212 segments
Even in today's world, UFO are not taken seriously by academia.
[0:00:00 - 0:00:05] ▶
And even with a wealth of multi-sensor data, the world of physics does not conduct hard
[0:00:05 - 0:00:10] ▶
Due to the powerful stigma, the idea that craft can perform aerial feats that violate our
[0:00:12 - 0:00:17] ▶
known laws of physics and break by magnitudes our current capabilities of material science
[0:00:17 - 0:00:24] ▶
are not just forgotten about, but actively scoffed at.
[0:00:24 - 0:00:28] ▶
While there is one accomplished academic who publicly takes the physics of UFO seriously,
[0:00:28 - 0:00:35] ▶
PhD physicist Kevin Knuth.
[0:00:35 - 0:00:38] ▶
Hey guys, it's UAPGurb, and for all my engineering and physics brethren, we are going to be very
[0:00:38 - 0:00:44] ▶
happy for today we are going to tackle the sole foundation speech by Kevin Knuth on UAK physics
[0:00:44 - 0:00:51] ▶
and break down his published paper, estimating flight characteristics of anomalous unidentified
[0:00:51 - 0:00:57] ▶
This is a video I've been looking forward to making for a long time, as regardless of how
[0:00:58 - 0:01:02] ▶
elusive and exotic UAP are, quantifiable data from multiple sensors on these craft's flight
[0:01:02 - 0:01:09] ▶
characteristics have and can be measured.
[0:01:09 - 0:01:12] ▶
Quickly, who is Kevin Knuth?
[0:01:12 - 0:01:14] ▶
Professor Knuth is a physics professor at the University of Albany and earned his PhD in physics
[0:01:14 - 0:01:20] ▶
from the University of Minnesota. He also conducts research into information physics,
[0:01:20 - 0:01:24] ▶
foundation of quantum mechanics, and Bayesian analysis applications.
[0:01:24 - 0:01:28] ▶
Recently, Knuth has taken a key interest in UFOs, serving as Vice President of UAPX,
[0:01:29 - 0:01:35] ▶
a non-profit UFO field research group, and is a research affiliate to Avilob's Galileo
[0:01:35 - 0:01:42] ▶
project, which searches for scientific evidence of NHI artifacts. In late 2023, the professor
[0:01:42 - 0:01:48] ▶
also held a mind-boggling talk at the Soul Foundation which we will cover today.
[0:01:48 - 0:01:52] ▶
On the 25th of September 2019, Knuth along with Robert M. Powell and Peter A. really published a
[0:01:53 - 0:01:59] ▶
paper in entropy titled, Estimating Flight Characteristics of Anomalous Unidentified Aerial Vehicles.
[0:01:59 - 0:02:06] ▶
This paper, which has deeply inspired me since its publication, aims to analyze the performance
[0:02:06 - 0:02:11] ▶
characteristics of some of the most well-documented UFO cases in history, including the 1951
[0:02:11 - 0:02:17] ▶
Bethane Encounter, the 1986 Japan Airlines Flight 1628, which I talked about in layer two of my
[0:02:17 - 0:02:24] ▶
iceberg, and a massive dive into the infamous 2004 Nimitz Encounter, with emphasis on Commander
[0:02:24 - 0:02:30] ▶
David Fravers' testimony and the Flair footage. In this paper, the physicists use data on UFOs to
[0:02:30 - 0:02:37] ▶
estimate flight speed, experience GeForce, and more of the encounters. To any of the community
[0:02:37 - 0:02:43] ▶
interested in physics, this paper reads like a dream, so check it out for yourselves.
[0:02:43 - 0:02:47] ▶
We will not dive into the data and results now as the professor touches on these cases in the
[0:02:48 - 0:02:53] ▶
Soul Foundation talk. In November of 2023, alongside powerful figures such as Caron Nell,
[0:02:53 - 0:02:59] ▶
David Grush, Gary Nolan, and more, Knuth gave a talk to the Soul Foundation focused on the
[0:02:59 - 0:03:04] ▶
physics of UAP and let's jump right in. Knuth begins his presentation by wisely stating his
[0:03:04 - 0:03:10] ▶
skepticism towards UFO and physicists who deny the plausibility of physics-defined craft,
[0:03:10 - 0:03:16] ▶
specifically stating, quote, I am skeptical of people who have assumed they have witnessed
[0:03:16 - 0:03:20] ▶
an alien spacecraft end quote. Knuth humbly states that it is surprising academia
[0:03:20 - 0:03:26] ▶
stalwartly states we know our physics, when modern day research fails to unify even general
[0:03:26 - 0:03:32] ▶
relativity and quantum mechanics. Engineering is the act of using physics to find workarons to
[0:03:32 - 0:03:38] ▶
problems and unfamiliar engineering can look a whole lot like anomalous physics. So I am not ready to
[0:03:38 - 0:03:46] ▶
immediately jump to the conclusion that there's anomalous physics going on when we see some anomalies.
[0:03:46 - 0:03:51] ▶
Similar to Nell, Kevin highlights the issue with the term UAP knocking the ambiguity out of the term.
[0:03:51 - 0:03:57] ▶
Some of these things are observed very well and described very well. While presenting UAP as a
[0:03:57 - 0:04:04] ▶
class of phenomena, Knuth presents a slide of 7 UFO images and yes, my profile image can be seen
[0:04:04 - 0:04:11] ▶
here, taken in 2007 in Green Bay, Wisconsin. The inclusion of these images is very deliberate,
[0:04:11 - 0:04:17] ▶
so let's go through the context of each image. And let's knock out the Mosul Orb from 2016 in Iraq
[0:04:17 - 0:04:23] ▶
provided by Jeremy Corbell and Japan 1943 food fighters as these have been discussed to death.
[0:04:23 - 0:04:28] ▶
Costa Rica 1971 occurred on the Lago de Cota Costa Rica. The photo was taken by a government
[0:04:29 - 0:04:36] ▶
mapping plane during an aerial mapping mission. A high quality photo of this disc was taken from
[0:04:36 - 0:04:42] ▶
10,000 feet. Interestingly, the four crew did not notice this craft but locals near the lake
[0:04:42 - 0:04:48] ▶
reported strange sightings of a disc-shaped craft operating around and below the lake's surface.
[0:04:48 - 0:04:54] ▶
The wayuwego was constant 2003 image is actually quite disturbing. This image features a disc
[0:04:54 - 0:05:01] ▶
hovering over trees. According to the photographer's account, she and her son were sledding near dusk
[0:05:01 - 0:05:07] ▶
when the child pointed to lights in the sky. The photographer quickly snapped three images of the
[0:05:07 - 0:05:12] ▶
disc as it passed directly overhead. And according to the woman, the light cycled between different
[0:05:12 - 0:05:18] ▶
colors. The UFO evidence investigator attempted to contact the photographer for more information to
[0:05:18 - 0:05:23] ▶
no avail but was able to analyze the photo and found no evidence of practical effects or CGI
[0:05:24 - 0:05:30] ▶
and noticed compression similar to that of a digital camera.
[0:05:30 - 0:05:33] ▶
The images taken from Vancouver, British Columbia Canada in 2005 highlights a truly
[0:05:34 - 0:05:39] ▶
anomalous shape almost dislike but with complex curves. According to the photographer
[0:05:39 - 0:05:45] ▶
of the image Rob RS, he was simply taking the images of the China shipping lanes vessel and saw
[0:05:45 - 0:05:51] ▶
no craft. Only when reviewing his photos on the SD card did he see the presence of the UFO.
[0:05:51 - 0:05:57] ▶
And now onto my actual profile picture, one of my favorite series of UFO images ever.
[0:05:58 - 0:06:03] ▶
These images were also taken in Wisconsin this time in 2007 around Green Bay and looks quite
[0:06:04 - 0:06:11] ▶
similar to the wayuwego UFO with a different light configuration. Of course, there is a noticeable
[0:06:11 - 0:06:17] ▶
difference in the three triangular lights and the O3 images and the circular pattern of lights as
[0:06:17 - 0:06:21] ▶
depicted here. But the craft shape, color and location is almost identical. I don't want to dive too
[0:06:21 - 0:06:28] ▶
much into this series of images now as I do plan to explore them further. The three 1958
[0:06:28 - 0:06:33] ▶
Trindade Brazil photographs depicted classic flying disc with sharp edges not dissimilar to the
[0:06:33 - 0:06:39] ▶
cow vine photographs. The photos were taken from the vessel Amarante Saldenha by photographer
[0:06:39 - 0:06:46] ▶
Almiro Berrana near the Trindade Island, 600 miles off the Brazilian mainland. Berrana, along
[0:06:46 - 0:06:52] ▶
with many of the other 48 passengers including Lieutenant Homerro, saw the UFO gleaming light fly
[0:06:52 - 0:06:58] ▶
behind Dessado Peak. Seconds later the craft reversed directions and flew closer and lower
[0:06:58 - 0:07:04] ▶
at noticeably faster speeds. The object was gray, metallic and solid looking, though surrounded
[0:07:04 - 0:07:10] ▶
by a greenish haze or mist. With a ring running through its midsection, this craft was described
[0:07:10 - 0:07:17] ▶
as resembling a flattened version of the planet Saturn. Canuth then goes on to reference the five
[0:07:17 - 0:07:22] ▶
characteristics of UAP or six if you include biological effects, as famously outlined by Luel
[0:07:22 - 0:07:29] ▶
Aisando of Aitib. These five characteristics I like to bring up quite often in them thrilled Kevin
[0:07:29 - 0:07:34] ▶
mentions them. He pays special attention to the combination of sudden slash instantaneous acceleration
[0:07:34 - 0:07:42] ▶
and hypersonic velocities without signatures. To analyze these two characteristics of UAP,
[0:07:42 - 0:07:48] ▶
Knuth references the famous Nimitz encounter. When people bring up UAP as foreign technology,
[0:07:48 - 0:07:53] ▶
I often like to reference this analysis. During the Tic Tacs Altitude change from 28,000
[0:07:53 - 0:07:58] ▶
feet to sea level in roughly 0.78 seconds, the craft experienced an estimated 5,400 Gs of force.
[0:07:58 - 0:08:07] ▶
To put this into perspective, a human can handle 16 Gs for less than a minute until death,
[0:08:07 - 0:08:12] ▶
and our best ballistic missiles can handle around 100 Gs before getting ripped to shreds.
[0:08:12 - 0:08:17] ▶
There's a lower bound for the acceleration, which comes out to be around 5,000 Gs.
[0:08:17 - 0:08:23] ▶
5,000 times the acceleration of gravity. No people aren't going to survive this. Most equipment
[0:08:23 - 0:08:30] ▶
won't survive this. And F-35's wings will rip off at about 13 Gs.
[0:08:30 - 0:08:35] ▶
To calculate the power of this acceleration, Knuth must have the mass of the Tic Tac.
[0:08:36 - 0:08:41] ▶
Of course, he does not have this data, so he takes an extremely conserved approach
[0:08:41 - 0:08:46] ▶
and estimates the mass of the Tic Tac to be around one tenth the mass of a similarly sized F-18
[0:08:46 - 0:08:52] ▶
at 10,000 kg. So for his calculations, he uses 1,000 kg as the mass of the Tic Tac.
[0:08:52 - 0:08:58] ▶
A simple power calculation reminiscent of my college physics days yields an output of 1,100 GW,
[0:08:58 - 0:09:07] ▶
10 times the total nuclear output of the United States. The professor then references a lecture
[0:09:07 - 0:09:13] ▶
made by the German father of modern rocketry, Hermann Oberth, on flying saucers that was completely
[0:09:13 - 0:09:19] ▶
new to me. For reference, Oberth mentored, Operation Paperclip Scientist, and Father of NASA,
[0:09:19 - 0:09:25] ▶
Werner von Braun. In this lecture, Oberth quotes UFO speeds have been clocked in at 19 km per second,
[0:09:25 - 0:09:33] ▶
which is equivalent to 42,000 miles per hour or Mach 55. Interestingly, Oberth was able to calculate
[0:09:33 - 0:09:41] ▶
these values based off of 50 cases derived from USath and US Navy data.
[0:09:41 - 0:09:47] ▶
This has been known for a long time. Hermann Oberth was the German father of modern rocketry. He was
[0:09:48 - 0:09:56] ▶
a mentor of Werner von Braun. In 1954, he gave a lecture on flying saucers, where he pointed out that
[0:09:56 - 0:10:04] ▶
they have been measured to travel at speeds of 19 km a second, which is about 42,000 miles an hour.
[0:10:04 - 0:10:13] ▶
And he points out that he actually says, if there were only three or four measurements,
[0:10:14 - 0:10:20] ▶
I would not rely upon them and would wait for further measurements, but there is existing more than
[0:10:20 - 0:10:25] ▶
50 such measurements. Rate our measurements. In 1954. To add some interest here, in 1954,
[0:10:25 - 0:10:32] ▶
Oberth wrote in American Weekly, quote, it is my thesis that flying saucers are real and that
[0:10:32 - 0:10:38] ▶
they are spaceships from another solar system. I think that they are possibly manned by intelligent
[0:10:38 - 0:10:43] ▶
observers who are members of a race that may have been investigating our Earth for centuries.
[0:10:43 - 0:10:48] ▶
He thinks that UFOs might fly by, quote, distorting the gravitational field.
[0:10:49 - 0:10:53] ▶
Kevin then references the flight characteristics of a really under the radar UFO encounter that
[0:10:54 - 0:11:00] ▶
occurred at Menot Air Force Base in North Dakota in 1968. And what's worthy to note here, similar
[0:11:00 - 0:11:06] ▶
to Mountstrom, this airbase supported nuclear weapons, another connection to UFOs and nukes.
[0:11:06 - 0:11:11] ▶
According to base personnel, an egg-shaped UFO with skin described as molten lava,
[0:11:12 - 0:11:17] ▶
maintained a distance of roughly three miles from the descending B-52. During a three-second radar
[0:11:17 - 0:11:23] ▶
sweep, the UFO closed a distance of two miles. According to this acceleration, the craft accelerated
[0:11:23 - 0:11:29] ▶
at 209 G's with a top speed of Mach 12 for 90-200 miles per hour. This case is absurdly interesting
[0:11:29 - 0:11:38] ▶
and something I may cover fully in the future as the egg-shaped craft with the skin like lava
[0:11:38 - 0:11:43] ▶
sounds awfully familiar to Wagant's described crash of an egg-shaped craft with the skin
[0:11:43 - 0:11:49] ▶
exhibiting the mother of pearl effect, doesn't it not? Also, I talk often about USAF regulation 200-2,
[0:11:49 - 0:11:58] ▶
implemented in 1953 to restrict UFO reporting, and to essentially keep any reports from being
[0:11:58 - 0:12:05] ▶
disclosed to Blue Book, Congress, and the American people. While the declassified siding of the
[0:12:05 - 0:12:10] ▶
Menot report shows this case was reported under regulation 200-2. Interesting to see how this case
[0:12:10 - 0:12:17] ▶
never made it into Blue Book files or real public awareness, but is a multi-sensor military
[0:12:17 - 0:12:22] ▶
detection of a UFO at a nuclear military base. And guys, I already covered the 1986 Japan
[0:12:22 - 0:12:29] ▶
Airlines incident pretty in depth in my iceberg layer 2, so if you don't mind, I'll just overlay
[0:12:29 - 0:12:34] ▶
some of that footage here. It's one of my absolute favorite UFO cases, but please remember,
[0:12:34 - 0:12:39] ▶
Knuth calculates the speed of the craft, reach around 269,000 miles per hour.
[0:12:39 - 0:12:48] ▶
At around 5pm on November 17, 1986, Captain Teriyachi and two crew claimed to see a UFO
[0:12:48 - 0:12:57] ▶
approach their plane traveling at 35,000 feet from the left. What they saw and described
[0:12:57 - 0:13:04] ▶
was one large, rounder-sized UFO, the size of an aircraft carrier, to put this into perspective
[0:13:04 - 0:13:10] ▶
about 4,747s in diameter. Accompanying this enormous craft were two smaller lights,
[0:13:10 - 0:13:18] ▶
and the three followed this Boeing 747 for a period of 31 minutes. While traveling at cruising
[0:13:18 - 0:13:26] ▶
speed, Captain Kenju said the mothership maintained a distance of about 7.5 miles from his aircraft,
[0:13:26 - 0:13:34] ▶
but was essentially orbiting around his aircraft in a circular motion, sometimes at a constant
[0:13:35 - 0:13:42] ▶
fixed speed, sometimes darting in and out around its orbit. It's worth mentioning that these
[0:13:42 - 0:13:49] ▶
UFOs were tracked on US Federal Aviation Administration, AN, FPS, 117 long-range 3D-fazed arrays.
[0:13:49 - 0:13:58] ▶
The radar confirmed the UFO stayed about 7.5 miles in radius from the aircraft,
[0:13:59 - 0:14:05] ▶
maintaining that distance, but occasionally changing sides during the radar's 12-second
[0:14:05 - 0:14:11] ▶
interval sweeps. These exhibit extreme accelerations, they've been tracked at hypersonic speeds in air,
[0:14:11 - 0:14:18] ▶
many times. They do not make, I'm running off the bottom of the screen, they don't make sonic
[0:14:20 - 0:14:26] ▶
booms or fireballs, which you would expect, so something very strange is going on.
[0:14:26 - 0:14:30] ▶
And one thing that's almost never mentioned is there's no energy deposition when they stop.
[0:14:31 - 0:14:36] ▶
This thing drops from 28,000 feet to sea level, getting up to about 42,000 miles an hour in the middle,
[0:14:38 - 0:14:44] ▶
and then stops. Where did that energy go? Well, first you worry about where it came from,
[0:14:44 - 0:14:50] ▶
but where did it go? Energy doesn't just disappear. When this thing comes to a stop,
[0:14:50 - 0:14:55] ▶
there ought to have been an explosion, and given the amount of power that it took,
[0:14:55 - 0:14:59] ▶
you can estimate how big that would have been, should have been an explosion about,
[0:14:59 - 0:15:03] ▶
with about the same amount of energy as 250 tomahawk cruise missiles simultaneously blowing.
[0:15:03 - 0:15:11] ▶
The professor then references the consequences of these drastic accelerations.
[0:15:11 - 0:15:16] ▶
To show that under such extreme rates of constant acceleration,
[0:15:16 - 0:15:20] ▶
these craft could reach high percentages of the speed of light to traverse intergalactic
[0:15:20 - 0:15:25] ▶
space at relativistic speeds. Crucially quoted by Knuth, quote, not only do these objects have
[0:15:25 - 0:15:32] ▶
flight characteristics necessary for interstellar travel, they would make excellent interstellar craft.
[0:15:32 - 0:15:38] ▶
And with available data not only can the physics of UFOs be analyzed, but the luminosity too.
[0:15:38 - 0:15:44] ▶
Kevin attests to the luminosity of some UFOs, attributing to their low visibility from photographs.
[0:15:45 - 0:15:50] ▶
Here he references three bright UFO sightings. The luminosity of these objects can be calculated
[0:15:51 - 0:15:57] ▶
like in the Canadian Air Force August 1953 sighting. By Dr. Bruce Maccabee, and then also summarized and
[0:15:57 - 0:16:06] ▶
reported by Jacques Vallet, Dr. Vallet. And if you, they were able to look at the original photograph
[0:16:06 - 0:16:18] ▶
and measure the exposure level, and if you do this, you find that the luminosities are on the order
[0:16:18 - 0:16:25] ▶
of 2000 to 30,000 megawatts. Knuth suggests this massive luminosity output may in fact be a
[0:16:25 - 0:16:33] ▶
product of the propulsion systems of these craft. And let's remember in many UFO cases,
[0:16:33 - 0:16:38] ▶
electronics fail when in close proximity to a craft. This suggests the presence of electric
[0:16:38 - 0:16:44] ▶
and magnetic fields, such as the case in the 1976 Tehran incident where major jafaris avionics
[0:16:44 - 0:16:51] ▶
were scrambled, as an orb detached itself from the UAP he was vectored towards and neared him.
[0:16:51 - 0:16:56] ▶
Many other cases see engines in cars fail as such the 1983 McCamble case.
[0:16:56 - 0:17:02] ▶
Electric fields needed to short out spark plugs on an engine would require a field output of
[0:17:02 - 0:17:08] ▶
three times ten to the six volt per meter, possibly ionizing the air.
[0:17:08 - 0:17:14] ▶
That'll short out the spark plugs in the car, it'll short out the distributor cam,
[0:17:15 - 0:17:21] ▶
so the car will stop running if it's a gasoline engine. This electric field emitted by a small
[0:17:22 - 0:17:28] ▶
UFO would require several coulombs of charge, equating to about ten to the ninth jewels of energy.
[0:17:28 - 0:17:34] ▶
Knuth additionally touches on magnetic fields created by UFO.
[0:17:35 - 0:17:38] ▶
These huge magnetic fields can cause an effect called the ferridae effect which rotates the
[0:17:39 - 0:17:44] ▶
polarization of the light. So if you take a photograph of a UFO with a polarizing filter,
[0:17:44 - 0:17:49] ▶
which I recommend for this reason, you will see that you'll get rings around the UFO if it has
[0:17:49 - 0:17:56] ▶
a large magnetic field. This has been observed and it's been photographed.
[0:17:56 - 0:18:01] ▶
Resulting in fields on the magnitude of around ten to the eleventh through ten to the 13th
[0:18:01 - 0:18:06] ▶
amp meter squared, aka guys massive magnetic fields. And finally one of the least
[0:18:06 - 0:18:12] ▶
represented aspects of UFO or should I say USO, unidentified submerged objects.
[0:18:12 - 0:18:18] ▶
Kevin dives into USOs operating near and within water.
[0:18:19 - 0:18:22] ▶
So this is from aqua thea, you can see the UFO dips into the water,
[0:18:23 - 0:18:27] ▶
doesn't make a splash, doesn't seem to affect the water very much,
[0:18:27 - 0:18:30] ▶
and in fact the analysis done by SCU and the lower right shows that as the UFO hits the water
[0:18:31 - 0:18:38] ▶
about a thousand miles an hour or a thousand, I'm sorry, a hundred miles an hour.
[0:18:38 - 0:18:42] ▶
It continues traveling through the water at a round at the same speed and only drops down to
[0:18:43 - 0:18:48] ▶
about 85 miles an hour and that actually accelerates itself.
[0:18:48 - 0:18:51] ▶
You reference is radar operator and semen David Barnett. The professor discusses a USO case
[0:18:52 - 0:18:58] ▶
brand new to me from February of 1987 near the north of New Zealand. In this case the HMZS
[0:18:58 - 0:19:05] ▶
was followed by a USO 150 feet wide and 800 feet long. In the span of less than half a minute,
[0:19:06 - 0:19:13] ▶
the USO closed a 20 kilometer distance estimated a minimum speed and acceleration of 1400 and 92
[0:19:13 - 0:19:21] ▶
miles per hour and an average of 4.5 G's. Noteworthy to add, the craft acted as if it did not
[0:19:21 - 0:19:29] ▶
interact with the water similar to the video Kevin commented on. Closing the 20 kilometer
[0:19:29 - 0:19:34] ▶
distance the USO passed under the HMZS killing all the ship's power and draining batteries.
[0:19:34 - 0:19:40] ▶
Kevin then lists a total of eight old cases in which transmedial air and water UFOs were observed.
[0:19:41 - 0:19:46] ▶
Not going to cover this now but let me know if you would like a full video on these cases.
[0:19:47 - 0:19:51] ▶
Thanks for joining me as we discussed Kevin Knuth and his Soul Foundation talk in his paper
[0:20:04 - 0:20:10] ▶
estimating flight characteristics of anomalous unidentified aerial vehicles. Truth be told,
[0:20:10 - 0:20:16] ▶
since this paper dropped in 2019 I have been infatuated with the data here. Even reaching out to
[0:20:16 - 0:20:22] ▶
Kevin on LinkedIn asking if I could work for him of course didn't pan out but maybe someday in the
[0:20:22 - 0:20:27] ▶
future but just being able to visualize the G forces experienced by things like the Nimitz Tic Tac
[0:20:27 - 0:20:32] ▶
and so forth is truly mind-boggling and actually is we start to put some calculations and data
[0:20:32 - 0:20:39] ▶
to these craft instead of just the anomalous craft in their kind of characteristics as proposed
[0:20:39 - 0:20:44] ▶
by Luel Azondo but a fascinating venture and presentation done by Knuth. What was your favorite
[0:20:44 - 0:20:50] ▶
case he discussed? Probably the Nimitz 5400 G's or the Japan Airlines but I'm just really impressed
[0:20:50 - 0:20:58] ▶
that Kevin Knuth and some physicists actually take the time to do academic research on UAP.
[0:20:58 - 0:21:03] ▶
At some point in the future I want to do a video on the Transmedial Craft as he discussed the
[0:21:04 - 0:21:08] ▶
eight cases that are pre-basically World War II that should be a really fascinating video and
[0:21:08 - 0:21:13] ▶
whenever people like to say that UAP are just foreign adversaries technology,
[0:21:14 - 0:21:18] ▶
look what Kevin's proposed. These cases have been occurring since the 20th century and almost before
[0:21:18 - 0:21:24] ▶
how is this technology possible then if it's a foreign adversary? Absolutely not. But anyway guys
[0:21:24 - 0:21:29] ▶
please remember to like and subscribe, I'll catch you guys on the next video. Thank you so much for joining. Bye.
[0:21:29 - 0:21:34] ▶