and and and attracted more people so that popular the
[1:17:19 - 1:17:24] ▶
population density became greater until eventually you had regional areas and then eventually you
[1:17:24 - 1:17:30] ▶
had borders of nations right United States and you're a Canadian and you're a Mexican and you know
[1:17:30 - 1:17:36] ▶
but as we continue to push our boundaries we begin to realize that we're really all the same
[1:17:37 - 1:17:42] ▶
and this is something that I've tried to tell people look if you're ever in space and you look
[1:17:43 - 1:17:46] ▶
down at the earth you don't see the lines between countries we're all together we're all together
[1:17:46 - 1:17:51] ▶
well you know we go so well i'm American what does that mean you know because people in South
[1:17:51 - 1:17:56] ▶
America they're Americans too they're just South Americans versus North American versus Central
[1:17:56 - 1:17:59] ▶
America we're all in this together um and uh but we're fighting instinct because our instinct is
[1:17:59 - 1:18:05] ▶
to be tribal our instinct is my loyalties to my people my country my family my this my that
[1:18:05 - 1:18:10] ▶
and that was a survive in order to survive as a species we needed to animals do the same thing right
[1:18:10 - 1:18:15] ▶
you have a pack of wolves and they stick together and they they go after everything else
[1:18:15 - 1:18:19] ▶
and so that is part of the Darwinian survival and evolution of all things biological because
[1:18:19 - 1:18:24] ▶
why we live in a resource starved environment it's either them or me eat or be eaten but we're now
[1:18:24 - 1:18:30] ▶
realizing if we want to evolve to the next phase of our existence as human beings where we rely on
[1:18:30 - 1:18:36] ▶
this and you know not this not bronze but our brains and our hearts we have to overcome that
[1:18:36 - 1:18:42] ▶
instinct um to to control to dominate to do all the things that nations and religions do in fact
[1:18:42 - 1:18:50] ▶
that is the one thing i think that is stopping our evolution to the next phase of human reality which
[1:18:50 - 1:18:56] ▶
is do we have enough sense to get rid of some of these instinctual habits that we've by the way
[1:18:56 - 1:19:03] ▶
required to survive to get to where we are now likely using the bomb right thank god as it was
[1:19:03 - 1:19:08] ▶
thank god we had it not them but have we been able to outgrow that to the point now where we can
[1:19:08 - 1:19:15] ▶
actually all have a conversation together and say look we're all brothers and sisters i mean not
[1:19:15 - 1:19:21] ▶
agree with you i mean i don't understand you you may not agree with me and understand me but we
[1:19:21 - 1:19:24] ▶
can't agree that humanity's survival as a species demands that we begin to work with each other
[1:19:24 - 1:19:32] ▶
communicate with each other toward a common goal and stop this infighting and competition and
[1:19:32 - 1:19:38] ▶
maybe at some point we'll get to a point where we're not in a resource starved environment we are
[1:19:38 - 1:19:42] ▶
an environment where we don't have that competition and we don't need to have that competition yeah
[1:19:42 - 1:19:47] ▶
yeah great and i think that you know Reagan said it to at the u n meeting there when uh back in
[1:19:47 - 1:19:54] ▶
the day when he was like it would it would take you know an external extraterrestrial threat for
[1:19:54 - 1:20:01] ▶
all of us to like be you know realize that hey we're in this together maybe hopefully it isn't an
[1:20:01 - 1:20:07] ▶
extraterrestrial threat that we're that we're facing um okay i have a question here i have a
[1:20:08 - 1:20:15] ▶
few more questions that we got to get into um you i'm just still fascinated with all the things that
[1:20:15 - 1:20:22] ▶
you've seen and i think that's where i think and i'll speak for a lot of people here i think that's
[1:20:22 - 1:20:28] ▶
the broadly in in a general sense why people are so fascinated with people of in your position
[1:20:28 - 1:20:37] ▶
because you got to peek behind the curtain we did not right so we to a certain extent
[1:20:37 - 1:20:42] ▶
to careful what you wish for i know i just say the dumbest sword that's another question i have but
[1:20:42 - 1:20:48] ▶
for now like you have you know access to the mechanism you have access to at least a portion of
[1:20:48 - 1:20:56] ▶
the mechanism and you get to peek behind the veil and all the rest of us are curious right we're
[1:20:56 - 1:21:02] ▶
curious because it involves mankind it involves our own potential uh religion it involves life
[1:21:02 - 1:21:09] ▶
and death it involves why we're here it involves the questions of the universe it involves the most
[1:21:09 - 1:21:14] ▶
important things that humanity has ever asked for and you potentially had one of the closest
[1:21:14 - 1:21:22] ▶
encounters with the answer that is a great that's heavy man you'll put that on my shoulders are
[1:21:22 - 1:21:29] ▶
you kidding me that is that is what it is that is why people are so passionate about this that is
[1:21:29 - 1:21:36] ▶
why people get fired up whether good or bad or angry or happier they they get fired up because
[1:21:36 - 1:21:42] ▶
this is important this is the big question and you know there aren't so many people that have come
[1:21:42 - 1:21:50] ▶
forward to talk about that and the second we get somebody you know is the the second we need to
[1:21:50 - 1:21:57] ▶
grill them it's it's the second we need to put them through the ranger because you're like you're
[1:21:57 - 1:22:01] ▶
playing with my emotions right and truth whatever that truth is and you're going to come out and
[1:22:01 - 1:22:05] ▶
if you're going to say this is the truth and you know you better prove it exactly and so you know
[1:22:05 - 1:22:09] ▶
you've all people can understand the amount of you know frustration and vitriol and all of this
[1:22:09 - 1:22:15] ▶
stuff combined because deep deep deep down everyone's just hoping for an answer that's just deep down
[1:22:15 - 1:22:22] ▶
but my but my role isn't to provide answers my role is just to provide information it's
[1:22:24 - 1:22:29] ▶
yes who you to find those answers okay this is what I'm trying to tell people well put you know it's
[1:22:29 - 1:22:33] ▶
don't put that responsibility on my show I'm just like you and I'm valuable and I'm a human being
[1:22:33 - 1:22:38] ▶
and I you know wake up and I spill my coffee and you know I'm I'm not a Messiah man that's
[1:22:38 - 1:22:44] ▶
understood that is that my job is simply as a as a purveyor of the information here's the information
[1:22:44 - 1:22:49] ▶
here's the data here's the facts how you interpret that and what you think about that brother that's
[1:22:49 - 1:22:55] ▶
on you not me but a lot of us are not willing to make that answer as long as there's information
[1:22:55 - 1:23:01] ▶
being with help oh great no you're right and that's why we're doing we're doing right here's the
[1:23:01 - 1:23:04] ▶
information we're gonna get more out we do we do want to make those answers and and hopefully
[1:23:04 - 1:23:10] ▶
you know we don't look to anyone else for answers and we can come up with those ourselves but as long
[1:23:10 - 1:23:14] ▶
as we're aware that there is information that is being withheld we can't fully formulate a proper
[1:23:14 - 1:23:19] ▶
answer and some people's frustration my guess is that you have that luxury of formulating some
[1:23:19 - 1:23:25] ▶
type of answer that they would love to formulate themselves makes sense yeah good point um so
[1:23:25 - 1:23:31] ▶
you know forgive me for always you know prying into what it is you've seen but that's the
[1:23:31 - 1:23:36] ▶
underlying value in this is that some of us just want to know more so that we can make our own answers
[1:23:36 - 1:23:42] ▶
sure and that's fair and I think that's a really good point and that's you know
[1:23:42 - 1:23:45] ▶
I guess indirectly some of why do what I do you know I want you to have information so you can
[1:23:46 - 1:23:52] ▶
make your own assessment and this why people say well what do you think you know what to hell with
[1:23:52 - 1:23:56] ▶
what do you think so that's a matter what do you think but matter what you think you know my job is
[1:23:56 - 1:24:00] ▶
this is why you know I was told people when I was a former special agent um and when I was a special
[1:24:00 - 1:24:05] ▶
agent in charge our job is very simple provide the information to the jury let the jury decide
[1:24:05 - 1:24:09] ▶
doesn't matter what I think about it but it doesn't matter how I feel about it it doesn't
[1:24:10 - 1:24:13] ▶
what matters is what does the data suggest what does the math suggest what are what is the the
[1:24:13 - 1:24:19] ▶
collection of data and observations provide and then you allow the people to make that decision
[1:24:19 - 1:24:24] ▶
for themselves correct right and I think it's the problem we have right now in this this UFO
[1:24:24 - 1:24:29] ▶
community which I do not consider myself a u-fologist I'm not a researcher of UFO who's
[1:24:29 - 1:24:34] ▶
having a job that was it paid by the government America taxpayer dollars um I think it's it's
[1:24:34 - 1:24:40] ▶
critical that people be allowed to make their own interpretive decisions for themselves because
[1:24:40 - 1:24:46] ▶
this is the people of course people say a little what do you think does matter what matters what
[1:24:46 - 1:24:51] ▶
you think here's the data you figure that don't be so quick to give up that that sacred right you
[1:24:51 - 1:24:56] ▶
to think but once again we don't have that data right well we get some of it we don't have it you
[1:24:57 - 1:25:02] ▶
know how all of it there's a difference you do have some of it yes we do we do some of it and I know
[1:25:02 - 1:25:05] ▶
it's frustrating because people say they want more I get it I understand well it's because it's
[1:25:05 - 1:25:09] ▶
uh it's like chocolate and it's not and that's not on you that it's frustrating by the way and I know
[1:25:09 - 1:25:14] ▶
you shoulder a lot of that uh and and and and and and just you know to a great extent it's very unfair
[1:25:14 - 1:25:20] ▶
because you have been forthcoming with more information I think than most people would have gotten
[1:25:20 - 1:25:24] ▶
in a lifetime of research uh you know thanks to thanks to the things that you've done coming for
[1:25:24 - 1:25:29] ▶
well thank you I am trying absolutely absolutely and that is undeniable and and I'm willing to
[1:25:29 - 1:25:34] ▶
fight anyone on that um you know but the the problem is once once we scrape the barrel we're like okay
[1:25:34 - 1:25:40] ▶
well what's next right and we know there is a next we know there is something right right um okay
[1:25:40 - 1:25:45] ▶
I think part of the first trailer and let me just completely transparent with you guys
[1:25:45 - 1:25:48] ▶
I do a lot of work behind the shadows behind the scenes in order to get to like where we are now
[1:25:49 - 1:25:54] ▶
um whether it's a new whistleblower that maybe I've been aware of for the last few years or
[1:25:54 - 1:26:00] ▶
uh maybe a secret project that will hopefully blow the lid on a lot of this you know whether through
[1:26:00 - 1:26:07] ▶
a documentary getting the right people to have a conversation the problem is when you do that in
[1:26:07 - 1:26:11] ▶
the dark people think that you're hiding something from them they don't realize that look it's not
[1:26:11 - 1:26:16] ▶
you I don't trust what I don't trust are some of the elements over there that don't want this
[1:26:16 - 1:26:21] ▶
conversation to happen and I can't have the conversation with you without them hearing it so I have
[1:26:21 - 1:26:26] ▶
to do things behind the scenes and in the dark until they become revealed right yes and people look
[1:26:26 - 1:26:31] ▶
at that is oh well that's Lou being secret that's Lou you know uh obfuscating the truth that's
[1:26:31 - 1:26:36] ▶
Lou controlling a narrative no it's not what it's doing is allowing me the time and the ability
[1:26:36 - 1:26:41] ▶
to present the information where someone's not going to take it away from you and that's
[1:26:41 - 1:26:45] ▶
that's why I do a lot of what I do when you when I leave these breadcrumb people say oh on breadcrumb
[1:26:45 - 1:26:50] ▶
that's why you're doing that look if you look for the last seven years everything I've ever said
[1:26:50 - 1:26:54] ▶
has come to pass without exception every single thing and I do that deliberately so people know look
[1:26:54 - 1:27:00] ▶
I am fighting for you I'm working for you behind the scenes I just can't tell you everything
[1:27:00 - 1:27:04] ▶
that I'm doing right now but eventually you'll know and I'm trying to you know I know people say
[1:27:04 - 1:27:08] ▶
well it's been seven years yeah but we've done more than seven years when we have the last 70
[1:27:08 - 1:27:13] ▶
I mean guys I'm working my ass off believe me I'm pulling myself a lot of risk I I lost almost
[1:27:13 - 1:27:18] ▶
everything pursuing this you know and like I said how much are you paying me to do your your
[1:27:18 - 1:27:23] ▶
podcast right now how much are you paying me zero that's right find any podcast or that I've
[1:27:23 - 1:27:27] ▶
taken a penny from you know it's it costs money baby it's it's I'm taking time away from my family
[1:27:27 - 1:27:33] ▶
to have this conversation with people and people don't realize that you know they're you're
[1:27:34 - 1:27:38] ▶
a grifter man you don't know a grifter if that's a grifter you know much money to have right now I'd
[1:27:38 - 1:27:42] ▶
be flying a lear jet you know I deliberately don't do that simply because I don't want to pollute
[1:27:42 - 1:27:48] ▶
the topic and so and I respect that and and I think you know just from my observation I try to
[1:27:48 - 1:27:55] ▶
remain really sort of unbiased from all of this and just look at it from like a perspective
[1:27:55 - 1:28:02] ▶
the spectator perspective and I think there are a lot of other bad actors in this
[1:28:02 - 1:28:08] ▶
specifically oh yeah there's a lot of people with cotton industries that have been
[1:28:09 - 1:28:12] ▶
yeah selling a line of bolt to people for a long time and now they've got to double down triple down
[1:28:12 - 1:28:16] ▶
and and and and there's a lot and there's also a lot of trust me bro yeah right and people are sick
[1:28:16 - 1:28:21] ▶
of the trust me yeah absolutely because there's a lot of it and so you know I guess I guess
[1:28:21 - 1:28:27] ▶
the reason there's probably so much frustration you're going to get hate by the way as I promise you
[1:28:27 - 1:28:32] ▶
yeah just for having me in your I'm aware having this conversation oh lose a grifter he's full of crap
[1:28:32 - 1:28:38] ▶
he doesn't know I mean I've been I've been called the same I'm I'm I'm aware and
[1:28:38 - 1:28:41] ▶
I'm currently unfazed by it because for me this is not only a pursuit for them this is a pursuit for
[1:28:41 - 1:28:48] ▶
myself as well I want to know right and whatever means I have to get that information is is the means
[1:28:48 - 1:28:54] ▶
I'm going to pursue but they they would also lot they would also be lying if they said they wouldn't
[1:28:54 - 1:29:01] ▶
want to be sitting right here and talking with you right now interesting um I think a lot of people
[1:29:01 - 1:29:07] ▶
followed yeah if anything to throw a tomato at me probably fine but if it means getting a little
[1:29:07 - 1:29:15] ▶
bit more a little closer to the answer that they're so desperately seeking then I think it's worthwhile
[1:29:15 - 1:29:21] ▶
but you know the answer here's here's a great point the answer doesn't come externally if and this
[1:29:21 - 1:29:28] ▶
is why I've told people before if you really want to know what's going on out there you first
[1:29:28 - 1:29:32] ▶
got to know what's going on in here yeah and that's if this is the filter for everything we see and we
[1:29:32 - 1:29:36] ▶
conceive and we perceive right and so you have to stop saying I demand the truth give me the truth
[1:29:36 - 1:29:43] ▶
look in the damn mirror and say first of all what can I do to be a better father a better husband
[1:29:43 - 1:29:49] ▶
a better a better citizen right and let me be the best that I can be and then hopefully that whatever
[1:29:49 - 1:29:56] ▶
that is makes more sense sure right because as long as we have these these these these pride and
[1:29:56 - 1:30:02] ▶
ego that so many of us carry around and the inability to look in the mirror and say you know what
[1:30:02 - 1:30:07] ▶
I don't really like that aspect of what I see awareness society was oh you have to love yourself
[1:30:07 - 1:30:11] ▶
you know oh you're the best you know what that affirmation is BS we need to be hypercritical of
[1:30:11 - 1:30:18] ▶
ourselves so we can be better people there's a you I'll share you know if these tattoos here on my
[1:30:18 - 1:30:22] ▶
arm and by the way I don't normally like tattoos but I did it from you know military and other
[1:30:22 - 1:30:26] ▶
stuff what this says it's Latin this is accept and pine it to you it means with regret because
[1:30:26 - 1:30:32] ▶
there are people out there live their lives I have no regrets you know what you're a moron then
[1:30:32 - 1:30:35] ▶
because then you're never going to learn a lesson I have lots of regret I've done things
[1:30:35 - 1:30:40] ▶
that I wish I didn't have to do now if I was putting the same situation again what I do it for my
[1:30:40 - 1:30:44] ▶
country damn right I would but I regret the fact that as humans we had to even be putting that
[1:30:44 - 1:30:48] ▶
situation I never want to forget the faces and the lives of other human beings that maybe you're
[1:30:48 - 1:30:54] ▶
in here anymore right because of things maybe I've done right and so no I I want to remember their
[1:30:54 - 1:31:00] ▶
faces I don't want to glorify that because I'm still a human you know and and I did things
[1:31:00 - 1:31:06] ▶
because I had to because I wanted to and I think we have to be self-reflective I think we have to
[1:31:06 - 1:31:12] ▶
have the courage to look in the mirror and say you know what I can be a better person you're not
[1:31:12 - 1:31:16] ▶
going to be perfect we're humans we're we're never ever going to be perfect but it shouldn't stop
[1:31:16 - 1:31:22] ▶
you from trying to being a better human being and I think that is maybe one of the keys to unlock
[1:31:22 - 1:31:28] ▶
this crater mystery you know we we can't how are we going to give perfect case in one at a general
[1:31:28 - 1:31:35] ▶
about two and a half years ago now it's been a while he says to me after giving him a briefing on this
[1:31:35 - 1:31:40] ▶
topic he says Lou this one I was a US space force because look Lou I really don't care about this all I
[1:31:40 - 1:31:45] ▶
care about is if this thing lands on the White House lawn do I go ahead and extend my hand out
[1:31:45 - 1:31:50] ▶
to shake its hand and and friendship or do I point in him 16 at its head and I looked at my dear
[1:31:50 - 1:31:56] ▶
general you're missing a point it's not an either or solution right both of those may be the wrong
[1:31:56 - 1:32:03] ▶
way to react to this we need to do a better job of of of understanding what's actually going on in
[1:32:03 - 1:32:10] ▶
order to do that you first have to understand how you're wired yourself what makes you tick what
[1:32:10 - 1:32:14] ▶
motivates you because that's going to depend on how you interpret that data is it friendly is a
[1:32:14 - 1:32:20] ▶
threat or is it something completely different and so we all have to be on that same sheet of music
[1:32:20 - 1:32:24] ▶
you know we all have to be have that honest conversation with yourself you know what we're not
[1:32:24 - 1:32:29] ▶
perfect you know what I'm not the best person out there you know what I'm not the prettiest I'm not
[1:32:29 - 1:32:34] ▶
the richest I'm not the most influential you know and yeah I've got some bad habits maybe I
[1:32:34 - 1:32:40] ▶
I don't clean up the bathroom or I drink too much or I'm a gambler whatever that is but be honest
[1:32:41 - 1:32:46] ▶
with yourself man and then make the effort of trying to to to learn those lessons and become a
[1:32:46 - 1:32:52] ▶
better human being because maybe that's what it's going to take to really understand out there
[1:32:52 - 1:32:57] ▶
you got to first understand here I love that I love that thank you for sharing that and I think
[1:32:57 - 1:33:01] ▶
that's a great point and it's it's one of the most refreshing things I've heard in this topic
[1:33:01 - 1:33:07] ▶
because even Jake Barber will get back to him you know he had this sort of this this providence this
[1:33:07 - 1:33:17] ▶
holy moment when he perceived him being contact with whatever emotional feminine energy entity
[1:33:18 - 1:33:26] ▶
was in this craft but that changed him fundamentally you could see that on camera he almost broke
[1:33:26 - 1:33:32] ▶
down into tears just even talking about it it was very real to him and he he said something he said
[1:33:32 - 1:33:38] ▶
something to the likes of everybody should feel this in order to understand you know that
[1:33:38 - 1:33:46] ▶
perspective is everything I don't disagree with that I think he's absolutely right about that yeah
[1:33:46 - 1:33:50] ▶
when and when you have you know I've always I've always stuck to this
[1:33:50 - 1:33:54] ▶
if you understand someone it is impossible to hate them and and and I will die by those words
[1:33:56 - 1:34:04] ▶
think about anyone in your life who you dislike find annoying or hate and now really try and
[1:34:05 - 1:34:11] ▶
understand them really try and walk a mile in their shoes and try to be empathetic to what it is
[1:34:11 - 1:34:17] ▶
their entire story is from beginning to end and and current and that's just hard to do it's really
[1:34:17 - 1:34:22] ▶
hard to do but if you can do that even if you can get close to doing that you find yourself
[1:34:22 - 1:34:27] ▶
feeling all sorts of other feelings for this person right that aren't negative well and think
[1:34:28 - 1:34:33] ▶
about if you've ever been guilty of that same behavior which chances are we have yeah because we're
[1:34:33 - 1:34:37] ▶
human but we don't want to do that and sometimes in life we won't have someone we can point the
[1:34:37 - 1:34:44] ▶
finger to well of course because human beings and it avoids us having to point it out ourselves and
[1:34:44 - 1:34:49] ▶
accept responsibility right yeah the hardest thing to do like I said is look in the mirror and accept
[1:34:49 - 1:34:53] ▶
responsibility and say you know what shoot I could have done better sure you know I did not I did
[1:34:53 - 1:34:58] ▶
not give it my best and I know it yeah and I need to I need to work on that right um and you're
[1:34:58 - 1:35:04] ▶
not without your flaws no more that's something that that you've also been vocal about as well right
[1:35:04 - 1:35:10] ▶
is that yeah mistakes happen things happen to people but you got to own up to it man still you haven't
[1:35:10 - 1:35:16] ▶
given up no you and you know what except responsibility remain accountable it's not that hard yeah it's
[1:35:16 - 1:35:23] ▶
sucks you got to swallow your pride but guess what that's the only way you're gonna you're going to
[1:35:23 - 1:35:28] ▶
succeed you have to under you have to have those lessons learned and if you don't right and for
[1:35:28 - 1:35:34] ▶
me had to be dumb enough I had to put out my arms to remind myself of it um you know you're gonna be
[1:35:34 - 1:35:39] ▶
you're gonna be doomed to repeat those same mistakes over and over and over and over again and
[1:35:39 - 1:35:43] ▶
something magical happens when you actually accept responsibility even though it's a gut punch
[1:35:43 - 1:35:47] ▶
through the pride and ego part all of a sudden you become free it is it is freedom in a way that you
[1:35:47 - 1:35:54] ▶
you would not expect but it's very very liberating and it's also very very I think um
[1:35:54 - 1:36:01] ▶
encouraging and it's uh it's it's it's helpful because you all of a sudden get more out of life
[1:36:02 - 1:36:08] ▶
you begin to appreciate things you wouldn't before you walking in a park and you look at a little
[1:36:09 - 1:36:14] ▶
flower that's growing underneath the tree and we'll say wow that's that's magical how many times
[1:36:14 - 1:36:19] ▶
have I walked by here and never even noticed that or cared right and now all of a sudden wow
[1:36:19 - 1:36:24] ▶
beauty is right there I don't have to go searching for beauty in a vogue magazine or you know a
[1:36:24 - 1:36:29] ▶
New York runway it's right there nature's beauty right there and here I am this entire time
[1:36:29 - 1:36:35] ▶
taking it for granted right so I think you know this is what I know to frustrate people people
[1:36:35 - 1:36:41] ▶
people who say well if I want to really know about that well what's your one suggestion Lou
[1:36:41 - 1:36:45] ▶
say stop worrying about that stop worrying about that um stop worrying about what's in here
[1:36:46 - 1:36:51] ▶
and then maybe you'll unlock the secrets you know get a fresh perspective yep all right let's
[1:36:51 - 1:36:55] ▶
get back to the nuts and bolts this is great I love this by the way thank you for addressing that
[1:36:55 - 1:37:00] ▶
okay bit of a fun question okay if you can get access to any archive out of the 19
[1:37:01 - 1:37:09] ▶
intelligence agencies if you can get full unrestricted access to any of their archives and we're
[1:37:09 - 1:37:15] ▶
talking DOE CIA DOD whatever it is DIA whatever what agency well it's a bit unfair for me because I
[1:37:15 - 1:37:24] ▶
had a very high security clearance you had access to a lot of stuff but I think for me okay if
[1:37:24 - 1:37:31] ▶
you were in my position the CIA and here's the reason why not because it's it's you know the CIA
[1:37:31 - 1:37:37] ▶
it's domestic it's not domestic it's not domestic but more importantly they share a lot of
[1:37:37 - 1:37:42] ▶
information from other agencies goes to the CIA so it's not just CIA information you'd have access
[1:37:42 - 1:37:47] ▶
to you'd have access to a lot of other agencies both domestic and foreign information that
[1:37:48 - 1:37:55] ▶
the CIA has access to it's kind of a belly button if you will and so if you can get into there
[1:37:55 - 1:38:00] ▶
and really have full open access you you would learn a lot um is the DOE interesting as well
[1:38:00 - 1:38:06] ▶
absolutely it is look by law and you think that gives off a certain amount of radiation falls
[1:38:06 - 1:38:11] ▶
under the DOE is there okay so we're speaking about lures earlier right and and how the ocean
[1:38:11 - 1:38:20] ▶
big bodies of water but also you know possibly strife and conflict nuclear war these things seem
[1:38:20 - 1:38:29] ▶
to attract are there any environmental factors that attract them yeah what are some that
[1:38:29 - 1:38:37] ▶
aren't the ocean what are some other environmental factors that you've seen activity in uh or
[1:38:38 - 1:38:43] ▶
atmospheric certain um so there is a lot of information um on this topic that's to suggest that
[1:38:43 - 1:38:51] ▶
uranium mines are particular interest and other mines as well believe it or not gold now if you
[1:38:51 - 1:38:57] ▶
think about it why gold not from a monetary perspective oh what gold is you know gold is a very
[1:38:57 - 1:39:03] ▶
interesting metal and which by the way makes it valuable not because it's a pretty good gold
[1:39:03 - 1:39:07] ▶
it's because the property is a reason why NASA and the Air Force used gold a lot but on the inside of
[1:39:07 - 1:39:12] ▶
radiation properties are all sorts of proper right right i gotta be careful what i say here but
[1:39:12 - 1:39:17] ▶
gold has some very interesting properties and um there has been some information to suggest that
[1:39:18 - 1:39:22] ▶
UAP are interested in mining operations um both uranium and and gold that was also suggested by
[1:39:22 - 1:39:30] ▶
the forechan whistleblower who talked about the underwater instruction unit yeah interesting very
[1:39:30 - 1:39:34] ▶
interesting um i mean if just my brains jumping to area the area school they were close to a uranium
[1:39:34 - 1:39:44] ▶
mine as well um that's not the only one yeah i'm sure there are other mass sightings there's some
[1:39:44 - 1:39:50] ▶
reports governmental reports um i can probably tell that they've been released before you now so
[1:39:50 - 1:39:56] ▶
they were classified um CIA reports uh on mines in the Congo um gold mines where these things were
[1:39:56 - 1:40:03] ▶
were seen by many many people wow um i'll show you two oh i mean they're okay so there's one thing
[1:40:03 - 1:40:11] ▶
being interested in the material but there's another in extracting it
[1:40:11 - 1:40:18] ▶
yep have you any recorded data of observing these UAP extracting anything no
[1:40:19 - 1:40:26] ▶
not i have not doesn't mean it's not the case yeah it means it's not the case but not in my
[1:40:26 - 1:40:30] ▶
experience i haven't seen actually any extraction of minerals from the earth okay the the
[1:40:30 - 1:40:35] ▶
the forechan whistleblower said that like the technology they used was laser somehow and that lasers
[1:40:35 - 1:40:41] ▶
were really interesting and that china was actually using some of these lasers and had figured out
[1:40:41 - 1:40:47] ▶
how to bore these holes and to mine things that left the united states baffles so are we sure it's
[1:40:47 - 1:40:53] ▶
actual laser so laser is very interesting it's in a visible light spectrum and it's a very specific
[1:40:53 - 1:40:59] ▶
frequency of light so green laser only uses green it looks green because it's it's green and the
[1:40:59 - 1:41:04] ▶
photon are coming out very specific frequency blue lasers red lasers um there's things that can be
[1:41:04 - 1:41:10] ▶
confused as lasers directed energy okay that are really not based in in photon or the emission of
[1:41:10 - 1:41:16] ▶
actual light then you also have a in some cases what they call a dopper shift so part of the
[1:41:16 - 1:41:23] ▶
discussion we had an a tip was some of the biological consequences of people getting too close to
[1:41:23 - 1:41:27] ▶
these things right and suffering yeah exactly dopper redshift blue shift what could be coming out
[1:41:27 - 1:41:32] ▶
in let's say a certain radio frequency when it goes through a certain process and perhaps leaves
[1:41:32 - 1:41:40] ▶
the the u a p or the u f o it gets a dopper shifted into a higher frequency that now becomes
[1:41:41 - 1:41:47] ▶
interpreted as visible light or possibly even energy like they could hurt you right um x-ray for
[1:41:47 - 1:41:53] ▶
example um so when someone says well they're using laser technology you can look that way yeah
[1:41:53 - 1:41:59] ▶
does it is it really laser technology or is it something else that we are now superimposing our
[1:41:59 - 1:42:04] ▶
own understanding of physics and go that laser when really it might not be a laser per se but it's
[1:42:04 - 1:42:09] ▶
interpreted that way yeah it has laser like properties right right okay has there been through
[1:42:09 - 1:42:16] ▶
what you've been shown any reason to believe that the the NHI or the u a p that you've been
[1:42:16 - 1:42:27] ▶
observing has a distinct and perhaps adverse effect on our religious beliefs well you don't have
[1:42:27 - 1:42:36] ▶
to look at aliens and u a foes a lot of things can can can threaten religion but was there anything
[1:42:36 - 1:42:42] ▶
specifically that you know because there has been talks of Jesus in Bibles and stuff let me explain
[1:42:42 - 1:42:49] ▶
let me make this wait there's nothing that I'm aware of okay that that threatens or hinders my
[1:42:49 - 1:42:54] ▶
own interpretation of of spiritualism and religion sure but we can look back in the past for
[1:42:54 - 1:43:00] ▶
example look at Galileo Galileo when he first proposed the the the non-earth centric view of our
[1:43:00 - 1:43:05] ▶
solar system and proposed the heliocentric view of our solar system what happened well religion
[1:43:05 - 1:43:09] ▶
responded very violently and almost put him to death for it till the he can't it right at the end
[1:43:09 - 1:43:13] ▶
of the day we realized Galileo didn't do anything to threaten religion it was mankind's interpretation
[1:43:13 - 1:43:18] ▶
of religion that was being threatened sure not god or the notion of god but mankind's understanding
[1:43:18 - 1:43:24] ▶
of god or or the great architect or the great beyond right whatever you want to call it um well I
[1:43:25 - 1:43:31] ▶
I guess more specifically my question would be has there been anything in what you have studied
[1:43:31 - 1:43:39] ▶
that would confirm or deny religion everything I've seen only reinforces the notion of the notion
[1:43:41 - 1:43:48] ▶
of religion but nothing specifically uh there's no specific data that points to any of the major
[1:43:48 - 1:43:56] ▶
religious events or any of the well you have to be careful because it's very subjective very
[1:43:56 - 1:44:01] ▶
interpretive let me give an example I hear over and over again people say well the Bible's full of
[1:44:01 - 1:44:05] ▶
UFO encounters look at Ezekiel's real sure okay great work it has just been someone's dream or
[1:44:05 - 1:44:10] ▶
it could have been a vision that wasn't related to UFOs at all we don't know because we're separated
[1:44:10 - 1:44:14] ▶
by space and time right so we weren't there so how do we know what the writer or the author was
[1:44:14 - 1:44:20] ▶
thinking at the time you really don't so we have to we have there's a lot of interpretive a lot
[1:44:20 - 1:44:24] ▶
of subjectivity there okay I look I I don't think I think if anything this topic only reinforces
[1:44:24 - 1:44:31] ▶
the notion that that there is certainly a degree of order in this universe and that the cosmos
[1:44:31 - 1:44:36] ▶
is incredibly vast let me give you an example here I've said this a few times before um there are
[1:44:36 - 1:44:42] ▶
there are two barriers to human beings really understanding the universe in fact if you if you look
[1:44:42 - 1:44:50] ▶
at the entire there's five fundamental senses for which we judge our environment and if you can't touch
[1:44:50 - 1:44:55] ▶
it takes it here it's smell it etc uh we really don't know it's there right because that's the only way
[1:44:55 - 1:45:00] ▶
we have to you know you can use technology to help enhance some of that but but we only have five
[1:45:00 - 1:45:04] ▶
senses so let's look at let's look at human vision for a second what is human vision human vision is a
[1:45:04 - 1:45:09] ▶
very very narrow band of the electromagnetic spectrum we call the electro optical spectrum right
[1:45:09 - 1:45:14] ▶
really tiny we can see red and we can see up the blue and that's it and we think we can judge
[1:45:14 - 1:45:18] ▶
the entire universe but that's only 0.0035 percent of the entire electromagnetic spectrum meaning
[1:45:18 - 1:45:24] ▶
most of reality lies beyond our ability to perceive it now are there animals I can't sure honey
[1:45:25 - 1:45:31] ▶
bees can look in ultraviolet there's animals I can see in infrared and whatnot we as humans can't
[1:45:31 - 1:45:36] ▶
so we rely on technology where I live in Wyoming beautiful night skies take a look at that night sky
[1:45:36 - 1:45:41] ▶
you'll see all these stars now look at that same night sky through a radio telescope and you start
[1:45:41 - 1:45:45] ▶
seeing things you can't see normally you see large gash gashous clouds and nova and things like that
[1:45:45 - 1:45:50] ▶
that are just as real but they lie beyond our ability to perceive and then you've got a scale ability
[1:45:51 - 1:45:55] ▶
issue you and I are sitting in a wonderful studio you have here having this great conversation between
[1:45:55 - 1:46:01] ▶
you and me and when you look at the scale of the universe so the visible most scientists believe
[1:46:01 - 1:46:08] ▶
that the visible universe visible horizon it's about 40 billion billion light years across now to
[1:46:08 - 1:46:15] ▶
understand that really perceive that what does that mean well that means take a photon of light
[1:46:15 - 1:46:20] ▶
which travels at the speed of light 186,000 miles per second seven and a half times around our entire
[1:46:20 - 1:46:28] ▶
planet in a second now think how far light can travel in a week and in a year and now take that
[1:46:28 - 1:46:36] ▶
multiply it by 40 billion right incredibly vast and that's only 10% of the actual size of the
[1:46:36 - 1:46:43] ▶
universe most most cosmologists agree that the universe is 10 times bigger it's just that is so vast
[1:46:43 - 1:46:48] ▶
light will never reach earth so that's our visible horizon 40 billion but really the universe
[1:46:48 - 1:46:53] ▶
probably over a hundred billion light years maybe even much bigger across and we are this
[1:46:53 - 1:46:57] ▶
infinitesimally small spec somewhere in the middle I would encourage your your audience if
[1:46:57 - 1:47:01] ▶
they ever get a chance get on Google look on Google images and type in pale blue dot what is that
[1:47:01 - 1:47:05] ▶
pale blue dot that is earth everything you've ever thought dreamed hope cried laughed occurred on
[1:47:05 - 1:47:11] ▶
that tiny dot every moment of history that we know of since the beginning of time occurred on that
[1:47:11 - 1:47:16] ▶
planet everybody's ever lived and died on that tiny little blue dot hurly through the vastness of
[1:47:16 - 1:47:21] ▶
space right that's very uncomfortable for people to look at and realize that and how vulnerable we
[1:47:21 - 1:47:26] ▶
really are real perspective now let's do the reverse let's go down let's look at avogadro's
[1:47:26 - 1:47:32] ▶
number 6.2 something times 10 to the negative 23rd a hydrogen atom a proton neutron electron for
[1:47:32 - 1:47:39] ▶
hydrogen that is times 10 to the negative 23rd and size that's roughly the same order of magnitude
[1:47:39 - 1:47:46] ▶
as we are to the universe and it's inside every human being meaning most of reality is either too big
[1:47:47 - 1:47:53] ▶
or too small for human beings to really interact with and grasp and in fact we can as a species if
[1:47:54 - 1:48:00] ▶
we're lucky one or two orders of magnitude up or down and that's it that's our reality when and
[1:48:00 - 1:48:05] ▶
the truth is most of the universe is is beyond our ability to even perceive it because it's either
[1:48:06 - 1:48:11] ▶
too big or too small and so by that definition alone in the fact that we look at 0.0036 percent of
[1:48:11 - 1:48:17] ▶
the entire electromagnetic spectrum some incredible number we we can perceive 0.000000 keep writing
[1:48:17 - 1:48:27] ▶
those years all the way down 1 percent of the entire universe in our reality and we know most
[1:48:27 - 1:48:32] ▶
of the universe and reality lies beyond that and so that's fact that's not supposition that's
[1:48:32 - 1:48:36] ▶
that's reality and we have to understand that this is an awfully big and complex universe and
[1:48:36 - 1:48:42] ▶
there's other things besides physical distance we talk about physical distance but you understand
[1:48:42 - 1:48:46] ▶
quantum mechanics and quantum entanglement there are some things in universe that really don't
[1:48:46 - 1:48:51] ▶
follow the rules of of of a three-dimensional space and time it's it's it's inconsequential it's
[1:48:51 - 1:48:58] ▶
irrelevant and I know for us a species as a human physical species that is our reality it's hard
[1:48:58 - 1:49:03] ▶
for us to perceive a reality where space and time is irrelevant but the fact is those those
[1:49:03 - 1:49:09] ▶
universes exist and so we have to really recalibrate the way we think about things if we want to
[1:49:09 - 1:49:15] ▶
if we want to imagine the unimaginable we first have to redefine what unimaginable is
[1:49:16 - 1:49:23] ▶
a lot to think about man that's a big pill to swallow
[1:49:25 - 1:49:28] ▶
you have a gold standard case that you look at they're all think back on they're all different
[1:49:28 - 1:49:36] ▶
there's so many gold standard cases the ones I can talk about because people know about it like
[1:49:36 - 1:49:40] ▶
the Nimitz incident okay but there's other set but the other ones okay platinum standard
[1:49:40 - 1:49:45] ▶
yeah because if you can talk about the Nimitz and Nimitz and you consider that a gold standard I
[1:49:45 - 1:49:50] ▶
mean there's got to be something above that yeah that a lot and there's a lot yeah in your mind
[1:49:50 - 1:49:57] ▶
when you hear of a case or you see a case or you see a photo or a video floating around or
[1:49:57 - 1:50:03] ▶
or whatnot you have a rolle dex that you can compare it to right that you know for a fact is
[1:50:03 - 1:50:10] ▶
anomalous that is confirmed and anomaly correct are we going to see some of those cases in the near
[1:50:10 - 1:50:19] ▶
future that decisions out up to mine but I certainly hope so let me give you an example without saying
[1:50:19 - 1:50:23] ▶
something specific okay let's say this coffee cup for you know better yet let's take a look at
[1:50:23 - 1:50:29] ▶
this water bottle let's say this is birth right it's round completely rounds yeah the way that gravity
[1:50:29 - 1:50:35] ▶
works is there are expected trajectories of things coming in and out of orbit and especially if
[1:50:35 - 1:50:40] ▶
a satellite let's say on retrograde it comes in that's how we know it's going to burn up over the
[1:50:40 - 1:50:44] ▶
Pacific Ocean that's how we know at what time you can see the fireworks showing the sky right at the
[1:50:44 - 1:50:48] ▶
rocket re-entering and burning up into satellite and whatnot things there's an expected path
[1:50:48 - 1:50:55] ▶
that things take even ICBMs and missiles if we were to launch on Russia Russia would launch on us
[1:50:55 - 1:51:00] ▶
there's a very predictable pattern because it's physics what you wouldn't expect looking at this
[1:51:00 - 1:51:05] ▶
as the earth is something because most things come in at a at a at a come in as art yeah um
[1:51:05 - 1:51:11] ▶
so wouldn't expect something going straight down and then popping straight back up because the
[1:51:11 - 1:51:16] ▶
amount of energy required to do that is enormous beyond our capability well certainly beyond our
[1:51:16 - 1:51:22] ▶
capability now um and so when you see that and you have the data and it's not just looking at it
[1:51:22 - 1:51:29] ▶
it's high-perspectral data and there's other ways to collect information besides a human eye
[1:51:29 - 1:51:32] ▶
remember that's only 0.0036 percent of the spectrum right so that's a little narrow window let's
[1:51:32 - 1:51:38] ▶
get a big window here let's get all the data baby you know give me give me all the frequencies and
[1:51:38 - 1:51:42] ▶
I want to see everything that's when you know you have something really special um because sometimes
[1:51:42 - 1:51:47] ▶
you know they say seeing his believing but your eyes can fool you look you're a magician I mean
[1:51:48 - 1:51:51] ▶
this is this is how you this is your trade made uh slight of hand making something appear to be one
[1:51:51 - 1:51:56] ▶
thing when it's really something else so we need more data points we need we need beta to include
[1:51:56 - 1:52:03] ▶
beyond the visible spectrum and that can tell you a lot I can tell you can tell you heat right
[1:52:03 - 1:52:08] ▶
things like infrared and and what something is even made out of because depending on the trail
[1:52:08 - 1:52:14] ▶
and the color just like we look at a at a star we can tell there's a planet around it why because we
[1:52:14 - 1:52:18] ▶
can tell actually the atmosphere of that planet and what is composed of because as light from that
[1:52:18 - 1:52:22] ▶
star travels through it and then eventually hits earth and our eyes we can say oh that plants
[1:52:22 - 1:52:26] ▶
primarily nitrogen and that plants primarily hydrogen that plant is composed of you know methane
[1:52:26 - 1:52:31] ▶
because the light behaves it's absorbed by the type of gas and so when you see something coming in
[1:52:31 - 1:52:38] ▶
out and if there happens to be a trail on it you can look at that and you can analyze okay this
[1:52:38 - 1:52:42] ▶
thing is this is what it's comprised of because of the color because of the length of the heat all
[1:52:42 - 1:52:48] ▶
sorts of different things so without giving away specific capabilities here hyperspectral technology
[1:52:48 - 1:52:53] ▶
can be very very informative it can tell you a lot more than just simply seeing something on a camera
[1:52:53 - 1:52:58] ▶
mm-hmm and so those are the ones that really get very compelling especially when you also have footage
[1:52:58 - 1:53:02] ▶
especially when you when you when you like when you browse stuff and you're in your shown things
[1:53:02 - 1:53:11] ▶
online are you ever just like me because of what you've seen but that's it listen but that's not
[1:53:11 - 1:53:19] ▶
because it's not compelling it's because I've been decent because you've been to sensitize I have
[1:53:19 - 1:53:23] ▶
right it's just like you know a cop who who comes across a crime scene and people are like oh my
[1:53:23 - 1:53:28] ▶
god the horrific is like yeah okay you know it's and it's unfortunate because that's just the
[1:53:28 - 1:53:32] ▶
reality of of us it's just like anybody who watches shows and horror shows on movies you know someone
[1:53:32 - 1:53:38] ▶
might say I don't like watching horror that's disgusting someone says that's not really that bad
[1:53:38 - 1:53:42] ▶
it you get desensitized it's like a magic trick it's like knowing how magic trick works and it's
[1:53:42 - 1:53:46] ▶
funny because I actually got to ask a Bob was are that question and he said for the same reason he
[1:53:46 - 1:53:52] ▶
said it's exactly like a magic trick um why doesn't the government talk about Bob was are
[1:53:52 - 1:53:58] ▶
well probably why they don't talk about me I can imagine you know we go against the grain I've
[1:54:00 - 1:54:04] ▶
never met Mr. Lazar to be honest with you and for the record so people say well what do you think
[1:54:04 - 1:54:07] ▶
it was are I don't I you know I have no way to judge I've never met the gentleman uh you know
[1:54:07 - 1:54:13] ▶
I think he's saying his truth whatever that truth may be just like I'm saying mine sure um
[1:54:13 - 1:54:18] ▶
you know but look the government has spent a lot of time doing the same thing to me when I first
[1:54:19 - 1:54:23] ▶
came out they even denied that age it was real I know even denied that I was part of it right and like
[1:54:23 - 1:54:27] ▶
in one somebody I think somebody even accused I wasn't even at the Pentagon I'm like dude you can't
[1:54:27 - 1:54:30] ▶
me there's my desk you know there's there's a safe that's got all the stuff in it um so I suspect
[1:54:30 - 1:54:38] ▶
if he is enduring the same thing it'd be for the same reasons it they they tried to obfuscate you
[1:54:38 - 1:54:42] ▶
know there's there's a there's a saying we have uh uh first of all you deny everything you admit
[1:54:42 - 1:54:49] ▶
nothing and then you make counter accusations right and so there is this the spectrum of efforts
[1:54:49 - 1:54:54] ▶
that happen when there's an inconvenient conversation having a government the first thing you do
[1:54:54 - 1:54:59] ▶
is a denied and then when they can't deny it anymore uh you know they'll they'll start trying to
[1:54:59 - 1:55:05] ▶
take away so much credibility like they do with Dave Groose 24 hours of him coming out and
[1:55:05 - 1:55:10] ▶
and and this by the way is American here this guy I know pro I worked with him at space force he
[1:55:10 - 1:55:14] ▶
is exactly who he is we had the same briefings together we saw the same UAP data right so he comes
[1:55:14 - 1:55:18] ▶
out and says the truth and with the 24 hours two guys from CIA leaked medical data and try to use
[1:55:18 - 1:55:24] ▶
his PTSD against him now how disgusting is that right oh and totally by the way that's if I were to
[1:55:24 - 1:55:29] ▶
go ahead and the government and release someone's private data I go to jail that's hip avialation
[1:55:29 - 1:55:35] ▶
that is also the the there's PII information there personal identifiable information there
[1:55:35 - 1:55:40] ▶
there's medical reticle is being doxed by the government that's being doxed by the government
[1:55:40 - 1:55:45] ▶
shame on you and you wonder why people are pissed you wonder why people like me do what I do
[1:55:45 - 1:55:50] ▶
that's why because that to me let me this is a you're you're getting to a point now in this
[1:55:51 - 1:55:57] ▶
conversation that is very near and dear to my heart and and I want to share something with you a lot
[1:55:57 - 1:56:01] ▶
of people know in my book I talk about my mother passing away and no I'm not plugging the book
[1:56:01 - 1:56:07] ▶
it doesn't want him here I'm just simply saying that people know that because I was forthcoming
[1:56:07 - 1:56:12] ▶
about it was some people may not know and I always just started talking about it was a death of my
[1:56:12 - 1:56:16] ▶
father my father was a revolutionary cubist part of the Bay of Pigs fact if you type in my name and
[1:56:16 - 1:56:24] ▶
type in the word Bay of Pigs you'll see his prisoner number and he was a tortured and tormented
[1:56:24 - 1:56:29] ▶
soul because of it but as later years he got he became very introspective and so about a month
[1:56:29 - 1:56:37] ▶
before he passed away passed away two years ago on father's day I had the opportunity I knew he
[1:56:37 - 1:56:43] ▶
was dying but he wouldn't tell me but I could tell he was dying and I know my time was limited so
[1:56:43 - 1:56:47] ▶
he came out to visit me and we had an opportunity to take a road trip together so we're going to
[1:56:47 - 1:56:51] ▶
drive back down to south Florida together and about halfway through the trip I asked him a question
[1:56:51 - 1:56:56] ▶
and I you know I look back and I feel kind of guilty about it because I was kind of flippant
[1:56:56 - 1:57:01] ▶
not expecting the answer that I got and I said dad what is the greatest threat to humanity
[1:57:01 - 1:57:07] ▶
now I'm thinking to myself is it a natural calamity earthquake is it a nuclear war is it a biological
[1:57:08 - 1:57:17] ▶
pandemic like COVID was and he looked to me and he says I thought about for say he says corruption
[1:57:17 - 1:57:24] ▶
it's a corruption it's like financial corruption says no son corruption corruption in any form is
[1:57:24 - 1:57:32] ▶
the act of trading away one of your core values in exchange for something else and whether it's
[1:57:32 - 1:57:38] ▶
religious corruption moral corruption governmental corruption if you have corruption in government
[1:57:38 - 1:57:44] ▶
then what winds up happening is you wind up chipping away eroding the very foundation of a democracy
[1:57:46 - 1:57:52] ▶
and when that occurs it's a very very quick and slippery slope down to total tyranny and it's
[1:57:53 - 1:57:58] ▶
something my father actually had direct experience in and so when you have in the government
[1:57:58 - 1:58:03] ▶
corruption and people making decisions that they don't have the authority to make for reasons that
[1:58:04 - 1:58:10] ▶
they don't have the authority to even even consider and doing things like they did to David Ruchin
[1:58:10 - 1:58:16] ▶
myself and other people that's a problem because now the entire democracy is at risk this is not
[1:58:16 - 1:58:23] ▶
just hey the government trying to insulate so hey man you're doing you're you're now going beyond
[1:58:23 - 1:58:28] ▶
the constitution here which is something we all agree with and you're telling me now the
[1:58:28 - 1:58:31] ▶
constitution doesn't matter and that I have to play by the rules and you don't
[1:58:31 - 1:58:34] ▶
hey buddy I don't know your memory but 1776 happened you know people have a vote and if you think
[1:58:35 - 1:58:40] ▶
that they're not they're going to sit here and tolerate corruption you know there's an old saying
[1:58:40 - 1:58:43] ▶
from Bob Marley you can fool some people sometimes but you can't fool all the people all the time
[1:58:43 - 1:58:48] ▶
and if you think you're going to do that brother that's that's not the government I signed up for
[1:58:48 - 1:58:52] ▶
that's not the constitution I signed up for I didn't go to war to allow you to do that because now
[1:58:52 - 1:58:57] ▶
don't look now but you're you're the enemy right yeah and and they have hijacked what the values of
[1:58:57 - 1:59:05] ▶
our country are and they're making decisions they don't have the authority to make right when
[1:59:05 - 1:59:09] ▶
they're not informing Congress they're not informing the president and they're lying that's a
[1:59:09 - 1:59:14] ▶
problem I don't care what you you can you can justify it all day long I don't give a crap what
[1:59:14 - 1:59:18] ▶
your answer is it's still wrong you they are balls and things you have to abide by and so when
[1:59:18 - 1:59:24] ▶
you see that action of people trying to defame somebody yeah um that is egregious and to me
[1:59:24 - 1:59:31] ▶
look out because you're you're you're now going into to to to a territory here into some very
[1:59:33 - 1:59:39] ▶
dangerous waters that uh you know you're you're doing things that are against the very ethos
[1:59:39 - 1:59:46] ▶
of what it means to be a free society and you don't have that permission and by the way I went to
[1:59:46 - 1:59:50] ▶
war for before I don't think I'll do it again that's you know you are our Congress and our
[1:59:50 - 1:59:55] ▶
our executive branch deserves better and if you are some mid-level bureaucrat making decisions
[1:59:55 - 1:59:59] ▶
on behalf of the president and Congress for which you're not allowed to make watch out baby
[1:59:59 - 2:00:04] ▶
you can have some serious explaining to do as we like to say yeah and and rightfully so I think I
[2:00:05 - 2:00:13] ▶
think you know the the pursuit of of that and especially in defense of people who have given up
[2:00:13 - 2:00:19] ▶
something for you know the freedom of people and the freedom of choice that people have you know
[2:00:19 - 2:00:25] ▶
I think it's I think it should be valued and protected and upheld um to to a standard uh that
[2:00:25 - 2:00:31] ▶
that I think most people should be on board with I think that just goes with that saying it's
[2:00:31 - 2:00:36] ▶
egregious like you said I mean I'm gonna have to ask 2027 no I don't know why people keep saying
[2:00:36 - 2:00:44] ▶
27 listen feel like oh lose said 20s when you were never said 2027 okay I never said that
[2:00:44 - 2:00:49] ▶
that's you know what happens is people in the internet who've got have got way too much time on
[2:00:49 - 2:00:53] ▶
their hands they they will clip together interviews I have to create a false narrative okay so let me
[2:00:53 - 2:00:58] ▶
let me know then then what is it is it um you know blood so says blood so has a hard date by the way
[2:00:58 - 2:01:04] ▶
he says Easter Sunday 2026 is like his date um I've heard people say 2025 is when we begin this
[2:01:05 - 2:01:12] ▶
whatever and like it you know it's obviously the gold post is going to shift depending on what's
[2:01:12 - 2:01:19] ▶
been said um recently Jeremy Corbell in his uh special in his three-part special um at the end of
[2:01:19 - 2:01:26] ▶
it said that the government was intending on having some mass siding or like a giant mothership
[2:01:26 - 2:01:35] ▶
come in and and and that you know this is going to happen and then 2027's been thrown around can you
[2:01:35 - 2:01:40] ▶
for everyone's sanity yeah sure shed a little bit of light on this just so we can stop being
[2:01:41 - 2:01:48] ▶
paranoid or we can start you know being paranoid um let me see if I can thread the needle on this
[2:01:48 - 2:01:54] ▶
sure take your time you know well I know a lot of people you know this is nothing new there's entire
[2:01:54 - 2:02:00] ▶
religions that are that plan for doomsday right the end of the world's coming then you have you know
[2:02:00 - 2:02:04] ▶
oh there's white 2k and oh it's gonna be Aztec calendar right and you know to
[2:02:04 - 2:02:08] ▶
now um there is some speculation and I won't say specifics that uh there may be something
[2:02:10 - 2:02:22] ▶
in later on um but the problem is I wouldn't go to the bank with it um and what that the specifics are
[2:02:23 - 2:02:30] ▶
because it's it's first of all to hearsay and it's also was yes there was an official
[2:02:30 - 2:02:35] ▶
effort by some people in the government to actually look at this data and there were some products
[2:02:36 - 2:02:42] ▶
produced that that's a fact I won't go into more detail with that but it wasn't 2027 okay and and
[2:02:42 - 2:02:47] ▶
it was based upon certain observations and again I can't this is I'm very carefully because what I
[2:02:47 - 2:02:54] ▶
don't want to do is people are gonna take this they're gonna hang on to these words and say
[2:02:54 - 2:02:57] ▶
whoa sad something's coming no I'm not saying that what I'm saying is that there were some people
[2:02:57 - 2:03:02] ▶
who were anticipating something happening and it was it was it was officially considered by some
[2:03:02 - 2:03:08] ▶
people based upon certain things uh and a product was written anything beyond that I really I don't
[2:03:08 - 2:03:16] ▶
want to discuss because um I think what happens is people take that and they take it to the bank
[2:03:16 - 2:03:21] ▶
sure and that's very dangerous um yeah you don't want to give any credence to something that could
[2:03:21 - 2:03:26] ▶
be on true right I mean look anything happened right a tornado could hit your studio in 10 minutes
[2:03:26 - 2:03:30] ▶
for now could probably wall but good right so we have to be very careful there's no such thing as
[2:03:30 - 2:03:35] ▶
absolute um but it's when you say something was observed that people's ears tend to perk up yeah
[2:03:35 - 2:03:42] ▶
I can't I can't I can't go into more detail that because first of all I didn't collect the data
[2:03:42 - 2:03:46] ▶
I'm just a part of that effort and and third and thirdly you know um that's not really for me to
[2:03:46 - 2:03:51] ▶
discuss but I don't think people need to be you know panic at the disco and you know oh my god
[2:03:51 - 2:03:57] ▶
and that look we've been down this road many times before let's let's let's stop speculating let's
[2:03:57 - 2:04:03] ▶
stick to what we know and if it turns out that there's a revelation based upon of us all working
[2:04:03 - 2:04:09] ▶
together on this and fine maybe it is what it is but but we need to make sure we don't
[2:04:09 - 2:04:14] ▶
do ourselves the injustice by predicting and and and predicating things I think I think that's a
[2:04:15 - 2:04:22] ▶
yeah I think that's a dangerous move and I think unless the government comes out and says
[2:04:22 - 2:04:26] ▶
something hey you need to pay attention to this then we probably should focus on other things I mean
[2:04:26 - 2:04:31] ▶
and and most people would probably agree with me but if the government did say that we might be
[2:04:31 - 2:04:35] ▶
questioning why they said that right sure and that leads me to another question do you rule out
[2:04:35 - 2:04:40] ▶
the idea that you might be being used to further some type of governmental agenda always always you
[2:04:40 - 2:04:47] ▶
have to consider that yeah um I don't think I have rocked the boats sufficiently that uh and I've
[2:04:47 - 2:04:55] ▶
made decisions that if that was a case I don't think they would have anticipated so I probably made
[2:04:55 - 2:05:00] ▶
their life very very difficult that's if I was supposed to go some sort of agenda I think I
[2:05:00 - 2:05:05] ▶
probably strayed from that agenda a long time ago but what if this this I say 2027 but what if
[2:05:05 - 2:05:10] ▶
this future revelation is something like that when it happens you know that you're not immune to
[2:05:10 - 2:05:15] ▶
that is what you know that like that might be yeah sure I don't look you don't know what you don't know
[2:05:15 - 2:05:19] ▶
right that's right how how do you know what you don't know so is it possible there's some sort of
[2:05:19 - 2:05:23] ▶
master scheme there to manipulate Louis Luzando and a few other insiders to to to get our message
[2:05:23 - 2:05:28] ▶
across it is but I'm also familiar with those techniques and I think I would be able to see at least
[2:05:28 - 2:05:33] ▶
one telltale said no one's that good where you can keep the secret forever I mean you just you
[2:05:33 - 2:05:38] ▶
really it's it would be really really hard to do have you ever had disinfo come across your desk
[2:05:38 - 2:05:43] ▶
um not at the Pentagon no I did foreign disinformation sure yeah sure it's a lot but actual
[2:05:44 - 2:05:49] ▶
disinformation on the UAP topic not at all not at all no in fact nobody wanted to talk about it
[2:05:49 - 2:05:53] ▶
so you know you're not gonna get disinformation disinformation is yeah usually when when people
[2:05:53 - 2:05:57] ▶
are at least talking about something and you want to affect a decision but when no one's talking
[2:05:57 - 2:06:00] ▶
about it you know but you're aware of projects are you are you aware of projects of the UAP
[2:06:00 - 2:06:08] ▶
narrative being slightly yeah they're back good they did in the seven look air force oversight penetrated
[2:06:08 - 2:06:14] ▶
civilian organizations you know in violation of do d 52 40 dot one and other rules regulations
[2:06:14 - 2:06:21] ▶
possibly executive order one two triple three and conducted intelligence operations and propaganda
[2:06:21 - 2:06:26] ▶
and manipulation against the American people by the way what happened two days ago a document came
[2:06:26 - 2:06:31] ▶
out from the CIA proposing it's okay to kill Americans if we want to go ahead and predicate
[2:06:31 - 2:06:35] ▶
a war and have an excuse to to have a war with Cuba and an invasion now think about that for a minute
[2:06:35 - 2:06:41] ▶
wait wait wait who the hell are you to propose killing American citizens for a political agenda
[2:06:41 - 2:06:50] ▶
dude that's that's worthy of a coup man well that's not American values you know you have don't
[2:06:51 - 2:06:56] ▶
look now but you've now become the enemy that we all hate you don't have the right to do that
[2:06:56 - 2:07:01] ▶
and this is what fires me up it there have been there have been some people who have made
[2:07:01 - 2:07:08] ▶
suggestions to conduct your legal activities to cover this topic up and it's gonna come out
[2:07:08 - 2:07:13] ▶
it's gonna come out in a few months it's come man just telling you um because I was victim to some of
[2:07:13 - 2:07:19] ▶
it when you when American people find out the length that some people in the government wanted to
[2:07:19 - 2:07:25] ▶
go to to keep something secret it's gonna it's gonna blow your mind scary yeah and it's honestly
[2:07:25 - 2:07:31] ▶
it's disappointing you know I I never thought my people I want to say my government because I don't
[2:07:31 - 2:07:37] ▶
think it's reflective of the government I think it's people in the government let's not forget
[2:07:37 - 2:07:41] ▶
government is made up of people right and there are some good people and there are some bad people
[2:07:41 - 2:07:45] ▶
and um you know that old saying absolute power corrupts absolutely maybe that's what we're dealing with
[2:07:45 - 2:07:52] ▶
and so I want to make careful that I'm not I'm not accusing the government I'm not labeling the
[2:07:52 - 2:07:56] ▶
governor mad at the government what I mad at are those rogue elements inside our government
[2:07:56 - 2:08:01] ▶
that are making decisions that are not in the best interest for the American people and a frankly
[2:08:01 - 2:08:06] ▶
that are that are against our constitution that is what motivates me to continue doing what I'm
[2:08:06 - 2:08:12] ▶
doing and if I have to pay the ultimate price for it then so be it I knew that while ago
[2:08:12 - 2:08:15] ▶
like I told people the only thing that's gonna stop me is bullet in the head or you know maybe
[2:08:15 - 2:08:20] ▶
and I got hit by a bus or you know a car accident right which has happened in the past um you know
[2:08:20 - 2:08:26] ▶
but I I had to pursue the truth and I think I think any real real patriot who served time serving
[2:08:26 - 2:08:34] ▶
their country feels the same way you know at the end of the day you know we owe it to the American
[2:08:34 - 2:08:38] ▶
we owe it to our government there's no excuse why a president wouldn't be briefed on something
[2:08:39 - 2:08:43] ▶
there's no excuse why oversight committees in our in our congress can't be briefed to something
[2:08:44 - 2:08:50] ▶
and that's exactly what's happened and that's a problem and that's not a reflection of the guts
[2:08:50 - 2:08:54] ▶
you can't say that's a government's fault no that's people in the government it's their fault
[2:08:54 - 2:08:58] ▶
and um they will go there's some people that will go to great lengths to to this information
[2:08:59 - 2:09:06] ▶
and it's not just the people in the government because what we've seen I think more frequently
[2:09:06 - 2:09:11] ▶
and more rampantly is these people who are working with the government oh yeah Foxes
[2:09:11 - 2:09:18] ▶
yeah media some elements even in the media in the media I think those tend to be a little bit
[2:09:18 - 2:09:22] ▶
more dangerous well we saw this right before this last election right I mean there were people in
[2:09:22 - 2:09:27] ▶
the media who who knowingly lied about people we just had a case landmark case against one of our
[2:09:27 - 2:09:32] ▶
major networks here where there was veteran where they tried to slander lie about them and defamation
[2:09:32 - 2:09:37] ▶
and he won the case right and this is this is a medium huge media organization that was super
[2:09:37 - 2:09:42] ▶
well respected yeah and it turns out there were journalists who had an agenda and and um then
[2:09:42 - 2:09:48] ▶
I mean look at everybody who's surprised by it right nobody right nobody surprised at the media
[2:09:49 - 2:09:54] ▶
would go through that links but sometimes we are surprised to find out that these other contractors
[2:09:54 - 2:09:59] ▶
are involved in things like this you know the big ones the the Raytheons the the Lockheeds the
[2:09:59 - 2:10:05] ▶
you know I mean there's there's a few of them out there um one in particular and you know feel
[2:10:06 - 2:10:14] ▶
free to answer however you want to answer you know because you've been asked about Lockheed in the
[2:10:14 - 2:10:19] ▶
past you've been asked about you know a lot of people are familiar with the Wilson Davis memo and
[2:10:19 - 2:10:24] ▶
and all the stuff that went on there about like the inside program and people doing reverse engineering
[2:10:24 - 2:10:29] ▶
what about eG&G where did they go you know I'm very careful not to mention companies specifically
[2:10:31 - 2:10:40] ▶
I went through a year process through the Pentagon to even reveal a few the names that I did
[2:10:40 - 2:10:45] ▶
in the book and I was given very clear instructions not to deviate from that okay um so because of your
[2:10:45 - 2:10:53] ▶
association with the Pentagon or because of their association with the nature I see because of
[2:10:53 - 2:10:58] ▶
their association with the Pentagon and that some of these companies who've been responsible for
[2:10:58 - 2:11:03] ▶
doing some not very nice things in the past um I've been I've been asked to you know have you have
[2:11:03 - 2:11:11] ▶
you are you aware of eG&G even being part of the picture I know the name okay I don't want to
[2:11:11 - 2:11:18] ▶
speculate one way or the other but I might have heard of what I didn't I'm not asking for speculation
[2:11:18 - 2:11:22] ▶
yeah yeah no no I'm just what my point being is that I look there's any time you mentioned
[2:11:23 - 2:11:29] ▶
especially in this topic if I mention a particular name there's liability issues right and and you
[2:11:29 - 2:11:34] ▶
have to be very there legal real legal consequences sure so unless you get it approved by the Pentagon
[2:11:34 - 2:11:38] ▶
like I did yeah um you got to be really careful you got the lawyers coming after you so you got
[2:11:38 - 2:11:43] ▶
to be really really careful and you know when you're someone like me who I'm living fairly
[2:11:43 - 2:11:49] ▶
modestly isn't that convenient for the government though like I mean it seems like
[2:11:50 - 2:11:54] ▶
it seems to me because these private corporations are protected they are protected we're not allowed
[2:11:56 - 2:12:02] ▶
to knock on their doors to find out what they're working on because it's it's private it's it's it's
[2:12:02 - 2:12:08] ▶
it's got um IP that we don't have access to and so legally and there is that fine line of like well
[2:12:08 - 2:12:16] ▶
I mean then you can just knock on anybody's door and take anybody's technology and and
[2:12:16 - 2:12:20] ▶
proprietary you know information but in this specific case and which is why you know people are
[2:12:20 - 2:12:25] ▶
trying to pass this uap act and trying to see that like hey if there is recovered technology then
[2:12:25 - 2:12:31] ▶
we should have access to it right you know Congress should be aware of it and and etc but the
[2:12:31 - 2:12:39] ▶
fact is that there is a law preventing us from doing that right it seems to me that that's a very
[2:12:39 - 2:12:46] ▶
convenient law well and this is part of the the the double edged sort of any capitalistic society
[2:12:46 - 2:12:53] ▶
right you have free and fair competition until you don't right and so in theory everything is
[2:12:53 - 2:12:58] ▶
free and fair competition and that needs to be protected and and I understand that and it's
[2:12:58 - 2:13:02] ▶
you know I'll tell you something fascinating here do you know where the word corporation comes from
[2:13:02 - 2:13:08] ▶
hmm I've never thought of it corpus meaning body body in the United States you can actually when
[2:13:10 - 2:13:17] ▶
you look at the tax laws a corporation has the same exact rights as an individual interesting and so
[2:13:17 - 2:13:24] ▶
when you have a lawyers group of lawyers creating this corporation this corpus they're creating a
[2:13:24 - 2:13:30] ▶
living breathing entity according to the rules and the rights of our country they have to be
[2:13:30 - 2:13:35] ▶
recognized as an individual and so they're afforded the same rights and only when the conjurers
[2:13:35 - 2:13:41] ▶
the great conjurers the lawyers come back and they de-establish a corporation and it is no longer a
[2:13:41 - 2:13:47] ▶
living body right it's a living thing and even then there's some rights that that that that that
[2:13:47 - 2:13:53] ▶
translate to that so people understand that in the United States corporations have the same rights
[2:13:53 - 2:13:58] ▶
and privileges as individuals just like a human being rights to privacy right so very convenient
[2:13:58 - 2:14:05] ▶
well it can be abused it is it works until it doesn't so I want to make this clear I understand
[2:14:05 - 2:14:12] ▶
why because the U.S. is a capitalist society and that's what how we thrive here and we've all
[2:14:12 - 2:14:16] ▶
agreed to that that's our social contract that this is the type of government we want and I agree
[2:14:16 - 2:14:20] ▶
we want the right to certify I have a company I want my company to be protected right I don't
[2:14:20 - 2:14:24] ▶
care what it does I want to be protected and I want my private information to stay private right so
[2:14:24 - 2:14:28] ▶
that's not a bad thing the problem is when it's abused and there's some gray areas and that's
[2:14:28 - 2:14:33] ▶
why you have rules and regulations on how corporations whether it's s-corps c-corps LLC and I'm not
[2:14:33 - 2:14:38] ▶
going to you know go into a class here about corporations but it's something I know a little bit
[2:14:38 - 2:14:43] ▶
about because I was involved in it and so we have to respect that and then when you have a
[2:14:43 - 2:14:48] ▶
corporation just like a human being that's got security clearances that's working on national
[2:14:48 - 2:14:52] ▶
security type issues they're even more protected right because we don't want adversaries to get a
[2:14:52 - 2:14:56] ▶
hold of that technology which is under again understandable I get it the problem is when people
[2:14:56 - 2:15:01] ▶
in those corporations not the corporation itself people in the corporation making decisions like
[2:15:01 - 2:15:05] ▶
people in the government are making decisions that are not consistent with the ethics and expectations
[2:15:05 - 2:15:12] ▶
that we have in these organizations for monetary gain and power mostly correct okay I got maybe
[2:15:13 - 2:15:20] ▶
maybe a couple questions left and then we're going to hop into the questions from the interns
[2:15:20 - 2:15:25] ▶
okay yeah you've been great so far thank you so much for sticking through this with me sure
[2:15:25 - 2:15:30] ▶
okay coffee helps by the way I can get you another one here shortly okay there is a documentary
[2:15:31 - 2:15:39] ▶
coming out that you've been a part of that we just saw that's been making the rounds the age of
[2:15:39 - 2:15:44] ▶
disclosure it seems like a big one it seems like a dops or dream team there's a lot of people in
[2:15:44 - 2:15:52] ▶
that lineup yeah can you shed any light on what's to be expected in this documentary so I haven't
[2:15:52 - 2:16:00] ▶
seen it yet okay I'm very eager for it to come out I have been part of facilitating a lot of people
[2:16:00 - 2:16:05] ▶
who are in that movie to come forward it's been a long project probably about three years now
[2:16:05 - 2:16:11] ▶
it's been done as most people know no sub-rosa right in secret because very important and there's
[2:16:12 - 2:16:18] ▶
people that are being interviewed that have never come out publicly on this topic that we've not
[2:16:18 - 2:16:22] ▶
seen on the trailer you've not seen on trailer I think people can oh you know what people are
[2:16:22 - 2:16:28] ▶
fighting right because some people come back and say wow this is the definitive documentary and then
[2:16:28 - 2:16:33] ▶
other people come out say nothing burger yeah because they because they you're not meeting their
[2:16:33 - 2:16:38] ▶
expectations right you know and so you know I'm very very quiet about I think it does it it certainly
[2:16:38 - 2:16:44] ▶
moves the needle in the right direction everything I try to do is to move the needle in in in the
[2:16:44 - 2:16:50] ▶
right direction I think this film project is another example of some very brave Americans coming
[2:16:50 - 2:16:58] ▶
forward first hand witnesses you know I'll I'll I don't want to give too much well I'll let I'll
[2:16:58 - 2:17:03] ▶
let the audience decide for themselves you know I want to be very careful what I say and what I don't
[2:17:03 - 2:17:08] ▶
say but I do believe it's going to change the conversation irrevocably and I'm very excited for it to
[2:17:09 - 2:17:16] ▶
come out are you aware of any new footage of UAP or NHI I can't discuss the details of the film like
[2:17:16 - 2:17:23] ▶
I said I have to ask on behalf of the audience yeah sure I have I have you know I have not I have not
[2:17:23 - 2:17:29] ▶
seen the film in its complete form but you know you have some very very significant
[2:17:29 - 2:17:34] ▶
information in that in that documentary J Stratten says not just J it okay that's right I mean
[2:17:35 - 2:17:43] ▶
that is interesting but J Stratten does say that he has seen an NHI do you know what he's referring to
[2:17:43 - 2:17:54] ▶
I do we have to talk to Jay about that I don't I don't like speaking on other people's behalf
[2:17:56 - 2:18:00] ▶
okay I've probably noticed that in other interviews I never I'm not a kiss until kind of guy yeah
[2:18:00 - 2:18:05] ▶
and I'm the kind of guy that you know if people want to throw rocks at me for that that's fine
[2:18:05 - 2:18:09] ▶
no I I respect that actually I think that's probably the best move there but is it safe to assume
[2:18:10 - 2:18:16] ▶
that you know what he's talking about I don't like to presume or is something great just have to
[2:18:16 - 2:18:23] ▶
have to have you yourself seen NHI
[2:18:23 - 2:18:27] ▶
let's just share that one to further later um the later like after this airs
[2:18:30 - 2:18:35] ▶
maybe never no again I am very restricted on what I can say and how I say it from the government
[2:18:37 - 2:18:46] ▶
I still am very loyal American and I you know this conversation is continuing and I think more
[2:18:46 - 2:18:54] ▶
we'll be forthcoming in time um and I'll leave it at that can I ask one more because what
[2:18:54 - 2:19:03] ▶
about that whatever you want because that's the one I want to know um how can I phrase this in a way
[2:19:03 - 2:19:12] ▶
that you can answer this um are you aware of more than one type of NHI
[2:19:12 - 2:19:23] ▶
okay let me see how I can answer this
[2:19:24 - 2:19:32] ▶
accuracy is very important
[2:19:46 - 2:19:47] ▶
being aware of is not necessarily the same as having proof of
[2:19:53 - 2:19:59] ▶
Roger um some people let me give you some and does by the way even that proof of doesn't even
[2:20:01 - 2:20:07] ▶
there's a double it sort with that you know there's people that will say the earth is flat
[2:20:07 - 2:20:11] ▶
they're flat earthers no matter what you tell them earth is flat the fact that the earth is
[2:20:11 - 2:20:14] ▶
round is not a truth for them um you know when ancient sailors used to talk about sea monsters in
[2:20:14 - 2:20:20] ▶
the great ocean specific in the Atlantic and people said well that's not true that's just their
[2:20:20 - 2:20:25] ▶
observation and turns out that there are blue whales and great white sharks and giant squid um
[2:20:25 - 2:20:31] ▶
it was just our interpretation at the time that made it difficult right we said these are monsters
[2:20:32 - 2:20:36] ▶
well reason why people didn't believe it on because we called them monsters you said hey look
[2:20:36 - 2:20:40] ▶
there's a giant mammal out there that looks like a dolphin but it goes to got a lot bigger
[2:20:41 - 2:20:45] ▶
you know that's different than saying there's a giant monster out there that does this and that
[2:20:46 - 2:20:50] ▶
uh i know i'm being evasive on this and i'm trying to answer a question without without
[2:20:51 - 2:20:56] ▶
well what i'm what i'm gathering from this is there a potential that some of these NHI might look
[2:20:56 - 2:21:02] ▶
a lot like us that's certainly potential you know we we do camouflaging all the time and as i
[2:21:02 - 2:21:10] ▶
mentioned on on another interview some time ago um you know you can go to a zoo in Beijing right now
[2:21:10 - 2:21:17] ▶
to the panda exhibit and you'll see that the zookeepers wear these fuzzy little panda suits and they
[2:21:17 - 2:21:22] ▶
do that because they don't want to perturb or disturb the local panda the pandas in their in their
[2:21:22 - 2:21:27] ▶
local environment and so they feed them and they do whatever they do but they have to wear panda
[2:21:27 - 2:21:31] ▶
suit to do it now is that a panda oh it's not a panda's human you know badly acting as a panda
[2:21:31 - 2:21:36] ▶
and probably the panda doesn't realize it but they may be they say i'm getting food on with
[2:21:36 - 2:21:40] ▶
care anyways but it's an attempt to blend in um in intelligence camouflage and i don't mean
[2:21:40 - 2:21:48] ▶
camouflage necessarily physical camouflage like in a military unit i mean i mean um mental camouflage
[2:21:48 - 2:21:56] ▶
the ability to assimilate into an organization or a society uh is very important and that's how
[2:21:56 - 2:22:02] ▶
spies work spies do their job because they're like a magician they get away with doing things that
[2:22:02 - 2:22:06] ▶
most people don't perceive or see um and it's it's it's a it's a way for us to protect ourselves
[2:22:06 - 2:22:12] ▶
and to do things so um it's not unusual you know i want to give you an example and i'm like
[2:22:12 - 2:22:21] ▶
getting trouble for this so there are certain circumstances in the military where
[2:22:21 - 2:22:27] ▶
military personnel don't advertise their affiliation with the government uh doesn't say us army and
[2:22:27 - 2:22:34] ▶
you know sergeant johnson on there they go in with sterile uniforms and do that for a reason
[2:22:34 - 2:22:39] ▶
because they are trying to they don't want the affiliation of a formal government
[2:22:40 - 2:22:47] ▶
entity to be known um that in itself is a form of camouflage blending in with the society
[2:22:48 - 2:22:54] ▶
army special forces do this all the time when they go into a country to train individuals
[2:22:54 - 2:22:57] ▶
and weapons tactics and things like that you don't advertise um a special forces guy right
[2:22:58 - 2:23:03] ▶
they got the long shaggy beard for a reason because they don't want to look military they're wearing
[2:23:03 - 2:23:06] ▶
civilian clothes and jeans and carrying a clash of the cuff for a reason without getting into a lot
[2:23:06 - 2:23:10] ▶
of detail right so so is it is it a hard is it a hard idea to to say well look if something is
[2:23:10 - 2:23:21] ▶
visiting us would it want to blend in um you know there's certainly an argument for that
[2:23:21 - 2:23:28] ▶
okay there's an argument for that
[2:23:29 - 2:23:35] ▶
is there evidence pointing to that being the case um not proof let me let me let me let me stay
[2:23:43 - 2:23:54] ▶
on the fence with that because I look I again knowing how people are predisposed to take
[2:23:54 - 2:23:59] ▶
information and run to the hills you know lulos and I was confirmed there's a just some
[2:23:59 - 2:24:04] ▶
of high bridge right that's what I'm trying to avoid because lulos ando is not confirming
[2:24:04 - 2:24:10] ▶
the existence of hybrid okay you heard but I'm saying is it a possibility um sure it's a possibility
[2:24:10 - 2:24:16] ▶
you know there's there's camouflage is is not just a human thing yeah animals in the wild do it
[2:24:17 - 2:24:23] ▶
you know uh fish do it um lizards and communians do it right it's it's it's part of our our natural
[2:24:23 - 2:24:31] ▶
ability to to blend in and if you ever want to see a master of disguise look at an octopus right
[2:24:31 - 2:24:36] ▶
yeah they do it for survival so it's not you know a con people say well you have to be a smart
[2:24:36 - 2:24:41] ▶
thing in order to try to camouflage and blend in not necessarily that's not true no camouflage is
[2:24:42 - 2:24:47] ▶
seen throughout there's a reason why my background is microbiology and immunology let me give you
[2:24:47 - 2:24:51] ▶
a perfect example there are there are parasites and there are microorganisms that are parasitic that
[2:24:51 - 2:25:00] ▶
mimic uh healthy human tissue to evade the autoimmune response and these are bacteria that
[2:25:00 - 2:25:06] ▶
have brains and high functioning you know thought processes like we do this is at a very basic
[2:25:06 - 2:25:12] ▶
elemental scale of our native of our of our our reality of nature nature uh is a master of mimicry
[2:25:12 - 2:25:22] ▶
and there's a reason why even plants plants will sometimes have attributes that mimic other
[2:25:23 - 2:25:29] ▶
plants yeah but we're not talking about plants well what but in the greater context you're trying to
[2:25:29 - 2:25:33] ▶
answer your question without answering you know is that a distinctly earth thing or is that
[2:25:33 - 2:25:39] ▶
any form of life sure that evolves to a certain point uses camouflage to blend it and we don't
[2:25:39 - 2:25:46] ▶
have that answer but it's something that's being proposed it's something that's being looked into
[2:25:46 - 2:25:50] ▶
it's certainly something that has been discussed it's not out there but obviously as someone who's
[2:25:50 - 2:25:56] ▶
in this topic you're also aware of the other kind the one that's a little bit more blatant in
[2:25:56 - 2:26:03] ▶
in terms of observation sure of not being from here right um are there images or videos of these
[2:26:04 - 2:26:14] ▶
beings um graze i don't want people to take this wrong way so i'm gonna abstain from that that
[2:26:14 - 2:26:22] ▶
answer and it's not because i'm trying to be a vase and be like oh look confirmed no i didn't
[2:26:22 - 2:26:26] ▶
um um there's a very specific reason why i'm i'm on the fence with this yeah um i'm hoping it
[2:26:27 - 2:26:32] ▶
becomes more apparent soon but i'm very careful not to commit one way or the other um you know
[2:26:32 - 2:26:39] ▶
have i heard yeah of course yeah the people that i trust and and known and had the conversation yes
[2:26:39 - 2:26:44] ▶
but i also haven't myself experienced that so for me to say yes or no
[2:26:46 - 2:26:51] ▶
is not so so what i'm doing is proposing if people are having trouble understanding the question
[2:26:52 - 2:26:57] ▶
they only have to look at mother nature to see countless examples okay where where biology does it
[2:26:57 - 2:27:02] ▶
for them? or aesthetically so is it that much of a stretch to look you know we have we have
[2:27:02 - 2:27:07] ▶
stealth air craft right now that can be confused as a bird because of its radar profile and radar
[2:27:07 - 2:27:13] ▶
return right and we do that on purpose um so i i you know camouflage is something that is
[2:27:13 - 2:27:20] ▶
is animals all life forms on earth at least have been been using that in mimicry since the beginning
[2:27:20 - 2:27:29] ▶
for survival okay we'll get off the n hi stuff thank you for answering those questions i know i
[2:27:29 - 2:27:34] ▶
didn't answer you know you know your audience could be really pissed at me for that but i i mean
[2:27:34 - 2:27:38] ▶
i think you're reluctant to answer some of these questions provides us with enough information
[2:27:40 - 2:27:48] ▶
and and i'm not going to assume anything but i'm going to say that the this topic is being taken
[2:27:48 - 2:27:54] ▶
seriously and i i i think i think that all options are on the table until they're not
[2:27:54 - 2:28:00] ▶
yeah and and i you know when it comes to pilots obviously you guys were thinking about that
[2:28:00 - 2:28:06] ▶
obviously there's a department that is all about the pilots if you're the nuts and bolts guy
[2:28:06 - 2:28:12] ▶
someone else is the pilot guy and or girl um and it was to do me more of an airframe kind of
[2:28:12 - 2:28:20] ▶
okay airframe kind of guy okay it makes sense but you know i mean even your background of microbiology
[2:28:20 - 2:28:26] ▶
does make it really interesting you know because i know i've i've had a lot of people approach me
[2:28:26 - 2:28:32] ▶
about that like yeah but it's not a coincidence on your background yeah i i i i i i i i i i there was
[2:28:32 - 2:28:37] ▶
another four-chan whistleblower who claimed to be a microbiologist and he had i mean this is
[2:28:37 - 2:28:42] ▶
something i could maybe run by you eventually and have you look at what he wrote but he basically
[2:28:42 - 2:28:47] ▶
dissected a gray alien and uh says he was at you know um i what was the what was the uh
[2:28:47 - 2:28:54] ▶
forget the location but uh essentially took took these grays and and and and you know
[2:28:56 - 2:29:04] ▶
from eyes to mouths to nose to the pores on their skin that's to create this like ammonia type stuff
[2:29:04 - 2:29:11] ▶
to the four fingers and the entire being and this was supposed to dread it and this is a massive
[2:29:11 - 2:29:17] ▶
file it's very complex to look at and i've shown it to experiencers and and to you know um
[2:29:17 - 2:29:23] ▶
abductees and and it seems to coincide with all of the the red flags that they've you know um
[2:29:24 - 2:29:31] ▶
perceived as well and so you know i would expect there at least to be is there a department that
[2:29:31 - 2:29:38] ▶
is looking into just n h i um without getting into trouble let me let me give you um i'm
[2:29:38 - 2:29:46] ▶
me asking you a question sure uh let's say hypothetically you know you're you're you're doing
[2:29:46 - 2:29:52] ▶
something and and and one of your vehicles crashes and so what do we do we do we do we recovery
[2:29:52 - 2:29:57] ▶
mission where we go it's okay we're gonna we're gonna recover our craft and and get the pilot out
[2:29:57 - 2:30:01] ▶
of there and um how would you feel if when you get back and not only is the plane been taken away but
[2:30:01 - 2:30:08] ▶
but when you say well how's our pilot there's oh yeah about that um we chopped them up in a bunch of
[2:30:08 - 2:30:13] ▶
pieces and and studied them um okay so what you're saying is that uh there's nothing left to give
[2:30:13 - 2:30:21] ▶
back right um how would you feel about that right and and what would the reaction be um again i'm
[2:30:21 - 2:30:29] ▶
i'm a nuts and bolts guy i'm not a biological guy sure through that but but that you're saying it's
[2:30:29 - 2:30:34] ▶
that's not a good thing to put out there probably not because you know how would you feel if you know
[2:30:34 - 2:30:39] ▶
that you're out in in the jungles and you your helicopter crash one of your buddies helicopter
[2:30:39 - 2:30:45] ▶
crashes and it turns out that the that the natives um not only you know dismantled your helicopter but
[2:30:45 - 2:30:50] ▶
wound up chopping up the pilot into thousand pieces and you know um it's very sorry about that
[2:30:50 - 2:30:55] ▶
what we didn't know um yeah that's a whole other can of worms if it turns out to be potentially
[2:30:55 - 2:31:02] ▶
the case if it turns again let me get it if it turns out to be the case you know that's that could
[2:31:02 - 2:31:08] ▶
be probably that's not a great way to have diplomacy right understood yeah okay uh interesting
[2:31:08 - 2:31:17] ▶
stuff man um all right we're gonna get to some questions from the from the interns probably a
[2:31:17 - 2:31:22] ▶
little lighter hold on a sec let me prepare myself a Gemini like long walks on the beach peanut colladas
[2:31:22 - 2:31:27] ▶
it's okay let me turn on this camera up here okay and while i set up the other camera i thought
[2:31:28 - 2:31:34] ▶
it was interesting that we were sitting with the person who's partially responsible for turning
[2:31:34 - 2:31:39] ▶
the term UFO into uap officially so i thought it might be time to make uap UFO again
[2:31:39 - 2:31:45] ▶
you can pick these hats up at area 52 dot shop okay this is actually funny because uh it kind
[2:31:47 - 2:31:57] ▶
of has to do with what we were just talking about okay oh that's cool survey says
[2:31:57 - 2:32:02] ▶
your key i think supposed to be an s oh yeah it could be what does it say here oh yeah do you believe
[2:32:06 - 2:32:12] ▶
any sort of cohabitation between our species and the alien species exists and this is from
[2:32:12 - 2:32:21] ▶
hex 0 8 1 1 correct sir so uh to hex 0 8 1 1 um let me let me throw this at you um
[2:32:21 - 2:32:33] ▶
most anthropologists agree that modern human species homo sapiens sapiens has been around
[2:32:36 - 2:32:41] ▶
between 200 to 400 thousand years our earth is roughly four and a half billion years old um
[2:32:41 - 2:32:46] ▶
according to to most the scientists uh and geologists and so we have really only been around in modern
[2:32:46 - 2:32:55] ▶
forms for a very short period of time and we've only been looking to the heavens with technology to
[2:32:55 - 2:33:01] ▶
actually allow us to look and only been off this planet for the last 60 years right and that 400
[2:33:01 - 2:33:08] ▶
thousand years and we've always been asking the question are we alone and we know life here on earth
[2:33:08 - 2:33:14] ▶
is prolific it's everywhere it's all the place we never expected to be it's miles beneath the Arctic
[2:33:14 - 2:33:18] ▶
ice it's in the bottom of the ocean by the black smokers um you know there's life forms at every time
[2:33:18 - 2:33:24] ▶
we try to define what life is in Mother Nature Wiggles are way out of the box um there was a time when
[2:33:24 - 2:33:29] ▶
I was taught that all life derived from photosynthesis turned out that's not true go to the bottom of
[2:33:29 - 2:33:34] ▶
the ocean there's there's animals and critters that live off something called chemosynthesis
[2:33:34 - 2:33:37] ▶
around the black smokers um these very very hot upwellings of of water and minerals and
[2:33:38 - 2:33:42] ▶
depotions uh there's bacteria that can live on the skin of the ISS space station where the radiation
[2:33:42 - 2:33:48] ▶
levels are through the roof and the extremes of temperature right and um every time we try to put
[2:33:48 - 2:33:53] ▶
Mother Nature in a box we we learn that we're wrong and so in our quest to find intelligent life in
[2:33:53 - 2:34:01] ▶
the universe in all that time is it possible that life found us first is it possible that
[2:34:01 - 2:34:09] ▶
because the same way we detect planets with their atmospheres someone detected us and said hey
[2:34:10 - 2:34:14] ▶
that that's a really special little planet out there we we need to figure out what what that's about
[2:34:14 - 2:34:20] ▶
and it's not that this cohabitation of our species is something recent
[2:34:20 - 2:34:26] ▶
is it possible there's a long history of there in fact when we were proto-humans is it possible
[2:34:26 - 2:34:32] ▶
that's some sort of advanced species was already observing us um you know the universe is very old
[2:34:32 - 2:34:38] ▶
and we even the earth being four and a half billion years old the universe is much older you know
[2:34:38 - 2:34:43] ▶
we're a third maybe four-generation star system which means the stuff that made our star
[2:34:43 - 2:34:49] ▶
came from another star which came from a supernova which before that became from a hypronome which
[2:34:50 - 2:34:54] ▶
before that became from you know so so even our earth is only it's relatively young in the scale of
[2:34:54 - 2:35:01] ▶
the universe um is possible that in our attempts to find intelligent life out in the cosmos that
[2:35:01 - 2:35:08] ▶
it has found us first I think it's certainly possible and products I think it's it's it's it's it's
[2:35:08 - 2:35:13] ▶
more than likely yeah we are not alone um okay next question here um see how this one goes
[2:35:13 - 2:35:23] ▶
cattle and human manipulations mutilations yeah mutilations right cattle and human mutilations
[2:35:35 - 2:35:41] ▶
don't seem to get discussed watch your take on this and this is from senzubin yeah
[2:35:42 - 2:35:48] ▶
senzubin okay um we know of the observables in the Pentagon we always talked about the five
[2:35:48 - 2:35:56] ▶
observables but we've always maintained it's actually six whatever misbiological effects so um
[2:35:56 - 2:36:01] ▶
you know the word i think the issue here is word mutilations um we're we're we're we're
[2:36:02 - 2:36:06] ▶
we are superimposing two different things a mutilation is usually something very negative
[2:36:08 - 2:36:13] ▶
and it's usually a crime and so we hear about cattle mutilations why because a cattle is the
[2:36:13 - 2:36:18] ▶
sovereign property of the farmer and if an animal gets hurt or injured or destroyed in a deliberate
[2:36:18 - 2:36:24] ▶
fashion or whether it's by an animal predator or human or anything else it's a mutilation um
[2:36:24 - 2:36:31] ▶
human mutilations usually have something called uh human experience not a mutilation most of the
[2:36:31 - 2:36:39] ▶
people they refer to themselves as quote-unquote experience serves and um will will relay
[2:36:39 - 2:36:46] ▶
their very positive or very negative cessation but but mutilation is usually not
[2:36:46 - 2:36:51] ▶
not ascribed because it's not permanent it doesn't result in death like it doesn't
[2:36:53 - 2:36:57] ▶
in for a cow for example there's been some examples yeah well yeah there's some there's some there
[2:36:57 - 2:37:03] ▶
are some outlying yeah stories of of individuals have been with similar effects that the cows had
[2:37:03 - 2:37:11] ▶
sure well the cows are the horses usually the cows and horses aren't around to tell you their story
[2:37:11 - 2:37:16] ▶
right what we're left is with a body that's in the process of decomposition advanced decomposition
[2:37:16 - 2:37:21] ▶
in some cases that appear to have some sort of surgical precision um without loss of blood um and
[2:37:21 - 2:37:29] ▶
instant cotterization of blood vessels right without a trace of without a trait right and I've
[2:37:29 - 2:37:34] ▶
spoken to um an individual who worked for the department of um let me see if I should we
[2:37:34 - 2:37:44] ▶
tell him trouble he was a uh usda person uh who happened to be also a a veterinarian okay and uh
[2:37:44 - 2:37:55] ▶
so he worked for the government but he was also a senior veterinarian out somewhere out west
[2:37:55 - 2:37:58] ▶
and I had a chance to speak to him and he told me point blank look what's happening to some of
[2:37:59 - 2:38:04] ▶
these cows it's it's not natural predation and it's not us uh something is doing this and we're
[2:38:04 - 2:38:10] ▶
very concerned um within his his his office um as far as as humans um there are people that we
[2:38:10 - 2:38:25] ▶
have like uh Dr. Gary Nolan who focused on the biological effects whatever whatever however
[2:38:25 - 2:38:32] ▶
you want to describe that right however you want to describe that um where there does seem to be
[2:38:32 - 2:38:38] ▶
at least in some cases brain scarring and yeah to quite a thippewdom and correct so where
[2:38:39 - 2:38:44] ▶
there's been specific morphology the other question is we have to ask is it deliberate look it could
[2:38:44 - 2:38:49] ▶
just be a product of the technology if I stick my head too close to a microwave oven while the
[2:38:49 - 2:38:52] ▶
microwave oven oven is on and the door is open don't be surprised if I get you know severe
[2:38:52 - 2:38:59] ▶
negative medical consequences I'm putting my head next to radiation right it's not the fault of
[2:38:59 - 2:39:04] ▶
the microwave it's just doing what it does if you get near some advanced technology that you don't
[2:39:04 - 2:39:08] ▶
understand don't be surprised if something happens right if I'm at an airport I jump on a 737
[2:39:08 - 2:39:13] ▶
hey no threat but if I'm at an airport I jump onto the tarmac the runway where that airplane is
[2:39:13 - 2:39:18] ▶
and its engine is is throttling up what's going to happen well I'm going to go deaf I'm going to get
[2:39:18 - 2:39:22] ▶
burned I'm you know bad things happen is it is it is it the fault of the airplane now it's my fault
[2:39:22 - 2:39:28] ▶
I got 2dM close to it right yeah so um that's for humans but for the for the cattle part I mean that
[2:39:28 - 2:39:34] ▶
just seems right well so let's go back to the question cattle and human relations don't seem to
[2:39:34 - 2:39:39] ▶
get discussed um well not publicly well but but we're discussing it now yeah right and what's my
[2:39:39 - 2:39:46] ▶
take on it my take is that there are some similarities but there's also some very significant
[2:39:46 - 2:39:52] ▶
differences um from what I have learned them in privy to again I am not an expert on on on bovine
[2:39:52 - 2:40:03] ▶
I'm not an expert on equine yeah but it wasn't part of the you know it could just be like the I guess
[2:40:03 - 2:40:10] ▶
the because it's scary when you see these animals yeah and they're they're disturbing it really is
[2:40:10 - 2:40:16] ▶
incredibly disturbing and they're lovely animals yeah you didn't ask for that and you know when you
[2:40:16 - 2:40:22] ▶
see them in the state they're in but don't we do the same though like that not to be not to be
[2:40:22 - 2:40:26] ▶
yeah but don't we do the same to the animals we do the same to those animals specifically we eat
[2:40:26 - 2:40:30] ▶
them yeah brother we put them in a place where they're with a bunch of other animals they know
[2:40:30 - 2:40:34] ▶
they're gonna die correct and they we put them through this awful little little runway where they're
[2:40:34 - 2:40:38] ▶
forced to run down and next thing they know they you know they got a bullet in the brain or they're
[2:40:38 - 2:40:42] ▶
getting the throat slashed yeah and they're choking on their own blood you're correct you know
[2:40:42 - 2:40:46] ▶
when we sound the cat emulation that's awful well you know what's really awful we do the same thing
[2:40:46 - 2:40:50] ▶
but we also don't advertise that and that's my point I think for the same reason is why it doesn't
[2:40:50 - 2:40:56] ▶
get discussed we don't we don't talk about the you know deplorable conditions in these farms that
[2:40:56 - 2:41:03] ▶
these you know pigs get slaughtered in terrible yeah terrible yeah but we don't talk about it we don't
[2:41:03 - 2:41:08] ▶
advertise it right could it be that that's the same reason we don't talk about these cattle
[2:41:08 - 2:41:11] ▶
mutilation well possibly also don't know that maybe these these cattle are being selected maybe
[2:41:11 - 2:41:16] ▶
they're being dispatched or perhaps killed before that happened right we we're assuming and
[2:41:16 - 2:41:21] ▶
presuming it's all happening at once these poor defense animals have you know they're just being
[2:41:21 - 2:41:25] ▶
tortured that may not be the case at all it could be the being euthanized right then they're doing
[2:41:25 - 2:41:30] ▶
and then you know okay well put it there in a far corner there where it'll it'll naturally decay
[2:41:30 - 2:41:34] ▶
and well the human dumb humans come across it okay but it's what we're doing I mean it's you know we
[2:41:34 - 2:41:41] ▶
as a species do that we go all the time look we mutilate animals all the time I mean go to go to some
[2:41:41 - 2:41:48] ▶
of these I want to be careful here we upset anybody but go to some of these these wet markets right
[2:41:48 - 2:41:54] ▶
I mean have you seen the way some of these animals are and they're living and breathing and conscious
[2:41:54 - 2:41:58] ▶
and they see they know what's gonna happen to them dogs cats right animals bird you know
[2:41:58 - 2:42:04] ▶
cattle me live you ask me that's a hell of a lot more you mean than the crap we do yep all right good
[2:42:04 - 2:42:11] ▶
take I like it and we do it to ourselves too unfortunately that is true too um okay last one from
[2:42:11 - 2:42:20] ▶
the audience here that's a good one for your game shop I love it it said I'm an old I'm old
[2:42:20 - 2:42:30] ▶
school so I remember actual the the shows the game shows that did the train stations yeah what is
[2:42:30 - 2:42:36] ▶
more interesting regarding the uap's and related phenomena the sky or the sea wow and this is from
[2:42:36 - 2:42:45] ▶
Dennis W Dennis W good question all of them were good um let me see what can do this well interesting
[2:42:46 - 2:42:52] ▶
is subjective right so if you're if you're if you're if you're in between well it's most people if
[2:42:52 - 2:42:56] ▶
you're an aerospace person then the atmosphere I mean to you this question is directed for you
[2:42:56 - 2:43:01] ▶
no but I'm saying here I'm looking at it through a specific lens I'm caveat
[2:43:01 - 2:43:05] ▶
I'm sorry okay so people know that I'm not the reason why my perspective is the way it is because
[2:43:05 - 2:43:09] ▶
it's to me in my background okay I got you so if you come from an aerospace background the things
[2:43:09 - 2:43:13] ▶
in the sky are very very interesting if you come from an oceanographic perspective let's say
[2:43:13 - 2:43:17] ▶
like Tim guy dead then the undersea things seem to be more more interesting because you are
[2:43:17 - 2:43:22] ▶
at expert in those areas and when you see the uap performing the way they're performing um whether
[2:43:22 - 2:43:27] ▶
you're an aerospace guy or an undersea guy it's pretty pretty amazing right so you're like oh wow
[2:43:27 - 2:43:32] ▶
how is that probably yeah the air stuff is interesting but the water is so dense and you can how's
[2:43:32 - 2:43:36] ▶
that possible right in the aerospace guys yeah but we're going to these things are coming in from
[2:43:36 - 2:43:39] ▶
outer space and and do you understand the physics involved and so um it's important to caveat
[2:43:39 - 2:43:45] ▶
that because it one is not more important than the other it's no different than you driving your
[2:43:45 - 2:43:50] ▶
what's more interesting when you're driving your car do you like driving your car in the rain or
[2:43:50 - 2:43:55] ▶
the snow well it depends you know if you're not used to driving in the rain you'd rather driving
[2:43:55 - 2:43:58] ▶
the snow if you're not used to driving a snow much rather driving you know am I from Florida
[2:43:58 - 2:44:02] ▶
am I from Buffalo New York right so it's going to be different for for people with this background for
[2:44:02 - 2:44:08] ▶
me uh I find I find very interesting the the the stuff that is is is in the sky but but not for
[2:44:08 - 2:44:21] ▶
the reason you might think not because of my background aerospace because frankly it's a cop
[2:44:21 - 2:44:25] ▶
out it's easier to collect the data for me it's look we've got so much things airborne capability
[2:44:25 - 2:44:31] ▶
spaceborne capability ground capability radars and all this other stuff and it's easier to collect
[2:44:31 - 2:44:37] ▶
the data and more people see it underwater it's very tough and unless you have a collection capability
[2:44:37 - 2:44:43] ▶
right there chances are you're not going to catch it so it's not as frequent and not as often it
[2:44:43 - 2:44:49] ▶
doesn't mean it doesn't happen just as much it just means that we don't have the persistent surveillance
[2:44:49 - 2:44:55] ▶
capabilities that we do above the water and people look we're terrestrial thing we live on land right
[2:44:55 - 2:45:01] ▶
we can see the sky we don't live underwater we're not a fish or a shark right so
[2:45:01 - 2:45:05] ▶
so for me I find what's in the sky very interesting but only because the data is more available
[2:45:06 - 2:45:12] ▶
and it's easier to make a determination what is conventional technology someone's being
[2:45:12 - 2:45:18] ▶
you they're confused between that non-section and airplane 737 was way to LA or that is a satellite
[2:45:18 - 2:45:24] ▶
or that's part of starlinker that's part of a whatever the maybe um versus undersea
[2:45:24 - 2:45:29] ▶
more of a puzzle up there it's more of a puzzle up there underwater we have less information but it's
[2:45:29 - 2:45:35] ▶
also to be more scary because it means it's a lot closer right but these things are from the ocean
[2:45:35 - 2:45:41] ▶
now it's like wait a minute we're neighbors you know yeah next time I'm on a carnival cruise ship
[2:45:41 - 2:45:47] ▶
you know heading to the Caribbean is it possible one of these things are below us right you know
[2:45:47 - 2:45:51] ▶
that's an awfully deep ocean like I said and it's it's it's interesting to consider it's a really
[2:45:51 - 2:45:58] ▶
good question but my answer is keep in mind it's it's subject phase subjective yeah be it's
[2:45:58 - 2:46:06] ▶
unqualified because I'm not an expert in the ocean sure and and see it's it's a cop out for me
[2:46:06 - 2:46:12] ▶
because it's easier there's just something more data for me to go through yep all right great answer
[2:46:12 - 2:46:16] ▶
all right man dude we almost pulled three hours here did we yeah that's crazy um one one more
[2:46:18 - 2:46:23] ▶
favor I'm gonna ask you yeah I'm gonna ask you to sign two of these well three of these one of
[2:46:23 - 2:46:27] ▶
this for me and I bought two extra ones because we're gonna give some away I love it to to the audience
[2:46:27 - 2:46:33] ▶
we're gonna give them a chance to get a signed copy here um guys simply if you if you'd like to win
[2:46:33 - 2:46:40] ▶
one of these signed copies uh make sure you're subscribed like this video and then comment below
[2:46:40 - 2:46:46] ▶
your favorite part of this podcast or this discussion something some piece of information that
[2:46:46 - 2:46:55] ▶
you found interesting that Lulette slipped through the cracks and I'm gonna choose one of you there
[2:46:55 - 2:47:02] ▶
and the other one is going to be an intern so if you want to increase your chances on winning one
[2:47:02 - 2:47:08] ▶
of these because there are far fewer interns than there are people watching this you can go ahead
[2:47:08 - 2:47:12] ▶
and uh join our membership I click on the join button or go ahead and go to um is it patreon.com
[2:47:12 - 2:47:20] ▶
slash area 52 investigations and join for five bucks a month there and we got all sorts of
[2:47:20 - 2:47:25] ▶
extra stuff but I'll be choosing one of our interns to win the other signed copy thank you so much
[2:47:25 - 2:47:31] ▶
for watching and Lulette thank you to all of you I don't know what the primary camera but to all of
[2:47:31 - 2:47:37] ▶
you thank you thank you thank you for your time hope I didn't drone on and bore the hell out of you
[2:47:37 - 2:47:41] ▶
uh talk to my wife she'll tell you I do a lot of people all the time uh but thank you truly and
[2:47:41 - 2:47:47] ▶
and if you don't mind just so you know you are making the difference this is only possible because of you
[2:47:47 - 2:47:53] ▶
and not only are other people listening but governments of the world are listening to you um so
[2:47:54 - 2:47:59] ▶
thank you for your courage and and having the curiosity in this topic a topic that was once
[2:47:59 - 2:48:05] ▶
perceived as being um according to the American Psychological Association that being an extreme
[2:48:05 - 2:48:10] ▶
form of deviance um thank you for being curious thank you for your courage uh being part of this
[2:48:10 - 2:48:15] ▶
conversation with us and um we do it for you so so thank you and God bless thanks man you got it brother
[2:48:15 - 2:48:22] ▶
appreciate absolutely my own privilege
[2:48:22 - 2:48:33] ▶
thank you so much for watching I guess we continue to that
[2:48:52 - 2:48:59] ▶