Lockheed

Report an issue

Every mention of Lockheed across the entire archive — with clickable timestamps to jump straight to the source.

60 Videos
314 Mentions
Page 6 of 11
A lot of the time these are done through sole source contracts, meaning Lockheed Martin, for example, doesn't have to bid for a contract.
[0:06:10 - 0:06:17] ▶
And I found those sorts of contract methods are pretty standard across the board for some corporations like Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin.
[0:06:26 - 0:06:35] ▶
Yeah. Is it Lockheed Martin? Is it NHI? Is it both? What is it?
[0:28:36 - 0:28:40] ▶
it's Lockheed skunk works tech, but he's never provided anything.
[0:28:45 - 0:28:49] ▶
like told, Oh, this is definitely, you know, Lockheed or whatever, which he was like, you know,
[0:28:54 - 0:29:00] ▶
well, but it might be some deeper military cover, you know, who knows. And if Lockheed Martin has that
[0:31:15 - 0:31:22] ▶
Isn't that also what the head of Lockheed said?
[1:08:26 - 1:08:29] ▶
MITRE Same with Dugway, the guys at the West Desert Test Center, the Induset industrial security personnel, they might only pop up to go test a craft in the Avery area that has an internal internal rail system possibly back down. It's crazy. And so many corporations throughout history that we would expect Lockheed Martin, TRW, the Rand Corporation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Navy SEABEs have all such extensive background in deep underground military bases, investigating cavities and so forth. I mean, even in 1964, the Army published a study of 12 deep basing sites.
[1:19:52 - 1:20:22] ▶
There's a former proposed Lockheed employee called Bill U house who not only said that,
[1:25:44 - 1:25:49] ▶
during the, um, Lockheed Martin 20, 2009 to 2012 divestment to, uh, you know, various
[1:26:02 - 1:26:08] ▶
And then the, the Lockheed engineer that actually has read on access to some of this stuff is
[1:31:45 - 1:31:49] ▶
So you might have a SAP specialist for Northrop Grumman and Lockheed who are aware of the
[1:33:22 - 1:33:29] ▶
gave all of its assets away to Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, I think Mitre as
[1:34:23 - 1:34:29] ▶
two from Lockheed out of the Hellendale radar cross-section plants,
[0:06:36 - 0:06:39] ▶
whose engineering was performed by Lockheed, Boeing, Northrop, Teledyne Ryan,
[0:07:09 - 0:07:15] ▶
was Lockheed Martin's Gunkworks technology.
[0:52:29 - 0:52:32] ▶
If, and I mean if the Tic Tac was indeed reverse-engineered technology out of the Lockheed Skunkworks,
[0:52:51 - 0:52:57] ▶
largely Lockheed Martin
[1:12:22 - 1:12:24] ▶
Lockheed and Boeing.
[1:14:42 - 1:14:43] ▶
was performed by Lockheed,
[1:19:22 - 1:19:24] ▶
Lockheed Skunkworks,
[1:28:03 - 1:28:04] ▶
Tehan and Lockheed
[1:28:19 - 1:28:20] ▶
Lockheed's Plant
[1:29:07 - 1:29:08] ▶
Lockheed Hellendale,
[1:30:31 - 1:30:32] ▶
Lockheed Skunk Works
[1:50:10 - 1:50:11] ▶
Now, in this building, they maintained it, but it was leased to Lockheed.
[0:21:28 - 0:21:36] ▶
Now, the reason I say them separately was that Martin Marietta was separate from Lockheed at the time I was there.
[0:21:39 - 0:21:48] ▶
Only in 1995 did they ever join to be Lockheed Martin.
[0:21:48 - 0:21:52] ▶
And many hardcore UFO researchers have placed EG&G's name alongside Lockheed, Boeing, Northrop,
[0:30:02 - 0:30:09] ▶
In 2001, a former Lockheed and CIA contractor went public saying that Lockheed is working
[0:30:15 - 0:30:21] ▶
It would have been something like Lockheed or Northrop.
[0:45:32 - 0:45:38] ▶
At the time, this is 92, Lockheed and Martin Marietta had not joined into Lockheed Martin yet.
[0:45:55 - 0:46:02] ▶
It was owned by Lockheed Skunk Works.
[0:47:13 - 0:47:20] ▶
If I were to guess, the Lockheed Skunk Works would be one of the tops of the list.
[0:58:09 - 0:58:14] ▶