118 videos containing this reference
Page 13 of 21
the United States Navy and its immeasurable special axis programs,
[0:03:02 - 0:03:06] ▶
shadowy US intelligence apparatuses. But does the Navy just retrieve UFO in USOs
[0:03:10 - 0:03:16] ▶
history and key players in US UFO Navy legacy programs. From the research we will
[0:03:34 - 0:03:40] ▶
Reconnaissance Office and Navy Special Program and involve US naval stations
[0:04:05 - 0:04:09] ▶
investigation into UFO legacy programs under the United States Navy. We will
[0:05:14 - 0:05:19] ▶
about it because the retrieval program undertaken by CIA and elements of the US Navy
[0:05:57 - 0:06:05] ▶
of the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office, US Navy, National Reconnaissance Office,
[0:08:14 - 0:08:19] ▶
the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office, coordinated between the CIA and US Navy,
[0:08:34 - 0:08:39] ▶
redacting all information about the Navy, NURRO, Woods Hole, NGA, NURRO, JSOC, etc.
[0:09:24 - 0:09:30] ▶
analysis end quote. From this article, we can extract a powerful thesis, the US Navy works in
[0:11:02 - 0:11:07] ▶
retrieval operations would be done in tandem with the US Navy and contractors such as Lockheed Martin
[0:12:02 - 0:12:08] ▶
the non-human materials on which the program's focus. The Navy employees numerous U-Arcs and FFRDCs
[0:13:19 - 0:13:26] ▶
according to the testimony of Randy Anderson, the Navy, specifically the Naval Service Warfare Center
[0:14:55 - 0:15:00] ▶
at the Underground Off-World Technologies Division. The Navy also engages in a tremendous roster of
[0:15:06 - 0:15:12] ▶
in this investigation, it is paramount to recognize the Navy has indeed participated in at least one
[0:15:44 - 0:15:50] ▶
from the NRO. Though the NRO likely works with the CIA DSNT and Navy for USO retrievals they are
[0:19:48 - 0:19:55] ▶
coordinate the CIA's and Navy's reconnaissance activities the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office.
[0:20:12 - 0:20:19] ▶
NRO began during the Cold War as a joint Navy CIA group to coordinate and fund special projects
[0:21:59 - 0:22:05] ▶
learn even more about NRO quote. In 1969 as a result of an agreement between the CIA and US Navy
[0:22:11 - 0:22:18] ▶
with Secretary of the Navy John Warner as its first director. The office served as a means of
[0:22:25 - 0:22:31] ▶
designated the special Navy control program. Author Jeffrey T. Richardson was even denied FOIA
[0:22:55 - 0:23:02] ▶
run in Scandinavian waters by NRO whilst directed by Secretary of the Navy John Lehman from 1981 to
[0:24:32 - 0:24:39] ▶
took charge and quote, NRO has seemingly seen a tug of war of control through the CIA and Navy
[0:25:16 - 0:25:21] ▶
but by 1972 the Navy regained some control of NRO seen Secretary of the Navy John Warner
[0:25:22 - 0:25:28] ▶
serve as its director. However through NRO the Navy and CIA DSNT's usage of the Glomar
[0:25:28 - 0:25:34] ▶
and touch on how I believe NRO provided transportation and logistics assets to the Navy's project
[0:27:00 - 0:27:06] ▶
in 1964 achieved scientist of the special project's office of the US Navy Dr. John Pania Craven
[0:27:23 - 0:27:30] ▶
launched the Deepse Emergent Systems project which saw the Navy drastically improve deep sea
[0:27:30 - 0:27:35] ▶
four star admiral in the US Navy from 1951 to 1982 while also serving as the NSA and CIA director
[0:28:44 - 0:28:52] ▶
SAIC locations. And of course Inman's dual roles within US intelligence and the Navy also suits
[0:29:27 - 0:29:33] ▶
a productive national asset working alongside NASA, Inman was reminded of his Navy and NSA days
[0:30:03 - 0:30:08] ▶
modern collection activities. The actual missions were conducted by the services by the US Navy,
[0:31:09 - 0:31:14] ▶
Secretary of the Navy to director of naval intelligence. Also recall how Inman states he was exposed
[0:31:35 - 0:31:40] ▶
directly involves US Navy UFO legacy programs let's dive back in. In 2022 on the project Unity show
[0:32:13 - 0:32:21] ▶
Eschler and insights he gained from senior Naval officials, Eschler would also claim Navy
[0:39:57 - 0:40:01] ▶
only Naval officials who have spoken on UFO legacy programs. In 2021, now deceased former Navy
[0:40:14 - 0:40:21] ▶
service, read into a Navy UFO crash retrieval and reverse engineering program, although Cobitz
[0:40:26 - 0:40:32] ▶
that I could barely believe who he was. His name was Nat Cobitz. He was the US Navy's former
[0:40:44 - 0:40:51] ▶
the CIA DSNT, Navy, Neuro, Socom and others. To quote Chris in the third iteration of the article,
[0:43:36 - 0:43:42] ▶
During the Cold War 1985 to be exact, the US Navy deployed a classified mission to investigate
[0:44:15 - 0:44:20] ▶
the Navy, where it develops technology including ocean battle space sensors, unmanned undersea vehicles,
[0:45:11 - 0:45:17] ▶
Navy Oceanographic Research Laboratory for the Department of the Navy. This WHOI lab is now part
[0:45:59 - 0:46:05] ▶
It was here he began doing rescue diving work on weekends alongside a Navy crew.
[0:48:38 - 0:48:43] ▶
Mark would form a friendship with a lieutenant in the Navy who would go on to become a commander
[0:48:43 - 0:48:47] ▶
two deep-semergence rescue vehicles that operated within the US Navy from 1970 to 2008.
[0:49:52 - 0:49:58] ▶
with disabled submarines. The Navy conducted numerous exercises with DSRVs-1 and-2, but no
[0:50:34 - 0:50:40] ▶
Deep Semergence Systems Project, DSSP, to increase and develop the Navy's deep ocean engineering
[0:50:55 - 0:51:01] ▶
capabilities. The project was initially founded out of the Navy Special Program Office and DSRV's
[0:51:01 - 0:51:07] ▶
Chief Scientist of the Special Programs Office of the Navy and first head of the DSSP,
[0:51:36 - 0:51:40] ▶
thesis in mind. Chief scientist John Craven was tasked by the US Navy to drastically increase
[0:54:20 - 0:54:26] ▶
So now the question must be asked was Sand Dollar the Navy's first UFO legacy program designated
[0:54:52 - 0:54:58] ▶
End quote. From the DSSP, the Navy plan to build six DSRV units and additional DSRVs known as
[0:55:19 - 0:55:26] ▶
I do think it is possible he and his Navy unit were assigned to a DSSV not the two acknowledged
[0:55:46 - 0:55:52] ▶
Remember back to the words of Dr. John P. Craven chief scientist of the Navy Special
[1:09:40 - 1:09:45] ▶
Systems project DSSP which aimed to increase and develop the Navy's deep ocean engineering
[1:10:09 - 1:10:14] ▶
years after the October 1962 Bluegill triple prime US Navy UFO recovery. Additionally this case
[1:10:19 - 1:10:26] ▶
even state the Navy housed by logics such as in 1975 when Lieutenant Colonel X claimed quote
[1:14:23 - 1:14:29] ▶
Pacific Ocean. Now the US Navy does employ multiple DOD laboratories and MRTFBs or major
[1:14:35 - 1:14:42] ▶
Richard Saudder that's similar to deep underground military bases the US Navy employs deep underwater
[1:14:58 - 1:15:05] ▶
Great Lakes Naval Station was shot down by the Navy between Hawaii and the mainland in June of 1973.
[1:18:59 - 1:19:06] ▶
If this story is true, this means the Navy, CIA, and intelligence organizations such as Nuro
[1:19:48 - 1:19:53] ▶
Naval Support Facility in Diego Garcia, he was exposed to the Navy conducting sensitive operations
[1:21:11 - 1:21:17] ▶
Special Navy Control Program. Special Navy Control Program is quite similar to something called the
[1:22:25 - 1:22:31] ▶
Navy Special Program, or NSP. The NSP is a highly elusive naval office that's similar to Nuro we
[1:22:31 - 1:22:38] ▶
can only find snippets of. The first ever mention I can find of the Navy Special Program is in a 1974
[1:22:38 - 1:22:45] ▶
Navy Special Program mentioned alongside the National Reconnaissance Program, especially in the
[1:23:03 - 1:23:08] ▶
Now since Nuro was created between the Navy and CIAD S&T, you may think Navy Special Program refers
[1:23:15 - 1:23:21] ▶
to Nuro. However, the Navy Special Program is itself a very real office. Indeed, the Navy Special
[1:23:21 - 1:23:27] ▶
Here we get a keen look at the organizational structure of the Navy Special Program.
[1:23:50 - 1:23:54] ▶
The Navy Special Program was once designated to run parallel to the National Reconnaissance
[1:23:54 - 1:23:59] ▶
the Navy Special Program seen as he himself served as former ASD slash I. The NSP, according to
[1:24:09 - 1:24:16] ▶
Therefore, with the Navy Special Program acting as an umbrella office for numerous Navy
[1:24:39 - 1:24:44] ▶
under the Navy Special Program Office. This process for Naval UFO legacy programs would likely remain
[1:25:06 - 1:25:12] ▶
Facilities by the Navy Special Program Central Office. Naval legacy programs hidden within the NSP
[1:25:19 - 1:25:25] ▶
encounter them or was not briefed during his prestigious position within the Navy. We can find one
[1:25:41 - 1:25:47] ▶
intriguing acknowledged CIA program that likely utilized the Navy Special Program, Project
[1:25:47 - 1:25:53] ▶
served as the technical director of the Navy Special Program Office, where he provided naval
[1:26:00 - 1:26:05] ▶
technical director of the Navy Special Program Office. And as the executive director of the intelligence
[1:26:27 - 1:26:33] ▶
potte's connection to the Navy Special Program Office. According to excellent researcher Jeff Crookshank,
[1:27:03 - 1:27:09] ▶
the aforementioned Gene Patete. Historically, the Navy special program saw heavy compartmentalization
[1:29:04 - 1:29:11] ▶
overlapping certain compartmented areas of the Navy special program. For read-on access,
[1:29:27 - 1:29:32] ▶
Navy rear admiral and director of Naval Intelligence John Butts. The memo thanks John for his personal
[1:29:51 - 1:29:57] ▶
from the Secretary of the Navy John Layman concerning the Navy special program. Remembered,
[1:30:07 - 1:30:12] ▶
UFO legacy operations. The work here on the Navy special program is just the beginning for me and
[1:30:33 - 1:30:38] ▶
an attempted to contact numerous former Navy special program personnel. These include a man who
[1:30:44 - 1:30:50] ▶
served for three years as a diver in the Navy special program with the mobile diving and salvage unit
[1:30:50 - 1:30:55] ▶
one. I have also contacted one Mr. P. R who served for eight years as project lead for Navy special
[1:30:55 - 1:31:02] ▶
Chris Sharp regarding USO retrievals the Navy and so calm especially intriguing scene as sharp
[1:31:08 - 1:31:14] ▶
security officer for the Navy special program and please understand I am protecting the identity
[1:31:33 - 1:31:38] ▶
as has majorly exploit has the Navy successfully created C-faring ARV a deep C equivalent to the
[1:32:04 - 1:32:12] ▶
Navy special program office an office of Naval research conducting under C UFO and USO crash
[1:32:17 - 1:32:23] ▶
dive into how legacy operations within the Navy are funded I have spoken before on witness Ed who
[1:33:07 - 1:33:13] ▶
clandestine UFO programs may have also occurred in the Navy and we may get a keen look at such an
[1:34:03 - 1:34:09] ▶
instance in 1985 the US Navy faced a massive controversy for an incredibly bizarre occurrence
[1:34:09 - 1:34:16] ▶
scandal arose when in 85 it was discovered the US Navy had paid crumman aerospace
[1:34:16 - 1:34:21] ▶
corporation $660 a piece for ash trays to be included in the E2C Hawkeye the Navy only began to
[1:34:21 - 1:34:29] ▶
investigation it had also been determined the Navy was paying crumman $400 per socket wrench that
[1:34:40 - 1:34:45] ▶
were used to adjust the seats of F-14s and the Navy had also increased payments for ground locks
[1:34:45 - 1:34:51] ▶
the Navy had been charging itself $954 for ash trays for such infractions defense secretary
[1:35:00 - 1:35:08] ▶
naval and special us oh legacy programs this is due to multiple sources of mine informing me navy
[1:36:17 - 1:36:24] ▶
dive into the us navy and UFO and us oh legacy program operations now as I said at the very end of
[1:36:35 - 1:36:43] ▶
why is this is it because the navy deals with weapons technology as in the randy Anderson case
[1:36:56 - 1:37:01] ▶
or is it because the navy specifically the on and r is a pristine stop for craft or is it because
[1:37:07 - 1:37:13] ▶
would like to tackle that case in the future especially because there is testimony of the us navy
[1:41:02 - 1:41:08] ▶
kind of coming in the us navy divers and coming in and really taking over the retrieval operation
[1:41:08 - 1:41:12] ▶
statements and i know i say this in most videos but our work with the navy is really just beginning
[1:44:10 - 1:44:16] ▶
because the navy and if chris sharp reporting is correct the oh and r specifically is almost a
[1:44:22 - 1:44:28] ▶
transported again does the navy just satisfy naval uf o legacy programs for storage of craft or do
[1:44:40 - 1:44:46] ▶
told investigated and seen is that army air force navy almost act siloed very different programs
[1:44:52 - 1:44:59] ▶