16 — Dates | UAP Files

And you have, you know, different sides saying things that are mutually exclusive.

[0:06:10 - 0:06:16] ▶

And truth, it never collapses into true or false.

[0:06:16 - 0:06:19] ▶

When did you become aware of this UFO legacy reverse engineering program?

[0:08:10 - 0:08:16] ▶

And how did you become aware of it, and how are you so high confidence in it?

[0:08:16 - 0:08:21] ▶

including my letter that I'm deputized by Jim Lekatsky as a representative of the Defense Intelligence Agency,

[0:09:16 - 0:09:22] ▶

because he just seems like a very kind of honest above board guy who stumbled into a lot of this stuff.

[0:12:11 - 0:12:16] ▶

And so I have an idea from plenty of sources that this program exists.

[0:15:58 - 0:16:04] ▶

And what's more, in the case of atomic weapons,

[0:16:04 - 0:16:08] ▶

physicists are not perfectly locked down.

[0:16:09 - 0:16:12] ▶

It's a high-trust community.

[0:16:12 - 0:16:13] ▶

And in general, people are willing to talk, you know,

[0:16:13 - 0:16:17] ▶

even if they shouldn't, about the role of physics in atomic weapons.

[0:16:18 - 0:16:21] ▶

I have never heard a colleague, not once, at a high level in physics,

[0:16:21 - 0:16:27] ▶

give any credence to this world.

[0:16:28 - 0:16:30] ▶

In other words—

[0:16:30 - 0:16:31] ▶

Well, that's because they didn't have access.

[0:16:31 - 0:16:32] ▶

They didn't have need to know.

[0:16:33 - 0:16:34] ▶

They didn't have a contract where they had to have access.

[0:16:34 - 0:16:36] ▶

Which, again, it's not a challenge in that sense.

[0:16:36 - 0:16:38] ▶

Assume that there is a dividing line.

[0:16:38 - 0:16:40] ▶

But it means that in the Manhattan Project, right?

[0:16:40 - 0:16:45] ▶

We called in Feynman and Bohr and Fermi and von Neumann

[0:16:46 - 0:16:53] ▶

and put them under Robert Oppenheimer and Teller and all these cats.

[0:16:53 - 0:16:57] ▶

And Bethi and…

[0:16:57 - 0:16:59] ▶

And Beta, right?

[0:16:59 - 0:17:00] ▶

we would call that in.

[0:17:14 - 0:17:16] ▶

Now, one of the great things that came out of our discussions before

[0:17:16 - 0:17:18] ▶

of just asking about kind of core evidence with Dr. Davis.

[0:18:13 - 0:18:16] ▶

to work on it for about roughly two decades.

[0:20:13 - 0:20:16] ▶

Who is this?

[0:20:16 - 0:20:17] ▶

electrical engineers,

[0:22:15 - 0:22:16] ▶

disjointed groups of people,

[0:23:14 - 0:23:16] ▶

in this.

[0:24:15 - 0:24:16] ▶

And essentially

[0:24:16 - 0:24:17] ▶

to ask questions

[0:27:15 - 0:27:16] ▶

of someone with full knowledge

[0:27:16 - 0:27:18] ▶

They wouldn't be able to

[0:28:15 - 0:28:16] ▶

because they were

[0:28:16 - 0:28:17] ▶

he wasn't fully aware

[0:29:14 - 0:29:16] ▶

of the UFO

[0:29:16 - 0:29:16] ▶

crash retrieval program,

[0:29:16 - 0:29:18] ▶

to see that film.

[0:31:14 - 0:31:16] ▶

You do have this fact pattern

[0:31:16 - 0:31:17] ▶

because he was the guy

[0:32:16 - 0:32:17] ▶

that craft were made from.

[0:34:14 - 0:34:16] ▶

They figured out

[0:34:16 - 0:34:17] ▶

billion dollar budgets

[0:35:15 - 0:35:16] ▶

involved in the actual

[0:35:16 - 0:35:17] ▶

That's right.

[0:36:15 - 0:36:16] ▶

The last gospel

[0:36:16 - 0:36:17] ▶

at the National

[0:37:15 - 0:37:16] ▶

Nuclear Security Agency

[0:37:16 - 0:37:17] ▶

and some innocuous words.

[0:39:14 - 0:39:16] ▶

And this could be

[0:39:16 - 0:39:17] ▶

the ASAP era,

[0:40:15 - 0:40:16] ▶

that he talked to the staff

[0:40:16 - 0:40:20] ▶

at the White House.

[0:41:15 - 0:41:16] ▶

Danny Sheehan

[0:42:16 - 0:42:17] ▶

by Bill Moore

[0:43:15 - 0:43:16] ▶

and Rick Doty,

[0:43:16 - 0:43:18] ▶

gets a copy,

[0:44:15 - 0:44:16] ▶

a permanent copy

[0:44:16 - 0:44:17] ▶

These are the

[0:46:16 - 0:46:16] ▶

first-generation documents

[0:46:16 - 0:46:17] ▶

trying to throw him

[0:47:15 - 0:47:16] ▶

off the track.

[0:47:16 - 0:47:17] ▶

what gives you

[0:48:14 - 0:48:16] ▶

confidence that

[0:48:16 - 0:48:17] ▶

Two.

[0:49:15 - 0:49:16] ▶

And why,

[0:50:16 - 0:50:16] ▶

I guess,

[0:50:16 - 0:50:17] ▶

about seeking legal counsel.

[0:51:14 - 0:51:16] ▶

Yeah, they're real.

[0:51:16 - 0:51:17] ▶

That's the office

[0:52:15 - 0:52:16] ▶

on Oak Ridge

[0:52:16 - 0:52:17] ▶

But if you have a...

[0:54:15 - 0:54:16] ▶

The Majorana particles.

[0:54:16 - 0:54:17] ▶

And on the other hand,

[0:56:15 - 0:56:16] ▶

the lack of anything tangible.

[0:56:16 - 0:56:18] ▶

throughout areas of the DoD.

[0:57:14 - 0:57:16] ▶

And so he was an academician

[0:57:16 - 0:57:23] ▶

Yeah, but it's preposterous.

[0:59:16 - 0:59:18] ▶

that with no mention

[1:00:12 - 1:00:16] ▶

of it is stunning

[1:00:16 - 1:00:17] ▶

predicated on

[1:01:15 - 1:01:16] ▶

some sort of

[1:01:16 - 1:01:17] ▶

I'm just saying,

[1:02:15 - 1:02:16] ▶

hey,

[1:02:16 - 1:02:17] ▶

it either does

[1:06:16 - 1:06:17] ▶

And they're both fitted

[1:08:16 - 1:08:17] ▶

and we always talk

[1:09:15 - 1:09:16] ▶

about Lockheed,

[1:09:16 - 1:09:16] ▶

but we don't talk

[1:09:16 - 1:09:17] ▶

So I went to an APS meeting

[1:10:15 - 1:10:16] ▶

with my dissertation supervisor,

[1:10:16 - 1:10:18] ▶

And then right up

[1:12:16 - 1:12:16] ▶

until 1984,

[1:12:16 - 1:12:18] ▶

and told,

[1:13:15 - 1:13:16] ▶

do not invest

[1:13:16 - 1:13:17] ▶

a Google Ngram search,

[1:14:14 - 1:14:16] ▶

there's basically

[1:14:16 - 1:14:17] ▶

from the physics community.

[1:15:15 - 1:15:16] ▶

And this issue

[1:15:16 - 1:15:17] ▶

has not been productive.

[1:15:59 - 1:16:01] ▶

Correct.

[1:16:01 - 1:16:02] ▶

And...

[1:16:02 - 1:16:02] ▶

I agree.

[1:16:02 - 1:16:03] ▶

Okay.

[1:16:03 - 1:16:03] ▶

But after 42 years

[1:16:04 - 1:16:06] ▶

of failure,

[1:16:06 - 1:16:06] ▶

you would imagine

[1:16:07 - 1:16:08] ▶

we would hold

[1:16:08 - 1:16:08] ▶

at least one, two,

[1:16:08 - 1:16:09] ▶

or ten conferences

[1:16:10 - 1:16:11] ▶

saying,

[1:16:11 - 1:16:11] ▶

what do we have wrong?

[1:16:11 - 1:16:12] ▶

Why are we not

[1:16:13 - 1:16:13] ▶

trying to make progress?

[1:16:13 - 1:16:14] ▶

And you don't see that.

[1:16:14 - 1:16:15] ▶

Well, that's the mirror

[1:16:15 - 1:16:16] ▶

to your thing

[1:16:16 - 1:16:17] ▶

that there are no physicists

[1:16:17 - 1:16:18] ▶

on the program.

[1:16:18 - 1:16:19] ▶

In other words,

[1:16:20 - 1:16:20] ▶

this is an effect

[1:16:20 - 1:16:22] ▶

that is so dumb,

[1:16:22 - 1:16:24] ▶

it is so pathologically stupid,

[1:16:25 - 1:16:27] ▶

so unfathomably wasteful.

[1:16:27 - 1:16:29] ▶

Why would you not question

[1:16:30 - 1:16:31] ▶

your own lack of progress?

[1:16:31 - 1:16:33] ▶

You know,

[1:16:33 - 1:16:34] ▶

in fact,

[1:16:34 - 1:16:34] ▶

Leonard Susskind,

[1:16:35 - 1:16:35] ▶

one of the fathers

[1:16:35 - 1:16:36] ▶

of modern string theory,

[1:16:36 - 1:16:37] ▶

was on a show

[1:16:37 - 1:16:39] ▶

of a sister podcast,

[1:16:39 - 1:16:41] ▶

Kurt Jai-Mungle's

[1:16:41 - 1:16:42] ▶

Theories of Everything.

[1:16:42 - 1:16:43] ▶

Or maybe it was

[1:16:45 - 1:16:46] ▶

with Lawrence Krasn.

[1:16:46 - 1:16:46] ▶

And he says,

[1:16:46 - 1:16:47] ▶

we have to go back

[1:16:47 - 1:16:49] ▶

to the beginning.

[1:16:49 - 1:16:50] ▶

We have to question

[1:16:50 - 1:16:51] ▶

absolutely,

[1:16:51 - 1:16:52] ▶

we've got this wrong.

[1:16:53 - 1:16:54] ▶

If we don't go back

[1:16:54 - 1:16:56] ▶

to the foundations,

[1:16:56 - 1:16:57] ▶

I'm just thinking like,

[1:16:57 - 1:16:58] ▶

finally,

[1:16:58 - 1:16:59] ▶

it's breaking.

[1:16:59 - 1:17:00] ▶

that I have is,

[1:17:14 - 1:17:16] ▶

whether it would work

[1:18:15 - 1:18:16] ▶

or not,

[1:18:16 - 1:18:16] ▶

and you do it all

[1:18:16 - 1:18:17] ▶

Yeah, that's right.

[1:20:15 - 1:20:16] ▶

Okay.

[1:20:16 - 1:20:16] ▶

Do you want to describe

[1:21:16 - 1:21:17] ▶

you can convince yourself

[1:22:15 - 1:22:16] ▶

that that guy knows nothing

[1:22:16 - 1:22:17] ▶

while it was still

[1:23:14 - 1:23:16] ▶

no such agency,

[1:23:16 - 1:23:17] ▶

in New Mexico.

[1:24:15 - 1:24:16] ▶

And it's got

[1:25:14 - 1:25:16] ▶

a secure campus.

[1:25:16 - 1:25:17] ▶

Like,

[1:26:16 - 1:26:17] ▶

It may be a manifold.

[1:29:14 - 1:29:16] ▶

I'm not saying that it isn't.

[1:29:16 - 1:29:18] ▶

to show

[1:30:15 - 1:30:16] ▶

or inform me

[1:30:16 - 1:30:18] ▶

in my opinion,

[1:31:15 - 1:31:16] ▶

sometimes too much.

[1:31:16 - 1:31:17] ▶

of a simple number

[1:33:15 - 1:33:16] ▶

like Lambda

[1:33:16 - 1:33:17] ▶

had a minus sign

[1:35:15 - 1:35:16] ▶

put in front of it.

[1:35:16 - 1:35:16] ▶

I don't believe

[1:36:16 - 1:36:21] ▶

in traversable

[1:37:14 - 1:37:16] ▶

black holes.

[1:37:16 - 1:37:17] ▶

So you're going to

[1:38:16 - 1:38:17] ▶

or a piece of matter,

[1:40:15 - 1:40:16] ▶

And...

[1:41:15 - 1:41:16] ▶

At least with some

[1:41:16 - 1:41:20] ▶

people now saying

[1:42:15 - 1:42:16] ▶

that it's a more faithful

[1:42:16 - 1:42:18] ▶

to Maxwell's equations

[1:43:15 - 1:43:16] ▶

in the low energy regime.

[1:43:16 - 1:43:17] ▶

based on A,

[1:44:16 - 1:44:17] ▶

So,

[1:45:16 - 1:45:16] ▶

the boundary

[1:45:16 - 1:45:17] ▶

people with

[1:47:14 - 1:47:16] ▶

sort of like

[1:47:16 - 1:47:16] ▶

an electrical

[1:47:16 - 1:47:18] ▶

there when we

[1:48:15 - 1:48:16] ▶

can't create enough

[1:48:16 - 1:48:17] ▶

coupled that we can

[1:49:15 - 1:49:16] ▶

barely detect it but

[1:49:16 - 1:49:18] ▶

You're going to get this

[1:50:15 - 1:50:16] ▶

kind of rapid attenuation

[1:50:16 - 1:50:17] ▶

No, we do.

[1:55:16 - 1:55:17] ▶

for Kimber Meyer Company, and they were

[1:56:09 - 1:56:16] ▶

a logistic service company servicing Los

[1:56:16 - 1:56:20] ▶

you can form a different quantity,

[1:59:15 - 1:59:16] ▶

where you take F inner product star F,

[1:59:16 - 1:59:21] ▶

has ever used that terminology.

[2:00:14 - 2:00:16] ▶

there's a guaranteed object

[2:03:16 - 2:03:17] ▶

of the Heisenberg uncertainty relations,

[2:04:15 - 2:04:16] ▶

that's a curvature

[2:04:16 - 2:04:17] ▶

that you embed

[2:05:14 - 2:05:16] ▶

what we currently call space-time

[2:05:16 - 2:05:18] ▶

in some books I've read

[2:07:15 - 2:07:16] ▶

back in the 90s,

[2:07:16 - 2:07:18] ▶

Well, we sort of have

[2:08:15 - 2:08:16] ▶

three long-range carriers.

[2:08:16 - 2:08:18] ▶

An advanced...

[2:10:14 - 2:10:16] ▶

No, nobody does threat

[2:10:16 - 2:10:17] ▶

denied it.

[2:11:15 - 2:11:16] ▶

And that was because

[2:11:16 - 2:11:17] ▶

something that we don't understand

[2:12:15 - 2:12:16] ▶

where people actually

[2:12:16 - 2:12:17] ▶

in GR.

[2:15:15 - 2:15:16] ▶

I didn't know

[2:15:16 - 2:15:17] ▶

will not involve

[2:15:59 - 2:16:01] ▶

a theoretical physicist.

[2:16:01 - 2:16:02] ▶

They might have...

[2:16:02 - 2:16:03] ▶

Sorry.

[2:16:03 - 2:16:03] ▶

What?

[2:16:04 - 2:16:05] ▶

You have craft.

[2:16:05 - 2:16:06] ▶

The claim is you have...

[2:16:07 - 2:16:08] ▶

I know.

[2:16:08 - 2:16:08] ▶

They're engineers.

[2:16:08 - 2:16:09] ▶

Okay.

[2:16:09 - 2:16:09] ▶

But if you...

[2:16:09 - 2:16:10] ▶

They're not thinking

[2:16:10 - 2:16:10] ▶

in terms of fundamental physics

[2:16:10 - 2:16:12] ▶

or something beyond

[2:16:12 - 2:16:13] ▶

the standard model

[2:16:13 - 2:16:14] ▶

or something beyond

[2:16:14 - 2:16:15] ▶

generalist,

[2:16:15 - 2:16:15] ▶

if they're thinking...

[2:16:15 - 2:16:16] ▶

How are they doing

[2:16:16 - 2:16:17] ▶

on this project

[2:16:17 - 2:16:18] ▶

decades in?

[2:16:18 - 2:16:19] ▶

The supposed project.

[2:16:20 - 2:16:21] ▶

How are they doing on it?

[2:16:21 - 2:16:21] ▶

What's their level of success?

[2:16:22 - 2:16:23] ▶

All I know is,

[2:16:23 - 2:16:24] ▶

as of my knowledge...

[2:16:24 - 2:16:25] ▶

If you're failing

[2:16:25 - 2:16:26] ▶

at something

[2:16:26 - 2:16:26] ▶

that requires new physics,

[2:16:26 - 2:16:29] ▶

you say,

[2:16:29 - 2:16:29] ▶

defy the laws of physics.

[2:16:30 - 2:16:31] ▶

We can't make progress

[2:16:31 - 2:16:32] ▶

and we have no physicists.

[2:16:32 - 2:16:33] ▶

Correct.

[2:16:33 - 2:16:34] ▶

That's because they don't...

[2:16:34 - 2:16:34] ▶

David, this can't...

[2:16:34 - 2:16:35] ▶

Eric, this can't add up.

[2:16:35 - 2:16:38] ▶

It's a two-line proof.

[2:16:38 - 2:16:40] ▶

It defies the laws of physics.

[2:16:41 - 2:16:42] ▶

We haven't made progress.

[2:16:43 - 2:16:44] ▶

We have no physicists.

[2:16:44 - 2:16:45] ▶

Okay.

[2:16:47 - 2:16:47] ▶

If something defies

[2:16:47 - 2:16:48] ▶

the laws of physics,

[2:16:48 - 2:16:49] ▶

who do you call?

[2:16:49 - 2:16:50] ▶

I know...

[2:16:51 - 2:16:52] ▶

You ask any of us,

[2:16:52 - 2:16:54] ▶

any of us,

[2:16:54 - 2:16:55] ▶

write down 15 names

[2:16:56 - 2:16:57] ▶

of who you call

[2:16:57 - 2:16:58] ▶

if you had a craft

[2:16:58 - 2:16:58] ▶

that defied the laws of physics.

[2:16:58 - 2:17:00] ▶

experimental physics,

[2:17:15 - 2:17:16] ▶

And then the physics chair

[2:18:14 - 2:18:16] ▶

who is the lead

[2:18:16 - 2:18:18] ▶

here's our solution

[2:20:14 - 2:20:16] ▶

to that problem.

[2:20:16 - 2:20:16] ▶

for NASA.

[2:22:15 - 2:22:16] ▶

There we go.

[2:23:16 - 2:23:16] ▶

is a fairy tale

[2:24:14 - 2:24:16] ▶

that should not be...

[2:24:16 - 2:24:18] ▶

and I'm also not hopeful

[2:25:15 - 2:25:16] ▶

because I don't think

[2:25:16 - 2:25:17] ▶

Who said that he breached

[2:26:15 - 2:26:16] ▶

the hull

[2:26:16 - 2:26:16] ▶

and walked inside of a UFO.

[2:26:16 - 2:26:18] ▶

working at the DIA.

[2:27:15 - 2:27:16] ▶

At some point,

[2:27:16 - 2:27:17] ▶

the legal counsel

[2:28:15 - 2:28:16] ▶

and the chief scientist.

[2:28:16 - 2:28:18] ▶

That was an interesting conversation.

[2:29:16 - 2:29:17] ▶

Right?

[2:30:16 - 2:30:16] ▶

Yeah.

[2:30:16 - 2:30:17] ▶

trying to reproduce

[2:31:15 - 2:31:16] ▶

something that clearly

[2:31:16 - 2:31:17] ▶

how the thing actually

[2:32:14 - 2:32:16] ▶

sort of functions

[2:32:16 - 2:32:17] ▶

You know,

[2:33:15 - 2:33:16] ▶

something like that.

[2:33:16 - 2:33:17] ▶

believes the jackalopes

[2:34:15 - 2:34:16] ▶

are real

[2:34:16 - 2:34:16] ▶

because there's an industry

[2:34:16 - 2:34:19] ▶

exists.

[2:35:15 - 2:35:16] ▶

Well, on that note

[2:35:16 - 2:35:17] ▶

So there's this concept

[2:36:15 - 2:36:16] ▶

in Washington

[2:36:16 - 2:36:16] ▶

of steady hands

[2:36:16 - 2:36:18] ▶

to Rand Paul

[2:37:15 - 2:37:16] ▶

in an open hearing

[2:37:16 - 2:37:18] ▶

about what gets done

[2:39:14 - 2:39:16] ▶

at Esalen,

[2:39:16 - 2:39:16] ▶

There is no conference

[2:40:15 - 2:40:16] ▶

that brings together

[2:40:16 - 2:40:18] ▶

and I was 16

[2:41:12 - 2:41:13] ▶

that's why I'm

[2:41:15 - 2:41:16] ▶

the youngest.

[2:41:16 - 2:41:16] ▶

mentions the phrase

[2:42:15 - 2:42:16] ▶

quantum gravity

[2:42:16 - 2:42:17] ▶

so that unearthing

[2:43:14 - 2:43:16] ▶

of a geometric origin

[2:43:16 - 2:43:18] ▶

or diffeomorphism

[2:44:15 - 2:44:16] ▶

invariance.

[2:44:16 - 2:44:16] ▶

gauge equivalence

[2:46:15 - 2:46:16] ▶

in the case

[2:46:16 - 2:46:17] ▶

and Mansouri,

[2:47:15 - 2:47:16] ▶

And so both in string theory

[2:49:14 - 2:49:16] ▶

and in what he's doing,

[2:49:16 - 2:49:18] ▶

because what's interesting

[2:50:15 - 2:50:16] ▶

is you have

[2:50:16 - 2:50:17] ▶

Try to figure out

[2:51:14 - 2:51:16] ▶

who's saying something

[2:51:16 - 2:51:16] ▶

interesting by listening.

[2:51:16 - 2:51:18] ▶

you were wrong.

[2:52:15 - 2:52:16] ▶

He clearly is a much

[2:52:16 - 2:52:17] ▶

get on,

[2:54:15 - 2:54:16] ▶

although sometimes

[2:54:16 - 2:54:17] ▶

Exactly.

[2:56:15 - 2:56:16] ▶

You know,

[2:56:16 - 2:56:16] ▶

so the issue is,

[2:56:16 - 2:56:18] ▶

In general,

[2:58:15 - 2:58:16] ▶

we do a bad job

[2:58:16 - 2:58:19] ▶

in Yang-Mills theory,

[2:59:15 - 2:59:16] ▶

you take zero difference,

[2:59:16 - 2:59:17] ▶

a transgression,

[3:01:15 - 3:01:16] ▶

misinterpreted

[3:01:16 - 3:01:17] ▶

Geometric unity

[3:02:15 - 3:02:16] ▶

gauges gravity

[3:02:16 - 3:02:17] ▶

So I'm going to need

[3:03:15 - 3:03:16] ▶

a little bit of help

[3:03:16 - 3:03:17] ▶

in our statistics.

[3:06:15 - 3:06:16] ▶

You're in the same situation I am.

[3:07:14 - 3:07:16] ▶

Why D.E. Shaw?

[3:08:15 - 3:08:16] ▶

when it comes to physics,

[3:09:15 - 3:09:16] ▶

like Southern Air Transport

[3:11:14 - 3:11:16] ▶

or Air America,

[3:11:16 - 3:11:17] ▶

Okay,

[3:12:16 - 3:12:16] ▶

well,

[3:12:16 - 3:12:16] ▶

there's a cluster

[3:12:16 - 3:12:17] ▶

It's, uh,

[3:15:15 - 3:15:16] ▶

And then you were saying,

[3:15:58 - 3:16:00] ▶

but we're operating

[3:16:00 - 3:16:02] ▶

within the bounds

[3:16:02 - 3:16:03] ▶

of the constraints

[3:16:03 - 3:16:04] ▶

that we've set on ourselves

[3:16:04 - 3:16:06] ▶

in this century.

[3:16:06 - 3:16:08] ▶

No me co de senso.

[3:16:08 - 3:16:09] ▶

It makes no sense.

[3:16:09 - 3:16:10] ▶

It's absurd.

[3:16:10 - 3:16:11] ▶

I'm following my contract.

[3:16:11 - 3:16:12] ▶

It's like,

[3:16:12 - 3:16:13] ▶

that's just nonsense.

[3:16:13 - 3:16:13] ▶

No, no, no.

[3:16:14 - 3:16:14] ▶

And everybody repeats this

[3:16:14 - 3:16:16] ▶

as if,

[3:16:16 - 3:16:17] ▶

as if they're,

[3:16:17 - 3:16:19] ▶

I mean,

[3:16:20 - 3:16:21] ▶

it's like,

[3:16:21 - 3:16:21] ▶

if you gave the excuse,

[3:16:21 - 3:16:22] ▶

well, no,

[3:16:22 - 3:16:23] ▶

because it's Wednesday

[3:16:23 - 3:16:24] ▶

every week

[3:16:24 - 3:16:25] ▶

and everybody said that,

[3:16:25 - 3:16:27] ▶

you sort of get a nerd to it,

[3:16:27 - 3:16:28] ▶

but then you realize,

[3:16:28 - 3:16:29] ▶

yes,

[3:16:29 - 3:16:29] ▶

there's a Wednesday

[3:16:29 - 3:16:30] ▶

of every week.

[3:16:30 - 3:16:30] ▶

That had nothing to do

[3:16:30 - 3:16:31] ▶

with anything.

[3:16:31 - 3:16:32] ▶

You have to be highly disagreeable

[3:16:32 - 3:16:33] ▶

to basically say,

[3:16:33 - 3:16:35] ▶

you know,

[3:16:35 - 3:16:35] ▶

Eric,

[3:16:35 - 3:16:36] ▶

what you just said,

[3:16:36 - 3:16:37] ▶

no,

[3:16:37 - 3:16:37] ▶

no,

[3:16:37 - 3:16:37] ▶

no offense,

[3:16:37 - 3:16:38] ▶

makes no sense at all.

[3:16:38 - 3:16:39] ▶

And what's so weird

[3:16:40 - 3:16:41] ▶

about it is

[3:16:41 - 3:16:41] ▶

I am cynical.

[3:16:41 - 3:16:43] ▶

I think,

[3:16:43 - 3:16:43] ▶

I think national security

[3:16:43 - 3:16:44] ▶

runs the day

[3:16:44 - 3:16:45] ▶

on all this stuff.

[3:16:45 - 3:16:46] ▶

And so once something

[3:16:46 - 3:16:47] ▶

makes sense

[3:16:47 - 3:16:48] ▶

from a national security

[3:16:48 - 3:16:48] ▶

standpoint,

[3:16:48 - 3:16:49] ▶

it just happens.

[3:16:49 - 3:16:50] ▶

And so if this

[3:16:51 - 3:16:53] ▶

were this grave

[3:16:53 - 3:16:55] ▶

national security issue

[3:16:55 - 3:16:56] ▶

where you think

[3:16:56 - 3:16:57] ▶

you might be able

[3:16:57 - 3:16:58] ▶

to do anything

[3:16:58 - 3:16:59] ▶

with any of this material,

[3:16:59 - 3:17:00] ▶

The white badges.

[3:17:15 - 3:17:16] ▶

and neutered

[3:18:15 - 3:18:16] ▶

and not particularly

[3:18:16 - 3:18:18] ▶

to be near that?

[3:19:15 - 3:19:16] ▶

Yes,

[3:19:16 - 3:19:16] ▶

because the scientists

[3:19:16 - 3:19:17] ▶

Who were the first people

[3:20:14 - 3:20:16] ▶

the Israelis killed

[3:20:16 - 3:20:17] ▶

And basically,

[3:21:15 - 3:21:16] ▶

these people are now

[3:21:16 - 3:21:17] ▶

founded the Santa Fe Institute,

[3:26:15 - 3:26:16] ▶

founded,

[3:26:16 - 3:26:17] ▶

it has this property

[3:27:16 - 3:27:17] ▶

an imaginative proposal

[3:28:14 - 3:28:16] ▶

by Benedict Gross

[3:28:16 - 3:28:17] ▶

Have you ever noticed

[3:29:14 - 3:29:16] ▶

how interesting astrology

[3:29:16 - 3:29:17] ▶

almost instantly.

[3:31:15 - 3:31:16] ▶

is an energy beam

[3:32:14 - 3:32:16] ▶

that can be focused

[3:32:16 - 3:32:19] ▶

in this particular direction,

[3:33:15 - 3:33:16] ▶

now can I refocus

[3:33:16 - 3:33:17] ▶

is as rich

[3:34:15 - 3:34:16] ▶

as I say it is,

[3:34:16 - 3:34:17] ▶

of the competent people.

[3:35:15 - 3:35:16] ▶

It doesn't matter

[3:35:16 - 3:35:17] ▶

you know,

[3:36:15 - 3:36:16] ▶

dangerous physics work

[3:36:16 - 3:36:18] ▶

is that the architects

[3:37:14 - 3:37:16] ▶

die and they

[3:37:16 - 3:37:16] ▶

leave a zombie.

[3:37:16 - 3:37:17] ▶

remotely in this

[3:38:15 - 3:38:16] ▶

perfectly precise

[3:38:16 - 3:38:17] ▶

put a healthy

[3:40:15 - 3:40:16] ▶

check on

[3:40:16 - 3:40:16] ▶

people who

[3:40:16 - 3:40:17] ▶

under FDR.

[3:41:15 - 3:41:16] ▶

You had

[3:41:16 - 3:41:17] ▶

It's ubiquitous.

[3:42:15 - 3:42:16] ▶

It exists in

[3:42:16 - 3:42:17] ▶

bizarre and worthy

[3:43:15 - 3:43:16] ▶

of scientific inquiry,

[3:43:16 - 3:43:17] ▶

that

[3:44:15 - 3:44:16] ▶

the atomic weapons

[3:44:16 - 3:44:19] ▶

Normandy

[3:46:15 - 3:46:16] ▶

was cool

[3:46:16 - 3:46:16] ▶

and Operation

[3:46:16 - 3:46:18] ▶

But why else

[3:47:16 - 3:47:16] ▶

should you be

[3:47:16 - 3:47:17] ▶

few days on this

[3:48:15 - 3:48:16] ▶

or literally like

[3:48:16 - 3:48:17] ▶

I can't

[3:49:15 - 3:49:16] ▶

understand why

[3:49:16 - 3:49:17] ▶

pedophile?

[3:50:15 - 3:50:16] ▶

Like do, do we

[3:50:16 - 3:50:17] ▶

That's low trust.

[3:52:15 - 3:52:16] ▶

No.

[3:52:16 - 3:52:16] ▶

It's blackmail.

[3:52:16 - 3:52:16] ▶

Omerta and the innovation

[3:53:14 - 3:53:16] ▶

of the Rico acts and all

[3:53:16 - 3:53:17] ▶

I think it, I think it's

[3:54:15 - 3:54:16] ▶

got a lot to Trump's, Trump's

[3:54:16 - 3:54:18] ▶

deeply grooved people not thinking

[3:55:14 - 3:55:16] ▶

for themselves.

[3:55:16 - 3:55:17] ▶

16

Eric Weinstein Demands UFO Secrets From Pentagon Scientist