Back in the 60s and 70s the US intelligence apparatus, particularly in the Department of Defense, was kind of naughty.
[0:00:47 - 0:00:54] ▶
You don't bring in US persons information and ingest them into a Department of Defense database, especially a Department of Defense intelligence database.
[0:01:27 - 0:01:36] ▶
That's a super no-no. That's called US persons information and it's pretty much foreboding.
[0:01:36 - 0:01:40] ▶
There's absolutely no doubt that we didn't have to look at civilian data because we had better collection sensor systems from the military that was looking at stuff and giving us better insight.
[0:01:58 - 0:02:07] ▶
If you can't tell us about, can you give us some sort of an understanding of like what you're talking about?
[0:02:07 - 0:02:13] ▶
But he was working with us on ATP as one of our scientists.
[0:08:29 - 0:08:33] ▶
But I do recall a time when he came into our skiff and gave us about a three hour lecture on this unifying theory.
[0:08:44 - 0:08:51] ▶
And at that moment, it was very much for us the epiphany that a lot of us had been been searching for.
[0:08:51 - 0:08:56] ▶
So it's really not. Can you give us a morons view of how it's possible?
[0:09:02 - 0:09:06] ▶
Why is the Pentagon teasing us? Why do they tell you why are they allowing you to say we are in possession of something that was not made by human beings, but not allowed to elaborate, not allowed to show these very compelling videos that you're talking about that you've seen?
[0:14:15 - 0:14:31] ▶