10 videos containing this reference
Page 2 of 4
I first took note of Witness 11063, who I will further refer to as Ed, when Dr. Greer released his witness list.
[0:03:10 - 0:03:21] ▶
Unlike MSTB and myriad other witnesses, no communications or files existed on Ed at the initial release of the DPI archive files.
[0:03:38 - 0:03:47] ▶
intelligence briefing modules, that we would get our first leads on Ed.
[0:03:55 - 0:03:59] ▶
Towards the end of Module 3, we see our first discussion of Ed outside the witness list, quote,
[0:04:57 - 0:05:02] ▶
First, let's analyze what I would consider to be the less impactful of the two documents on Ed
[0:06:02 - 0:06:07] ▶
an unknown individual emailed Greer stating witness Ed had been following Greer's work for some time
[0:06:14 - 0:06:20] ▶
This DPI employee states Ed served in USAF from 1999 to his early retirement in 2015,
[0:06:23 - 0:06:29] ▶
According to the email, Ed additionally came from an engineering background,
[0:06:31 - 0:06:35] ▶
The email accurately breaks down Ed's service record.
[0:06:39 - 0:06:42] ▶
In 2006, Ed was sent to Edwards AFB for the base's test pilot school.
[0:06:50 - 0:06:55] ▶
It was here Ed would claim pilots at the Air Force Base are trained for unacknowledged special access programs
[0:06:55 - 0:07:01] ▶
Ed would serve as the head of an electronic warfare group that tested NHI reverse-engineered technology.
[0:07:44 - 0:07:50] ▶
In this role, Ed claimed to serve as the intermediary between engineers who had direct reporting to him
[0:07:50 - 0:07:56] ▶
Ed agrees with Dr. Greer's stance on free energy systems from direct first-hand involvement in various projects.
[0:08:03 - 0:08:10] ▶
Ed is in complete agreement with Greer's stance on free energy.
[0:09:42 - 0:09:46] ▶
Ed isn't the only witness to comment on zero-point systems either.
[0:09:46 - 0:09:50] ▶
Towards the end of our witness testimony internal email, mention is made Ed had been tracking current legislation relating to legacy program member Amnesty,
[0:10:15 - 0:10:24] ▶
So, let's briefly cover a new revelation that supports Ed's accusations of the doctor injecting misinformation into the public.
[0:11:58 - 0:12:04] ▶
The witness testimony document gives us a brief overview of Ed, his background, and motives,
[0:12:24 - 0:12:29] ▶
This two-page set of notes roughly covers a phone conversation between Dr. Greer and Ed on November 25th, 2023.
[0:12:38 - 0:12:45] ▶
Not only do these notes describe Ed's testimony in depth,
[0:12:45 - 0:12:48] ▶
Off the bat, Ed asks Greer if he has threatened legal action against Lockheed and Boeing,
[0:12:57 - 0:13:02] ▶
as Ed was read into programs overlapping these two companies.
[0:13:02 - 0:13:05] ▶
Ed did indeed work with Lockheed as a range technical contractor in the early 2000s at Nellis Air Force Base,
[0:13:07 - 0:13:13] ▶
The idea, Ed was read into UAP programs at Nellis Air Force Base as a first lieutenant from 1999 to 2002,
[0:14:25 - 0:14:32] ▶
Ed was briefed at Area 51 S-4,
[0:14:35 - 0:14:38] ▶
the base where Ed would transfer to and conduct the bulk of his first-hand work around UAP programs.
[0:14:54 - 0:15:00] ▶
Ed states this briefing was conducted via a 30-minute video which showed inspection aircraft that were essentially invisible.
[0:15:00 - 0:15:07] ▶
Is Ed referring to crash retrievals or possibly alien reproduction vehicles, ARVs, for inspection use only?
[0:15:11 - 0:15:18] ▶
Ed worked at Building 200, under the redacted name of the first commander of the 98th Range Wing.
[0:16:09 - 0:16:15] ▶
His time at Building 200 at the NTTR may have seen Ed interact with Boeing, Lockheed Martin, alongside the DOE,
[0:17:46 - 0:17:54] ▶
Circling back to the call notes, Greer made specific note to Ed serving under the first commander right around 2001 of the 98th Range Wing, or NTTR.
[0:17:57 - 0:18:06] ▶
I find this analysis necessary, as Ed may have implied the 98th commander has oversight to UAP reverse-engineering programs.
[0:18:17 - 0:18:24] ▶
Ed saw man-made craft on the range, was there quite a bit, end quote.
[0:19:30 - 0:19:34] ▶
From this statement, we can also gauge that Ed is claiming Area 51-S4 and or Nellis Air Force Base
[0:19:39 - 0:19:45] ▶
Greer then comments on Ed being sent to Edwards Air Force Base in California in 2006 for range orientation,
[0:19:49 - 0:19:55] ▶
where Ed would go on to serve as director of Redacted for an electronic warfare group.
[0:19:56 - 0:20:01] ▶
this station followed Ed's service in Edwards' test pilot school.
[0:20:10 - 0:20:13] ▶
What bolsters these claims from Ed is the fact Edwards Electronic Warfare Group stems from the 412th Test Wing,
[0:20:13 - 0:20:20] ▶
If Ed's testimony is true,
[0:20:24 - 0:20:26] ▶
Ed was briefed on UAP programs at S-4 while stationed at Nellis,
[0:20:48 - 0:20:51] ▶
The documents state Ed served at Nellis until 2002,
[0:21:01 - 0:21:04] ▶
Where was Ed during this gap?
[0:21:07 - 0:21:08] ▶
saw Ed stationed at Hanscom Air Force Base near Boston, Massachusetts.
[0:21:12 - 0:21:16] ▶
Greer writes that Ed worked with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology while at Hanscom,
[0:21:17 - 0:21:21] ▶
Okay, so Ed served at Edwards from 2006 to 2010,
[0:22:30 - 0:22:33] ▶
almost like Ed's time at Nellis saw him getting bits and pieces of program information,
[0:22:41 - 0:22:45] ▶
Ed was part of a go-public plan via the Air Force.
[0:23:00 - 0:23:03] ▶
The plan was called off in 2009 to 2010 and saw Ed move to the Pentagon.
[0:23:03 - 0:23:08] ▶
and served as a colonel during Ed's alleged disclosure plan.
[0:24:45 - 0:24:48] ▶
His early career dovetails almost identically with that of Ed and is worth mentioning.
[0:26:02 - 0:26:07] ▶
According to Ed, Wright-Patterson has a tight connection with Edwards.
[0:26:41 - 0:26:44] ▶
Ed even makes an educated guess Wright-Patt's Hangar 6,
[0:26:45 - 0:26:48] ▶
Ed moved to the Pentagon where, according to Greer,
[0:27:37 - 0:27:39] ▶
Little was discussed between Greer and Ed on his responsibilities at the Pentagon.
[0:27:43 - 0:27:46] ▶
The primary testimony of ED involves first-hand work on UAP programs
[0:28:44 - 0:28:53] ▶
As we have discussed before, numerous factors including ED being briefed at S-4
[0:29:04 - 0:29:09] ▶
we can conclude with high confidence ED's work revolved primarily
[0:29:21 - 0:29:24] ▶
that can support or detract from ED's claims?
[0:29:43 - 0:29:46] ▶
as we took a deep dive into Ed's witness testimony.
[0:41:24 - 0:41:26] ▶
Analyzing Ed's credible witness testimony,
[0:41:37 - 0:41:39] ▶
on Ed's time at the Pentagon.
[0:43:14 - 0:43:17] ▶
After hearing Ed's testimony,
[0:44:04 - 0:44:05] ▶
than to speak to Ed firsthand
[0:44:08 - 0:44:10] ▶
to see this individual, Ed,
[0:44:38 - 0:44:40] ▶