104 videos containing this reference
Page 5 of 17
Some of them I knew when I was at NASA have come talk to me and said,
[0:00:12 - 0:00:15] ▶
So the question I've had is why, when we had the NASA commission,
[0:00:26 - 0:00:31] ▶
And you have a NASA background as well.
[0:03:42 - 0:03:45] ▶
I had the opportunity to have clearance when I worked at NASA.
[0:17:50 - 0:17:55] ▶
At NASA, you mentioned the people there weren't really into UFOs.
[0:32:38 - 0:32:42] ▶
So she has this NASA mission controller who I guess now is public, but his name is Tim
[0:32:53 - 0:32:59] ▶
There are individuals at NASA who are interested in that.
[0:33:08 - 0:33:12] ▶
I knew when I was at NASA have come to talk to me and said, oh yeah, I was interested.
[0:33:16 - 0:33:20] ▶
You have Hal Pollenmeier who was a, I think he was both CIA and NASA showing up at Chris
[0:33:26 - 0:33:31] ▶
You find that, you know, I've now had a couple people from NASA, I find out were interested
[0:33:40 - 0:33:46] ▶
Is there a, when were, are they doing remote viewing in a professional capacity at NASA?
[0:33:54 - 0:33:58] ▶
Um, so one of the people at NASA has actually written a CIA training manual for remote viewing.
[0:34:05 - 0:34:12] ▶
And, and that person did it before they came to NASA, but, um, but our current,
[0:34:30 - 0:34:35] ▶
the, or, or, or NASA, they may be retired now.
[0:34:35 - 0:34:38] ▶
On that patent, that NASA patent, I believe Larry Smalley, it has his name there.
[0:35:12 - 0:35:17] ▶
So like NASA, I don't like, it almost seems like what you're saying is there is no official
[0:36:47 - 0:36:52] ▶
knowledge of UFOs, but it's like these people within NASA that are extremely interested in
[0:36:52 - 0:36:58] ▶
And, and NASA isn't like that now, but when I worked there, which was the early two thousands,
[0:37:30 - 0:37:36] ▶
you had to convince your area lead that this was in line with NASA's missions basically in some way.
[0:37:43 - 0:37:51] ▶
what does that memo say? And so me and one of my colleagues at NASA, because we were,
[0:39:38 - 0:39:45] ▶
what this memo says, and then we're going to publish it as a NASA publication, but it's going
[0:40:41 - 0:40:45] ▶
make it public and make it an official NASA publication. Right. That was, that was our
[0:40:57 - 0:41:01] ▶
earth, which would crush you. And it's about 800 degrees Fahrenheit. And actually I was at NASA
[0:44:24 - 0:44:32] ▶
Interesting. Do you know of any interesting space-based encounters of UFOs, like NASA encounters?
[1:20:14 - 1:20:20] ▶
when we had the NASA commission, why was there no section on what astronauts have seen in space?
[1:23:35 - 1:23:41] ▶
Really? Yeah. None of that mentioned in the NASA commission's report.
[1:23:49 - 1:23:54] ▶
weren't even mentioned in the NASA commission report. Why? Shouldn't that be of interest?
[1:24:28 - 1:24:32] ▶
So do you think, I mean, you were, you were at NASA. Do you think NASA's sort of
[1:24:39 - 1:24:43] ▶
with a current NASA person who said that NASA tracks what they call uncorrelated targets all the time.
[1:24:50 - 1:24:56] ▶
Well, proof that, um, NASA, you know, probably knows something, a thing or two internally about
[1:29:46 - 1:29:53] ▶
So we have, we have this, um, this Simpkinson NASA UFO archive and this photo, which is like,
[1:30:19 - 1:30:26] ▶
Now, of course, it's easy to claim, well, NASA erased the UFO from that picture.
[1:31:53 - 1:31:58] ▶
So, so NASA, the Gemini project, Gemini meaning twins, was all about docking.
[1:32:36 - 1:32:42] ▶
Was that officially published in some NASA thing?
[1:35:03 - 1:35:06] ▶
It was found in Scott Simpkinson was a NASA engineer.
[1:35:09 - 1:35:13] ▶
Um, he was, he was actually the first engineer hired by NASA.
[1:35:13 - 1:35:18] ▶
So he had, he had, and he had a collection of his NASA files.
[1:35:50 - 1:35:54] ▶
He and his secretary, Emily Erdl, had a collection of, of their NASA files.
[1:35:54 - 1:35:59] ▶
that there's almost institutional NASA knowledge of the fact that the Gemini 11 astronauts did see a UFO.
[1:36:20 - 1:36:25] ▶
And why none of this is mentioned in the NASA Commission's report, I have no idea.
[1:36:42 - 1:36:47] ▶
Speaking of NASA obstruction, 3i Atlas, you know, we have this Manhattan-sized object that is now
[1:36:53 - 1:36:59] ▶
And then NASA did this stupid gaslighting press conference where I was honestly a little skeptical of some of Avi's statements.
[1:37:43 - 1:37:51] ▶
But I ended up, I wanted to side with Avi after watching this gaslighting NASA thing.
[1:37:55 - 1:38:00] ▶
Well, first, NASA press conferences are the absolute worst.
[1:38:00 - 1:38:02] ▶
I mean, every, even when I was at NASA, you wait for this press conference.
[1:38:10 - 1:38:14] ▶
And you're always, and part of the problem is that your expectation for excitement from NASA is way too high.
[1:38:18 - 1:38:28] ▶
So, I can't, not all the blame should go to NASA for that.
[1:38:32 - 1:38:35] ▶
And I don't even think he's probably familiar with a lot of the NASA cases, you know, because these seem like anecdotal, small sample size, you know, conspiratorial things.
[1:42:25 - 1:42:33] ▶
Until 2022 happened, there's a NASA UAP panel.
[1:49:34 - 1:49:39] ▶
On the NASA UAP review panel.
[1:49:47 - 1:49:49] ▶
Because we were just talking about all the weird NASA data and that seems to be, you know, it seems like it might be suppressed or something.
[1:49:54 - 1:50:00] ▶